logo
CEO pay rose nearly 10% in 2024 as stock prices and profits soared

CEO pay rose nearly 10% in 2024 as stock prices and profits soared

Independent6 days ago

The typical compensation package for chief executives who run companies in the S&P 500 jumped nearly 10% in 2024 as the stock market enjoyed another banner year and corporate profits rose sharply.
Many companies have heeded calls from shareholders to tie CEO compensation more closely to performance. As a result, a large proportion of pay packages consist of stock awards, which the CEO often can't cash in for years, if at all, unless the company meets certain targets, typically a higher stock price or market value or improved operating profits.
The Associated Press' CEO compensation survey, which uses data analyzed for The AP by Equilar, included pay data for 344 executives at S&P 500 companies who have served at least two full consecutive fiscal years at their companies, which filed proxy statements between Jan. 1 and April 30.
Here are the key takeaways from the survey:
A good year at the top
The median pay package for CEOs rose to $17.1 million, up 9.7%. Meanwhile, the median employee at companies in the survey earned $85,419, reflecting a 1.7% increase year over year.
CEOs had to navigate sticky inflation and relatively high interest rates last year, as well as declining consumer confidence. But the economy also provided some tail winds: Consumers kept spending despite their misgivings about the economy; inflation did subside somewhat; the Fed lowered interest rates; and the job market stayed strong.
The stock market's main benchmark, the S&P 500, rose more than 23% last year. Profits for companies in the index rose more than 9%.
'2024 was expected to be a strong year, so the (nearly) 10% increases are commensurate with the timing of the pay decisions,' said Dan Laddin, a partner at Compensation Advisory Partners.
Sarah Anderson, who directs the Global Economy Project at the progressive Institute for Policy Studies, said there have been some recent 'long-overdue' increases in worker pay, especially for those at the bottom of the wage scale. But she said too many workers in the world's richest countries still struggle to pay their bills.
The top earners
Rick Smith, the founder and CEO of Axon Enterprises, topped the survey with a pay package valued at $164.5 million. Axon, which makes Taser stun guns and body cameras, saw revenue grow more than 30% for three straight years and posted record annual net income of $377 million in 2024. Axon's shares more than doubled last year after rising more than 50% in 2023.
Almost all of Smith's pay package consists of stock awards, which he can only receive if the company meets targets tied to its stock price and operations for the period from 2024 to 2030. Companies are required to assign a value to the stock awards when they are granted.
Other top earners in the survey include Lawrence Culp, CEO of what is now GE Aerospac e ($87.4 million), Tim Cook at Apple ($74.6 million), David Gitlin at Carrier Global ($65.6 million) and Ted Sarandos at Netflix ($61.9 million). The bulk of those pay packages consisted of stock or options awards.
The median stock award rose almost 15% last year compared to a 4% increase in base salaries, according to Equilar.
'For CEOs, target long-term incentives consistently increase more each year than salaries or bonuses," said Melissa Burek, also a partner at Compensation Advisory Partners. "Given the significant role that long-term incentives play in executive pay, this trend makes sense.'
Jackie Cook at Morningstar Sustainalytics said the benefit of tying CEO pay to performance is 'that share-based pay appears to provide a clear market signal that most shareholders care about." But she notes that the greater use of share-based pay has led to a 'phenomenal rise' in CEO compensation 'tracking recent years' market performance,' which has "widened the pay gap within workplaces."
Some well-known billionaire CEOs are low in the AP survey. Warren Buffett's compensation was valued at $405,000, about five times what a worker at Berkshire Hathaway makes. According to Tesla's proxy, Elon Musk received no compensation for 2024, but in 2018 he was awarded a multiyear package that has been valued at $56 billion and is the subject of a court battle.
Other notable CEOs didn't meet the criteria for inclusion the survey. Starbucks' Brian Niccol received a pay package valued at $95.8 million, but he only took over as CEO on Sept. 9. Nvidia's Jensen Huang saw his compensation grow to $49.9 million, but the company filed its proxy after April 30.
The pay gap
At half the companies in AP's annual pay survey, it would take the worker at the middle of the company's pay scale 192 years to make what the CEO did in one. Companies have been required to disclose this so-called pay ratio since 2018.
The pay ratio tends to be highest at companies in industries where wages are typically low. For instance, at cruise line company Carnival Corp., its CEO earned nearly 1,300 times the median pay of $16,900 for its workers. McDonald's CEO makes about 1,000 times what a worker making the company's median pay does. Both companies have operations that span numerous countries.
Overall, wages and benefits netted by private-sector workers in the U.S. rose 3.6% through 2024, according to the Labor Department. The average worker in the U.S. makes $65,460 a year. That figure rises to $92,000 when benefits such as health care and other insurance are included.
'With CEO pay continuing to climb, we still have an enormous problem with excessive pay gaps,' Anderson said. "These huge disparities are not only unfair to lower-level workers who are making significant contributions to company value – they also undercut enterprise effectiveness by lowering employee morale and boosting turnover rates.'
Some gains for female CEOs
For the 27 women who made the AP survey — the highest number dating back to 2014 — median pay rose 10.7% to $20 million. That compares to a 9.7% increase to $16.8 million for their male counterparts.
The highest earner among female CEOs was Judith Marks of Otis Worldwide, with a pay package valued at $42.1 million. The company, known for its elevators and escalators, has had operating profit above $2 billion for four straight years. About $35 million of Marks' compensations was in the form of stock awards.
Other top earners among female CEOs were Jane Fraser of Citigroup ($31.1 million), Lisa Su of Advanced Micro Devices ($31 million), Mary Barra at General Motors ($29.5 million) and Laura Alber at Williams-Sonoma ($27.7 million).
Christy Glass, a professor of sociology at Utah State University who studies equity, inclusion and leadership, said while there may be a few more women on the top paid CEO list, overall equity trends are stagnating, particularly as companies cut back on DEI programs.
'There are maybe a couple more names on the list, but we're really not moving the needle significantly,' she said.
Prioritizing security
Equilar found that a larger number of companies are offering security perquisites as part of executive compensation packages, possibly in reaction to the December shooting of UnitedHealthCare CEO Brian Thompson.
Equilar said an analysis of 208 companies in the S&P 500 that filed proxy statements by April 2 showed that the median spending on security rose to $94,276 last year from $69,180 in 2023.
Among the companies that increased their security perks were Centene, which provides health care services to Medicare and Medicaid, and the chipmaker Intel.
__

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. S25 Edge: The ULTIMATE Speed Battle!
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. S25 Edge: The ULTIMATE Speed Battle!

Geeky Gadgets

time18 minutes ago

  • Geeky Gadgets

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. S25 Edge: The ULTIMATE Speed Battle!

When comparing flagship smartphones, the iPhone 16 Pro Max and Galaxy S25 Edge emerge as two of the most advanced options available. Each device caters to distinct user preferences, offering unique strengths in design, performance, and usability. The Galaxy S25 Edge emphasizes speed and innovation, while the iPhone 16 Pro Max focuses on delivering a refined and consistent user experience. Below is a detailed breakdown of how these two devices stack up across key features in a new video from Nick Ackerman. Watch this video on YouTube. Design and Build The Galaxy S25 Edge stands out with its ultra-thin and lightweight design, redefining portability in the smartphone market. Despite its slim profile, it incorporates effective heat management, making sure the device remains comfortable to use even during extended sessions. This makes it an excellent choice for users who prioritize sleekness and mobility. In contrast, the iPhone 16 Pro Max offers a more substantial build, emphasizing durability and robustness. Its slightly bulkier design accommodates a larger battery, which translates to longer usage times. For users who value sturdiness and extended battery life, the iPhone's design is a clear winner. Both devices showcase premium craftsmanship, but their appeal depends on whether you prioritize portability or endurance. Performance Performance is a critical factor for any flagship device, and here the Galaxy S25 Edge takes the lead with its faster app launch speeds and superior multitasking capabilities. The device's snappy interface and responsiveness are particularly noticeable during demanding tasks, making it a favorite among power users. On the other hand, the iPhone 16 Pro Max offers a different kind of performance advantage. Its smooth animations and optimized app performance create a polished and seamless user experience. While the Galaxy S25 Edge excels in raw speed, the iPhone prioritizes fluidity and consistency, which many users find more intuitive for everyday use. Both devices deliver exceptional performance, but their strengths cater to different user needs. Display and Software The iPhone 16 Pro Max features a ProMotion display with adaptive refresh rates, offering a visually smooth experience during scrolling, video playback, and gaming. This technology enhances usability and provides a refined visual experience, making it ideal for users who value visual precision and fluidity. In comparison, the Galaxy S25 Edge delivers a faster and more responsive user interface, appealing to those who prioritize speed and efficiency. However, its rapid transitions and animations may feel overwhelming to users accustomed to a more measured pace. Both devices feature high-quality displays, but the choice between them depends on whether you prioritize visual refinement or interface responsiveness. Unlocking and Biometrics Biometric security is another area where these devices differ significantly. The iPhone 16 Pro Max relies on Face ID, a secure and seamlessly integrated system that works intuitively with its swipe-to-unlock functionality. This system is reliable and easy to use for most users. The Galaxy S25 Edge, however, offers greater versatility with both in-display fingerprint scanning and face unlock. These options provide faster access and cater to users who prefer having multiple unlocking methods. While both systems are effective, the Galaxy S25 Edge's variety may appeal to those who value flexibility and convenience. Gaming and Graphics For gaming enthusiasts, the Galaxy S25 Edge is a standout performer. Its multi-core processing power and advanced 3D graphics capabilities make it ideal for resource-intensive games. The device handles demanding titles with ease, delivering a smooth and immersive gaming experience. The iPhone 16 Pro Max, while slightly behind in multi-core performance, excels in single-core tasks and game launch speeds. Both devices maintain similar temperatures during extended gaming sessions, making sure comfort for users. Ultimately, the Galaxy S25 Edge is better suited for hardcore gamers, while the iPhone offers reliable performance for casual gaming. Camera Performance The iPhone 16 Pro Max excels in everyday photography, offering fast camera launch speeds and a responsive shutter. Its camera system is optimized for social media, making sure consistent results across platforms. This makes it a dependable choice for users who frequently capture spontaneous moments. The Galaxy S25 Edge, equipped with a 200MP main sensor, shines in capturing fine details and high-resolution images. However, its zoom capabilities fall short compared to Samsung's Ultra models. While both devices deliver impressive results, the iPhone's consistency and ease of use give it a slight edge for most users. Battery Life Battery life is a crucial consideration, and the iPhone 16 Pro Max outperforms the Galaxy S25 Edge in this area. Its larger battery capacity ensures longer usage times, making it a reliable choice for users with demanding schedules. The Galaxy S25 Edge, while capable of lasting a full day with moderate use, sacrifices battery capacity for its thin and lightweight design. This trade-off may appeal to users who prioritize portability, but those seeking endurance and reliability will find the iPhone more dependable. Future Implications The Galaxy S25 Edge's innovative design sets a new benchmark for smartphone portability. Its ultra-thin profile has sparked speculation about future trends, including the possibility of an 'iPhone Air' model. As manufacturers continue to push the boundaries of design and performance, devices like the Galaxy S25 Edge pave the way for thinner and more efficient smartphones. Meanwhile, the iPhone 16 Pro Max reinforces Apple's commitment to delivering a polished and consistent user experience, emphasizing durability, battery life, and ecosystem integration. These qualities ensure its relevance in a market increasingly focused on balancing innovation with practicality. Final Thoughts The iPhone 16 Pro Max and Galaxy S25 Edge represent two distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. The Galaxy S25 Edge impresses with its ultra-thin design, faster app launches, and superior gaming performance, making it an excellent choice for users who prioritize speed and portability. On the other hand, the iPhone 16 Pro Max delivers a refined and consistent experience, excelling in battery life, camera functionality, and ecosystem integration. Ultimately, the choice between these devices depends on your priorities. Whether you value innovative design or reliability and durability, both smartphones offer compelling features tailored to different user needs. Here are more detailed guides and articles that you may find helpful on iPhone 16 Pro Max. Source & Image Credit: Nick Ackerman Filed Under: Android News, Apple iPhone, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

AP PHOTOS: Cuba's energy crisis forces families to find ingenious solutions to get by
AP PHOTOS: Cuba's energy crisis forces families to find ingenious solutions to get by

The Independent

time20 minutes ago

  • The Independent

AP PHOTOS: Cuba's energy crisis forces families to find ingenious solutions to get by

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.

Trump cornered as China weaponises its rare-earths dominance
Trump cornered as China weaponises its rare-earths dominance

Telegraph

time31 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Trump cornered as China weaponises its rare-earths dominance

When or if Donald Trump gets on the phone with Xi Jinping, the tone between the two men is likely to be frosty. The US and China have in recent days both accused each other of violating their fragile, three-week-old trade truce. The two presidents are expected to speak this week in an effort to rescue the deal. But Trump has a tough pill to swallow: it is his arch-rival who looks to have the better negotiating hand. China's near-total dominance of the world's supply of rare-earth metals – which are used in the manufacture of everything from cars and computer chips to F-35 fighter jets and nuclear-powered submarines – means Xi can squeeze the US where it hurts. 'Critical minerals are one of the most important bargaining chips for China in its negotiations with Washington. China will really hold on to this, as a significant point of leverage,' says Matilda Buchan, a senior analyst at Asia House, a London think tank. Beijing's willingness to weaponise the rare-earths supply chain is so potent a threat to the US economy and military that it has already pushed the White House into de-escalating its planned trade war with China. After Trump's April 2 'liberation day' announcement raised tariffs on US imports from China to an eventual peak of 145pc, Beijing's retaliation included a ban on exports to the US of magnet alloys containing key rare-earth materials. The impact was quickly felt. On May 9, some of the biggest carmakers in the US – including General Motors, Toyota, Volkswagen and Hyundai – wrote to the White House warning that unless China's export ban was lifted, they would soon have to start cutting back production. That same day, Trump told his Truth Social followers that he was ready to make big concessions to get a deal with China. Negotiations in Geneva took place over the ensuing weekend, and the tariffs came tumbling down. It emerged, more quietly, in subsequent days that China would allow rare-earths exports to the US to resume. 'Major disruption' Last Friday, though, Trump was back on Truth Social claiming that China had 'TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US'. Jamieson Greer, the president's trade envoy, told CNBC that Beijing was 'slow-rolling' its issuance of licences to export products containing rare earths. 'We haven't seen the flow of some of those critical minerals as they were supposed to be doing,' he said. The question is whether China is actively frustrating the deal, as some White House officials reportedly suspect, or whether the explanation is more mundane: not a grand conspiracy but simply a system coming to grips with new red tape. Back in April, Beijing did not just slap a ban on exports, it built a new bureaucratic structure to underpin future rare-earths trade. China-based companies wanting to export metal alloys containing more than a trace of seven key rare earths – samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, yttrium and scandium – now need to apply for a licence from the commerce ministry. It was not initially clear which shipments would be caught by the new rules, and there was plenty of precautionary laboratory testing, even of exports that were below the rare-earth content threshold. 'What initially looked like an almost total freezing of exports from China was really just a response to this need for testing of all the material, and of any material which contained more than 0.1pc of any of these elements,' says David Merriman, the research director at Project Blue, a critical minerals analysis and advisory firm. Project Blue's analysis suggests the application process is taking about 45 days, which may explain why exports to the US have been slower than expected. By mid-May, six large companies had received export licences, and at least another three were in the process of doing so. 'We are seeing some approvals come through, certainly slower than industry would like,' Michael Hart, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, told Bloomberg this week. 'Some of the delay is related to China working through their new system to approve exports, not that they are not allowing exports.' As part of the Geneva trade deal between the US and China, the commerce ministry has taken 28 US businesses off its export-control blacklist. But exports will still have to be approved on a shipment-by-shipment basis, and none is so far bound for the US. Volkswagen's European operations appear to have been an early beneficiary of an export licence, but not in sufficient quantities to ease supply concerns. 'There are a few approvals coming through, but they are far from being sufficient to prevent imminent production halts,' Jens Eskelund, the president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, told the New York Times. 'We are still facing a major disruption of supply chains.' Trump cornered The threat of factory production lines grinding to a halt highlights the immense power of China in this crucial market, and the power of its hand in negotiations. China's mines churn out about 61pc of the world's rare earths, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). Chinese refiners and manufacturers also hoover up most of the rare earths from elsewhere, processing 92pc of the world's supply. It is refining that is key, as this is the process that turns the material into a usable product. The country has a particular stranglehold on the manufacture of magnet alloys containing rare earths, which have near-ubiquitous application in computing, vehicular and electrical systems. 'Particularly as you move further down the supply chain, from mined products towards downstream highly engineered products, China's market share only grows,' Merriman says. 'Its grip only gets tighter.' Rare earths are used in very small quantities, which means it has long been uneconomic for most countries to mine or refine them – most, that is, except China, where the industry is under state control. The US has been spearheading sporadic efforts to restart rare-earths production and magnet manufacture either at home or in friendlier countries. But these efforts are yet to bear real fruit. The IEA estimates that a decade from now, China will still account for 85pc of refined rare-earths output. This leaves Trump cornered. He has been talking up the prospects of Ukraine and Greenland as alternatives, but his presidency will be long gone before either of those becomes a realistic option. Tariffs are no use here either. His only weapon is semiconductors. Over the past month, the US has been gradually tightening controls over China-bound exports of chips and associated software, particularly those used in artificial intelligence. The chips squeeze is partly motivated by the White House's long-term strategic desire to retain technological supremacy over China. But it also has some immediate tactical trade leverage – as Howard Lutnick, the US commerce secretary, admitted on Sunday. '[We are] taking certain actions to show them [the Chinese] what it feels like on the other side of that [export ban] equation,' he told Fox News. This has riled Beijing. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions,' the Chinese commerce industry said in a statement on Monday. 'These practices seriously violate the consensus.' Despite the war of words, Lutnick claimed he was confident that Trump would 'work it out' with Xi. Perhaps his confidence is well-founded. With the US and Chinese tech and manufacturing industries hanging in the balance, a deal looks essential for both sides.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store