Gary Lineker DELETES pro-Palestine video featuring a rat emoji after critics draw parallels with Nazi propaganda and BBC are urged to SACK him
Gary Lineker has deleted a pro-Palestine video he shared online featuring a rat emoji after facing a backlash over parallels with Nazi propaganda.
The BBC has also faced calls to fire the ex-England captain, 64, who is stepping down from presenting Match Of The Day this summer but is still due to front the corporation's coverage of next year's World Cup.
The ex-footballer, a vocal critic of Israel's war in Gaza, earlier shared to his 'Stories' reel footage originating with the pro-Palestine group Palestine Lobby.
The cartoon image of a rat was seen on screen throughout, above the video in which Canadian-Palestinian lawyer Diana Buttu attacks Israel 's war in Gaza.
Disgusted users on X shared his post to on the social media platform, formerly known as Twitter - and a former BBC Director of Television demanded action from the corporation over the 'utterly grim' content he said 'echoes Nazi propaganda'.
Screenshots of Lineker's shared video were immediately flagged as posts which 'may violate X's rules against Hateful Conduct'.
Images of rats and other vermin were regularly used as tropes by Nazi Germany to depict Jewish people, as many of Lineker's critics today have pointed out.
There has been no comment yet from Lineker nor his representatives in response to today's criticism, while BBC sources highlighted how his post had now been deleted - having remained on his Instagram profile page this morning.
The Match Of The Day presenter and former England football captain posted a reel originating with the pro-Palestine group Palestine Lobby
The BBC is facing mounting calls for Gary Lineker to go in response to the new controversy
Jewish groups have been among those condemning his post and calling for the BBC to end any association with him, with charity Campaign Against Antisemitism posting on X: 'Nothing to see here. Just Gary Lineker's Instagram account sharing an anti-Israel video misrepresenting Zionism, complete with a rat emoji.'
A CAA spokesperson later told MailOnline: 'Gary Lineker really has the worst luck when it comes to campaigning for his causes without aligning himself with extremists and antisemites.
'Not only does this video deliberately misrepresent Zionism - the belief that Jews have the same right to self-determination as everyone else - but it adds a rat emoji in doing so.
'Why is it that Gary Lineker keeps sharing content on social media that seems to cater to Jew-haters? Perhaps Mr Lineker is not as naive as he would like us to believe.
'As the BBC's highest-paid presenter and owner of a major media enterprise, maybe he knows exactly what he's doing. We will be submitting a complaint to the BBC over this latest post.
'However, we all know that, no matter how appalling Mr Lineker's output, the BBC will perform all sorts of mental gymnastics to look the other way. When it comes to Jews, it seems that our national broadcaster believes that the usual standards simply don't apply.'
Danny Cohen, former Director of BBC Television, this afternoon said: 'Gary Lineker appears to have shared content about the Jewish State which echoes Nazi propaganda. This is utterly grim.
'The BBC's Director General Tim Davie has a simple question to answer: does he tolerate the BBC's flagship presenters sharing content that has historically been used as an anti-Semitic slur?'
A spokesperson for the Board of Deputies of British Jews said: 'The BBC has allowed the situation with Gary Lineker to continue for far too long.
'He has caused great offence with this video – particularly with his egregious use of a rat emoji to illustrate Zionists.
'The BBC should ask him to leave now rather than allowing him to dictate his own terms.'
MailOnline has contacted Lineker's representatives for comment, with one agency working on his behalf saying it was for the other one to respond.
There were also requests for comment from the BBC and the group Palestine Lobby that initially posted the video reel.
The BBC responded by highlighting the corporation's 'Editorial Guidelines' document, posted online, covering employees' 'Personal Use of Social Media, which had been updated in 2023 - suggesting he had not broken the rules.
Lineker himself said in February last year at a Broadcasting Press Guild event: 'I know the guidelines really well. I was partly involved in drawing them up.
'I know the guidelines inside out. Obviously the new guidelines actually now allow you much more freedom to tweet. We're allowed opinions and other stuff.'
The charity Campaign Against Antisemitism has been among critics of the latest video shared - while many other X users have also been condemning Lineker's post
A backlash has been continuing today against both Lineker and his BBC employers following his sharing of the video last night amid a 'Stories' compilation reel also including extracts from sporting talks on his The Rest Is Football podcast.
One poster wrote on X: 'Hidden in insta stories @GaryLineker displays exactly what he is - complete with the rat picture. @ BBC that you choose to accept his behaviour, and keep him on your payroll, is as disgusting as it is shameful.'
Barrister Simon Myerson KC, who chairs the Leeds Jewish Representative Council, wondered whether Lineker would 'have the guts to explain this to Emily Damari', one of the hostages captured by Hamas in their terror attacks targeting Israel on October 7 2023.
Mr Myerson added: 'I reckon not. Big man behind a keyboard mind.'
Former BBC journalist Sean McGinty posted: 'The boss of the BBC, Two-tier Tim Davie, is sitting on his hands again. Is he too scared or too dim to understand what @GaryLineker is saying here?
'This antisemitic post (note the rat) on Linekar's Instagram cannot be defended. Yet he has demanded to stay to present the World Cup next year and the BBC have agreed.
'I love what the BBC once was (for all its faults) and it pains me greatly to watch it being vandalised to the point of destruction by these people for their own financial gains.'
Clint Matthews wrote: 'Nothing to see here. Just @GaryLineker proudly showing his antisemitic roots.'
Labour Against Antisemitism activist Emma Picken said, '@GaryLineker is an antisemite. Gross', while another poster described the video's use of a rat emoji as 'straight up Nazi rhetoric'.
Author Alex Hearn accused the presenter of 'sharing classic Nazi representations of Jews as rats', adding: 'The content Gary Lineker is sharing is so toxic that just explaining it can get a "hateful conduct" label on X. Too extreme for X, but okay for the BBC.'
Lineker, who played for Tottenham Hotspur, Everton and Barcelona, has previously faced controversy for his political interventions which critics claim are breaches of the BBC's impartiality rules.
In January last year he said he received threats after he retweeted and later deleted a post on social media calling for Israel to be banned from international sporting events, including football.
Later, speaking to news site Zeteo, he said: 'There is a lot of heavy lobbying on people to be quiet so I understand why most people refrain but I'm getting on a bit now, I'm fairly secure and I can't be silent about what's happening.
'I think it's just so, so utterly awful and now they're talking about, "Oh, it looks like it's happening, going into Rafah", where they've sent everybody down there.
'So I don't see how you can be - it's not antisemitic to say that what Israel is doing is wrong. I just can't see how everybody doesn't see it that way now.
'But whatever the cause, whatever started it - we all know that the history of this area of the world goes way before October 7. But it's truly dreadful what's happening. And I cry on a regular basis when I see certain images on social media.'
Lineker also told the Broadcasting Press Guild event in February last year: 'We have been getting a lot more leeway now, which is a good thing. I am always sensible.'
He also claimed that he now rarely used X as it had become 'increasingly toxic'.
He told the gathering of journalists that people should step away from the platform to save their mental health.
He said: 'It's always been a bit of a cesspit but it has become increasingly toxic and you can't have nuanced conversations on there anymore and debates.
'So I have kind of stepped away from that side of things.'
He also said the BBC 'love' him being on the social media platform to 'promote their shows'.
While his Instagram post has prompted this latest controversy, his recent contributions on X have been dominated by promotions for episodes from his Goalhanger podcast firm including The Rest Is Football that he presents.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
36 minutes ago
- BBC News
Family visa income threshold should be lower, review says
The minimum income threshold for family visas should be relaxed, a government-commissioned review has recommended.A report by the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) has suggested a reduction from the current level of £29, warned against previous proposals to raise the threshold to the same level as for skilled workers - £38,700 a year - saying it could breach the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).The Conservatives said that the UK should leave the ECHR if it "stops us from setting our own visa rules". Article 8 of the ECHR enshrines the right to family threshold is the minimum income a British citizen or settled resident must earn to bring their partner to join them in the UK. If the partner is already in the UK on a valid visa, their income also counts towards the minimum applications are made by people not already living in the UK. The MAC suggested a range of possible new thresholds. It said a level between £23,000 to £25,000 would enable families to support themselves.A threshold of between £24,000 to £28,000 meanwhile would put more emphasis on economic wellbeing - both of the families themselves and for said it did "not understand the rationale" for setting the family visa threshold at the £38,700 level for skilled workers, as the two visas have "completely different objective[s]".A £38,700 level would be the "most likely to conflict with international law and obligations".It is the government's decision whether to accept any of the MAC's recommendations. Prof Brian Bell, chairman of the MAC, said that balancing family life and economic wellbeing was a "real trade-off"."There is a cost to the UK economy and UK taxpayers of having this route, and we should just be honest about that and say there is a trade-off," he said."But similarly, on the other side, people who say 'we should set it at very high numbers to make sure that we don't lose any money' ignore the massive impact that has on families and the destruction of some relationships and the harm it causes to children." A higher threshold would also have a "negative impact on the family life of a larger number of people", the MAC said. It noted many families with lower incomes still earn enough to support themselves even if they do not make a net positive fiscal impact on the said an adult would need to earn £27,800 to have a neutral impact on the public finances - and £40,400 for a couple to have no impact in the first year a spouse arrived in the MAC did not recommend a higher threshold for families with children, saying the impacts on family life for them would be "particularly significant". In 2023 the previous Conservative government announced plans to raise the salary threshold to £38,700, as part of plans to cut the level of they backed down following criticism that this would keep families apart, settling on a £29,000 threshold with plans to gradually increase it did not implement those further rises when the party came into government and asked the MAC to review the committee said the threshold of £29,000 was already high compared to other high-income countries it had looked at. The MAC said it "was not possible to predict with any confidence" the impact different thresholds would have on the level of net migration - the difference between those entering and leaving the did suggest lowering the threshold from £29,000 to roughly £24,000 may increase net migration by up to 8,000 migration in 2024 was an estimated 431,000 people, down almost 50% on the previous followed record high levels in recent years, with the government under political pressure to get numbers down further. The MAC also criticised the Home Office for its data collection, saying insufficient data "greatly hindered" their review.A Home Office spokesperson said the government was considering the review's findings and would respond in due course. Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said migration figures remain too high and that the government "must urgently re-instate the Conservative plan to further increase the salary threshold"."If the ECHR stops us from setting our own visa rules, from deporting foreign criminals or from putting Britain's interests first, then we should leave the ECHR," he ECHR, which was established in 1950, sets out the rights and freedoms people are entitled to in the 46 signatory countries and is a central part of UK human rights month, the government said it would bring forward legislation to clarify how aspects of the ECHR should apply in immigration cases.
BreakingNews.ie
37 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Greta Thunberg says she was kidnapped by Israeli forces in international waters
Greta Thunberg on Tuesday accused Israel of kidnapping her and her fellow pro-Palestinian activists in international waters, saying she declined to sign a document stating she entered the country illegally prior to being deported. Speaking in the arrivals section of Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport after being deported from Israel, the Swedish activist said she and her team had broken no laws, and called for the immediate release of the activists still in Israel. Advertisement "I was very clear in my testimony that we were kidnapped on international waters and brought against our own will into Israel," she said. She laughed off criticism from US president Donald Trump, who had described her as an angry person, saying: "I think the world needs a lot more young angry women to be honest, especially with everything going on right now." World Greta Thunberg deported from Israel after Gaza-bou... Read More Thunberg (22) arrived in Paris a day after the Israeli navy prevented her and a group of fellow pro-Palestinian activists from sailing to Gaza. Israeli forces boarded the charity vessel as it neared Gaza early on Monday, trying to break through a years-old naval blockade of the coastal enclave, and seized the 12-strong crew, including Thunberg. Thunberg denied her mission to deliver aid to Gaza by breaking through a years-old naval blockade of the coastal enclave was a PR stunt, saying a previous effort in a larger boat was ended after the vessel was bombed. She said she was now in desperate need of a shower and sleep. She admitted it was unclear where she would be heading next, telling reporters it could be Sweden.
The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
What's behind Keir Starmer's decision to back nuclear power?
Keir Starmer has committed the UK to its first significant stake in a new nuclear power plant since the 1980s. The decision to invest almost £18bn of taxpayer money into the Sizewell C nuclear power plant in Suffolk was welcomed by Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, as the beginning of a 'golden age' of nuclear investment that would be critical to the government's net zero goals. The government said on Tuesday it would commit £14.2bn to the project, including the £2.7bn it earmarked for Sizewell C in the autumn budget. It has already committed £3.6bn to Sizewell over the past two years. Britain's nuclear renaissance will also include spending about £2.5bn of taxpayer money building some of Europe's first small modular reactors (SMR), after the government gave the green light to plans for Rolls-Royce to build three in the UK by the early 2030s. For critics, the technology's high costs and lengthy construction time have always eclipsed the benefits of abundant low-carbon electricity, given Hinkley Point C's current price tag of up to £35bn and repeated delays. There are also persistent concerns over the safety of nuclear reactors, and the disposal of nuclear waste. But questions over whether countries can meet the growing demand for electricity without fossil fuels, and avoid blackouts, mean many governments now believe nuclear represents a price worth paying. Megawatt for megawatt, nuclear power is far more expensive than most renewable energy technologies. But, unlike wind and solar farms, nuclear reactors do not need investment in battery backup technologies to provide a steady, reliable source of low-carbon power. The guaranteed electricity price offered to Hinkley Point C was initially £92 per megawatt-hour but this will fall to £89.50/MWh with the go-ahead for Sizwell C, under the terms of the government's contract with French state-owned EDF. By contrast, the guaranteed price for offshore windfarms which were successful in last year's subsidy auction was just under £59 per megawatt-hour. 'The upfront cost [of nuclear] is undoubtedly high,' said Dr Iain Staffell, an associate professor at Imperial College London. '£14bn could fund around 10 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind versus just 3.2 GW of nuclear. But, these reactors will run day and night, especially valuable when the wind is not blowing.' Prof Mark Wenman, also at Imperial College London, added that the costs needed to be balanced against the fact that these reactors 'will produce low carbon electricity for 80 or possibly 100 years, 24/7, providing around a 10th of the current UK electricity needs'. 'Once paid for, nuclear reactors produce the cheapest electricity of any kind, so this investment should be seen as future-proofing the UK electricity system,' Wenman said. Experts believe that powering a country on 100% renewable energy is technically possible. But there is clear evidence that grid systems running predominantly on wind and solar power can be more expensive in the long run, and could be at higher risk of blackouts. This is because renewable energy cannot help to keep the electrical frequency of the grid stable at around 50Hz in the same way that the spinning turbines of a power plants have done in the past by creating inertia. The answer, according to the government's National Energy System Operator (Neso), is to encourage renewables to become the backbone of the energy system while keeping alternatives such as nuclear, biomass and gas to provide backup for when renewable resources are low and grid stability is needed. The government's independent climate advisers agree. The Climate Change Committee recommends that the UK's nuclear capacity doubles by 2050 because while it is 'relatively expensive on a levelised cost basis' it can provide 'valuable zero-carbon generation at scale'. Britain risks losing the benefits offered by nuclear plants by shutting its ageing nuclear reactors faster than it can build new ones – leaving a gap in the UK's supplies of low-carbon electricity at a time when demand for clean energy is growing. The UK's five existing nuclear power reactors generated 14% of the country's electricity last year – down from the industry's late-1990s peak when 18 nuclear reactors provided more than a quarter of Britain's power. Four of these plants are due to close before the end of the decade, even with plans to extend their lifetimes, while only one nuclear power plant is under construction. The Hinkley Point C project in Somerset was originally due to begin generating electricity by 2017 but it has been delayed until the early 2030s. Driving Britain's nuclear renaissance is the tech industry's appetite for nuclear power. Starmer unveiled plans for a once-in-a-generation nuclear expansion earlier this year alongside an open invitation to tech companies such as Google, Meta and Amazon to invest in AI datacentres in Britain, which could be powered by small modular reactors. This is because world's biggest tech companies are investing in extending the life of nuclear plants and building small modular reactors to help meet the enormous power demands of their datacentres. This growing demand is expected to accelerate with the adoption of artificial intelligence. Earlier this month Meta struck a deal to keep one nuclear reactor of a US utility company in Illinois operating for an extra 20 years to help supply the company's datacentres with low-carbon power. It follows a similar deal from Google to supply its datacentres with nuclear power from half-dozen small reactors built by a California utility company. In addition, Microsoft has paid for the restart the Three Mile Island nuclear plant, the site of the most serious nuclear accident and radiation leak in US history. 'They are very keen to get the datacentres in and they're very alive to the fact that the power is a big issue,' Starmer said.
