DPS Dwarka fee row continues, parents protest at Jantar Mantar & raise 5 demands
Even as the Delhi High Court in May had ordered reinstatement of 102 students, directing submission of a 50% hiked fee, demonstrators on Saturday alleged that the school had not complied. However, sources in DPS Dwarka said that the students will be reinstated as per the court's order once the hiked fee is paid. 'Parents have been asked to clear dues as per the order,' an official said.
But parents have alleged that the school continues to harass them. 'They are not complying with the complete court order, and not refunding the extra amount charged… they are asking more than what the High Court order allowed,' said a parent.
Carrying placards and banners, the demonstrators laid out five key demands as the conflict continues: immediate reinstatement of all 32 affected students at DPS Dwarka without conditions; strict enforcement of DoE (Directorate of Education) and court directives; criminal proceedings against school management and security personnel for alleged child harassment; a time-bound review of the school's pending fee proposals or suspension of the responsible DoE officials; and audit reforms, including cancellation of licenses of any chartered accountants found complicit in financial irregularities.
Highlighting the emotional and academic distress families have faced, protest groups from over 20 other private schools in the city joined in solidarity, warning that unchecked fee hikes and unfair practices at one institution could set a dangerous precedent across the city.
In a statement on Saturday, the group of parents said that they have issued an appeal to the Supreme Court, the Delhi High Court, the GNCTD Directorate of Education, and the Delhi government to ensure that private schools operate within the law and that no child is denied access to education or subjected to harassment over fee disputes.
The fee hike dispute in the Capital's schools has been a long-standing issue. Amid widespread demonstrations in the city, the Cabinet on June 10 approved the 'Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Ordinance, 2025'. Under this, private schools must obtain approval before any fee increase, establish three independent panels at the state, district, and school levels to review proposals, and require automatic refunds of any excess fees already collected.
This came in the backdrop of the DoE rejecting DPS Dwarka's proposed fee hike for the 2023–24 academic year and directing the school to refund any excess fees collected last May. Parents have alleged that, despite this order, the school again raised fees for the 2024–25 and 2025–26 sessions.
DPS Dwarka, for its part, has maintained that it issued show-cause notices to parents as early as December, and that over Rs 1 lakh remained outstanding from around 130 students, resulting in a loss of over Rs 6 crore when some students completed Class XII, an official had earlier told The Indian Express. The school had also previously rejected the parents' claims as 'false and frivolous.' In response, parents of 102 students from the school approached the Delhi High Court, challenging both the unauthorised fee increases and the expulsions that followed.
On May 16, the High Court orally indicated its inclination to stay the school's decision to expel 32 students for non-payment of unapproved fees, observing that DPS Dwarka had not followed Rule 35(4) of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, which requires prior notice and an opportunity to show cause. Further clarity came on May 30, when Justice Vikas Mahajan ordered DPS Dwarka to allow 102 affected students to continue attending classes provided their parents paid 50% of the increased portion of their 2024–25 fees, while still settling the regular fee in full.
The court affirmed that under Section 17(3) of the Delhi School Education Act, the DoE holds the power to curb arbitrary or profiteering fee hikes. The next hearing is scheduled for August 28.
On June 5, the HC – while slamming the school for deploying bouncers to stop students from attending classes – made it clear that if a school seeks to act under Rule 35 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, it must first issue prior communication to the affected students or their guardians, specifying the date on which the action is proposed. The school must also provide a reasonable opportunity to show cause against such action, the order stated.
Beyond the fee issue, on Saturday, parents pointed to an April DoE inspection report that documented alleged discriminatory practices at the school. According to the report, some students were confined to the library, barred from classrooms and the canteen, subjected to constant staff surveillance even during restroom visits, and in certain cases physically prevented from entering the premises by hired bouncers. Demonstrators described these measures as inhumane and a serious violation of child rights.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Delhi govt passes Bill to regulate private school fees: What it says — and why parents are concerned
The Delhi Assembly passed the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025, last week to curb the increasing commercialisation of school education in the national capital. The Bill, which Education Minister Ashish Sood tabled, was sent to Lieutenant Governor V K Saxena for his assent. The move has come three months after Delhi saw widespread protests by parents over fee hikes by several private schools at the start of the academic session in April. What does the Bill say? The Bill seeks to ensure that all recognised and unrecognised private schools in Delhi are governed under a common structure of oversight regarding school fees. There will be a three-tier fee regulation framework, which includes the School Level Fee Regulation Committee, the District Fee Appellate Committee, and a Review Committee. Under the first tier, every private school will be required to set up a School Level Fee Regulation Committee by July 15 of each year. This committee is to be chaired by a nominee of the school management and will include the school principal as the secretary. The membership includes five parents, who are drawn by lots from the Parent-Teacher Association, along with three teachers of the school and a nominee from the Director of Education, who acts as an observer to the committee. Of the members, one must hail from a SC/ST or socially and educationally backwards class of citizens, and at least two members should be women. The committee is required to meet at least once a year before 15 August and must unanimously approve the school's proposed fee for the upcoming academic year. Once approved, the fees can be revised after three years. The second tier is the District Fee Appellate Committee, which is tasked with grievance redressal. The committee will be constituted in each district of Delhi and will oversee all schools within its jurisdiction. It is chaired by the deputy director of education (DoE) of the concerned district and includes the Zonal DoE as its member-secretary. Other members include a chartered accountant or district accounts officer, two representatives from the school, and two representing the parents. A challenge to the fee prescribed by the School Level Fee Regulation Committee can only be initiated by filing a complaint by 15% of the parents from the affected school. Once a case is taken up, the District Fee Appellate Committee can summon witnesses, seek documents, examine evidence, and even appoint commissions for witness examinations. The third tier is the Revision Committee that is set up at the state level, comprising a chairperson who is 'an eminent person with valuable contributions in the field of education'. Its members include a chartered accountant, controller/deputy controller of accounts, a representative of schools, one representative of parents, and an additional DoE. The orders passed by the committee are binding for a three-year period, which aligns with the fixed duration of the approved fee structure. What are the penalties under the Bill? According to the Bill, a first-time violation may attract fines ranging between one lakh and five lakh rupees, and if the violation is repeated, the fine doubles, ranging between two lakh and 10 lakh rupees. Non-compliance also triggers a graded escalation. In cases of continued non-compliance, the DoE is empowered to suspend or withdraw a school's recognition, restrict its right to revise fees, or take over its management. Coercive practices such as withholding exam results, striking off a student's name from the roll list, and denying participation in classroom activities are penalised under the Bill, attracting a Rs 50,000 fine per student. However, there are concerns that schools may recover the cost of these fines through school fees, which may further impact the parents. Why has the Bill been criticised? The Bill has drawn widespread criticism from the parents. One of the key arguments is the lack of any retrospective application to the steep fee hikes imposed earlier this year. No provision addresses the rollback and reassessment of such increases. Another issue is the composition of the regulatory committees. Parents argue that the School Level Fee Regulation Committee is dominated by school-appointed figures and parents selected by a lottery draw. This has raised concerns about the neutrality of the composition. At the district and state levels, the parent representation thins out even further, with no procedure outlined for the selection mechanism. The 15% threshold for raising grievances marks a departure from earlier Delhi High Court-mandated mechanisms that allowed individual parents to lodge complaints. In 1999, following a PIL over steep fee hikes, the court constituted the Justice Duggal Committee, which led to the creation of Fee Anomaly Committees in each district. These allowed individual grievances to be verified and examined by the DoE. The current Bill requires collective action, limiting individual access to redressal.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
5 hours ago
- First Post
Om Birla forms panel to probe HC judge Yashwant Varma's impeachment in cash recovery case
A three-member panel has been set up to probe the recovery of burnt cash from former Delhi High Court judge Yashwant Varma's home, with Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla also accepting an impeachment motion against him signed by 146 MPs. read more A three-member panel will investigate the recovery of burnt cash from the home of former Delhi High Court judge Yashwant Varma, Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla said on Tuesday. The committee, comprising Supreme Court judge Aravind Kumar, Madras High Court Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, and senior advocate BV Acharaha, will submit its findings to the Speaker, who has also accepted an impeachment motion against Justice Varma signed by 146 MPs. Under Article 124(4) of the Constitution, the committee can summon evidence and cross-examine witnesses. If it finds the judge guilty, both Houses must pass the motion. With the ruling and opposition parties in agreement, the process is expected to proceed without hurdles. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This is a developing story.
Economic Times
7 hours ago
- Economic Times
Justice Vimal Kumar Yadav sworn in as Delhi High Court judge
Synopsis Justice Vimal Kumar Yadav was sworn in as a judge of the Delhi High Court on Monday, administered by Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya. With over 30 years of experience in Delhi's lower judiciary, his appointment follows recent inductions of six transferred judges and three new judges in July, strengthening the court's bench. ANI Justice Vimal Kumar Yadav sworn in as Delhi High Court judge In a significant addition to the Delhi High Court, Justice Vimal Kumar Yadav was formally sworn in on Monday as its newest judge. The oath-taking ceremony was led by Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and attended by fellow judges, senior advocates, family members, and distinguished members of the legal community. Justice Yadav brings over three decades of experience from Delhi's lower judiciary, most recently serving as the Principal District and Sessions Judge at Patiala House Courts. His elevation was proposed by the Supreme Court Collegium on July 28 and received final approval from the central government on August 8. A government statement confirmed the appointment, stating, "In exercise of the powers conferred by the Constitution of India, the President of India, after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, is pleased to appoint Vimal Kumar Yadav as a Judge of the Delhi High Court." This appointment comes shortly after a wave of judicial inductions. On July 21, six judges transferred from other courts were sworn into the Delhi High recently, on July 24, the court welcomed three new judges, Justice Shail Jain, Justice Madhu Jain, and Justice Vinod Kumar, in a similar ceremony presided over by Chief Justice Upadhyaya.
