logo
Gold price prediction today: Where is gold rate headed in the near-term & will silver outperform the yellow metal? Here's the outlook

Gold price prediction today: Where is gold rate headed in the near-term & will silver outperform the yellow metal? Here's the outlook

Time of India12 hours ago
Gold price prediction: Gold prices may see further consolidative moves trading in a tight range in near term. (AI image)
Gold price prediction today: Gold prices will continue to be influenced by global economic outcomes in the shadow of US President Donald Trump's looming August 1, 2025 reciprocal tariff deadline.
What should gold and silver investors do and what's the outlook for gold rates in the near term? Maneesh Sharma, AVP - Commodities & Currencies, Anand Rathi Shares and Stock Brokers shares his views and recommendations for gold and silver investors:
Gold traded steady to sideways while it ended last week with mild gains while Silver continued to outperform Gold on a weekly basis. This was despite investors growing increasingly convinced that the Federal Reserve will not cut interest rates any time soon.
Uncertainty over President Donald Trump's trade tariffs kept the downside limited.
Earlier in the last week, US economic data revealed mixed readings of inflation, with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) edging toward the 3% threshold, while the Producer Price Index (PPI), moved downwards.
However, the release of stronger-than-expected Retail Sales indicated that most of the increase was due to higher prices resulting from tariffs.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
15 most beautiful women in the world
Topgentlemen.com
Undo
Meanwhile Silver was supported on downside as Trump's 15 % - 20 % EU tariff threats & political pressure on Powell to cut rates fuelled higher safe-haven demand in white metal. The dollar's pullback following the yield decline last week & volatile trading driven by mixed US inflation data, political pressure on Fed Chair Jerome Powell & escalating trade tensions all kept Silver supported.
For the current week, focus to remain on the trade negotiation outcome ahead of August 1 deadline, Fed official speeches including Powell speech, US macro data, including housing market, durable goods orders & Global PMI numbers.
Gold Weekly View: Sideways to Slightly Positive Bias
Trading Range: Rs 98,100 – 1,00,500 (CMP Rs. 99,345 / 10 gm.)
Gold prices may see further consolidative moves trading in a tight range in near term. On the other hand, Silver could remain volatile while still preferred among both precious metals on strong fundamental tailwinds, falling yields, and tariff risk.
Overall expectations still remain of silver prices to rise beyond $40 per ounce in the long run perspective this year as physical supplies tighten and investment demand grows at a steady rate.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RBI Bulletin article: Indian economy remains largely resilient despite global uncertainties, high tariff risk
RBI Bulletin article: Indian economy remains largely resilient despite global uncertainties, high tariff risk

Indian Express

time13 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

RBI Bulletin article: Indian economy remains largely resilient despite global uncertainties, high tariff risk

Amid geopolitical tensions and tariff policy uncertainties, the Indian economy has remained resilient, aided by strong macroeconomic fundamentals, according to an article in the Reserve Bank of India's July monthly bulletin. 'Domestic economic activity held up in June, with high-frequency indicators pointing to improving prospects of the kharif agricultural season and continuation of strong momentum in the services sector,' according to the 'State of the Economy' article in RBI's July bulletin. The article has been prepared by central bank officials. The RBI said views published in the article are of the authors and not of the institution. It said that the growth in rural demand remained resilient and was accompanied by a recovery in urban economic activity. The all-India unemployment rate remained unchanged from the previous month at 5.6 per cent with rural areas faring better as compared to their urban counterparts. During April-May 2025, total expenditure grew by 19.7 per cent on a year-on-year (y-o-y) basis, accounting for 14.7 per cent of the Budget Estimates for FY26. Capital expenditure recorded robust growth during the first two months of the current fiscal and was at 19.7 per cent of the budgeted capital expenditure vis-à-vis 12.9 per cent during the same period a year ago, indicative of front-loading of capital spending by the Central government. India's merchandise trade deficit narrowed in June 2025, due to contraction in both oil and non-oil trade deficit. De-escalating geo-political tensions in the Middle East, optimism on trade deals and the easing of norms for infrastructure financing by the Reserve Bank buoyed up domestic financial market sentiments in the second half of June, the article said. In the first half of July, however, domestic markets traded with a negative bias as investor sentiment remained cautious amidst ongoing uncertainty over the potential India-US trade agreement and mixed corporate earnings results by companies in the first quarter of FY25. The article said that easing inflation, front-loading of government expenditure, targeted fiscal measures and congenial financial conditions for faster transmission of rate reductions should support aggregate demand in the economy, going forward. Headline inflation, as measured by y-o-y changes in the all-India consumer price index (CPI), declined to 2.1 per cent in June 2025 — the lowest since January 2019 — from 2.8 per cent in May. The retail inflation remained below the 4 per cent target for the fifth consecutive month in June. On the trade front, the article stated that as intense negotiations are underway for closing trade deals before the new import tariff rates kick in from August 1, 2025, the focus is back on US trade policies and their spillover effects globally. Financial markets, however, seem to have taken trade policy uncertainties in their stride, possibly reflecting optimism on reaching trade deals that are less disruptive to the global economy. Even so, underpricing of macroeconomic risk by financial markets remains a concern. According to the article, the average trade tariff rates are set to touch levels unseen since the 1930s. Moreover, the risk of imposition of new high tariffs looms large for additional sectors. The evolving pattern of global trade flows and supply chains are far from settled, the article highlighted, adding that these uncertainties pose considerable headwinds to global economic prospects. 'Amidst rising trade uncertainties and geo economic fragmentation, building more resilient trade partnerships presents a strategic opportunity for India to deepen its integration with global value chains,' it said. In addition, measures to accelerate domestic investment in infrastructure and structural reforms aimed at improving competitiveness and productivity would build resilience while supporting the growth momentum.

The US can survive tariffs. That doesn't mean they're worth it
The US can survive tariffs. That doesn't mean they're worth it

Economic Times

time31 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

The US can survive tariffs. That doesn't mean they're worth it

On hearing of the Continental Army's pivotal victory at the Battle of Saratoga in 1777, John Sinclair told Adam Smith, 'The British nation must be ruined.' As Sinclair recalled, the author of The Wealth of Nations (published the year before) urged him to calm down. 'Be assured, my young friend, there is a great deal of ruin in a nation.'Dedicated though he was to the benefits of free trade, Smith would doubtless say the same about today's turn toward mercantilism. It's a blow, but not the end of the world. That's worth noting: Catastrophism, a popular mode of discourse these days, is usually unhelpful. But champions of President Donald Trump's approach to trade are apt to make the opposite mistake — namely, thinking that if the roof hasn't fallen in, the policy must be succeeding. If it results in slower growth and persistent underperformance, that might not be 'ruin,' but it sure isn't Trump's new system of tariffs has settled down — if it ever does — what might it cost? What might 'less than ruin' amount to?According to most estimates, the direct economic losses are certainly tolerable, especially for a huge and relatively closed economy like the US. One recent study explores the upper limit on what's at stake by calculating the benefits of liberal trade compared with no trade at all. For the US, the costs of closing the economy altogether would fall in the range of 2% to 8% of gross domestic product. The costs of less trade, as opposed to no trade, would naturally be smaller still. Earlier this month the Federal Reserve published a research note on the effects of specific tariffs. Its economists modeled an increase of 60 percentage points in the US tariff on imports from China, with and without a 'baseline' tariff of 10% on other trading partners, assuming for one set of scenarios that the trade deficit is unchanged and for another that it shrinks. According to their model, the 60% extra tariff on China, the 10% baseline tariff on everybody else plus a 25% reduction in the trade deficit would cut US GDP by a little under 3%. (China's losses would be about the same; thanks to shifts in the pattern of trade, the rest of the world would come out about even.) These and other such studies reveal the complexity of the changes caused by trade barriers. For example, surely tariffs would reduce imports and hence shrink the trade deficit. Why assume, as some of the Fed's scenarios do, that the deficit doesn't change? Actually, it's far from obvious that the trade deficit will narrow. You'd expect a smaller trade deficit to make the dollar appreciate — in due course increasing imports, cutting exports and undoing the initial effect. In any case, the overall external balance is determined by the gap between its saving and investment, which tariffs affect only consider the surprisingly small estimated cost of closing the economy completely. One of the assumptions behind the estimated losses of 2% to 8% of GDP is that the ease of replacing domestic goods with imports — the so-called elasticity of substitution — can be estimated from current trade data. But as the economy approaches autarky, this elasticity might fall abruptly as certain critical foreign products prove difficult or impossible to replace. The costs of abolishing imports might then be much bigger than projected. (Granted, a rational mercantilist would be careful not to press too far: An entirely closed economy isn't the goal.)The list of other complications is endless. What's the effect of trade on competition and innovation? It depends. Up to a point, competition through trade is likely to spur innovation, but if foreign competition is severe enough to shut a domestic industry down, said industry won't be more innovative. The dynamic effects of trade — that is, the effects of trade on growth — are even harder to estimate than the static effects captured in the studies mentioned all the uncertainty, two points seem worth emphasizing. First, despite the complexities, economists generally agree that trade does deliver net gains — that, on this, Adam Smith was right. If suppressing trade is costly, then exactly how costly is not the most important question. You don't do it. To be sure, the US has a huge domestic market and is richly endowed with natural resources. These advantages mean that trade is likely to deliver smaller gains than it does for other economies. But, to repeat, small gains are better than the costs of the new mercantilism aren't confined to the implications for GDP of moving from a settled regime of liberal trade to a settled regime of managed trade. That shift involves massive economic and geopolitical dislocations, which are likely to be costly in restructuring expends resources; it creates jobs and destroys them. The 'China Shock' was disruptive — but vainly trying to reverse it will be disruptive all over again. In the first case, there were aggregate benefits; in the second, there'll be aggregate dislocation could involve the biggest costs of all. The new mercantilism puts US-led alliances and multilateral institutions under enormous strain. The view that the US has been exploited by these arrangements isn't unwarranted — there's been some free-riding, no doubt — but on balance US global leadership has been an exercise in enlightened self-interest. Dismantling the global trading order, and casting this as overdue retaliation against selfish so-called friends, is to cast away American power. It would be bad policy if undertaken in return for small economic gains. In return for substantial, even if less-than-ruinous, economic losses, it's insane.

Sony launches 98-Inch Bravia 5 TV in India with cinema-grade features
Sony launches 98-Inch Bravia 5 TV in India with cinema-grade features

Time of India

time42 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Sony launches 98-Inch Bravia 5 TV in India with cinema-grade features

Sony India has unveiled the 98-inch Bravia 5, transforming home entertainment with cinema-quality visuals and immersive audio technology. Priced at Rs. 6,49,990, this model represents Sony's entry into the premium large-screen television market. The centerpiece of the Bravia 5 is its Advanced AI Processor XR , which combines artificial intelligence with cognitive processing to analyze content the way humans perceive it. This dual-intelligence approach delivers enhanced picture quality by making images appear more natural and lifelike than traditional processing methods. Visual quality comes through the XR Backlight Master Drive technology, featuring independently controlled LEDs and precision dimming algorithms. This system produces bright highlights alongside deep blacks, creating contrast that maintains detail even in challenging lighting conditions. From candlelight's subtle glow to sunrise brilliance, every visual nuance appears with lifelike precision. The television supports Dolby Vision and Atmos technologies, delivering cinema-grade HDR visuals with richer colors, deeper contrast, and enhanced brightness. The accompanying spatial audio creates an immersive three-dimensional soundscape that replicates actual theater acoustics. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 100 free family-friendly activities comes to the heartlands Yayasan Mendaki Learn More Undo Content creators' vision remains intact through Studio Calibrated Mode, which reproduces intended image quality in home settings. The TV includes calibrated modes for Netflix, Sony Pictures Core , and introduces Prime Video Calibrated Mode—optimized for movies, series, and live sports content. Sony Pictures Core integration provides access to a movie library in near 4K Blu-ray quality, including IMAX Enhanced titles, ensuring viewers experience blockbusters and classics with detail and depth. Sony offers purchase incentives: a three-year warranty, Rs. 25,000 cashback on selected credit cards, and fixed EMI options at Rs. 19,995 monthly. The Bravia 5 will be available starting July 23 across Sony retail stores, the company's online portal, electronics outlets, and major e-commerce platforms nationwide, marking Sony's commitment to bringing cinematic experiences directly into Indian homes. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store