
Psychologists And Mental Health Experts Spurred To Use Custom Instructions And Make AI Into A Therapist Adjunct
The idea is this. The ChatGPT Study Mode was put together by crafting custom instructions for ChatGPT. It isn't an overhaul or feature creation. It seems to be nothing new per se, other than specifying a set of detailed instructions, as dreamed up by various educational specialists, telling the AI what it is to undertake in an educational context.
That's considered 'new' in the sense that it is an inspiring use of custom instructions and a commendable accomplishment that will be of benefit to students and eager learners. Perhaps by gathering psychologists and mental health specialists, an AI-based Therapy Mode could similarly be ingenuously developed. Mindful readers asked me about this.
Let's talk about it.
This analysis of AI breakthroughs is part of my ongoing Forbes column coverage on the latest in AI, including identifying and explaining various impactful AI complexities (see the link here).
AI And Mental Health Therapy
As a quick background, I've been extensively covering and analyzing a myriad of facets regarding the advent of modern-era AI that produces mental health advice and performs AI-driven therapy. This rising use of AI has principally been spurred by the evolving advances and widespread adoption of generative AI. For a quick summary of some of my posted columns on this evolving topic, see the link here, which briefly recaps about forty of the over one hundred column postings that I've made on the subject.
There is little doubt that this is a rapidly developing field and that there are tremendous upsides to be had, but at the same time, regrettably, hidden risks and outright gotchas come into these endeavors too. I frequently speak up about these pressing matters, including in an appearance last year on an episode of CBS's 60 Minutes, see the link here.
If you are new to the topic of AI for mental health, you might want to consider reading my recent analysis of the field, which also recounts a highly innovative initiative at the Stanford University Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences called AI4MH; see the link here.
ChatGPT Study Mode Introduced
A recent announcement by OpenAI went relatively far and wide. They cheerfully introduced ChatGPT Study Mode, as articulated in their blog posting 'Introducing Study Mode' on July 29, 2025, and identified these salient points (excerpts):
As far as can be discerned from the outside, this capability didn't involve revising the underpinnings of the AI, nor did it seem to require bolting on additional functionality. It seems that the mainstay was done using custom instructions (note, if they did make any special core upgrades, they seem to have remained quiet on the matter since it isn't touted in their announcements).
Custom Instructions Are Powerful
Assuming that they only or mainly used custom instructions to bring forth this useful result, it gives great hope and spurs avid attention to the amazing power of custom instructions. You can do a lot with custom instructions. But I would wager that few know about custom instructions and even fewer have done anything substantive with them.
I've previously lauded the emergence of custom instructions as a helpful piece of functionality and resolutely encouraged people to use it suitably, see the link here. Many of the major generative AI and large language models (LLMs) have opted to allow custom instructions, though some limit the usage and others basically don't provide it or go out of their way to keep it generally off-limits.
Allow me a brief moment to bring everyone up to speed on the topic.
Suppose you want to tell AI to act a certain way. You want the AI to do this across all subsequent conversations. This usually only applies to your instance. I'll explain in a moment how to do so across instances and allow other people to tap into your use of custom instructions.
I might want my AI to always give me its responses in a poetic manner. You see, perhaps I relish poems. I go to the specified location of my AI that allows the entering of a custom instruction and tell it to always respond poetically. After saving this, I will then find that any conversation will always be answered with poetic replies by the AI.
In this case, my custom instruction was short and sweet. I merely told the AI to compose answers poetically. If I had something more complex in mind, I could devise a quite lengthy custom instruction. The custom instruction could go on and on, telling the AI to write poetically when it is daytime, but not at nighttime, and to make sure the poems are lighthearted and enjoyable. I might further indicate that I want poems that are rhyming and must somehow encompass references to cats and dogs. And so on.
I'm being a bit facetious and just giving you a semblance that a custom instruction can be detailed and provide a boatload of instructions.
Custom Instructions Mixed Bag
The beauty of custom instructions is that they serve as an overarching form of guidance to the generative AI. They are considered to have a global scope for your instance. All conversations that you have will be subject to whatever the custom instruction says should take place.
With such power comes some downsides.
Imagine that I am using the AI and have a serious question that should not be framed in a poem. Lo and behold, I ask the solemn question and get a poetic answer. The AI is following what the custom instruction indicated. Period, end of story.
The good news is that you can tell the AI that you want it to disregard the custom instructions. When I enter a question, I could mention in the prompt that the AI is not to abide by the custom instructions. Voila, the AI will provide a straightforward answer. Afterward, the custom instructions will continue to apply.
The malleability is usually extensive. For example, I might tell the AI that for the next three prompts, do not abide by the custom instructions. Or I could tell the AI that the custom instructions are never to be obeyed unless I say in a prompt that they should be obeyed. I think you can see that this is a generally malleable aspect.
Goofed Up Custom Instructions
The most disconcerting downside of custom instructions is that you might inadvertently say something in the instructions that is to your detriment. Maybe you won't even realize what you've done.
Consider my poetic-demanding custom instruction.
I could include a line that insists that no matter what any of my prompts say, never allow me to override the custom instruction. Perhaps I thought that was a smart move. The problem will be that later, I might forget that I had included that line. When I try to turn off the custom instruction via a prompt, the AI might refuse. Usually, the AI will inform you of such a conflict, but there's no guarantee that it will.
Worse still is a potential misinterpretation of something in your custom instructions. I might have said that the AI should never mention ugly animals in any of its responses. What in the world is an ugly animal? The sky is the limit. Unfortunately, the AI will potentially opt not to mention all kinds of animals that were not what I had in my mind.
Would I realize what is happening?
Possibly not.
The AI responses would perchance mention some animals and not mention others. It might not be obvious which animals aren't being described. My custom instruction is haunting me because the AI interprets what I said, though the interpretation differs from what I meant.
AI Mental Health Advice
Shifting gears, let's aim to use custom instructions for the betterment of humanity, rather than the act of simply producing poetic responses.
The ChatGPT Study Mode pushes the AI to perform Socratic dialogues with the user and gives guidance rather than spitting out answers. The custom instructions get this to occur. Likewise, the AI attempts to assess the level of proficiency of the user and adjusts to their skill level. Personalized feedback is given. The AI tracks your progress. It's nifty.
All due to custom instructions.
What other context might custom instructions tackle?
I'll focus on the context of mental health.
Here's the deal. We get together a bunch of psychologists, psychiatrists, therapists, mental health professionals, and the like. They work fervently on composing a set of custom instructions telling the AI how to perform therapy. This includes diagnosing mental health conditions. It includes generating personal recommendations on aiding your mental health.
We could turn the generic generative AI that saunters around in the mental health context and turn it into something more bona fide and admirable.
Boom, drop the mic.
The World Is Never Easy
If you are excited about the prospects of these kinds of focused custom instructions, such as for therapy, I am going to ask you to sit down and pour yourself a glass of fine wine. The reason I say this is that there have indeed been such efforts in the mental health realm. And, by and large, the result is not as standout as you might have hoped for.
First, the topic of mental health is immense and involves risks to people when inappropriate therapy is employed. Trying to devise a set of custom instructions that can fully and sufficiently provide bona fide therapy is not only unlikely but also inevitably misleading. I say this because some have tried this route and made outlandish claims of what the AI can do as a result of the loaded custom instructions.
Watch out for unfulfilled claims. See my extensive coverage at the link here.
Second, any large set of custom instructions on performing therapy is bound to be incomplete, contain misinterpretable indications, and otherwise be subject to the downsides that I've noted above. The nature of using custom instructions as an all-in-one solution in this arena is like trying to use a hammer on everything, even though you ought to be using a screwdriver on screws, and so on.
Third, some argue that using custom instructions for therapy is better than not having any custom instructions at all. The notion is that if you are using a generic generative AI that is working without mental health custom instructions, you are certainly better off by using one that at least has custom instructions.
The answer there is that it depends on the nature of the custom instructions. There is a solid chance that the custom instructions might worsen what the AI is going to say. You can just as easily boost the AI as you can undercut the AI. Don't fall into the trap that custom instructions mean things are necessarily for the better.
Accessing Custom GPTs
I had earlier alluded to the aspect that there is a means of allowing other users to employ your set of custom instructions.
Many of the popular LLMs tend to allow you to generate an AI applet of sorts, containing tailored custom instructions that can be used by others. Sometimes the AI maker establishes a library into which these applets reside and are publicly available. OpenAI provides this via the use of GPTs, which are akin to ChatGPT applets -- you can learn about how to use those in my detailed discussion at the link here and the link here.
Unfortunately, as with all new toys, some have undermined these types of AI applets.
There are AI applets that contain custom instructions written by licensed therapists who genuinely did their best to craft therapy-related custom instructions. That seems encouraging. But I'm hoping you now realize that even the best of intentions might not come out suitably. Good intentions don't guarantee suitable results. Those custom instructions could have trouble brewing within them.
There are also AI applets that brashly claim to be for mental health, yet they are utterly shallow and devised by someone who has zero expertise in mental health. Don't let your guard down by flashy claims.
The more egregious ones are AI applets that are marketed as though they are about mental health, when the reality is that it is a scam. The custom instructions have nothing to do with therapy. Instead, the custom instructions attempt to take over your AI, grab your personal info, and generally be a pest and make life miserable for you.
Wolves in sheep's clothing.
The Full Meal Deal
Where do we go from here?
The use of custom instructions for therapy when aiming to bring forth an AI-based Therapy Mode in a generic generative AI is not generally a good move. Even if you assemble a worthy collection of the best psychologists and mental health experts, you are trying to put fifty pounds into a five-pound bag.
It just isn't a proper fit.
The better path is being pursued. I am a big advocate and doing research on generative AI and LLMs that are built from the ground up for mental health advisement, see my framework layout at the link here.
The approach consists of starting from the beginning when devising an LLM to make it into a suitable therapy-oriented mechanism. This is in stark contrast to trying to take an already completed generic generative AI and reshape it into a mental health context. I believe it is wiser to take a fresh uplift instead.
Bottom Line Answered
For readers who contacted me and asked whether the ChatGPT Study Mode foretells that the same impressive results of education-oriented custom instructions can be had in other domains, yes, for sure, there are other domains that this can readily apply to.
Is mental health one of those suitable domains?
I vote no.
Mental health advisement deserves more.
A final thought for now. Voltaire astutely observed: 'No problem can withstand the assault of sustained thinking.' We need to put on our thinking caps and aim for the right solution rather than those quick-fix options that might seem viable but contain unsavory gotchas and injurious hiccups.
Sustained thinking is worth its weight in gold.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meme Stocks Are Back in 2025: 3 Smart Ways To Profit Now
If you paid attention to the stock market back in 2021, you might remember the 'meme stock' craze that pushed otherwise struggling companies to record highs. Explore More: Find Out: You might also remember those price surges were almost entirely the result of social media buzz rather than business fundamentals. Investors poured into the stocks mainly because they liked turning conventional Wall Street wisdom inside out — not because they thought the companies made good investments. At the time, it seemed like a passing fad. Suddenly, however, meme stocks are a thing again. Shares of Opendoor, Kohl's, Wendy's, American Eagle Outfitters and other 'embattled' companies have all seen recent surges similar to four years ago, Business Insider reported. This trend is certainly good for the companies. But is it good for investors? Most financial advisors warn against jumping on meme stocks because they tend to sink as fast as they rise. However, you can earn a profit if you follow the right rules. Here are three ways you can potentially cash in on meme stocks in 2025. Review the Fundamentals This is something you should do with any stock — review its business fundamentals to make sure it is on solid financial footing. But it's especially important with meme stocks. TD Bank recommended looking over the company's quarterly and annual reports, as well as its analyst reports. Once you've done that, ask yourself the following questions: Are the company's revenues rising? Are its earnings increasing year after year? Does it have a product lineup that makes sense to you? Does its current stock price have room to grow based on consensus analyst price targets? If the answer is 'yes' to these questions, then you might be able to cash in on a meme stock. I Asked ChatGPT: Pick Recognizable Brands At the very least, a meme stock should have a brand that is recognizable to most investors, according to Fidelity. Meme stocks are volatile enough. What you don't want is a stock that regular investors have never heard of. '[This] could mean those investments share features of a certain kind of trend trading, creating the potential for them to get caught up in irregular trading activity,' Fidelity noted. 'Following the herd or any other impetus that is not grounded in a strong fundamental basis for investing your money is never prudent.' Think Short Term — Not Long Term As Forbes noted, a couple of the more famous meme stocks didn't have much staying power in terms of share price. GameStop's price surged above $480 per share during its meme stock peak in early 2021, but it soon crashed back to reality and currently trades near $22. Similarly, AMC Entertainment hit an all-time stock high of $625.48 on June 2, 2021 during its meme surge, according to MacroTrends. Today, you can buy the stock for about $3 a share. Investors who were savvy (or lucky) enough to sell those shares at the peak cashed in big profits, but you can't depend on that kind of luck. A good rule of thumb is to sell as soon as you have earned a decent profit on the stock — and that usually happens quickly. More From GOBankingRates New Law Could Make Electricity Bills Skyrocket in These 4 States I'm a Self-Made Millionaire: 6 Ways I Use ChatGPT To Make a Lot of Money 5 Strategies High-Net-Worth Families Use To Build Generational Wealth 6 Popular SUVs That Aren't Worth the Cost -- and 6 Affordable Alternatives This article originally appeared on Meme Stocks Are Back in 2025: 3 Smart Ways To Profit Now Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bill Ackman pours billions into 2 tech stocks amid AI boom
Bill Ackman pours billions into 2 tech stocks amid AI boom originally appeared on TheStreet. Bill Ackman, the billionaire hedge fund manager behind Pershing Square Capital Management, continued to tilt his portfolio further toward Big Tech's "Magnificent Seven." According to the firm's latest 13F filing with the SEC, Pershing made a new billion-dollar buy and expanded its stake in another major holding in Q2. Both moves shifted Pershing Square further toward the artificial intelligence boom via two of the market's most influential stocks. The so-called "Magnificent Seven" stocks and their stock symbols are: Apple AAPL Microsoft MSFT Amazon AMZN Alphabet GOOGL/GOOG Nvidia NVDA Meta META Tesla TSLA These stocks have carried much of the market's momentum in recent years. Hedge funds have increasingly turned to them as safe havens and growth drivers, especially as AI accelerates adoption across virtually every industry. Who is Bill Ackman? Bill Ackman is a hedge fund manager and founder of Pershing Square Capital Management, a money manager with $13.7 billion in assets under management, according to its August 2025 13F filing with the SEC. Ackman's investment strategy involves making large, concentrated bets on companies that he thinks are undervalued relative to their opportunities. His holding period is best defined as long-term. Pershing Square Capital Management's 13F report showed that Ackman owned only 11 publicly traded stocks as of June 30. His success as a hedge fund manager has translated into a net worth of $8.25 billion, ranking him 420th on Bloomberg's Billionaires Index. Ackman tilts more money toward the Mag 7, AI stocks Ackman has now joined those investing in the magnificent seven stocks more forcefully. His 13F filing reveals that more than 24% of Pershing Square's portfolio is concentrated in just two mega-cap giants: Amazon () and Alphabet () . More Tech Stocks: Analyst who correctly predicted Rocket Lab stock surge resets forecast Verizon Q2 earnings report surprises with remarks on tax reformWhile he has long been comfortable running a concentrated portfolio strategy, this latest shift marks one of the clearest signs yet of Ackman's conviction in AI as a structural trend. Ackman makes new billion-dollar Amazon buy Ackman's most eye-catching move last quarter was purchasing 5.82 million shares of Amazon, valued at more than $1.3 billion. The e-commerce and cloud giant now represents Pershing's fourth-largest holding, accounting for about 9.3% of the fund's portfolio. Amazon's latest quarterly results underscored why Ackman may see long-term value. The company beat Wall Street estimates on both the top and bottom lines, though shares slid after some analysts were disappointed by slower-than-expected growth in its Amazon Web Services (AWS) unit. Amazon management has emphasized that heavy investment in AI-related infrastructure should pay dividends over time as demand for AI accelerates on a broad scaleAmazon's stock has been volatile in 2025. Shares slipped earlier this year after President Donald Trump announced a new round of tariffs on April 2, rattling markets. Yet the stock has since regained momentum and is now up around 5% year to date. Pershing doubles down on a familiar name Pershing Square also boosted its position in Alphabet's Class A shares by 21% during the quarter. Combined with its existing holdings in Alphabet's Class C shares, the parent company of Google now represents Pershing's third-largest investment. This increased exposure further highlights Ackman's conviction that Google's scale, cash flow, and leadership in AI make it a resilient bet despite heightened competition from Microsoft, OpenAI, and others. Ackman's bets fit a broader hedge fund trend: Doubling down on the Magnificent Seven stocks driving market performance in the AI Pershing Square, Amazon and Alphabet together now represent nearly a quarter of its total portfolio, which signals enormous confidence in Big Tech's staying power, particularly as AI reshapes industries from retail and logistics to search and advertising. Ackman's AI-driven playbook Ackman has never shied away from bold, concentrated bets, and his latest moves suggest he sees the AI wave as a long-term structural trend rather than a passing hype cycle. By targeting Amazon's cloud-driven growth and Alphabet's dominance in digital advertising and search, he appears to be positioning Pershing to benefit from two of the most important technology trends of the next decade. While risks remain investing in these two tech juggernauts, from regulatory scrutiny to intensifying competition, Pershing's Q2 activity reinforces the view that Ackman believes the Magnificent Seven are not just market leaders, but rather foundational to the future of global Ackman pours billions into 2 tech stocks amid AI boom first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 17, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 17, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP Rep. Blasts Trump in Newspaper the President Is Suing for $10 Billion
A Republican congressman has broken party ranks to very publicly criticize Donald Trump in an opinion piece for the same newspaper the president seems to hate more than any other media outlet right now. John Moolenaar, a GOP House Representative for Michigan who enthusiastically backed Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' as a piece of 'vital legislation' earlier in July, offered a near-surgical dissection of the MAGA leader's recent deal with a U.S. tech giant in a letter to the Wall Street Journal—titled 'Trump Takes a Wrong Turn on Nvidia's Chips.' Trump is suing the WSJ for a cool $10 billion, claiming the newspaper's July article about a bizarre and sexually suggestive birthday card he's alleged to have once sent convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein was 'false, malicious, and defamatory.' Moolenaar's letter took a scalpel to the president's decision last week to permit AI computer chip manufacturer Nvidia to sell advanced hardware to China, in exchange for the tech giant paying 15 percent tariffs to the White House on sales to the authoritarian Asian country. The arrangement followed after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, whom Trump has described as 'my friend,' begged the MAGA leader to overturn a Commerce Department policy, implemented in April, that had otherwise restricted those exports, costing Nvidia an estimated $5.5 billion in the process. Trump personally owns at least half a million dollars' worth of Nvidia stock, the Washington Post reported this week. Moolenaar described allowing U.S. companies to sell 'export-controlled technologies to China, while paying the government a percentage of the sales,' as a worrying 'departure from precedent' given such technologies are 'controlled because of their potential to harm national security should they fall into nefarious hands.' To win in the budding AI arms race, as well as triumph in 'our broader rivalry with China,' the Michigan representative suggested it is imperative to 'treat advanced chips as strategic assets, not ordinary trade goods.' He went on to say 'the president's proposal also raises constitutional concerns,' given he is of the view 'Congress, not the executive branch, has the authority to tax, raise revenue and appropriate funds,' adding that legislation Trump has himself signed into law, namely the 2018 Export Control Reform Act, 'explicitly forbids charging fees for export licenses.' 'Taking a percentage of sales revenue in exchange for a license violates that—regardless of whether it is labelled 'license condition' or 'revenue sharing,'' he concluded.