Re-ranking all 18 Big Ten football 2025 conference schedules from hardest to easiest
The 2025 college football season is inching closer, and as we cross the 100-day barrier until the season begins, you can feel anticipation start to build.
Even in the ever-changing world of college football, where teams are changing conferences and players are jumping from team to team like never before, one constant will always remain: fans complaining that their team's path to the finish line is more difficult than anyone else's.
A year ago, major questions faced the Oregon Ducks as they moved from the Pac-12 Conference to the Big Ten Conference. Would they be able to hold up against the elevated competition? Dan Lanning's team answered that right away, winning the Big Ten in their first season as conference members.
With marquee conference wins over Ohio State, Penn State, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Washington, the Ducks left little doubt that they were the best regular-season team. But will they be able to prove the same in 2025? More than that, how conducive is their schedule to establishing such a thing?
This is where the conversation about strength of schedule comes in. Who does Oregon play this year, and how tough will it be to get back to the conference title game? How does their path compare to other teams in the Big Ten, and what can this tell us about who might end up in Indianapolis at the start of December?
Those are things best answered by our strength of schedule rankings. Prior to the spring football season, we went through this exercise, using a combination of ESPN's SP+ rankings and combined opponent score to place a numerical value on each team's slate of games. From there, we were able to see who had the toughest path forward.
After spring ball, though, the SP+ numbers got an update from ESPN's Bill Connelly. Therefore, it is worth revisiting our SOS rankings to see how much things changed as well. Here is a reminder on how things work:
The equation used to compare each slate is simple. First, we take each team's SP+ rating to find a numerical value for every game. The higher that number, the tougher the matchup. We then add every opponent's SP+ rating together to find a total opponent score. That large number is divided by the number 12 (total games) to find the average opponent score — a number that can then be compared to the SP+ leaderboard to find, on average, what a team will face each week.
(Note: Home and away is not factored into the model. Also, Football Championship Subdivision opponents are not listed in SP+. Every FCS opponent was assessed a "minus-15' rating, akin to the No. 118 team in the Football Bowl Subdivision.)
With that, here is an in-depth look at the Big Ten's strength of schedule ranking entering the 2025 season:
Total Opponent Score: 41.6
Average Opponent Score: 3.46 (akin to the 47th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
USC (11.0)
Purdue (-10.0)
Ohio State (29.5)
Washington (6.4)
Rutgers (4.7)
Maryland (-1.1)
Wisconsin (7.2)
Northwestern (-6.1)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 18
Conference games against Ohio State, USC, and Washington could be challenging, but outside of that, Illinois should be able to handle the rest of the slate with relative ease, especially in the non-conference.
17. Michigan Wolverines
Total Opponent Score: 45.6
Average Opponent Score: 3.80 (akin to the 47th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
Nebraska (8.9)
Wisconsin (7.2)
USC (11.0)
Washington (6.4)
Michigan State (-0.2)
Purdue (-10.0)
Northwestern (-6.1)
Maryland (-1.1)
Ohio State (29.5)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 17
Any year in the Big Ten when you can miss two of the three big dogs — Oregon, Ohio State, and Penn State — is favorable, and with Michigan only drawing the Buckeyes of that trio, it bodes well. If the QB situation is what it's cracked up to be under Bryce Underwood, the Wolverines could make some noise. That early-season game against Oklahoma should be interesting.
Get more Michigan news, analysis and opinions on Wolverines Wire
16. USC Trojans
Total Opponent Score: 67.4
Average Opponent Score: 5.61 (akin to the 40th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
Purdue (-10.0)
Michigan State (-0.2)
Illinois (14.3)
Michigan (21.5)
Nebraska (8.9)
Northwestern (-6.1)
Iowa (11.4)
Oregon (24.7)
UCLA (2.9)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 10
A non-conference game against Notre Dame is always going to be tough, but USC does manage to skip both Ohio State and Penn State during the season. Games against Oregon, Michigan, and Illinois could prove challenging, but we will see if Lincoln Riley's revamped squad is up to the task.
Get more USC news, analysis and opinions on Trojans Wire
15. Minnesota Golden Gophers
Total Opponent Score: 70.2
Average Opponent Score: 5.85 (akin to the 40th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
Rutgers (4.7)
Ohio State (29.5)
Purdue (-10.0)
Nebraska (8.9)
Iowa (11.4)
Michigan State (-0.2)
Oregon (24.7)
Northwestern (-6.1)
Wisconsin (7.2)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 12
I expect Minnesota to be an average-to-above-average team in the conference this year, so they should be able to deal with a lot of the teams on their schedule, outside of the like of Ohio Stae, Oregon, and maybe Nebraska.
14. Nebraska Cornhuskers
Total Opponent Score: 73.1
Average Opponent Score: 6.09 (akin to the 40th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
Michigan (21.5)
Michigan State (-0.2)
Maryland (-1.1)
Minnesota (6.0)
Northwestern (-6.1)
USC (11.0)
UCLA (2.9)
Penn State (27.7)
Iowa (11.4)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 13
Missing Ohio State and Oregon is great for Nebraska, but Penn State late in the year could be challenging, and an early game against Michigan could provide an early test for Dylan Raiola and his teammates. If the QB is everything he's cracked up to be, the Cornhuskers should be able to fare well with this slate of games, though.
Get more Nebraska news, analysis and opinions on Cornhuskers Wire
13. Maryland Terrapins
Total Opponent Score: 74.9
Average Opponent Score: 2.87 (akin to the 39th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
Wisconsin (7.2)
Washington (6.4)
Nebraska (8.9)
UCLA (2.9)
Indiana (12.2)
Rutgers (4.7)
Illinois (11.3)
Michigan (21.5)
Michigan State (-0.2)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 15
Maryland draws a nice schedule, missing out on Oregon, Ohio State, and Penn State, with Michigan being the toughest game on the slate. Of course, the Terrapins also aren't one of the better teams in the conference, so it remains hard to forecast a successful season despite the relative ease of the schedule.
Total Opponent Score: 76.9
Average Opponent Score: 6.40 (akin to the 39th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
Illinois (14.3)
Iowa (11.4)
Oregon (24.7)
Michigan State (-0.2)
UCLA (2.9)
Maryland (-1.1)
Penn State (27.7)
Wisconsin (7.2)
Purdue (-10.0)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 16
Can Curt Cignetti bounce back from his College Football Playoff season in 2024? The non-conference slate is easy, but games against Oregon and Penn State will prove to be difficult, especially in Autzen Stadium. Outside of those two, though, I don't see many roadblocks.
11. Oregon Ducks
Total Opponent Score: 80.5
Average Opponent Score: 6.70 (akin to the 38th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
Northwestern (-6.1)
Penn State (27.7)
Indiana (12.2)
Rutgers (4.7)
Wisconsin (7.2)
Iowa (11.4)
Minnesota (6.0)
USC (11.0)
Washington (6.4)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 8
Oregon's non-conference schedule should be pretty straightforward, and missing the likes of Ohio State and Michigan helps in conference play. Still, games against Penn State and Washington on the road will be challenging, while Indiana and USC get the Ducks at Autzen.
Get more Oregon news, analysis and opinions on Ducks Wire
10. Ohio State Buckeyes
Total Opponent Score: 80.7
Average Opponent Score: 6.72 (akin to the 38th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
Washington (6.4)
Minnesota (6.0)
Illinois (14.3)
Wisconsin (7.2)
Penn State (27.7)
Purdue (-10.0)
UCLA (2.9)
Rutgers (4.7)
Michigan (21.5)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 4
A season-opener against Texas is going to be thrilling to watch for Ohio State, but their conference slate is very manageable, with the biggest games coming against Illinois, Penn State, and Michigan at the end of the year.
Get more Ohio State news, analysis and opinions on Buckeyes Wire
9. Penn State Nittany Lions
Total Opponent Score: 88.0
Average Opponent Score: 7.33 (akin to the 35th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
Oregon (24.7)
UCLA (2.9)
Northwestern (-6.1)
Iowa (11.4)
Ohio State (29.5)
Indiana (12.2)
Michigan State (-0.2)
Nebraska (8.9)
Rutgers (4.7)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 14
Games against Oregon, Ohio State, and Indiana could prove tough for Penn State, but outside of those three, there aren't many that give you pause, especially if James Franklin can get his veteran squad playing at a similar caliber as they did a year ago.
Get more Penn State news, analysis and opinions on Nittany Lions Wire
8. UCLA Bruins
Total Opponent Score: 88.3
Average Opponent Score: 7.35 (akin to the 36th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
Northwestern (-6.1)
Penn State (27.7)
Michigan State (-0.2)
Maryland (-1.1)
Indiana (12.2)
Nebraska (8.9)
Ohio State (29.5)
Washington (6.4)
USC (11.0)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 5
An opening game against Utah is tough for UCLA, and they get some solid teams in conference play as well, with Penn State, Indiana, Ohio State, and USC all through the regular season.
Get more UCLA news, analysis and opinions on UCLA Wire
7. Washington Huskies
Total Opponent Score: 93.7
Average Opponent Score: 7.80 (akin to the 35th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
Ohio State (29.5)
Maryland (-1.1)
Rutgers (4.7)
Michigan (21.5)
Illinois (14.3)
Wisconsin (7.2)
Purdue (-10.0)
UCLA (2.9)
Oregon (24.7)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 11
What version of Washington can we expect this year? A return to their normal form makes this a very manageable schedule, with tough games against Oregon and Ohio State. However, another year like 2024 and games against Washington State, Michigan, and Wisconsin qualify as tough as well.
Get more (Washington) news, analysis and opinions on Huskies Wire
6. Purdue Boilermakers
Total Opponent Score: 99.5
Average Opponent Score: 8.29 (akin to the 34th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
USC (11.0)
Illinois (14.3)
Minnesota (6.0)
Northwestern (-6.1)
Rutgers (4.7)
Michigan (21.5)
Ohio State (29.5)
Washington (6.4)
Indiana (12.2)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 2
The non-conference game against Notre Dame really makes this schedule tougher than it seems, as the conference slate isn't too brutal without Oregon or Penn State on the schedule.
5. Michigan State Spartans
Total Opponent Score: 100.5
Average Opponent Score: 8.37 (akin to the 34th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
USC (11.0)
Nebraska (8.9)
UCLA (2.9)
Indiana (12.2)
Michigan (21.5)
Minnesota (6.0)
Penn State (27.7)
Iowa (11.4)
Maryland (-1.1)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 9
At this point in the list, we're getting to pretty tough schedules. The non-conference is easy here, but games against USC, Nebraska, Indiana, Michigan, Penn State, and Iowa all could be a challenge for the Spartans.
Get more Michigan State news, analysis and opinions on Spartans Wire
Total Opponent Score: 102.2
Average Opponent Score: 8.51 (akin to the 34th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
Rutgers (4.7)
Indiana (12.2)
Wisconsin (7.2)
Penn State (27.7)
Minnesota (6.0)
Oregon (24.7)
USC (11.0)
Michigan State (-0.2)
Nebraska (8.9)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 6
A non-conference game against Iowa State won't be easy, and facing Indiana, Penn State, and Oregon in a five-game stretch could prove difficult for the Hawkeyes, followed by games against USC and Nebraska not long after.
Get more Iowa news, analysis and opinions on Hawkeyes Wire
Total Opponent Score: 107.0
Average Opponent Score: 8.91 (akin to the 34th-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
Oregon (24.7)
UCLA (2.9)
Penn State (27.7)
Purdue (-10.0)
Nebraska (8.9)
USC (11.0)
Michigan (21.5)
Minnesota (6.0)
Illinois (14.3)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 7
Facing Oregon and Penn State in a three-game stretch is not going to be easy, and games against Nebraska, USC, Michigan, Minnesota, and Illinois will all be tough down the stretch for Northwestern.
2. Rutgers Scarlet Knights
Total Opponent Score: 108.9
Average Opponent Score: 9.07 (akin to the 33rd-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
Iowa (11.4)
Minnesota (6.0)
Washington (6.4)
Oregon (24.7)
Purdue (-10.0)
Illinois (14.3)
Maryland (-1.1)
Ohio State (29.5)
Penn State (27.7)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 3
The deadly trio of Oregon, Ohio State, and Penn State on the schedule is going to be tough for any team to handle. Outside of those three, Rutgers has to deal with Iowa, Washington and Illinois, which doesn't set up for a great season.
1. Wisconsin Badgers
Total Opponent Score: 124.9
Average Opponent Score: 10.4 (akin to the 32nd-best team in the country)
Conference Schedule (with SP+ rating):
Maryland (-1.1)
Michigan (21.5)
Iowa (11.4)
Ohio State (29.5)
Oregon (24.7)
Washington (6.4)
Indiana (12.2)
Illinois (14.3)
Minnesota (6.0)
Previous SOS Ranking: No. 1
A non-conference game against Alabama is always going to be tough, with conference games against Oregon, Ohio State, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, and Washington. Good luck, Luke Fickell.
Get more Wisconsin news, analysis and opinions on Badgers Wire
Contact/Follow @Ducks_Wire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oregon Ducks news, notes, and opinions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
Notre Dame AD ‘100 percent committed' to USC series, opposed to Big Ten's CFP model
Notre Dame athletic director Pete Bevacqua said he will do what it takes to continue the school's long-running football series with USC but rejected the Big Ten's plan to reserve multiple automatic qualifiers in the College Football Playoff for each power conference as a means to that end. 'We make no secret about it. We want to play USC every year,' Bevacqua said. 'I think it would be a horrible thing if we don't. I think it would be bad for us. I think it would be bad for college football. And USC knows that. Advertisement 'We're having conversations to try to put something together. We are 100 percent committed to doing everything we can to keep that series going. Whether it's the beginning of the year, end of the year, middle of the year, we want to keep that series going. Whether it's working in a neutral site every once in a while, we want to keep that series going.' Bevacqua met with a small group of reporters Tuesday after returning to campus with the Fighting Irish less than 48 hours away from the start of preseason camp. Notre Dame's athletic director spent part of his summer golfing with President Donald Trump and SEC commissioner Greg Sankey, as part of the lobbying work that helped craft the recent executive order from the White House on student-athlete compensation. In the coming days, Bevacqua will meet with Notre Dame's head coaches for a status report on their programs ahead of the new academic year. Bevacqua has largely sat out 'talking season' when it comes to the College Football Playoff, while arguments to different expansion formats flew during SEC and Big Ten media days. The SEC has moved away from the idea of multiple automatic bids for the power conferences and toward the 5+11 model, which looks more like the current 12-team format in concept. The Big Ten has pushed four automatic bids for itself and SEC while the Big 12 and ACC get two each, plus one for the Group of 5's highest-ranked conference champion and the remaining going to at-large bids. One school of thought argues the Big Ten's plan could be better for Notre Dame if there's language that guarantees the independent program an at-large berth if it meets certain rankings criteria. USC head coach Lincoln Riley has dangled the Big Ten's favored format as a solution to extending the Notre Dame series. 'There's a million reasons why we as a college football community should adopt the automatic qualifying in terms of the College Football Playoff,' Riley said last week at Big Ten media days. 'And this might be the most important one.' Advertisement Bevacqua's accommodation of Notre Dame's rival stopped short of that change to the CFP format. That put him in line with the ACC and Big 12, along with the movement within the SEC for a 5+11 model. 'I happen to think that there should be automatic qualifiers for the Power 4 conference champions, and there should an automatic qualifier for the highest-rated G5 champion.' Bevacqua said. 'But then, whether it's 12, 14, or 16 (teams), I think you have to earn it on the field. And those should be at-large berths. 'I think that's the best way, the most repeatable way, to get the very best teams to compete for a national championship year-in and year-out. And I think most people agree with that. Both the decision makers, the general public, football fans, I think that's what people want to see.' If a new format cannot be agreed upon by the end of this year, the CFP will remain at 12 teams in its current format in 2026. While Bevacqua, the former chairman of NBC Sports, understands that not expanding the field would likely leave money from CFP broadcast partners on the table, he also endorsed last year's postseason as a success. And not just because Notre Dame made the national championship game and pocketed nearly $20 million in revenue that it didn't have to split with conference membership. 'I think college football right now is really healthy,' Bevacqua said. 'And I think with this House settlement and with the cap and with some regulations around collectives, I think we could be entering into a period of stability. I think conference realignment has seemed to stabilize a bit with the changes that have been made over the course of the last few years. There's tremendous media interest in college football. I personally think it's the second strongest media product in sports behind the NFL. And we gotta keep it going.' Advertisement Bevacqua doesn't think the sport is headed toward an inevitable super league format, where the top teams break away and take their media rights with them. While Notre Dame would almost certainly be one of those teams, Bevacqua believes that outcome would be a death knell for the sport. He's a believer in college football's idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies being more of a feature than a bug for the entire enterprise. For example, Bevacqua doesn't believe every program should play the same number of conference games. He doesn't see the standardization of schedules as inherently positive, regardless of how often it was trumpeted as such at conference media days. Imbalance is not inherently bad for a sport, in contrast to the structural parity of the NFL. 'College football is different,' Bevacqua said. 'Like we're never going to play the same exact schedule. We're never gonna, unless you create some super league. Where you get the 30 best teams, put them together, create two divisions and have them have at it, but that to me spells the end of college football as we know it. 'There's always going to be arguments, it's always part of the narrative. I think the selection committee, those individuals put their heart and soul into this, they're humans, right? They're gonna have different opinions, different perspectives, but I think that's part of the process, and we're working as a group to make the selection process better and better and stronger and factoring in things like strength of schedule.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey fires back at James Franklin with hilarious troll-job
The post SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey fires back at James Franklin with hilarious troll-job appeared first on ClutchPoints. SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey took the latest shot in the ongoing SEC vs. Big Ten conference rivalry—and he did it with viral flair. After James Franklin referred to the SEC as 'that other conference' during Big Ten Media Days, Sankey flipped the insult into a full-on troll job that lit up social media. Sankey posted a custom graphic on X (formerly known as Twitter) that mimicked the SEC's logo—but with a twist. The letters now read 'TOC,' short for 'That Other Conference,' in the conference's signature navy and gold colors. The Commissioner didn't mince words in the post, either. He kept it simple, writing the following caption with the graphic attached. 'Greetings from That Other Conference.' This response came just days after Franklin, the head coach at Penn State and former coach of the Vanderbilt Commodores, offered sharp commentary on the SEC's approach to media during conference meetings. His initial comments were covered by Mark Heim, where Franklin critiqued the SEC's strategy to dominate offseason headlines. 'I think that other conference, when they have their meetings, there is essentially a press conference every single day at the end of the meetings. It keeps people talking about that conference at a time in the year and it makes them relevant.' The head coach also complained about the Big Ten's decision to hold media days in Las Vegas, suggesting that costs prevented many beat reporters from attending and diminished the event's visibility. 'A lot of our beat writers did not come to this because they couldn't afford to get out here. I walk around the lobby, and I don't see any signage. I don't see anything for the Big Ten.' Sankey's sarcastic rebrand of the SEC logo into 'TOC' quickly went viral, drawing laughs, praise, and even criticism. Some college football fans and SEC enthusiasts applauded his sharp wit, while others questioned whether it was childish or not. Still, the timing and simplicity of the commissioner's post struck a chord. It emphasized the SEC's ability to command offseason attention—and reminded everyone why the league remains dominant in both branding and results. This isn't just offseason banter. The back-and-forth comes as both conferences continue to position themselves for control of the expanded College Football Playoff structure. The SEC has added powerhouses like Texas and Oklahoma, while the Big Ten countered with USC, UCLA, Oregon, and Washington. Sankey rarely engages in public feuds, which makes his post even more impactful. In just five words and one graphic, the commissioner reminded everyone why his league owns the spotlight, whether it's the middle of summer or the heart of the season. Related: Five must-watch HBCU football games in 2025 Related: Giants' Jameis Winston doubles down on FSU QB's brutally honest Alabama take
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Trio of Penn State players named to Maxwell Award watch list
With college football's conference media days in the rearview mirror and the start of the new season less than a month away, watch list season is in full bloom. With raised expectations for team success in 2025, Penn State is already being well-represented on some high-profile award watch lists this summer, including the Maxwell Award. This week saw three of Penn State's finest named to the watch list for the Maxwell Award by the Maxwell Football Club. The three players representing Penn State on the list are quarterback Drew Allar, and running backs Kaytron Allen and Nicholas Singleton. All three offensive stars chose to return to Penn State this season to attend to some unfinished business. Allar, Singleton, and Allen give Penn State one of the top backfields in college football coming back this season and are a big reason why the Nittany Lions are being labeled a top preseason Big Ten and national championship contender. Singleton was named a preseason All-America by the Walter Camp Football Foundation for the 2025 season after a being an honorable mention All-Big Ten player on offense and special teams as a return specialist. Singleton will start the season as the nation's leading rusher returning this season with 2,912 career rushing yards and 32 career rushing touchdowns. Allen earned second-team All-Big Ten honors last season despite playing in the same backfield and splitting playing time with Singleton. Allen has rushed for 2,877 yards in his career with 24 rushing touchdowns and an average of 5.1 yards per rushing attempt. Only Singleton has more career rushing yards among players returning in 2025 across the nation. Head coach James Franklin believes these two could end their careers taking over the top two spots in the Penn State rushing record book when all is said and done. Allar was a Davey O'Brien semifinalist last season after passing for 3,327 yards and 24 touchdowns and rushing for 302 yards and six touchdowns. He will enter the 2025 season ranked sixth in all-time in Penn State history wiht 6,302 career passing yards. Allar was an honorable mention All-BigTen player a season ago after leading the Nittany Lions to the Big Ten championship game and a run to the semifinal in the College Football Playoff. The Maxwell Award is presented to the nation's college football player of the year and has been awarded annually since 1937. The Heisman Trophy may be the most notable individual award in college football, but the Maxwell Award is a high honor as well. Penn State has had seven all-time winners of the Maxwell Award, tied with Notre Dame for the most. Penn State's previous winners are Richie Lucas (1959), Glenn Ressler (1964), Mike Reid (1969), John Cappelletti (1973), Chuck Fusina (1978), Kerry Collins (1994), and Larry Johnson (2002). Last year's winner of the Maxwell Award was Boise State running back Ashton Jeanty. The last Big Ten player to win the award was Penn State's Larry Johnson in 2002. Although it is worth recognizing that USC and Washington had back-to-back winners with Caleb Williams and Michael Penix Jr. in 2002 and 2023, respectively, as members of the Pac-12. Follow Kevin McGuire on Threads, Bluesky, Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook. Follow Nittany Lions Wire on X, Facebook, and Threads.
