
Trump funding freeze raises uncertainty for universities, states and nonprofits
A White House directive to pause federal grants and loans raised uncertainty and fears among many who depend on federal aid before a judge intervened Tuesday to temporarily block it from taking effect.
President Donald Trump 's administration said the freeze would not affect federal assistance to individuals, such as Social Security, Medicare, food stamps, student loans and scholarships. But it said a pause is necessary to ensure funding for other programs complies with Trump's executive orders, which aim to reverse progressive policies on transgender rights, environmental justice and diversity, equity and inclusion.
A federal judge blocked the directive just minutes before it was to kick in Tuesday. The order placed it on hold until next Monday while legal wrangling continues.
States on the edge
States on average receive about 30% of their revenues from the federal government, according to Federal Funds Information for States, a nonprofit that analyzes the affect of federal actions on states. Although the federal government has rescinded unspent funds in the past, it hasn't normally halted grants on the front-end, said Marcia Howard, executive director of Federal Funds Information for States.
The grant pause is perhaps most similar to a federal government shutdown, when a congressional impasse on spending legislation delays federal payments for some state and local services. In most of those circumstances, a couple weeks delay "isn't hugely disruptive,' Howard said.
But some state officials are nonetheless anxious.
'If the federal government coughs, Maryland catches pneumonia,' state Senate President Bill Ferguson said Tuesday, while discussing how the grant freeze could affect the state.
Higher education faces uncertainty
Universities around the country are scrambling to determine how a funding freeze could affect their research programs, students and faculty.
University of North Carolina administrators sent a campus email urging patience until decisions can be confirmed directly from federal agencies.
'The messaging is, 'Try not to panic, and sit tight,'' said psychology professor Keely Muscatell. 'But I also think it's a lot easier said than done.'
A University of Florida memo obtained by the Associated Press indicates that the university is advising faculty to continue grant-related activities unless they have been specially told that the research has been suspended.
But at Gallaudet University in Washington, D.C., researchers said they were told to stop work on grant-funded projects. If the funding freeze goes forward, scientists may miss deadlines to present and share their work, said researcher Lorna Quandt, who has a grant application pending to fund interpreters to accompany deaf students to an upcoming conference.
The Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities said a freeze would "sideline world-leading American scientists who are working toward cures for cancer, developing breakthroughs in AI and quantum computing, driving progress in advanced manufacturing, and supporting American farmers.'
Road funding may keep rolling
For many highway projects that are partially funded by federal grants, states pay the contractors directly then seek reimbursement from the federal government. There initially was widespread concern among state transportation leaders that states 'would be left holding the bag,' but further clarification from the White House calmed some nerves, said Jim Tymon, executive director of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
Although some grants, particularly those awarded at the discretion of the federal government, could still be at risk, Tymon said he is now confident the Trump administration isn't targeting the formula-based grants that states use to set their own transportation priorities and pay for roads.
'We're not as panicked as maybe we had been,' he said.
Early childhood providers raise fears
Some operators of federally funded Head Start centers, which work with 800,000 kids and low-income families nationwide, initially were concerned that the freeze could mean closing their doors as soon Wednesday. Operators logged on to a website where they typically draw down their federal grants and discovered they no longer had access to the money, which they need to pay their employees and vendors.
'Is it a short-term thing? Is this a glitch? Is it a long-term thing? All of those things, we just really don't know at this point,' said Tommy Sheridan, deputy director of the National Head Start Association. 'That's really adding to the fear and the concern.'
Nonprofit groups launch a challenge
A coalition of nonprofit groups filed a lawsuit Tuesday against the funding freeze. The nonprofit Democracy Forward, a public interest litigation group, wrote that the White House's memo fails to explain its legal authority "to gut every grant program in the federal government.'
The National Science Foundation postponed this week's grant review panels and is pausing the distribution of new or existing awards.
The National Crime Victim Law Institute described the Trump administration action as a 'devastating blow' to nonprofits such as the institute.
'These grants are the backbone of critical programs for those in need across this country,' executive director Meg Garvin said. 'Without this funding, nonprofits face the heartbreaking reality of scaling back services, cutting essential programs, and, in some cases, closing their doors entirely."
Tribal groups could be affected
Tribal nations, 'more so than almost any other community, will be negatively impacted' by a freeze on federal funding, said John Echohawk, executive director of the Native American Rights Fund. He said tribal nations rely on federal funding for public safety, healthcare, education, infrastructure "and the basic needs of our most vulnerable citizens."
'The United States must fulfill its trust obligation to protect Tribal treaty rights, lands, assets, and resources,' he said.
Other services could see delays
North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein said on X he is 'concerned that freezing federal funding will hurt North Carolinians, especially those recovering' from Hurricane Helene in western North Carolina. Stein, a Democrat, said he is seeking clarity from federal officials and working to ensure people in the storm-affected areas get the support they need.
The federal government also supports state programs that fund billions of dollars in drinking water and sewage infrastructure. Money the federal government already sent out could probably be used, but the pause calls into question new spending, said Alan Roberson, executive director of the Association of State Drinking Water Administrators.
The Biden administration had stipulated that some of those funds go to disadvantaged communities, a term tied to its environmental justice efforts that the Trump administration has targeted for elimination. The fate of that effort 'is to be determined, and we recognize that,' Roberson said.
___
Associated Press writers Moriah Balingit in Washington, D.C.; Thalia Beaty in New York; Becky Bohrer in Juneau, Alaska; Fernando Figueroa in Austin, Texas; Stephanie Matat in West Palm Beach, Florida; Jeff McMurray in Chicago; Cheyanne Mumphrey in Phoenix; Michael Phillis in St. Louis; Adithi Ramakrishnan in New York; Gary D. Robertson and Makiya Seminera in Raleigh, North Carolina; Adrian Sainz in Memphis, Tennessee; and Brian Witte in Annapolis, Maryland.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Bank of England weighs interest rate cut as Budget costs hammer jobs market
Unemployment is at its highest level since July 2021 as the labour cost implications of the Chancellor's Autumn Budget continue to weigh on the UK jobs market. The jobless rate rose to 4.6 per cent in the three months to May, while vacancies were slashed by 63,000 to 736,000 and payroll numbers saw their largest slump since May 2020, according to data from the Office for National Statistics. It follows the introduction of higher national insurance contributions and a national living wage hike the previous month. Wage growth also eased more than expected to 5.4 per cent year-on-year before bonuses, though this remains roughly 2.1 per cent above the rate of overall inflation in real terms. Private sector regulator wages, a figure closely monitored by the Bank of England, fell from 5.5 to 5.1 per cent, but remain well above the 3 per cent target the central bank thinks is consistent with its goal of 2 per cent overall inflation. It follows separate data published earlier on Tuesday that showed retail sales grew at their slowest pace in six months in May, adding to signs of economic deterioration. The data provides further food for thought for the BoE, which must weigh signs of economic weakness with growing inflationary pressures when making its latest decision on the direct of interest rates next week. BoE Governor Andrew Bailey told MPs last week the pace of interest rate cuts is now 'shrouded in a lot more uncertainty', citing 'heightened unpredictably' as US President's Donald Trump's trade tariffs weigh on the global economy. The bank will be armed with fresh GDP data published later this week when it makes its decision, but the Monetary Policy Committee is currently forecast to keep base rate on hold at its current level of 4.25 per cent. The unemployment rate rose again in the three months to May Two more base rate cuts tipped for this year Thomas Pugh, economist at RSM UK, said: The labour market is clearly cooling, and we are becoming more concerned about demand for labour. 'Indeed, rather than the labour market starting to recover in May, the early indications are that easing accelerated. 'The hawks on the MPC will still be too concerned about strong wage growth to consider going for another rate cut in June. But today's data leaves the MPC on its gradual rate cutting path.' Current market pricing suggests the BoE will cut interest rates at least one more time this year by 25 basis points to 4 per cent, with a slight majority of investors predicting a second cut of the same size to 3.75 per cent. Richard Carter, head of fixed interest research at Quilter Cheviot, said: 'Despite what is an obviously slowing economy, many risks remain present in the world that could easily allow inflation to climb higher again, principally an escalation of the trade war come July when Donald Trump's 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs ends. 'We will need to see a significant further weakening of the labour market here in the UK before the Bank of England chooses to up the pace of its rate cuts.'


STV News
28 minutes ago
- STV News
Trump sends thousands more troops to LA as unrest continues
US President Donald Trump has deployed a further 2,000 National Guard troops as well as 700 US Marines to LA, escalating a military presence local officials describe as unhelpful and 'sowing terror.' An initial 2,000 troops began arriving on Sunday, which saw the most violence out of three days, with Governor Gavin Newsom claiming only 300 troops were actually used. 'The first 2,000? Given no food or water. Only approx. 300 are deployed – the rest are sitting, unused, in federal buildings without orders,' Newsom posted on X. Despite Monday's protests being less violent, Trump has continued to describe Los Angeles in dire terms that Mayor Karen Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. They say he is putting public safety at risk by adding military personnel, even though police say they don't need the help. Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said in a statement he was confident in the police department's ability to handle large-scale demonstrations and that the Marines' arrival without coordinating with the police department presented a 'significant logistical and operational challenge' for them. Newsom called the deployments reckless and 'disrespectful to our troops' in a post on X. Bass also criticised the deployment of National Guard troops and marines, calling it a 'deliberate attempt' by the Trump administration to 'create disorder and chaos in our city.' 'I feel like we are part of an experiment that we did not ask to be a part of,' Bass said. A line of California National Guard, stand in formation guarding a Federal Building in downtown Los Angeles. / Credit: AP The protests began Friday in downtown Los Angeles after federal immigration authorities arrested more than 40 people across the city. The smell of smoke hung in the air downtown Monday, one day after crowds blocked a major road and set self-driving cars on fire as police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades. Additional protests against immigration raids continued into the evening on Monday in several other cities, including San Francisco and Santa Ana in California and Dallas and Austin in Texas. Local officials have pushed back against the president's orders, with California Attorney General Rob Bonta filing a lawsuit over the use of National Guard troops. He told reporters in his announcement Monday that Trump had 'trampled' the state's sovereignty. 'We don't take lightly to the president abusing his authority and unlawfully mobilising California National Guard troops,' Bonta said. He sought a court order declaring Trump's use of the Guard unlawful and asking for a restraining order to halt the deployment. Trump said Monday that the city would have been 'completely obliterated' if he had not deployed the Guard. Despite their presence, there has been limited engagement so far between the Guard and protesters while local law enforcement implements crowd control. A police officer fires a soft round near the metropolitan detention center of downtown Los Angeles. / Credit: AP The deployment appeared to be the first time in decades that a state's National Guard was activated without a request from its governor, a significant escalation against those who have sought to hinder the administration's mass deportation efforts. The last time the National Guard was activated without a governor's permission was in 1965, when President Lyndon B Johnson sent troops to protect a civil rights march in Alabama, according to the Brennan Centre for Justice. In a directive Saturday, Trump invoked a legal provision allowing him to deploy federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


The Sun
37 minutes ago
- The Sun
Trump sends 700 Marines & another 2k National Guard to riot-ravaged LA as chaos spreads with arrests in NYC & Texas
DONALD Trump is sending 700 Marines and another 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles to defend the city from immigration raid riots. Violent protests have continued to spread across the US over the past 24 hours with lawless demonstrators arrested in California, New York and Texas. 5 5 5 5 The City of Angels has been engulfed in anarchy over the past four days as rioters have burned cars and battled with cops. On Monday, the issues continued across LA with dozens of arrests made as police and rioters clashed once more. The scenes of violence which sparked on Sunday night were toned down on Monday despite the continued issues. Police were again struck by fireworks and forced to deploy tear gas and pepper gas on incoming demonstrators. Buses were even used to load up those detained and ship them off to police stations for the evening. A defiant Trump is still hoping for a quick end to the protests so he can enforce his immigration policy. It comes as the President also issued a searing warning to Gavin Newsom and called for the California Governor's arrest. The President has claimed LA - a sanctuary city - has now been "invaded" by illegal immigrants. He raged "If they spit, we'll hit" after reports of masked rioters spitting in the face of cops emerged. Trump said: "I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before." His latest call has seen the US Marines drafted in to help restore order. They will be tasked with protecting federal property and federal personnel, according to Fox News. And another 2,000 National Guard troops will be deployed across the city after Trump already ordered 1,000 members to defend the city. The decision to bolster up LA's police force was widely criticized by California's leadership. Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass insisted the federal troops only escalated the peaceful protests into riots on Sunday night. The Governor even shot back against Trump saying: "This isn't about public safety. It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego." California then officially sued the Trump administration to try and stop more federal troops being sent. Trump lashed out at Newsom in response and told reporters he agreed with border czar Tom Homan that the Governor should be arrested because he's "grossly incompetent." Newsom fired back on X, slamming Trump's threat as "an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." Homan said there are no official plans to arrest Newsom. The exchange came hours after Trump said Newsom and Bass should thank him because the city would be "completely obliterated" if he hadn't mobilized the Guard. Rioters looted shops, set self-driving Waymo cars on fire, and blocked off the 101 Freeway on Sunday night. Cops used flash-bang explosives and pepper balls to push back the protesters, even shooting a TV reporter with rubber bullets live on air at the terrifying scene. 5 By What is the US National Guard? THE US National Guard is a reserve military force made up of part-time service members who typically hold civilian jobs but can be activated for federal or state duty. Each state, territory, and the District of Columbia has its own National Guard, which can be mobilized by the state governor or the President. Can the President call the National Guard for local matters? Yes, but with limits. Normally, governors deploy their state's National Guard to handle local emergencies like natural disasters, protests, or civil unrest. The President can federalize the National Guard under specific laws, such as the Insurrection Act. This allows them to respond to domestic unrest if it's deemed beyond the capacity of local or state authorities. When federalized, National Guard troops operate under presidential command rather than the governor's. While it's unusual, a president can deploy the National Guard into a state without a governor's consent if certain legal thresholds are met. These typically involve threats to federal property, national security, or widespread breakdowns in public order. However, such actions are often politically and legally controversial. 9th Jun 2025, 07:13 By Georgie English Trump vs California Despite the carnage flooding the streets, California's government has said they have the situation under control. Governor Gavin Newsom even accused Trump of "inflaming tensions" by deploying the National Guard. The pair have a long history of heated disputes over policy. Newsom formerly requested Trump remove the guard members, which he called a "serious breach of state sovereignty". Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass added the arrival of troops is a "dangerous escalation". She said: "We do not want to play in to the [Trump] administration's hands." "What we're seeing in Los Angeles is chaos provoked by the administration." Trump fired back at California's government as he called them "incompetent". Newsom and Trump reportedly spoke for 40 minutes by phone on Saturday, though details of their conversation have not been disclosed. The deployment of troops marks the first time in six decades that a state's National Guard was activated without a request from its governor, according to the Brennan Center for Justice.