Should We Switch Off Our Economy: Indian Envoy Defends Oil Ties With Russia, Questions Western ‘Convenience' Deals
In an interview with Times Radio, the Indian envoy highlighted the inconsistencies in the West's stance, noting that many European countries continue to buy rare earths and other energy products from the same suppliers they now expect India to avoid. 'Don't you think that seems a little odd?' Doraiswami remarked.
India, the world's third-largest oil importer, traditionally relied on the Middle East for its energy needs. However, after facing steep discounts from Russia, which began redirecting exports following Western sanctions over its invasion of Ukraine in 2022, India shifted a substantial portion of its imports to Moscow.
Addressing questions about India's ties with Russia and President Vladimir Putin, Doraiswami said the relationship is built on several long-standing factors, including historical security cooperation.
'There was a time when some of our Western partners refused to sell us weapons but supplied them to our neighbours, who then used them against us,' he said.
He further pointed out that India's energy trade with Russia is a result of being priced out of other markets, as global buyers outbid India for energy sources it once relied on.
'We import over 80% of our energy. We're the third-largest consumer in the world. What would you have us do, switch off our economy?' he asked.
Doraiswami also questioned the double standards in global diplomacy, highlighting that several nations maintain relationships of convenience with countries that pose challenges to India's own interests.
'Do we ask you to come up with a little test of loyalty?' he said.
On the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the envoy reiterated that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has consistently advocated for peace.
'He has said repeatedly, including to both President Putin and President Zelensky, that this is not an era of war,' Doraiswami emphasized.
'We want this terrible conflict to end, just as we want other conflicts around the world to end,' he concluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘I am confident of strong EV ecosystem being built in Tamil Nadu'
As the MD of Renault India , Venkatram Mamillapalle has seen Tamil Nadu's Oragadam belt develop into an automotive manufacturing hub even as the Renault Nissan factory made cars for India and exported from there. In a chat with TOI, he discusses TN's next big leap into EVs, infrastructure, ecosystem, and the near future. Excerpts: Question: Renault has launched the new Triber, and three new products are to be rolled out in the next two years. What is the capacity utilisation at the Oragadam plant? Will it increase? Renault MD: The Oragadam plant is still used by both the partners, Renault as well as Nissan. So, together, we are currently at about 50% utilization. The new Triber will help enhance our volumes for this year and in the future as well. And the Triber will be exported to all those countries where the old Triber had been going, and the first shipment should leave Ennore Port sometime in the first week of August. The first export shipment will be headed to South Africa. Question: Two years ago, Renault announced a 5,400 crore investment in its Indian business in general, and in product development in particular. The new products in the pipeline were set to include some EVs as well. When will we see electric vehicles rolling out of your Oragadam plant? Renault MD: When we announced the new investment in February 2023, we said we were going to launch four new products, two for Nissan, two for Renault. Later on, we said we are going to launch four new products, and we are still holding to that. Starting with the new Triber, we will launch four products in the next two years. We did say that we are also looking to launch an EV as early as possible because HEV and EV are arm's length technologies for us, and they are already available in Europe (whether they are ethanol, hybrids, or electric). We are still waiting for regulatory clarifications on a host of issues like CAFE policy, tax issues related to EVs, and the fact that HEVs currently don't have any tax benefits today. The carbon trading policy is also not clear, and the ecosystem that has to support an EV in the Indian market is not completely ready. Question: How does Tamil Nadu's EV manufacturing ecosystem compare to that of other states? What more should it do to support automobile companies? Renault MD: I've been in touch with Guidance Tamil Nadu and the ministry of industries in TN. Recently, we had a positive discussion and they're encouraging investments in Tamil Nadu for new technologies. I'm sure there are many suppliers interested in building the EV ecosystem in TN. They're already in talks or discussions with the government, thanks to the government's ability and agility in supporting such investments. I admire the way Tamil Nadu is moving forward. The govt is going door-to-door to speak to suppliers about investing. I am confident they will build a strong EV ecosystem in Tamil Nadu. Question: Have you spoken to the govt regarding getting into EV production? Renault MD: We've been speaking with them to support the development of a robust EV ecosystem—making it as wide and as deep as possible. Their efforts are focused on helping demand grow, which in turn allows EV manufacturers to justify their investments and sell their cars. These discussions have been very positively received. Question: Will the presence of big-ticket EV investors like VinFast help catalyse the supplier ecosystem in TN? Renault MD: Everything acts as a catalyst to develop the ecosystem. It should be a group effort, along with strong govt support, which is already happening. The way the govt is promoting the state's subsidies and supportive programmes is helping. Question: What can be done to ease the congestion at Chennai's ports? Renault MD: There are two ports in Chennai, and Renault operates out of the Ennore Port. No doubt, logistically, the state does need better port infrastructure. Ship visits to these ports should be more frequent. When demand increases, that will follow. Especially with our focus on Europe and Latin America, improvements in port infrastructure are necessary. One round of discussions has already taken place. We are waiting for further feedback following discussions with the commerce and industry ministry at the central level. These discussions were primarily about improving logistics from our ports towards Europe and expanding infrastructure as well.
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Incorrect To Say Op Sindoor Was...': Rajnath Denies Cong's 'Surrender' Charge, Rejects Trump's Role
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh made a fiery intervention in Lok Sabha during the debate on Operation Sindoor, India's powerful military response after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. Singh dismissed Donald Trump's claim of pressuring India to pause its strikes, asserting that the mission ended only after achieving strategic objectives. 'This wasn't a war to seize land, but to destroy Pakistan's terror network,' he clarified. Taking a swipe at the Opposition, Singh questioned why no one in Parliament asked how many Pakistani jets were downed. His assertive speech reignited the national security vs political narrative debate and set the tone for a landmark moment in Indian defence politics.#operationsindoor #rajnathsingh #rajnathsinghspeech #loksabha #loksabhalive #donaldtrump #indiandefence #pokstrikes #pahalgamattack #counterterrorism #narendramodi #loksabhadebate #indianpolitics #modidoctrine #bjpvscongress #indiapakistan #trumpclaim #indianairforce #terrorresponse #surgicalstrikes #nationalsecurity #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews Read More
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
23 minutes ago
- First Post
WATCH: No Modi-Trump phone call took place between April 22 and June 17, says Jaishankar
EAM Jaishankar confirmed in Lok Sabha there was no phone call between PM Modi and President Trump between April 22 and June 17, dispelling rumours of secret negotiations or trade-linked talks amid India's Operation Sindoor. read more External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar clarified in the Lok Sabha that there was no telephonic communication between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump from April 22 to June 17, directly contradicting speculation about secret diplomatic dealings surrounding Operation Sindoor and associated border tensions. VIDEO | Speaking on Operation Sindoor in Lok Sabha, EAM S Jaishankar (@DrSJaishankar) said, "...At no stage, in any conversation with the United States, was there any linkage with trade and what was going on. There was no call between the Prime Minister and President Trump… — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) July 28, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Responding to Opposition allegations in the Lok Sabha, Jaishankar said, 'At no stage, in any conversation with the United States was there any linkage with trade and what was going on. There was no call between the Prime Minister and President Trump between April 22, when the President called to convey his sympathy and June 17 when he called the Prime Minister from Canada to explain why he couldn't meet.' He further explained that India's response to the Pahalgam terror attack was independent and decisive. 'After we retaliated against Pakistan's attack, we received messages saying Pakistan was ready to stop. But we conveyed that such a request must come from their Director General of Military Operations (DGMO),' he said. Hailing the government's diplomatic efforts post-Pahalgam attack, the EAM said, 'What we tried to create was a narrative and prepare the diplomacy for launch of Operation Sindoor. The result of that diplomacy was that out of the 190 nations of UN only three, besides Pakistan, opposed Operation Sindoor. 'Overwhelmingly, there was recognition that terror was unacceptable and the country which has been attacked has the right to defend itself and India was doing exactly that,' Jaishankar said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'When Operation Sindoor was launched, we put out our objectives that it was hitting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Our actions were focussed, measured and non-escalatory and we were living up to the commitment that those responsible for those attacks will be held responsible,' he said. Jaishankar pointed out that The Resistance Front (TRF) group had been designated as a global terror organisaion by the US due to Indian diplomacy. 'On May 10, we received phone calls sharing the impression of other countries that Pakistan was ready to cease the fighting. Our position was that if Pakistan was ready, we needed to get this as a request from the Pakistani side through the DGMO channel. That is exactly how that request came,' Jaishankar said. 'I want to make two things very clear – at no stage in any conversation with the US was their any linkage with trade and what was going on. Secondly, there was no call between the prime minister and President Trump from April 22 – when President Trump called up to convey his sympathy – till June 17, when he called up, the PM who was in Canada,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Talking about the post-Pahalgam actions of the government, Jaishankar said that the Cabinet Committee on Security had decided that the Indus Waters Treaty would be held in abeyance until Pakistan abjures its support for terrorism, along with a host of other steps. 'It was very clear that after the steps, India's response to the Pahalgam attack will not stop there. Our responsibility from a foreign policy approach was to shape the global understanding of the Pahalgam attack,' he said. Jaishankar said that Indian diplomacy then tried to bring out Pakistan's long-standing support to terrorism and how the Pahalgam attack was targeted at Jammu and Kashmir's economy and sow communal discord. 'Messages were two – zero tolerance for terrorism and right to defend our people against terrorists. All diplomatic briefing were aimed at these two objectives,' he said. Jaishankar's remarks came after Congress' Deputy Leader in the House Gaurav Gogoi slammed the government over US President Donald Trump's claim made '26 times', that he used trade to bring about a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Congress has been repeatedly attacking the government over Trump's remarks. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire after a long night of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim on several occasions that he helped settle the tensions between India and Pakistan. However, India has been consistently maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. In a nearly 35-minute phone call with Trump last month, Modi firmly stated that India does not and will 'never accept' mediation and that the discussions between Indian and Pakistani militaries on cessation of military actions were initiated at Islamabad's request. India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in retaliation for the Pahalgam attack that killed 26 civilians. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of intense cross-border drone and missile strikes. With inputs from agencies
