Why Trump is eyeing Canada's wealth of critical minerals
When Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told a group of executives that US President Donald Trump wasn't kidding about annexing Canada , he offered one reason: critical minerals.
Canada is rich in nearly three dozen critical minerals essential to modern technology and produces more than 60 minerals and metals including nickel, potash, aluminium and uranium.
The deposits are strewn across the country, which has a land mass about as big as all of Europe and second only to Russia. Ontario, Canada's most populous province, is rich in nickel, chromite and copper. Quebec has lithium, rare earth metals and graphite.
British Columbia has copper, molybdenum and niobium. The prairie provinces – Saskatchewan and Manitoba – have ultra high-grade uranium and potash. Much of this material ends up in the US, which was the biggest buyer of Canada's critical minerals in 2023.
Since his election in November, Trump repeatedly has said Canada could avoid tariffs by becoming the 51st state. His move to lower his initial tariffs threats on raw materials in January – calling for 10 per cent on imports instead of 25 per cent, like most other Canadian goods – was a nod to the country's reliance on its northern neighbour's resources.
About a quarter of US uranium needs are fulfilled by gigantic mines in Saskatchewan, owned by companies like Cameco Corp. More than 80 per cent of US potash comes from Canada, including from Nutrien Ltd. And about 70 per cent of US aluminium is supplied by plants in Quebec and British Columbia.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Hegseth grilled over Trump's LA troop deployment, estimated to cost US$134 million
UD Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth pushed back against Democrats' criticism of the decision to deploy troops to Los Angeles, telling Congress that the Trump administration wants to protect immigration agents and keep demonstrations there from getting out of control. Advertisement Asked by congresswoman Betty McCollum, a Minnesota Democrat, how much the deployment would cost, Hegseth criticised Governor Tim Walz's handling of protests that erupted after the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis 2020. US President Donald Trump recognises 'a situation like that, improperly handled by a governor like it was by Governor Walz, if it gets out of control – it's a bad situation for the citizens of any location', Hegseth said. He said Immigration and Customs Enforcement 'has the right to safely conduct operations in any state and any jurisdiction in the country, especially after 21 million illegals have crossed our border under the previous administration'. Hegseth's comments during the hearing, which at times turned combative, echoed Trump's remarks on Monday in which he said he 'watched Minneapolis burn'. Officials also gave more detail on the scope of the deployment and the role the Marines will play. Advertisement Hegesth said the deployment would last 60 days, as detailed in a presidential memorandum over the weekend.
South China Morning Post
7 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
In the Indo-Pacific, ‘America first' looks like American unpredictability
Within around 10 days in late May, three top US leaders – US President Donald Trump , US Vice-President J.D. Vance and US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth – delivered speeches that together outlined the administration's evolving foreign policy vision. Taken separately, each speech reaffirmed the US' commitment to strength and strategic deterrence. Yet when considered as a whole, they exposed a deep tension at the heart of America's global posture – especially in the Indo-Pacific . For America's allies and partners in the region, these mixed messages raise questions about reliability, strategic clarity and long-term alignment. At West Point on May 24, Trump reiterated his 'America first' doctrine, denouncing foreign entanglements and 'absurd ideological experiments'. He asserted that under his leadership, the military will refocus on core missions: 'crushing America's adversaries, killing America's enemies, and defending our great American flag'. This was paired with an aggressive military posture. Trump emphasised overwhelming strength, boasting of new planes, tanks, drones and the creation of a Golden Dome missile defence shield . For regional allies, this blend of retrenchment and military escalation signals a shift from global stewardship to transactional power projection. A day earlier at the US Naval Academy, Vance presented similar realist rhetoric to Trump's, adding a bureaucratic lens. He said past leaders abandoned hard power for soft power and praised the administration's use of force in Yemen as a model of clarity and decisiveness. The US vice-president also spoke of great-power competition, especially with China, and advocated maintaining a technological edge through investment in hypersonics, drones and battlefield innovation. This fusion of restraint and readiness further muddies the message: Is America stepping back from global policing or simply recalibrating how it asserts dominance?
South China Morning Post
8 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US risks hard-won soft power by alienating Chinese students
While the US has resumed processing of student and exchange visitor visas, the future of Chinese students who are attending Harvard remains uncertain. The resumption followed a federal judge's decision last week to temporarily block a ban on Harvard's qualification to enroll international students. The judge set a June 16 hearing for further arguments in the case. Harvard also vowed to continue its legal battle, while working to ensure its international students and scholars can 'fully' pursue their academic work. While many have highlighted how hard Chinese students have been hit by the ban, since they account for one-fifth of Harvard's international enrollment, the visa restrictions imposed by the White House have sent mixed messages. In a phone call last week with Chinese President Xi Jinping, Donald Trump said the 'US loves to have Chinese students coming to study in America'. Earlier, Trump said he welcomed Chinese students, but not those who caused 'troubles'. It is still not clear what he meant.
