Illinois advocates concerned about proposed cuts to care hours for developmentally disabled
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (NEXSTAR) — If you just look at the line item for the Illinois Department of Human Services in Governor Pritzker's proposed budget, you will see an increase for services for the developmentally disabled. However, advocates are now drawing attention to a specific cut that could result in less care hours for people who need care in group homes.
The They Deserve More Coalition, which is made up of different organizations that support the developmentally disabled, came to the Illinois State Capitol to share their concerns.
Bill cracking down on license plate flippers in Illinois passes Senate
The Governor's proposed budget would include a $32 million dollar decrease in funded hours for care of developmentally disabled living in group homes. The funded hours specifically pay for direct support professionals to staff these group homes.
The Illinois Association for Rehabilitation Facilities said the decrease would result in 900,000 hours being cut from the current total, which could mean over an hour less of care per day.
'If we cut 900,000 hours out of the service system from those people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, then they're going to be in danger of not being able to live effectively in their community,' Lore Baker, President of the Association for Individual Development said.
People with developmental disabilities are assessed and prescribed a certain number of hours of care. In these group home settings, hours are typically pooled together to make sure the people have the proper care.
A spokesperson for Governor JB Pritzker's office said the rollback is more about efficiently using the hours allotted.
Illinois House passes 'Dillon's Law' to help more people carry Epi-Pens
'The discussion of the 'funded hours' obscures a basic fact: IDHS and Governor Pritzker are committing more to DD services than ever before,' Spokesman for the Governor Alex Gough said in a statement. 'Providers will never be told 'you've reached your hours limit' or be forced to lay off support workers. The global hours total is part of a funding model with multiple parts, designed to fairly and equitably distribute limited resources.'
The administration pointed to the other investments being made to services for the developmentally disabled. Those include a 50-cent per hour wage increase for direct support professionals. It's also another year of increases for the overall budget for that division. That overall increase is why advocates and organizations were so caught off guard by the proposed cut, especially since they thought they were past this discussion.
This cut was proposed after the state already backed off a much bigger proposed cut last year. Starting in 2023, the state was prepared to cut 2.3 million hours to the same area. At the time, the state said that was just a step in implementing the findings from the state-commissioned Guide House Rate study, but the state backtracked on that plan after pressure from advocates and lawmakers.
While this proposal will impact significantly less hours, advocates still say it will result in a loss of care.
Bill to ban two food additives passes Illinois Senate
'I think it might be possible if the hours didn't disappear,' Baker said. 'But what happened, instead of moving around two hours to go have more hours for someone who has a higher service need and less hours for someone who needs less support, the total amount of hours in the system totally shrunk.'
The governor's proposed budget is just that — a proposal. Lawmakers will spend the next month and a half hammering out the details of the budget. Advocates voiced their concerns about these proposed cuts to the appropriations committee in the House of Representatives.
'Every legislator that we've spoken to has been shocked that this was in the governor's proposed budget,' Baker said. 'They keep saying, didn't we fix this last year? And we're like, We thought so, but not so much.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kansas Senator believes ranked choice voting is good for Kansas, despite ban
TOPEKA (KSNT) — A Kansas lawmaker is pushing back on the state's ban of ranked choice voting. The system allows voters to rank the candidates on their ballot based on preference. In March, the legislature passed Senate Bill 6, which prohibited the use of ranked choice voting in all Kansas elections. 'The Kansas Democratic Party used ranked choice voting in the 2020 presidential primary, and even though they say it's complicated, it turns out people seemed to understand how to use their ballot,' Senator Marci Francisco, D-Lawrence, told Nexstar's Kansas Capitol Bureau on Monday. Marci was one of 10 senators, mostly democrats, who voted not to ban ranked choice voting in Kansas. Those in favor of a ban on ranked choice voting say that the system makes the voting process more complicated. Additionally, it can be difficult to implement due to high costs associated with updating voting machine software. Activists protest possible Medicaid cuts outside KS Rep. Derek Schmidt's Topeka office However, those against a ban believe ranked choice voting is the best way to find the most popular candidate in any given election. They believe it also helps third party candidates who are often not represented in a one choice voting system. 13 other states have banned ranked choice voting, and all bans have taken effect within the past 4 years. For more Capitol Bureau news, click here. Keep up with the latest breaking news in northeast Kansas by downloading our mobile app and by signing up for our news email alerts. Sign up for our Storm Track Weather app by clicking here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Chicago among cities with Monday rallies in protest of Calif. National Guard deployment
CHICAGO (WGN) — Immigrant, civil rights and labor groups in more than a dozen US cities on Monday, including Chicago, held rallies in protest of the new phase in the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. President Donald Trump over the weekend federalized the California National Guard after protestors and law enforcement faced off in Los Angeles. The rising tension follows last week's immigration crackdown in Chicago, in which advocates accused Chicago police of assisting Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, a claim the department denies. 'What we saw last week and over the weekend wasn't lawful enforcement it was a belligerent power grab,' Rep. Jesus 'Chuy' Garcia said at a Monday rally at Daley Plaza. 'This isn't about safety. This is about control. Fear is the tactic. Silence is the goal. This is not about immigration. This is about domination of all of our communities.' What to know about Trump's deployment of National Guard troops California governor to sue Trump over National Guard deployments ICE arrests at Chicago immigration building spark protest; advocates speak out The event in Chicago coincided with planned rallies from coast to coast, including Seattle, Denver, Atlanta, Philadelphia and Boston. 'Their tactic to incite violence is clearly intentional and it creates a moment that Trump will certainly exploit to enact even more harm,' said Lawrence Benito, CEO of the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights. Groups gathered Monday also spoke out against Trump's extensive new travel ban barring nationals of 12 countries from entering the U.S. The ban mostly affects countries in Africa and the Middle East. The president made the final call on signing the order following the June 1 antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado. 'We must be clear that this is undeniably rooted in anti-Muslim, anti-Black … racism,' said Nadiah Alyafai with the Arab American Action Network. In Washington, House Republicans are set to grill three blue state governors about their cooperation with ICE. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker is set to testify Thursday along with the governors of New York and Minnesota. As first reported by the Chicago Sun-Times, a source tells WGN-TV that Pritzker has retained a Washington, D.C. law firm to help him prep, paying for the services out of his own pocket. He's also getting a hand from a former White House counsel to President Joe Biden. A Pritzker spokesman says the governor will show that the Illinois TRUST Act is fully compliant with federal law. The law, signed by Republican Bruce Rauner, enables people regardless of immigration status to report crime and call emergency services. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
19 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump hails $1K-per-child ‘Trump Accounts' during White House roundtable
(NEXSTAR) – On Monday, President Trump promoted the so-called 'Trump Accounts' during a roundtable meeting with lawmakers and business leaders, including the CEOs of Dell, Uber and Goldman Sachs, among others. Related video above: Trump and Musk feud continues over 'big, beautiful bill' 'This is a pro-family initiative that will help millions of Americans harness the strength of our economy to lift up the next generation,' Trump said at the meeting. 'They'll really be getting a big jump on life, especially if we get a little bit lucky with some of the numbers and the economy.' The proposal, part of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' would create tax-deferred investment accounts for infants that start with $1,000 per child. Once the child reaches age 18, they would be able to take out money to put toward a down payment for a home, education or to start a small business. If the money is used for other purposes, it'll be taxed at a higher rate. Dell CEO Michael Dell called the proposed accounts a 'simple yet powerful way to transform lives' Monday. Dell and the other assembled CEOs were expected to earmark billions of dollars to be invested in the Trump Accounts for their employees' children. 'Decades of research has shown that giving children a financial head start profoundly impacts their long-term success,' Dell said, according to the White House. 'With these accounts, children will be much more likely to graduate from college, to start a business, to buy a home, and achieve lifelong financial stability.' In order to qualify for one of the accounts, the child must have at least one parent with a Social Security number with work authorizations, meaning that some babies born in the U.S. to immigrant parents might not qualify. The money will be invested in an index fund where it will grow until the child reaches 18 and can withdraw funds to buy a home, pay for education or start a small business. Money spent on other things would be taxed at a higher rate. Families, guardians and private entities will be able to deposit up to $5,000 more per year. While the investment would be symbolically meaningful, it's a relatively small financial commitment to addressing child poverty in the wider $7 trillion federal budget. Assuming a 7% return, the $1,000 would grow to roughly $3,570 over 18 years. It builds on the concept of 'baby bonds,' which two states — California and Connecticut — and the District of Columbia have introduced as a way to reduce gaps between wealthy people and poor people. Economist Darrick Hamilton of The New School, who first pitched the idea of baby bonds a quarter-century ago, said the GOP proposal would exacerbate rather than reduce wealth gaps. When he dreamed up baby bonds, he envisioned a program that would be universal but would give children from poor families a larger endowment than their wealthier peers, in an attempt to level the playing field. The money would be handled by the government, not by private firms on Wall Street. 'It is upside down,' Hamilton said. 'It's going to enhance inequality.' Hamilton added that $1,000 — even with interest — would not be enough to make a significant difference for a child living in poverty. A Silicon Valley investor who created the blueprint for the proposal, Brad Gerstner, said in an interview with CNBC last year that the accounts could help address the wealth gap and the loss of faith in capitalism that represent an existential crisis for the U.S. 'The rise and fall of nations occurs when you have a wealth gap that grows, when you have people who lose faith in the system,' Gerstner said. 'We're not agentless. We can do something.' The Associated Press contributed to this report.
