Fuel Supply Cut After Takeoff, shows Report
The preliminary report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) did not recommend action against the manufacturer Boeing, or engine supplier General Electric, indicating no major fault with the plane or its engines, aviation safety experts said.
AAIB said analysis of the aircraft's cockpit voice recorder (CVR) and flight data recorder (FDR) showed both fuel control switches, which regulate flow to the engines, had been disengaged seconds after lift-off.
Ten seconds later, the switches were turned on again, but the plane failed to regain power fast enough to stop its descent, before crashing.
The fuel cut-off switches in a modern aircraft such as the Boeing 787 are located below the thrust lever and have safeguards such as a metal lock, as well as a guard built around them, to avoid accidental switching off. The safeguards were built in after multiple incidents of unintentional fuel shut-off on older generation planes.
The report also pointed to apparent confusion over the rapidly-unfolding scenario between the two pilots. 'In the CVR, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he cut off. The other pilot responded that he did not do so,' the report said.
Sumeet Sabharwal, with more than 15,000 hours of flying experience, was the captain of Air India flight AI71 on a scheduled service from Ahmedabad to Gatwick. First Officer Clive Kunder had 3,400 hours of flying experience, according to Air India.
The AAIB report did not offer any final conclusion about the factors that could have led to the fuel switches getting turned off.
A person aware of the development said investigators will now determine whether any software problem with the plane's control could have led to the confusion. The person pointed to the possibility of a second interim report if there are more significant findings, but safety experts said investigators have more or less determined the cause to be human error. 'It's not Boeing or the engines, as we can see from the fact that there have been no recommendations for them,' said John Goglia, a former member of the National Transportation Safety Board of the US.
'They clearly say somebody turning fuel switches off at an inappropriate moment. I believe the investigation will now focus on determining whether the act was intentional,' said Goglia.
Goglia said the presence of an aviation psychologist at the initial stage of an air crash probe is very unusual, and indicates the investigators were focusing more on the angle of human error.
The AAIB team probing the crash also comprises a psychologist. Air India said it will fully cooperate with investigators.
'Boeing will defer to India's AAIB to provide information about Air India Flight 171, in adherence with the United Nations International Civil Aviation Organization protocol known as Annex 13,' the American aircraft manufacturer said.
AAIB also noted that the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), in 2018, recommended airlines inspect the fuel control switches on the 787 and other Boeings, after a few airlines reported incidents of the fuel-locking mechanisms getting disengaged. The FAA, however, mentioned the recommendations were not mandatory.
Moreover, the fuel switches on the crashed plane had been changed when Air India replaced the throttle control module — once in 2019 and then in 2023. A maintenance record of June 11 for the same aircraft, a day before the crash, did not reveal any fault with any critical part.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Questions mount over gaps, error in ‘opaque' AI prelim crash report
Kolkata: Veteran pilots from various airlines who reviewed the preliminary AI 171 crash report have questioned whether a software glitch or mechanical failure — which could cause fuel valves in a Boeing 787 Dreamliner to switch off — was ruled out before it was published. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now An experienced pilot said it was curious that the report did not even mention this possibility. "On the B 787, fuel shut-off valves are controlled via remote data units (RDUs). While the left and right engines have independent RDUs, power is supplied via remote power distribution units (RDPUs), which are software-based electrical substations. Since RCDs and RDPUs are networked, a common software error or network fault could potentially impact both engines," the pilot said. Another industry veteran pointed out that valve closure due to power interruption or software glitches was flagged during the initial rollout of B 787. Pilots have also flagged issues in the report like incorrect and incomplete information, which has sparked speculation about pilot culpability. While appreciating the move to publish a report on the primary findings, pilots pointed out that even basic information, like the flying hours of Captain Sumeet Sabharwal mentioned, was erroneous. Sabharwal's airline transport pilot licence was issued on May 14, 2021. With DGCA stipulating a maximum of 1,000 flying hours a year, he could have 4,000 hours under his belt as pilot in charge by May 2025. The report, however, logs this at 8,260 hours. Pilots also allege that the report is deliberately opaque on several issues and uses words and phrases selectively to not only hint at human error but insinuate ill intent behind the accident. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They make three arguments to substantiate this. First, just one brief exchange between the captain and the first officer is presented in the report in indirect speech, instead of releasing the entire transcript of the interaction in the 21 minutes between when the flight departed the parking bay and when it crashed. The most crucial section is the 1 minute 22 seconds between ATC takeoff clearance and the Mayday call. "Why is the transcript of the conversation from the cockpit voice recorder not given in its entirety so that the context can be understood? The report states: 'In the cockpit, in the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cut off. The other pilot responded that he did not do so'," a pilot said. Pilots also pointed to the use of the phrase "transition" of fuel switches instead of attributing it to human action, and said it was an insinuation that the men in the cockpit were responsible for the catastrophic accident. A captain said: "In an extremely challenging and unprecedented situation, these men were trying their best to achieve the impossible. They were too close to the surface for recovery, which they did attempt per the checklist, which is a testament to their sound and calm minds." He said that in the case of dual engine loss, the full authority digital engine control (FADEC) that optimises engine performance is reset using the following procedure: start switches on; shift thrust lever to idle; shift fuel switches from run to cut off to run. "This is exactly what the pilots appear to have done and managed to get one engine to start revving up but rammed into a building before the engine could spool up," he said. Airline Pilots Association of India president Captain Sam Thomas said the tone and direction of the investigation suggested a bias towards pilot error. "ALPA-I categorically rejects this presumption and insists on a fair, evidence-based inquiry," he said.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Accusing Air India pilots a gross violation: Unions
New Delhi: The Indian Commercial Pilots' Association , a union of Air India pilots , has raised concerns about discussions suggesting that a deliberate action by one the pilots may have led to the crash of the Boeing 787 aircraft in Ahmedabad last month. The association termed such accusations and allegations against the pilots and flight crew a "gross violation of ethical reporting" and "disservice to the profession". The fuel control switches, which regulate the flow of fuel to the engine, of the aircraft had been disengaged seconds after lift-off, according to the initial findings of an investigation into the accident that claimed 275 lives. The preliminary report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) did not recommend action against the manufacturer Boeing, or engine supplier General Electric, indicating no major fault with the plane or its engines, safety experts said. According to the report, in the voice recordings from the cockpit, one of the pilots was heard asking why the switches were disengaged and the other replying that he did not do so. The AAIB report did not say whether the fuel flow was cut off deliberately or accidently. Live Events "In the aftermath of this incident, we are deeply disturbed by speculative narratives emerging in sections of the media and public discourse-particularly the reckless and unfounded insinuation of pilot suicide," the association said. "Let us be unequivocally clear: there is absolutely no basis for such a claim at this stage, and invoking such a serious allegation based on incomplete or preliminary information is not only irresponsible-it is deeply insensitive," it added. Any mention of pilot error or suicide "in the absence of verified evidence is a gross violation of ethical reporting and a disservice to the dignity of the profession," it said. Another group, the Airline Pilots' Association of India , also rejected any suggestion of a pilot error causing the accident, stating: "The tone and direction of the investigation suggest a bias toward pilot error. We categorically reject this presumption and insist on a fair, fact-based inquiry." The association renewed its call to be included in the investigation process, at least as observers. "Transparency and the inclusion of qualified personnel, especially line pilots, are essential for public trust," it said.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Air India replaced module in cockpit in crashed Dreamliner following Boeing directive
Air India replaced the Throttle Control Module (TCM) of the crashed Boeing 787-8 plane twice in the last six years following a directive from Boeing in 2019, sources said on Sunday. TCM includes fuel control switches, which have come to focus in the ongoing probe into the fatal crash as these switches were cut off immediately after takeoff of the ill-fated London-bound Dreamliner VT-ANB that crashed in Ahmedabad on June 12. The replacement of the TCM twice -- in 2019 and 2023 -- was mentioned in the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau's (AAIB) preliminary probe report into the crash that was released on Saturday. It also said the TCM replacement was not linked to the fuel control switches. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like When Knee Pain Hits, Start Eating These Foods, and Feel Your Pain Go Away (It's Genius) Read More Undo The source told PTI that a revised Maintenance Planning Document (MPD) was issued by Boeing for all the operators of the Dreamliners in 2019. As per the MPD, the operators have to change the TCM, which includes the fuel control switches, every 24,000 flight hours, the sources said. Live Events Since 2019, when the MPD was issued, the source said Air India changed the TCM in the ill-fated aircraft twice -- in 2019 and 2023. Queries sent to Air India remained unanswered. Specific details about the MPD could not be immediately ascertained. In response to questions sent to Boeing, a company spokesperson on Sunday referred to its statement issued on Saturday saying it will continue to support the investigation and Air India. "We will defer to the AAIB to provide information about AI171, in adherence with the UN International Civil Aviation Organization protocol known as Annex 13," the spokesperson said in the emailed statement. AAIB, in its report on Saturday, said that at this stage of investigation, "there are no recommended actions to B787-8 and/or GE GEnx-1B engine operators and manufacturers". Air India's Dreamliner VT-ANB, which crashed on June 12, was powered by GEnx-1B engines. According to the report, FAA issued Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin on December 17, 2018, regarding the potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature. "This SAIB was issued based on reports from operators of Model 737 airplanes that the fuel control switches were installed with the locking feature disengaged. The airworthiness concern was not considered an unsafe condition that would warrant airworthiness directive by the FAA," it said. AAIB also said the fuel control switch design, including the locking feature, is similar on various Boeing airplane models including part number 4TL837-3D, which is fitted in B787-8 aircraft VT-ANB. "As per the information from Air India, the suggested inspections were not carried out as the SAIB was advisory and not mandatory. The scrutiny of maintenance records revealed that the throttle control module was replaced on VT-ANB in 2019 and 2023. "However, the reason for the replacement was not linked to the fuel control switch. There has been no defect reported pertaining to the fuel control switch since 2023 on VT-ANB," the report said. After being in cut-off mode, the fuel control switches of the aircraft's two engines were turned on later but the London-bound aircraft could not get enough thrust and altitude before it crashed into a building in Ahmedabad killing 260 people.
