logo
Spencer Strider, Braves' bats not good enough against rival Phillies

Spencer Strider, Braves' bats not good enough against rival Phillies

New York Times28-05-2025

PHILADELPHIA — Even with Spencer Strider's fastball averaging 2-3 mph below the extreme heat he threw before his second elbow surgery 13 months ago, he still pitched competitively against a Philadelphia Phillies team he has dominated for the most part in the past.
But there were notable differences in this 2-0 Atlanta Braves loss at Citizens Bank Park. It was the first loss for Strider in nine decisions covering 11 regular-season games against the Phillies, including 10 starts.
Advertisement
• He wasn't as efficient and didn't go as deep as he had in past starts against them, running up 90 pitches in 4 2/3 innings.
• He got no run support, an issue that has plagued Chris Sale and other Braves pitchers in an entirely underwhelming first two months for Atlanta's offense.
• And the Braves' bullpen isn't as good as Philadelphia's, which was evident again when Daysbel Hernández gave up consecutive two-out singles in the eighth inning, followed by two walks, the second of which doubled the lead to 2-0. For Strider and others, there's precious margin for error.
'We got shut out,' Braves manager Brian Snitker said, putting it succinctly after Atlanta lost for the fifth time in six games and fell to 9 1/2 games behind the NL East-leading Phillies and eight behind the second-place New York Mets.
The Braves struck out 11 times and got five hits, all singles, including four hits in six innings against crafty left-hander Ranger Suárez.
'We just need to get it done, that's all,' Snitker said. 'They're up there trying, and it's a good pitcher. He keeps you off-balance with that sinker and a good changeup and a little breaking ball. He knows what he's doing. We kept the game there, just couldn't get a big hit.'
The Braves' best scoring chance came in the fifth inning when they loaded the bases on a Michael Harris II leadoff single and two walks before Matt Olson struck out to strand three in a 1-0 game.
'He made some good pitches, but we also missed some opportunities,' Olson said. 'Speaking for myself, he gave me a couple of pitches to hit in that bases-loaded situation. He's a good pitcher. He's not going to light up the velo, but he mixes it up well, moves it around. The changeup's 80 miles an hour, so it makes the 92, 93 fastball look a lot firmer. He's got good arm speed on the changeup, throws it to lefties and righties, moves it around.'
Advertisement
The Braves left 10 runners on base and were shut out for the fourth time this season and the first since April 5.
Olson had 15 homers in 30 career games (including the postseason) at Citizens Bank Park before Tuesday and a 1.034 OPS that was second only to Juan Soto's (1.100) among all players — Phillies or opponents — with at least 100 at-bats at the ballpark. His past success and the closeness of the game only made it harder to swallow his 0-for-4 performance with two strikeouts, including that one critical K.
'That's part of my job title is to drive guys in,' Olson said. 'You know, middle-lineup guy, it's something I pride myself on is driving guys in, scoring runs, and I got a couple of chances to do it. That at-bat, he left a couple pitches in decent spots to hit, and I was a little under them, a little late on one, just trying to stay within myself and kind of work off-gap a little bit and back it up a little too much. Yeah, you kick yourself after that in a tight game.'
Strider allowed one run and only one hit, albeit with four walks and a high-profile hit batter — he nailed Phillies star Bryce Harper in the right elbow with a 95 mph fastball in the first inning. Harper left the game and had X-rays that showed only a contusion, news Strider was relieved to hear.
'Certainly not trying to hit him,' Strider said. 'In the moment, I just assumed he had a guard on and was just pissed that I hit him, and then saw him in pain, and that was tough. So I'm definitely relieved that he's OK. He's one of the best players, you know, this century. So he needs to be on the field. It's best for the game. And it's good for us. It's good to compete against him.'
Strider added: 'You have to stay focused on what you're trying to do in the moment. It's easy to unravel. Of course, I'm not a complete sociopath, so I have some empathy. So I do feel bad for him to see a person in pain that I caused. But I've still got a job to do.'
Advertisement
He did it, for the most part. But Braves fans hoping to see pre-surgery Strider will need to be patient, as Snitker has said many times and did again Tuesday. Strider missed the first three weeks of the season while completing his rehab from internal-brace surgery, then made one start and missed five more weeks for a hamstring strain.
'He competed a lot better than he did the other day,' Snitker said, referring to Strider's first start after the injury, when he gave up six hits and four runs in 4 1/3 innings May 20 at the Washington Nationals. 'I thought command was better. The velocity wasn't great, but it was better than the other day. It looked like the way they were swinging at it, it had a little life on it. Secondary stuff … it was just an overall better outing than the last one.'
This series feels a lot more important than a late-May series should feel. That's because the Braves are in danger of falling behind the Phillies by 10-plus games before the calendar turns to June. And nearly as far back of the Mets.
'I think we're focused on ourselves and understanding what needs to get better,' Strider said. 'Ultimately, if we want to achieve what we want to achieve, we've got to be the best version of ourselves, regardless of what anybody else is doing. We don't know who we're going to play if we make the playoffs. That kind of stuff works itself out when you get there.
'I think right now you've got to picture every jersey the same on the other side of you and focus on what's going on in your clubhouse and in your own routine and optimize for the next game and the next game.'
For the Braves to make an eighth consecutive postseason appearance, Strider will surely need to have a big part in getting them there. The Phillies scored their only run against him in the second inning, when Alec Bohm drew a leadoff walk and Max Kepler lined a one-out double to the right-center warning track.
Bryson Stott's 11-pitch leadoff walk in the third inning underscored a difference in Strider from his pre-surgery form. Stott fouled off five full-count pitches, all 95.3-95.8 mph fastballs. He couldn't put Stott away; in the past, however, Strider likely would've blown him away with 98-99 mph fastballs up in the strike zone.
Advertisement
Still, he worked out of that inning unscathed, striking out hot-hitting Kyle Schwarber on a slider with a runner at second to end the inning.
After four innings, Strider had all of the 40 hardest-thrown pitches in the game. Granted, Suárez hadn't thrown a pitch above 93.3 mph, but Strider had eight at 96.0-96.8 mph. All came in the first two innings, and he topped out at 95.8 mph in the third inning and 94.6 mph in the fourth inning before getting one pitch to 95.7 mph in the fifth.
The decline in velocity as games have progressed has been a pattern in each of Strider's three starts as he continues to build arm strength. He averaged 95.1 mph on 49 fastballs Tuesday and got 24 swings, including just four swings-and-misses on that pitch.
Strider's fastball velo was in the 68th percentile in the majors at 95.2 mph before Tuesday. For some context, it was in the 98th percentile as a rookie in 2022 at 98.2 mph and the 92nd percentile in his first full season as an MLB starter in 2023 at 97.2 mph, when he led the majors in wins and strikeouts.
But it wasn't velocity that upset Strider on Tuesday. It was falling behind hitters early in counts and giving up a run after Bohm's leadoff walk. He loathes allowing the first run of a game.
'I can't concern myself with velo too much right now,' he said. 'It's going to come, and ultimately, whether I'm throwing hard or not, I've got to execute pitches and get ahead and stick to our game plan.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

All that Jazz: 'Electric' Chisholm Jr. talks new approach for Yankees
All that Jazz: 'Electric' Chisholm Jr. talks new approach for Yankees

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

All that Jazz: 'Electric' Chisholm Jr. talks new approach for Yankees

NEW YORK – Arriving at a less-is-more revelation, Jazz Chisholm Jr. believes he's found that next-level key to personal success. That means an easier swing, a steadier running gait, a calmer approach in the field. Advertisement 'If I stay fundamentally sound at 70%, I'm a pretty good baseball player,'' said Chisholm, whose second straight three-hit night boosted the Yankees to a 9-6 victory Friday night. Chisholm's three-run homer and RBI single contributed to an early seven-run lead against the rival Boston Red Sox and starter Walker Buehler, knocked out after two innings. Of course, the last time Buehler was on the Stadium mound, he closed out the World Series clincher in Game 5 for the Los Angeles Dodgers. This time, the Yanks jumped Buehler for five first-inning runs – including Chisholm's three-run homer on an 0-2 changeup to straightaway center field and a two-run shot by Anthony Volpe. Advertisement Volpe left the game shortly after being plunked on the left elbow, forcing home a second inning run; X-rays and a CT scan were negative, and Volpe feels he'll be available Saturday. Meanwhile, Chisholm is batting .500 (8-for-16) with two homers, six RBI and three stolen bases in four games since coming off the injured list due to a strained oblique. Yankees' Jazz Chisholm Jr. at '70%' 'Electric is the only way to describe Jazz,'' said Yankees rookie starter Will Warren, who rebounded from a rough start last Saturday at Dodger Stadium by being more aggressive in the strike zone. As Chisholm reasons, 'you can be electric while being in control at the same time,'' though 'it's super challenging for me. The only thing I knew was how to go fast. Advertisement 'Basically, I was Ricky Bobby. That's all I knew.'' Chisholm's new approach had its first light-bulb moment on April 29, the day he was injured at Baltimore – doubling to right despite three small tears to his oblique. Before his brief minor league rehab assignment began last week, Chisholm convened with the club's hitting coaches and reviewed video of his minor league days. 'The swing looked so effortless,'' and a plan was hatched to dial back in some respect – inspiring more contact, less swing and miss. '(At) 70%, you're one of the best out there,'' said Chisholm, quoting a conversation with assistant hitting coach Pat Roessler. 'At 100 percent, I might be dog crap. I was hitting .171 at 100 percent.'' Aaron Judge's take on Jazz Chisholm's approach 'It's really just about slowing everything down and taking a nice easy swing,'' said Judge. 'And that's what I felt like I saw tonight, even the homer to center field.'' Advertisement Chisholm drove an 0-2 Buehler curveball an estimated 417 feet over the center field wall, a ball that just kept carrying in the warm, humid air. 'I'm looking forward to seeing more of that,'' Judge said of the at-bat that produced Chisholm's ninth homer of the year, in his 34th game. In his third time up, Chisholm rifled a single to center off a 1-0 changeup. 'Earlier I the season, I was pulling off that and hitting it foul or rolling over because I was trying to hit a home run,'' said Chisholm. 'I feel like a baseball player again.'' Maybe the 70-percent stuff sends a mixed message, so Chisholm emphasized, 'you can't be lackadaisical," but 'if I stay fundamentally sound at 70%, I'm a pretty good baseball player. Advertisement "I really heard that all my life," Chisholm said. "I need to tone down the way I play." This article originally appeared on Yankees' Jazz Chisholm on new approach for New York

New $3 million addition could put Cowboys ahead of curve in revolutionizing red-zone play
New $3 million addition could put Cowboys ahead of curve in revolutionizing red-zone play

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

New $3 million addition could put Cowboys ahead of curve in revolutionizing red-zone play

It's not common practice to develop a specialist role for a key position such as quarterback in today's NFL. A starter is a starter and removing said player tips off intensions and frankly comes off as a little disrespectful. For the Dallas Cowboys and Dak Prescott, replacing the QB in select goal-line packages could be seen as both, even if it seems like a smart course of action for all parties involved. The Cowboys touchdown scoring percentage in the red zone was just 46 percent in 2024. That was second to last in the NFL, ranking only above the lowly Giants. The Cowboys' inability to get into the endzone was a season-long issue, dating back before Prescott's season-ending injury. It left points on the board and ultimately demoralized an already fragile unit. Advertisement Prescott is scheduled to return in 2025 with a full bill of health. In previous seasons, he's been an assassin from the red zone, guiding the Cowboys to a No. 12 ranking in 2023 and to No. 1 overall ranking in 2022. Given his past proficiency, it's not preposterous to think he can bounce back to those levels again in 2025, but is the risk worth it? A major part of Prescott's redzone efficiency lies in his ability to run the ball. As a ball carrier Prescott operated at a 0.40 EPA/play with a 100 percent success rate on two attempts in 2024. The season before he was at 0.16 EPA/play with a 71.43% success rate on 14 attempts. QBs are universally a highly efficient rushing option from the red zone; the only downside is such plays open them up to hits and potential injury. The Cowboys can ill afford to suffer and injury of Prescott's magnitude so alternatives need to be explored. Prescott, 32, is the highest paid player in the NFL and an irreplaceable part on the Cowboys' machine. He's not injury prone, per say, but having missed five or more games in three of the last five seasons, he's not exactly made of metal either. Using him as a runner might be more risk than the Cowboys want to take on and finding a replacement option may not be as crazy as it sounds when all factors are under consideration. After adding Joe Milton in an offseason trade, the Cowboys have an intriguing option as a situational replacement to Prescott. The highly gifted, yet severely underdeveloped, quarterback prospect is sure to drive headlines throughout the summer with dazzling throws and highlight runs. Milton, who has three years and $3 million remaining on his rookie deal, could be the answer in the red zone based on his skillset and dispensability. If Prescott gets hurt tucking and running the season might be over for the Cowboys. If Milton gets hurt running the rock, it's unlikely to have any impact on the success or failure of the season, and the financial investment in him is already minimal. At 6-foot-5, 246-pounds, Milton is built for the part. Coming from an RPO-rich offense in college, Milton is an ideal dual-threat inside the redzone. His reads downfield and accuracy as a passer leave something to be desired, but if cast into zone-read role where he can either handoff or run it himself, he offers something Prescott does not. Incorporating a single read as a passer is a great way to take that zone-read attack into a simple, but multifaceted, RPO. Advertisement Once upon a time the idea of having a dedicated closer in baseball seemed absurd. It wasn't until the late 1970s when teams started to designate specialists and from there it took years before it became the norm. In much the same way an occasional red-zone specialist could be normalized on early downs in the NFL. For teams with veteran QBs who are too important to risk and somewhat susceptible to injury, bringing in a dual-threat QB on early downs (non-obvious passing downs) could be a great way to take advantage of the game's highest leverage situations. QB runs are an important part of an efficient redzone offense but with a QB1 who's too important to risk, situational alternatives should be explored. Can Milton be that alternative? You can follow Reid on X @ReidDHanson and be sure to follow Cowboys Wire on Facebook to join in on the conversation with fellow fans! This article originally appeared on Cowboys Wire: Joe Milton could give Cowboys creative advantage in red-zone scenarios

Attorneys in NCAA antitrust case to share $475M in fees, with potential to reach $725M
Attorneys in NCAA antitrust case to share $475M in fees, with potential to reach $725M

Associated Press

time29 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Attorneys in NCAA antitrust case to share $475M in fees, with potential to reach $725M

The attorneys who shepherded the blockbuster antitrust lawsuit to fruition for hundreds of thousands of college athletes will share in just over $475 million in fees, and the figure could rise to more than $725 million over the next 10 years. The request for plaintiff legal fees in the House vs. NCAA case, outlined in a December court filing and approved Friday night, struck experts in class-action litigation as reasonable. Co-lead counsels Steve Berman and Jeffrey Kessler asked for $475.2 million, or 18.3% of the cash common funds of $2.596 billion. They also asked for an additional $250 million, for a total of $725.2 million, based on a widely accepted estimate of an additional $20 billion in direct benefits to athletes over the 10-year settlement term. That would be 3.2% of what would then be a $22.596 billion settlement. 'Class Counsel have represented classes of student-athletes in multiple litigations challenging NCAA restraints on student-athlete compensation, and they have achieved extraordinary results. Class Counsel's representation of the settlement class members here is no exception,' U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken wrote. University of Buffalo law professor Christine Bartholomew, who researched about 1,300 antitrust class-action settlements from 2005-22 for a book she authored, told The Associated Press the request for attorneys' fees could have been considered a bit low given the difficulty of the case, which dates back five years. She said it is not uncommon for plaintiffs' attorneys to be granted as much as 30% of the common funds. Attorneys' fees generally are calculated by multiplying an hourly rate by the number of hours spent working on a case. In class-action lawsuits, though, plaintiffs' attorneys work on a contingency basis, meaning they get paid at the end of the case only if the class wins a financial settlement. 'Initially, you look at it and think this is a big number,' Bartholomew said. 'When you look at how contingency litigation works generally, and then you think about how this fits into the class-action landscape, this is not a particularly unusual request.' The original lawsuit was filed in June 2020 and it took until November 2023 for Wilken to grant class certification, meaning she thought the case had enough merit to proceed. Elon University law professor Catherine Dunham said gaining class certification is challenging in any case, but especially a complicated one like this. 'If a law firm takes on a case like this where you have thousands of plaintiffs and how many depositions and documents, what that means is the law firm can't do other work while they're working on the case and they are taking on the risk they won't get paid,' Dunham said. 'If the case doesn't certify as a class, they won't get paid.' In the request for fees, the firm of Hagens Berman said it had dedicated 33,952 staff hours to the case through mid-December 2024. Berman, whose rate is $1,350 per hour, tallied 1,116.5 hours. Kessler, of Winston & Strawn, said he worked 1,624 hours on the case at a rate of $1,980 per hour. The case was exhaustive. Hundreds of thousands of documents totaling millions of pages were produced by the defendants — the NCAA, ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and SEC — as part of the discovery process. Berman and Kessler wrote the 'plaintiffs had to litigate against six well-resourced defendants and their high-powered law firms who fought every battle tooth and nail. To fend off these efforts, counsel conducted extensive written discovery and depositions, and submitted voluminous expert submissions and lengthy briefing. In addition, class counsel also had to bear the risk of perpetual legislative efforts to kill these cases.' Antitrust class-action cases are handled by the federal court system and have been harder to win since 2005, when the U.S. Class Action Fairness Act was passed, according to Bartholomew. 'Defendants bring motion after motion and there's more of a pro-defendant viewpoint in federal court than there had been in state court,' she said. 'As a result, you would not be surprised that courts, when cases do get through to fruition, are pretty supportive of applications for attorneys' fees because there's great risk that comes from bringing these cases fiscally for the firms who, if the case gets tossed early, never gets compensated for the work they've done.' ___ AP college sports:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store