Cambridge takes up to £4.9m from Chinese Communist Party-linked donor
Cambridge was under pressure on Thursday night to hand back the cash amid claims that accepting the 'tainted' money compromised its academic independence.
The donor Daryl Ng, who is estimated to be worth more than £11billion and whose family's business empire includes the Sino Group, has worked for both Carrie Lam and John Lee Ka-chiu, the former and serving chief executives of Hong Kong respectively.
Mr Ng has served on two regional advisory committees in mainland China, which form part of the Chinese Communist Party's governing structures, and has praised Beijing's approach to Hong Kong.
Both Lam and Lee were sanctioned by the US Treasury in 2020 for their crackdown on free speech and political freedoms in the city, carried out at the behest of Beijing. It was widely condemned by western Governments after causing mass protests.
The UK has also accused Hong Kong's leaders and Beijing of reneging on legal commitments that the city maintain a high degree of autonomy. Since the clampdown began, more than 150,000 Hongkongers have fled to Britain under the British National Overseas visa route.
Now, a freedom of information request has revealed that Cambridge University last year accepted a donation of between £1 million and £4.99 million from Mr Ng to fund a land economy PhD scholarship. Cambridge refused to specify the exact sum.
Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the former Tory leader, said Cambridge should hand back the money. He said: 'What Cambridge is trying to do is to disguise the nature of his links to the Chinese Communist Party and try to do it in a way that doesn't alert anybody. But they have been found out.
'This is not the only time. My worry is that Cambridge has pretty much sold out to China. Anything that comes from China is going to be money that is tainted by the CCP's own actions.
'It is a brutal Government that practises genocide and slave labour. Cambridge should hand [the donation] back.'
Luke de Pulford, the executive director of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, said: 'This is a characteristic failure of due-diligence by Cambridge, which has one of the worst Beijing dependency problems of any UK university.
'Ng enjoys senior CCP positions and is literally all over the Chinese internet calling for Hongkongers to use their influence abroad. This kind of investment is not benevolent. It will come at a heavy price for Cambridge, where, as we have seen time and again across the UK, academic freedom will suffer.'
Mr Ng, whose family is originally from Singapore, was born in Hong Kong and has spent most of his career working for his family's Hong Kong real estate businesses as deputy chair of the Sino Group.
He has also built deep political ties in the former British colony and mainland China. In 2017, he served as deputy director of Lam's election campaign to become Hong Kong's chief executive. Five years later, he also formed part of the three-member campaign finance team for Lee, who replaced Lam as chief executive.
During Lam's tenure, Beijing imposed a new national security law on Hong Kong, granting it and the Hong Kong authorities more power to stifle opposition to the two respective governments.
Mr Ng has served on municipal people's political consultative committees for Sichuan province and Beijing, which granted him an award in 2020 that is given to 'those who love the motherland, are committed to the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, and have made outstanding contributions to international cooperation and exchanges'.
Such committees form part of China's 'patriotic united front' and have no official legislative role. According to the Taiwanese government, members are 'hand-picked to function as a rubber stamp' of CCP policy.
In August last year, the same month he donated to Cambridge, Mr Ng also wrote an article praising the CCP's 'visionary grand design [with] promising implications for Hong Kong' in the South China Morning Post.
When his donation was announced by Cambridge, the university made no reference to the sum of money or his political affiliations, citing only his 'passion for real estate' and that the studentship would be named in honour of his grandfather who studied at Cambridge in the 1940s.
Mr Ng is just one of several wealthy donors to have given to the university since the clampdown in Hong Kong began. In the past four years, it received £24.45 million from donors in the city, compared with just £13.57 million in the previous four-year period.
Cambridge has accepted multiple donations from China particularly under Stephen Toope, its former vice-chancellor. This week, Jesus College announced that its controversial China Forum would close after criticism over opaque funding arrangements and avoiding controversial subjects such as treatment of the minority Uyghurs.
A Cambridge university spokesman said: 'The studentship was funded by Mr Ng, a Singaporean citizen, to honour his late Singaporean grandfather who studied at Cambridge in the 1940s. It supports talented students of all nationalities to undertake research. The University has a robust system for reviewing strategic relationships, donations, and sources of funding.'
Mr Ng has been contacted for comment via his company.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EasyJet launches cabin crew recruitment drive targeting young people
Airline easyJet is launching a new cabin crew recruitment drive – targeting young people who are not in employment, education or training. The airline is set to take on almost 1,000 new cabin crew for 2026, and is encouraging young adults and school leavers to consider applying. New research commissioned by easyJet of 2,000 16 to 24-year-olds showed there were still misconceptions around the role of cabin crew which prevented them from pursuing it as a career. More than nine in 10 of those surveyed were unaware there are no minimum educational qualifications required to apply for the job, with two in three believing they would be under-qualified for cabin crew training. As a result, almost nine in 10 said they had never considered a career working for an airline. Michael Brown, director of cabin services at easyJet, said: 'We want to show young people that being cabin crew is more than just a job – it's a career filled with variety, teamwork and opportunity, which has so much to offer to so many people as well as offering a pathway to progress in working within our wider industry too. 'If you have enthusiasm, people skills and a willingness to learn something new, our taster sessions could be the perfect first step towards a new opportunity.' Aviation minister Mike Kane said: 'It's fantastic to see British firm easyJet investing in our young people, encouraging and inspiring them into careers in aviation. 'We are determined to break down barriers to opportunity in the UK to deliver our Plan for Change so everyone can pursue and progress in rewarding careers.' Error al recuperar los datos Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
British manufacturers lagging behind international competitors on automation
British manufacturing companies have been lagging behind international competitors over the last two decades, falling down global automation tables, according to a report. Use of robotics and AI systems was poor, with training of people in relevant digital skills well below what is needed to catch up, it was warned. The report by Make UK and Sage said nearly half of British manufacturers identify a lack of technical skills as the biggest hurdle to improving their use of innovative advanced technologies. Projects which do start often stall after implementation stage, because companies cannot find the help and advice they need to make the technologies work well. Seamus Nevin, chief economist at Make UK said: 'Time and again, we hear from small and medium-sized manufacturers that they're keen to adopt new technologies, but are being held back by fragmented support, complex funding systems, and a lack of accessible, appropriate digital skills training. 'If we want to unlock a £150 billion boost to UK GDP by 2035, we must make it easier for SMEs to adopt automation and AI.' A Government spokesperson said: 'We are taking a range of actions to remove the barriers holding back growth and unleash the potential of AI in our economy, including through the AI opportunities action plan. 'Our modern industrial strategy has also introduced ambitious plans to drive growth and investment across the UK, and our Plan for Change will ensure our country continues to be the best place to invest and do business.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


CNN
15 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump gave China the AI chips it wanted. Beijing isn't saying thank you
In a surprising reversal of the United States' years-long technology restrictions on China, President Donald Trump last month allowed Nvidia to resume sales of a key AI chip designed specifically for the Chinese market. Yet rather than celebrating, Beijing's response has been noticeably lukewarm, despite having long urged Washington to ease the stringent export controls. In the weeks since the policy U-turn, Beijing has called the chip a security risk, summoned Nvidia for explanations and discouraged its companies from using it. The less-than-welcoming sentiment reflects Beijing's drive to build a self-sufficient semiconductor supply chain – and its confidence in the progress its rapidly advancing chip industry has made. But the cold shoulder may also represent some political posturing. Despite significant advances in its semiconductor sector, China still needs America's chips and technology. Experts said China's national champion Huawei has developed chips with performance comparable to — and in some cases surpassing — the newly approved Nvidia chip. However, China still wants the more advanced AI processors that remain blocked under US export controls. In the years since Trump first imposed tech restrictions on Huawei during his first term, China's chip technology has made significant strides, spurred by the frustration that mounted as Washington piled on export controls, said Xiang Ligang, director-general of a Beijing-based technology industry group and an advisor to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. 'We have this capability, it's not as they imagine – that if China is blocked, China won't be able to function, or that China will be finished,' he said. To him, the policy about-face only reflects the importance of having a wholly homegrown chip supply chain. 'For Chinese companies, we may only have one choice if we wish to ensure a relatively secure supply of chips – that means relying on our own domestically produced chips,' Xiang said. That may be China's goal, but in the high-stakes AI race, with all its national security implications, the US remains the leader, at least for now. The chip in focus is Nvidia's H20, which was released by the AI chip leader last year to maintain access to the Chinese market following strict export controls put in place under the Biden administration that stopped the export of chips with high processing power. Last month, Trump greenlit the sales of the chip to China after banning it in April as the US trade frictions with China deepened. Trump has justified his decision by calling the chip 'obsolete,' as it lags behind the company's cutting-edge AI processors like Blackwell or H100, from which H20 is derived. He and his officials appeared to have embraced a view long promoted by Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang – that US can maintain its tech leadership only through ensuring its chips remain the global standard. 'You want to sell the Chinese enough that their developers get addicted to the American technology stack,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last month. But the dramatic reversal has fueled questions about Trump's transactional approach to national security – once considered off-limits to bargaining. China, on the other hand, is alarmed by the alleged security risks of Nvidia's H20s like 'tracking and positioning' and 'remote shutdown' features, capabilities that some US lawmakers have called for but Nvidia denies it has placed in its chips. China's cyberspace watchdog and industry ministry have since summoned the American chip giant over the security concerns and urged firms to avoid H20 chips, a development which was previously reported by Bloomberg. One major Chinese tech company which has developed its AI models has received notice from the authorities urging it to exercise caution in the use of H20s, and advising it not to purchase them, a company insider said on the condition of anonymity. CNN has reached out to the ministry and the cyberspace authorities for comment. An Nvidia spokesperson told CNN that NVIDIA 'does not have 'backdoors' in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them.' 'Banning the sale of H20 in China would only harm US economic and technology leadership with zero national security benefit,' the spokesperson added. But China believes the US isn't playing fairly, Xiang said. 'What we actually want, you refuse to sell us. For the things you already consider obsolete, you still want to dump them into our market and occupy our market. Do you really think we're that naive?' he said. Despite Beijing's concerns and the H20's reduced performance, the chips remain highly sought after by Chinese companies. Equity research firm Bernstein estimated that shipment of the chips to China this year would have reached 1.5 million units, or about 23 billion in revenue, without Trump's export restrictions. Major buyers include Chinese tech giants such as TikTok owner ByteDance, Alibaba and Tencent. While Huawei's top AI chips excel in computing power – one of the key measures in evaluating processors' performance – in comparison with H20, they fall short in terms of memory bandwidth, which determines how much data can move between a chip's memory and computing unit. That bandwidth depends on a technology known as High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) used in AI chips to ensure efficient data transmission in AI model training. China's top HBM maker CXMT, or ChangXin Memory Technologies, is still about three to four years behind industry leaders like South Korea's SK Hynix and Samsung, and American Micron, according to MS Hwang, research director at Counterpoint Research, a research firm. Last year, the Biden administration further tightened export controls on China, including restrictions on HBM sales, forcing Chinese companies to rely on existing stockpiles. Beijing has requested Washington to lift restrictions on HBM as part of the trade deal negotiations, Financial Times reported this week. Key appeal of H20 for Chinese companies also lies in Huawei's limited production capacity and Nvidia's well-established ecosystem, said Qingyuan Lin, senior analyst at Bernstein focusing China's semiconductor industry. 'Even when you want to completely replace the H20 demand with the local guys, they're not able to deliver the amount of chips that's needed,' he said. The supply bottlenecks stem from constraints in scaling up production of both the manufacturing of computing units of the AI chips and the integration of various components in them, a technology known as advanced packaging in the industry, Lin said. Bernstein estimated that Huawei's shipments of its advanced AI chips in 2025 would amount to around 700,000 units, still far short of the demand in the country. CNN has reached out to Huawei for comment. Meanwhile, Nvidia's powerful ecosystem, which integrates its chips with its software platform, has created what experts call a 'moat,' making it difficult and costly for AI developers who train models on its software to switch to alternatives. 'The H20 comes with a complete ecosystem covering both hardware and software support, ensuring better compatibility and ease of integration,' said Brady Wang, associate director at Counterpoint. 'This ecosystem maturity is still a challenge for many Chinese-developed chips, making the H20 more attractive despite its cost disadvantage.' Still, experts said China's rapid progress in semiconductor technology should not be underestimated. Years of tightening export controls have injected both urgency and opportunity into Beijing's push for self-sufficiency, Lin said. While chipmaking technology appeared to stall after Huawei's 2023 flagship smartphone showcased advanced chips that American officials had deemed extremely difficult to produce, domestic chipmaking equipment companies have been steadily gaining ground, he said. 'The local guys actually had very little chance to gain share from the global players because of the technology gap, but export controls created a market that didn't exist before and accelerated the domestic substitution,' he said. Bernstein projects that the percentage of homemade AI chips in China will surge from 17% in 2023 to 55% by 2027, while American suppliers like Nvidia and AMD will shrink to 45% from 83%. In April, Huang of Nvidia met with Trump in Washington, urging the administration to loosen export controls on chips and saying that the diffusion of American AI technology around the world needs to be accelerated. 'There's no question that Huawei is one of the most formidable technology companies in the world…they made enormous progress in the last several years,' he said. 'China is right behind us. We're very, very close.' CNN's Hassan Tayir and Fred He contributed reporting.