
The easy decking mistake that means you're laying it wrong and it could cost you thousands, says gardener
A garden deck is the perfect place to pull up a lounger and soak up the rays on a hot day.
3
3
But if it's not installed correctly, it can quickly become slippery and dangerous to use.
Poorly laid decking is more likely to warp or rot so you could have to fork out all over again for the job.
It could set you back £2,400 or more to replace your decking depending on the size of the area and the type of boards you choose.
Garden expert James Lewis, of MyBuilder.com said there's one extremely common error that can drastically cut the lifespan of your deck.
James told The Sun: 'While it might be a bit of an old faithful, it's surprising how often decking is actually installed completely wrong."
What's the correct way to lay decking?
The landscaping pro has warned that many DIY enthusiasts and even some tradespeople are laying their decking upside down.
He said: 'Often even in advertising images you'll see it with the grooves facing up.
'Because of this, so many people who want to build decking areas believe this is the correct way.
'Some also prefer the look of it, and others have the mistaken belief that the grooves facing up will make it less slippery – a common hazard with decking.
'But actually the correct way to install it is with the grooves in the wood facing downwards.'
And contrary to popular belief, having the grooves facing up doesn't prevent it from becoming slippery, according to James.
In fact, it's the reverse.
He said: 'Installing it grooves upwards can risk trapping water and debris, causing your decking to rot.
'If you wish for your decking to last longer, I recommend that you have it installed with the grooves facing down.
'This will allow for better air circulation within your decking and more efficient drying and drainage of its surface.'
Some decking has grooves on both sides.
In this case it's designed to go with the wider grooves facing downwards and the narrower ones facing up, according to manufacturers.
How to maintain decking
3
If you want your deck to last as long as possible, you need to keep on top of algae and grime, according to Mark Irving, an expert at DIY supplier Build & Plumb.
Mark said: 'Regularly cleaning your timber decking is crucial for increasing the longevity of your deck and preventing the build-up of dirt.
'I recommend using a specialised decking cleaner for this process and always following the manufacturer's instructions before use.
'However, warm water and washing up liquid is a delicate, but effective solution for removing dirt and stains.
'Always ensure that you rinse your decking thoroughly after cleaning and leave it to fully dry before moving furniture back onto the deck.
'In addition, it's important to apply a good quality deck sealer to the surface of your decking at least once a year.
'This will create a protective layer on the surface of the decking, to prevent moisture penetration and decrease the likelihood of wood rot.'
How much does decking cost and how long should it last?
The most affordable material is pressure-treated softwood.
For an average sized deck, this costs roughly £2,400 in total, including the materials and installation costs, according to Mark.
He said: 'Typically, you can expect timber decking to last an average of 15 to 30 years, if it's installed and maintained correctly.'
Composite decking, which is made of plastic or synthetic materials, can cost about double the price of wooden boards.
But it's designed to last a lot longer.
Mark said: 'Composite decking is typically much more weather-resistant than timber decking.
'It requires far less regular maintenance and cleaning than wooden decking.
'Although composite decking does have higher initial costs than timber decking, its lifespan can reach up to 50 years, adding around 20 years onto the lifespan of wooden decking.'
How to find gardening bargains
Doing up your garden to enjoy on warm and sunny days needn't cost the earth.
Sun Savers Editor Lana Clements explains how to get a top deal on items for the garden…
You can bag big savings on plants, shrubs and flowers, as well as gardening tools and furniture.
Many retailers have flash sales across entire seasonal ranges – often these promotions tie into payday at the end of the month or Bank Holiday weekends, so keep a lookout.
Sign up to mailing lists of your favourite brands and you'll be first to know of special offers. It can be worth following retailers on social media too.
Use a price comparison site to search out the best value items.
And keep a close eye on the specialbuys at Aldi and middle of Lidl drops which drop a couple of times a week and usually mean great value seasonal items for your outdoor areas.
If you are not in a hurry to buy an item, try adding it to the shopping cart online and leaving it for a couple of days.
Sometimes big brands will try to tempt you into the sale by offering you a discount.
And always check if you can get cashback before paying.
It's especially worth using sites such as Topcashback, Quidco and app Jamdoughnut when buying bigger ticket items such as garden furniture as you'll get a nice kickback.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
2 minutes ago
- The Sun
Georgina Rodriguez dubbed ‘perfection' as she stuns in barely-there see-through outfit for steamy seaside photoshoot
CRISTIANO RONALDO'S fiancee Georgina Rodriguez took social media by storm once more. Georgina, 31, has amassed a large audience on social media thanks to her relationship with Ronaldo, 40. 19 19 19 19 And the content creator treated her 69.9million Instagram followers with another glam snap. The Argentinean model posed in a barely-there see-through outfit at the beach. And Georgina 's fans were left in awe as they stormed the comments' section. One followers posted: "Perfection." And that one gushed: "You're glowing." Georgina and Ronaldo finally got engaged after a long nine-year relationship. The couple met in 2016 when she was working at a Gucci store in Spain during the five-time Ballon d'Or winner's time with Real Madrid. They have two children together - Alana, seven, and Bella, three - and formed a family with the Manchester United legend's three kids born to two surrogate mothers. That includes Cristiano Jr, 15, as well as twins Mateo and Eva Maria, both eight. Inside the glamorous world of Georgina Rodriguez... 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19


Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tesco risks wrath of shoppers as it becomes latest supermarket to raise meal deal price
In a devastating turn of events Tesco has become the latest supermarket to raise the price of its iconic meal deal. Customers said they were 'outraged' after it was revealed the supermarket's popular deal will increase from £4 to £4.25 on Thursday. Meanwhile savvy shoppers with a Clubcard will see their beloved deal go from £3.60 to £3.85. The shocking news broke when an insider posted a picture of the updated shelf labels online. One unimpressed customer posted on X: 'Tesco meal deal going up again... genuinely outrageous. Games gone.' Another wrote: 'Tesco meal deal price is going up again what is this absolute nonsense.' The deal involves a main, snack and drink and includes a variety of options from sushi to iced coffee. Last year, Tesco raised the price of the deal from £3.90 to £4 and £3.40 to £3.60 for Clubcard users. File image: The shocking news broke when an insider posted a picture of the updated shelf labels online And in 2022 the deal increased for the first time in a decade. Boots was the first retailer to sell a meal deal back in 1985, but supermarkets later followed suit with similar offerings and it is now a highly competitive market. A Tesco spokesperson said: 'Our meal deal remains great value and the ideal way to grab lunch on-the-go at just £3.85 for a main, snack and drink when bought with a Clubcard. 'With more than 20m possible combinations the Tesco meal deal has got something for every taste, from a classic Chicken Club Sandwich to Tesco Korean Style Chicken Dragon Rolls.' In January, it was revealed that the most popular Tesco meal deal was the Chicken Club Sandwich emerging as the go-to main, Tesco Egg Protein Pot as the most popular snack, along with the returning top drink of Coca-Cola 500ml. Prior to that the nation's go-to combination for Tesco's lunchtime Meal Deal has been Tesco Sausage Bacon & Egg Triple, McCoy's Flame Grilled Steak Grab Bag Crisps 45g and Coca-Cola 500ml.


Telegraph
2 minutes ago
- Telegraph
If Reeves isn't stopped, every inch of Britain will be the property of the state
The pitch rolling has started. The propagandists have been unleashed. We are being softened-up for the ultimate betrayal, the most obscene of broken promises, the grossest attack on private wealth in living memory. If you are a homeowner, I have grim news: Rachel Reeves has just declared war on you. You could pay even more tax, so much so that in some cases you may be forced to sell your house to pay the bill – and then to hand over yet more cash just to be allowed to say goodbye to your beloved family home. Reeves is considering several options, all abhorrent: an annual proportional wealth tax on the value of homes, large enough to replace stamp duty, council tax and more; the imposition of capital gains tax (CGT) on primary residences for the first time ever, albeit just on more expensive ones at first; an 'exit tax' as an alternative to CGT, payable on sale; and a revaluation of council tax, with even higher bands, including a mansion tax. Britain is in the midst of an epic struggle between tax-eaters and net taxpayers, between those seeking to squeeze ever more out of the private sector to keep our bankrupt welfare state going a little longer, and those desperately seeking to preserve their wealth at a time of weak GDP, stagnant real wages and rocketing costs. We have almost reached the economy's maximal taxable capacity, at least with the tools at HMRC's disposal. The bond vigilantes are circling, and Reeves has taken the UK to the brink of fiscal meltdown. Her party won't allow her to cut spending, so she is turning to the last untapped El Dorado, the final pot of cash ripe for raiding: our homes, worth trillions of pounds in total. If she goes down, she wants it to be in a blaze of Left-wing glory, taking out the forces of conservatism's last bastion and scoring the greatest victory for socialism since the glory days of Hugh Dalton and Sir Stafford Cripps. Primary residences have long been the great tax taboo, the last line of defence against predatory politicians: no government has been able to directly tax their gains in value or to impose an annual levy (a property wealth tax) over and above council tax. Slapping CGT on primary residences or an annual property wealth tax based on the value of one's home isn't some minor technocratic tweak to the tax system to make it slightly more 'efficient' or 'fair': it's an attempt at dynamiting the foundations of our society, to drastically curtail the power of the petite bourgeoisie, and to enshrine the political class's supremacy. Unlike with ISAs or pensions, whose tax-beneficial status are understood to survive at the Chancellor's discretion, primary residences are an Englishman's tax-free castles, for which we assume we have a natural right not to be taxed. This is one of the last in-built libertarian assumptions in British society, and the reason why Reeves's proposed tax 'reforms' are so pernicious. Tim Leunig, who advised Rishi Sunak and whose Left-wing ideas are also proving attractive to Reeves, is advocating for a 0.44 per cent levy on homes worth up to £500,000 to replace council tax. He simultaneously wants stamp duty to be replaced by a 0.54 per cent annual tax on homes above £500,000, with an extra 0.28 per cent supplement on values over £1m. These would be revenue-neutral, which wouldn't be good enough for Reeves: she wants to raise billions more. The rates would need to be even higher. I loathe council tax and stamp duty, but this idiot savant scheme would create Britain's first annual wealth tax, levied on a stock of illiquid assets, and would prove even worse. Property rights would be abrogated, and homeowners downgraded into leaseholders, paying the state-cum-landlord a fee for the right to keep living in our homes. The ancient tradition of the yeoman freeholder would be extinguished. Many homeowners would end up paying £7,000, £15,000 or more a year. At best, there would be no money left for holidays or school fees; at worst, total tax bills would exceed 100 per cent of annual incomes. Pensioners and the cash-poor would be forced to sell. Many would pray their house didn't increase in value, and halt repairs and enhancements. Some would tear down garages or annexes to reduce their annual tax, or allow homes and gardens to fall into disrepair to influence assessors. Entrepreneurs, rich investors and the last non-doms would flee the UK. We should scrap stamp duty, but by cutting spending, not by introducing this repulsive new form of larceny. Imposing CGT on primary residences would be almost as toxic. Like every new tax, invariably pitched to us as limited in scale and scope, it would soon be extended, in this case to ever more homes. The rates would soon be equalised to that on income. Eventually, it would become impossible to make any gains from property at all. Tax used to be only payable on real capital gains, not on inflationary increases. Labour largely ended that key protection; the Tories scrapped the last safeguards. Inflation, now at 3.8 per cent, is once again a silent thief, delivering what Milton Friedman described as 'taxation without legislation' on a grand scale. Under Reeves's plans, homeowners would pay tax on phantom inflationary gains and in many cases lose money in real terms. This would be especially true in London, where real, as opposed to nominal, property prices are often lower than they were a few years ago. It would be barely concealed theft. Buying a house would become a high-risk gamble. Homeowners who haven't kept every receipt would face tax bills for their recently completed new kitchens. More generally, there would be far fewer future home improvements and extensions as the post-tax payback would be lower. Nobody who didn't have to sell their home would do so, especially with the prospect of a Reform government reversing the raid. The housing market would implode. This war on homeowners is a bridge too far, a leap into proto-Marxist hell. Reeves is seeking to pauperise the middle classes. Taxpayers must make their fury known, write to their MPs and take to social media. This is the final battle, the fight to end all political fights: the Chancellor must be persuaded to change her mind, or else there will be no hope left for this country.