UK probes US firm over Gaza ethnic cleansing charges
Boston Consulting Group (BCG), one of the world's most influential management firms, has been asked to explain its role in a controversial "postwar reconstruction plan" for Gaza, which reportedly included financial modeling for the mass displacement of Palestinians.
Liam Byrne MP, chair of the Business and Trade Select Committee, has sent a formal request to BCG seeking 'clarification and information' regarding its activities, particularly its collaboration with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a US- and Israeli-backed group criticized for disguising forced displacement as humanitarian relief.
A report by the Financial Times revealed that BCG was hired to provide financial analysis for a postwar development plan. As part of the assignment, BCG reportedly calculated the cost of 'voluntarily' relocating hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, a proposal widely denounced by legal experts and human rights organizations as a euphemism for ethnic cleansing.
The investigation has also drawn in the Tony Blair Institute (TBI), whose staff reportedly took part in early discussions about the Gaza plan. Internal documents suggest that TBI shared a postwar scenario paper with BCG during the preliminary phase of the project. Although the institute has denied authoring or endorsing the proposal, its involvement has triggered public outrage, particularly given Tony Blair's contentious role in the US invasion of Iraq in 2003.
BCG has since disavowed the project, stating that the work was 'unauthorized' and that two senior partners involved have been dismissed. Nevertheless, Byrne has made it clear that the firm's explanations thus far are 'not sufficient".
He has demanded a detailed timeline of BCG's engagement, identification of all clients and collaborators, and full disclosure of any UK-based entities, including companies, NGOs, or think tanks, that may have been involved.
'Who commissioned or requested this work?' Byrne asked. 'Which individuals or entities did BCG engage with in this context? Is any such work ongoing or active in any form?'
BCG's ties to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation are now facing parallel scrutiny in the US. Senator Elizabeth Warren has requested a formal investigation by the State Department into GHF's funding sources, as well as into the transparency of BCG's internal review.
While BCG has not denied that some of its employees contributed to the financial framework of the plan, CEO Christoph Schweizer acknowledged in an internal message that the firm's involvement is 'deeply troubling and reputationally very damaging.'
The UK parliamentary committee has given BCG until 22 July to respond. In a short statement, the firm said, 'We are aware of the request from the House of Commons Business & Trade Committee. We are reviewing the request and are committed to responding.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LBCI
41 minutes ago
- LBCI
At Paris summit, Israel secures 'strategic ground' in Syria — ‘core red lines met'
Report by Amal Shehadeh, English adaptation by Laetithia Harb Following a summit held in Paris, Israel secured key conditions regarding southern Syria during a meeting that included Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani, and U.S. envoy Tom Barrack. The agreement reaffirmed Israeli red lines in the region: maintaining a buffer zone, disarming towns in southern Syria, and preventing Syrian regime forces from entering these areas. The discussions specifically focused on Druze-majority towns, with the stated aim of protecting their security—particularly in Sweida. Israeli officials welcomed the outcome, describing it as meeting Tel Aviv's core demands and safeguarding its interests in Syria. As part of the deal, the dismantling of weapons in Quneitra and Daraa was agreed upon, alongside the formation of local security committees that would operate without heavy arms. The agreement concerning Sweida is considered the most significant. It will unfold in two phases under direct U.S. supervision. The first phase involves the withdrawal of tribal forces and Syrian government troops from Druze villages, a process to be verified by Druze factions. In the second phase, local councils composed of Sweida residents will be established to manage the region's resources and services, as well as monitor the agreement's implementation and document any violations. The deal also bars any organizations affiliated with the Syrian government from entering the area, while granting access to international agencies. While Israeli officials described the agreement as a major achievement, some within the Druze community in Israel criticized it as deepening Israeli involvement in Druze affairs. The Israeli-Syrian border was also included in the agreement. Joint Israeli and Syrian security and technical teams will be tasked with maintaining order along the frontier. Additional meetings may be held if the agreement is successfully implemented and calm returns to the Syrian front, where Israeli influence continues to expand.
LBCI
41 minutes ago
- LBCI
Israeli military says senior Hezbollah official killed in southern Lebanon strike
The Israeli army said it carried out a strike in southern Lebanon earlier Friday, killing Ali Mohammad Hassan Kassan, the Hezbollah official in charge of manpower for the Bint Jbeil sector. Army spokesperson Avichay Adraee claimed Kassan had recently been working to rebuild Hezbollah's presence in the area and recruit new members during the ongoing conflict. Adraee said his activities violated the understandings between Israel and Lebanon, adding that the Israeli military would 'continue operating to eliminate any threat to Israel.'
LBCI
41 minutes ago
- LBCI
Trump says Hamas doesn't want a deal, 'want to die'
U.S. President Donald Trump said Friday that Hamas did not want a ceasefire deal in Gaza, after Israel and the United States quit indirect negotiations with the Palestinian militant group. "It was too bad. Hamas didn't really want to make a deal. I think they want to die," Trump said. "Now we're down to the final hostages, and they know what happens after you get the final hostages. And basically because of that, they really didn't want to make a deal."
