Gabby Logan's husband Kenny knew something was seriously wrong after simple question
Gabby Logan's husband and rugby star Kenny Logan has since called for a programme to be rolled out across the UK, in a bid to identify the diagnosis before it has a chance to deteriorate
Kenny Logan was given the all-clear in February 2023
Gabby Logan's husband Kenny Logan has recalled the moment he was told he had prostate cancer. The 53-year-old discovered his cancer after undergoing a Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) test by chance.
At the time, he had no symptoms that were of concern, but was encouraged to undergo a test by his wife, following a conversation about changes in midlife on her The Midpoint podcast.
Realising how quick and easy the test was, Kenny decided to give it a go assuming all would be fine.
As a result, he was told that his PSE (prostate-specific antigen) level was a bit high, which prompted doctors to keep an eye on him.
Speaking on BBC Radio 2's Tracks Of My Years, the rugby star told Vernon Kay: "I thought I'd be fine, [I] tested every six months, 'Yeah you're fine' and then I couldn't do the meeting, so I said [to the doctor] 'Can just we do a zoom?'
"And he said, 'Yeah, yeah fine, I'll get the results', thinking it'll be like the same as it was last time.
Article continues below
Kenny Logan was encouraged to undergo a test by his wife Gabby Logan
"He said, 'Is Gabby with you?' and I went 'Yep', and as soon as he said, 'Is she with you?' I just knew something was not right.
"He was right, I've got prostate cancer."
Kenny was then given the choice of having; brachytherapy, radiotherapy or surgery to have it removed, to which he opted for the latter.
The father-of-two believes that if he had not gone for the test voluntarily, his prognosis could have been far more devastating.
In 2022, he told BBC Sport: "I decided to take it out. I'm now three months since the operation, had the prostate out, I'm probably 95 per cent back to normal. I'm extremely lucky." In February 2023, he was given the all-clear.
Kenny has since called for men to be tested for prostate cancer from the age of 45, following Sir Chris Hoy's diagnosis.
The six-time Olympic cycling champion announced in October 2024 that his prostate cancer diagnosis was terminal after the primary cancer spread to his bones.
Kenny wants to see a programme rolled out across the UK which could identify the diagnosis, before it has a chance to deteriorate.
He told Daily Mail Sport: "Fifty feels a bit old. It should be like an MOT. It should be the first thing that happens. You've got to go and get tested.
"All of this is putting more pressure on the NHS, and pressure on families? The way to attack it is to get it early."
Scotland rugby star Kenny Logan 'knew' bad news was coming after one simple question
As it stands, routine PSA testing is not offered on the NHS, though a patient may be offered a PSA test if a doctor thinks they have symptoms that could be prostate cancer.
If you're having treatment for a prostate condition, you may be offered regular PSA tests to check how the treatment is working.
According to Prostate Cancer UK, there are NHS guidelines for testing men without symptoms via the Prostate Cancer Risk Management Programme (PCRMP).
It states: 'Any asymptomatic man, aged 50 and over can make an appointment with their GP to discuss having the PSA test. GPs should not proactively raise the issue with asymptomatic men.
"The PCRMP provides good quality evidence-based information to help guide primary health care professionals in these discussions.
"Men aged 50 and over who decide to have a PSA test based on this balanced information can do so for free on the NHS.'
What the NHS says
Prostate cancer usually develops slowly over time, so there may be no signs for many years.
Symptoms of prostate cancer do not usually appear until the prostate is large enough to affect the tube that carries urine from the bladder out of the penis (urethra).
When this happens, you may notice things like:
Article continues below
an increased need to pee
straining while you pee
a feeling that your bladder has not fully emptied
These symptoms should not be ignored, but they do not mean you have prostate cancer. Seek advice from your GP if you are concerned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Health officials tell UK to brace for surge of virus that is the leading cause of death in newborns
Britons have been warned to brace themselves for an upsurge in cases of a deadly lung infection amid a global rise. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), which can be deadly for young children and the elderly, flares up every autumn in the UK—just like the flu. But official surveillance data shows Australia has already logged a record number of cases this year. NHS chiefs believe the Australian winter is a good predictor of how viruses will spread in the UK. Spread by coughs and sneezes, it hospitalises around 30,000 children and 18,000 adults in the UK every year, due to serious breathing complications like pneumonia and lung infections. It said that the virus is a leading cause of death among babies. Around 20 to 30 children die from the virus each winter. It's also estimated to contribute to the deaths of 8,000 adults over the same period, due to the increased strain the infection puts on patient's hearts, causing the organ to fail. Officials have now urged pregnant women and those eligible to get the RSV vaccine. Kate Brintworth, chief midwifery officer for NHS England, said: 'While for most adults RSV only causes mild, cold-like symptoms, for older adults and young children it can lead to serious breathing problems that can end up in hospitalisation. 'Getting vaccinated while pregnant is the best way to protect your baby from the moment they are born. 'Now is the time for mums to act, to make sure their babies are protected ahead of their first few months this winter, when there tends to be more bugs circulating.' Last week, data published by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) also showed the jab for pregnant women can prevent almost three quarters (72 per cent) of hospital admissions for their babies. The antibodies the mums produce in response to the jab are passed to their babies in the womb, protecting them for the first six months after being born. Meanwhile, the vaccine is 82 per cent effective at preventing hospital admissions for RSV among older adults, the UKHSA noted. Pregnant women can get the jab from 28 weeks of pregnancy onwards through their maternity services or GP surgery. Older adults aged 75-79 are also eligible for the jab and NHS England will start inviting people to come forward in the next few weeks. The NHS's jab rollout comes as part of its winter vaccine plans, which also includes Covid and flu vaccines. The lung condition spreads by large droplets and the virus can survive on surfaces for up to seven hours. Children remain infectious for up to three weeks, even after their symptoms have passed. Higher risk babies can receive the nirsevimab vaccine from September—with the single jab replacing five monthly injections previously given to infants classed as being at high risk.
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Come to Britain illegally: get free kidney dialysis
The Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI) is quite right to reject criticism for picking up illegal immigrants in distress in the Channel. The charity's task for all its 200 years has been to rescue what the hymn calls 'those in peril on the sea', not to ask them where they come from. Nevertheless, it is an indictment of government policy that the RNLI is saddled with so much of this work. Through no fault of its own, the RNLI helps the people-smugglers maintain a thriving trade, since the traffickers' customers believe, usually correctly, that they will be saved. Repeated failure by either main party to stop the trade has placed an unfair burden on others. Something similar applies to the National Health Service. The way the law interprets its 'duty of care' means that the illegality of immigrants does not compromise their right to free treatment. Indeed, they can sometimes jump the queues in which British citizens wait. Except in the case of emergency, this seems wrong. It lengthens those queues for ordinary taxpayers and legal immigrants who pay their dues. It also creates an incentive for more illegals to arrive. I recently came across a striking example of this. Inevitably, this is a subject about which no one in the NHS wants to go on the record, so what follows is anecdotal rather than proved. I can only say that I trust my well-informed sources. The story is that there have been several recent cases in southern England of illegal immigrants arriving from Middle-Eastern countries and immediately demanding kidney dialysis. The doctor at each migrant centre must refer them to specialist units. The duty of care means that they must be treated at once, regardless of any effect on queues. Free personal translation services are also provided for those who do not speak English. Obviously, the sick arrivals are not faking it. Almost equally obviously, they knew they would need the dialysis before they set out on their dangerous journey. Theirs is an extreme example of health tourism. The very fact that they could get here so quickly after dialysis in their home countries (treatment normally requires at least two sessions a week) is evidence that the traffickers have reliable systems worked out and a very high chance of outwitting the British authorities and getting people through fast. No doubt they are extra well-paid for this. The annual cost of dialysis in Britain is more than £30,000 per patient. Each session lasts three to five hours; bloods also need monitoring, and there are quite frequent complications, so a huge amount of limited clinician and equipment time is consumed by each new patient. There is no doubt about the good intentions behind the rules, but it does not seem extreme to suggest that they help pave the way to the hell of overcrowding which is the modern NHS. For the BBC, does a cat have higher moral status than a Jew? In its morning news yesterday, the BBC revealed what it called 'an international network that shares online videos of cats and kittens being tortured'. This network included British members, it reported. It rightly invited its audience to consider this disgusting. In the same bulletin, the BBC also reported another torture video. It was of an Israeli man, Evyatar David, held hostage by Hamas. Emaciated and weak, he was filmed in a tunnel, digging what he described as his own grave. He was pleading for his life. The BBC acknowledged that this film might be distressing for the hostage's family but said nothing about the torturer. Indeed, its news report referred to 'the publication of two videos', without even naming Hamas as the perpetrator. Instead, it brought on Jeremy Bowen, its international editor. He was clear. Over a year ago, he said, Hamas had offered Israel a deal which said: 'End the war, leave Gaza, don't come back in and you'll get all the hostages back.' He made not the faintest suggestion that we might be disgusted by Hamas's bargaining over kidnap victims or by the video. Instead, he strongly implied that Benjamin Netanyahu had been wrong to refuse the Hamas offer. The lesson I learnt from these contrasting reports is that, on the BBC, a cat has a higher moral status than a Jew. We already have a wealth tax: IHT There is talk that Labour wants to introduce a wealth tax in the next Budget to help rescue itself from its own profligacy. In the heated discussion about this, it tends to be forgotten that Britain already has a punishing wealth tax, otherwise known as inheritance tax (IHT), which is charged at 40 per cent. Even less noticed is the fact that IHT is moving from being a tax solely on the pretty well-off to one that hits the middling sort. This is because the threshold at which it kicks in has been held at £325,000 since 2009 and will now continue at that level until at least 2030. If the threshold had increased with inflation, it would be nearly £520,000 today. Not coincidentally, the number of estates (in effect, the heirs of dead people) paying IHT went up 13 per cent last year. Receipts rose to £2.2bn in the first quarter of this year. As so often in recent times, what looks like a socialist measure lasted throughout the 14 years of Conservative government which ended last year. As the Tories seem to be in repentant mode at last, should they not catch up with Reform on this issue before it tightens its hold on the rising generation of grandparents?
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
My cracked tooth led to a deadly brain condition after becoming infected... here's the symptom that diagnosed me
A man's seemingly benign tooth infection spiraled into a deadly brain condition. Graham Bell, a 61-year-old father-of-two from the UK, was preparing for a day trip with his wife, Sue, in March when he came down with a severe headache. Sue also noticed her husband's face 'had fallen to one side,' which is usually a sign of a stroke. However, after being rushed to the Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust in Liverpool, doctors found a one-inch mass in Graham's brain called an abscess. Graham underwent 'life-saving brain surgery' to drain the abscess, a growth that forms from pus and other materials in the brain. Abscesses swell and put pressure on the brain, which damages cells and restricts blood flow, eventually killing off brain tissue. Doctors believe the growth was caused by a crack in one of Graham's teeth that had become infected. He said in a hospital news release: 'It was bizarre because I had no pain or swelling in my mouth to tell me there was something wrong.' About 1,500 to 2,500 Americans suffer brain abscesses every year, and around 10 to 30 percent die from the condition. Estimates vary for the UK but range from 200 to 900 cases per year with a similar mortality rate. Bacteria from tooth infections are thought to travel from the infected tooth through the bloodstream, reaching the brain through the sinuses. Pus, which forms from infected tissues, then develops into an abscess. Sue said by the time Graham got to the hospital, his condition 'had deteriorated greatly.' 'The ambulance brought us to The Walton Centre, and once there I knew it was serious,' she said. 'Graham was prepped for surgery right away. The team was so professional, but it was obvious that speed was of the essence.' Surgery to drain the abscess was a success, and Graham's condition gradually began to improve over the coming days. He said: 'It was a lot of information to take in a short time. I had the family around me, but I think we were all in a bit of shock. I was not well, so finding out what was going on quickly was key for all of us.' However, his symptoms returned a few days after surgery, with doctors realizing Graham was suffering from sepsis. Sepsis is the immune system's extreme reaction to an infection that causes the body to attack vital organs. It's been dubbed a 'silent killer' in the US, taking 350,000 lives each year or one every 90 seconds. It's usually treated with antibiotics for the underlying infection and medications called vasopressors, which divert blood flow back to vital organs. However, this takes blood from 'non-vital' areas like limbs, increasing the risk of tissue death and amputations. Graham was rushed to the operating room for a second time to drain the abscess again. He spent six weeks recovering, though scar tissue in the brain from the infection has left him with some communication and movement delays. Sue said: 'He still has issues with communicating and moving around, but we're following the therapy and on our way to getting back to as close to normal as possible.' Graham's two children, Rob and Aimee, raised about $4,200 for The Walton Centre Charity with a sponsored walk after being inspired by their father's treatment. Sue said: 'The hospital saved his life. For that there is nothing we can do to thank them enough! 'But as a family we can raise some money and give something back to support the outstanding care they give to patients every day.'
