
Former Labor leader Mark Latham warned no more delays in alleged homophobic tweet, sexual harassment case
Independent Sydney MP Alex Greenwich launched proceedings against Mr Latham in the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal over allegations of homosexual vilification and sexual harassment.
The case centres on a homophobic tweet made by Mr Latham and further comments he made on Twitter (now known as X) and in radio and newspaper interviews.
The NCAT proceedings come after Mr Latham was ordered by the Federal Court to pay Mr Greenwich $140,000 over the tweet and further defamatory comments.
Justice David O'Callaghan ruled that the primary tweet could convey the meaning that Mr Greenwich 'engages in disgusting sexual activities'.
Mr Latham's defence of honest opinion and common law qualified privilege was dismissed.
Mr Greenwich was expected to give evidence in the NCAT hearing on Monday; however, Mr Latham's lawyer Zali Burrows successfully pushed for an adjournment after she argued it was important for Mr Latham – who was unable to attend – to be there for the key witness's evidence.
'(It's) important Mr Latham is here in this tribunal,' Ms Burrows said.
'Mr Latham wants to be here.'
Mr Greenwich's barrister Prue Bindon said her client had been 'ready to give evidence several times' but ultimately did not oppose the adjournment, noting it was important the hearing be dealt with in a timely manner.
Senior legal member Mandy Tibbey ruled it was appropriate to grant the adjournment given Mr Greenwich was a key witness.
'Given that the respondent is a party and this is the evidence of the other main witness, we determine that it is appropriate to agree to an adjournment,' Ms Tibbey said.
However Ms Tibbey said she would not agree to any further delays, telling the court that Mr Latham had access to material for 'some time' now and he therefore should be able to instruct Ms Burrows.
'As long as the applicant (Mr Greenwich) is here we will be proceeding,' Ms Tibbey said.
Mr Greenwich is set to give evidence on Tuesday, with Mr Latham expected to attend.
Ms Bindon earlier claimed that Mr Latham's comments had incited hatred, contempt or severe ridicule during her opening submissions.
She said the sexual harassment allegations were in relation to unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature in circumstances where a reasonable person would've anticipated it to cause humiliation or intimidation and was not to do with unwanted sexual advances.
Ms Bindon also anticipated the defence would claim Mr Greenwich's reputation was to some extent not damaged.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

AU Financial Review
12 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Former iSignthis boss Karantzis to appeal six-year ban, $1m fine
John Karantzis, the former chief executive of iSignthis, will appeal a Federal Court decision won by the corporate regulator to ban him from managing companies for six years and a $1 million penalty. iSignthis, a payments' technology firm, was worth more than $1 billion before it was suspended from trading on the ASX in 2019. The company and Karantzis have been embroiled in rolling legal battles with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and stock exchange since.

Sydney Morning Herald
12 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Chinese drone boffin loses visa appeal over weapons claim
A Chinese drone researcher whose student visa was denied over claims he was associated with weapons of mass destruction has lost his appeal against the immigration minister. Xiaolong Zhu, 36, was in Australia on a tourist visa in 2018 when he applied for a student visa to begin studying for a doctorate of philosophy at QUT's Gardens Point campus. Zhu proposed focusing on surveying and studying the navigation of unmanned aerial vehicles, also known as UAVs or drones, in environments where GPS guidance was not available. The immigration minister's delegate rejected Zhu's student visa application in October 2020 due to the Home Affairs Department receiving information that he was 'directly or indirectly associated with the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction'. On Monday, the Federal Court in Brisbane rejected Zhu's latest appeal of that decision and ordered him to pay costs. His barrister, Matt Black, had argued there was 'repugnancy or inconsistency' between the wording of the Migration Act and Australia's migration regulations, but that was rejected by justices Darryl Rangiah and Stephen Burley. 'In our view, no such repugnancy is demonstrated in the present case, and the learned primary judge did not err in so concluding,' the justices stated in their decision. The initial Federal Circuit Court decision from May 2024 noted that Zhu had a master's degree in aeronautical engineering and space vehicle guidance from Beijing's Beihang University, which is closely linked to China's People's Liberation Army. Judge Gregory Egan said in 2024 the section of the Migration Act used to deny Zhu a visa was also concerned with 'missiles or other devices that may be capable of delivering' weapons of mass destruction.

The Age
12 hours ago
- The Age
Chinese drone boffin loses visa appeal over weapons claim
A Chinese drone researcher whose student visa was denied over claims he was associated with weapons of mass destruction has lost his appeal against the immigration minister. Xiaolong Zhu, 36, was in Australia on a tourist visa in 2018 when he applied for a student visa to begin studying for a doctorate of philosophy at QUT's Gardens Point campus. Zhu proposed focusing on surveying and studying the navigation of unmanned aerial vehicles, also known as UAVs or drones, in environments where GPS guidance was not available. The immigration minister's delegate rejected Zhu's student visa application in October 2020 due to the Home Affairs Department receiving information that he was 'directly or indirectly associated with the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction'. On Monday, the Federal Court in Brisbane rejected Zhu's latest appeal of that decision and ordered him to pay costs. His barrister, Matt Black, had argued there was 'repugnancy or inconsistency' between the wording of the Migration Act and Australia's migration regulations, but that was rejected by justices Darryl Rangiah and Stephen Burley. 'In our view, no such repugnancy is demonstrated in the present case, and the learned primary judge did not err in so concluding,' the justices stated in their decision. The initial Federal Circuit Court decision from May 2024 noted that Zhu had a master's degree in aeronautical engineering and space vehicle guidance from Beijing's Beihang University, which is closely linked to China's People's Liberation Army. Judge Gregory Egan said in 2024 the section of the Migration Act used to deny Zhu a visa was also concerned with 'missiles or other devices that may be capable of delivering' weapons of mass destruction.