The R440bn private transmission gamble that could finally end load shedding
Government fast-tracks private sector participation in grid infrastructure while the national transmission company prepares for a competitive electricity market by April 2026.
South Africa's electricity salvation is called the Independent Transmission Projects (ITP) Programme – a joint venture between Kgosientsho Ramokgopa's Department of Electricity and Energy and Enoch Godongwana's National Treasury – and it's racing the clock to unlock billions in private investment and build the 14,000km of new transmission lines needed to connect renewable energy projects and end the country's electricity crisis.
Speaking to the parliamentary committee on electricity and energy last week, Minister of Electricity and Energy Ramokgopa painted a picture of a country on the cusp of an energy revolution, but one that required unprecedented national rewiring coordination between government, the private sector and state-owned entities to succeed.
Ramokgopa knows the stakes. It was his Integrated Resource Plan that estimated a desperate need of more than 14,000km of new transmission lines and 170 transformers over the next decade – requiring a minimum of the N1 road length from Joburg to Cape Town's worth of new lines annually – South Africa's current grid expansion pace is 'wholly inadequate', according to government briefings.
Private sector rush
The appetite for private sector involvement is clear. Between December 2024 and February 2025, the government conducted a request for information that received more than 130 formal responses from local and international developers, financiers, operators and equipment manufacturers.
More than 44% of local participants indicated they intended to partner with international entities, suggesting the scale of investment required exceeds domestic capacity alone.
The feedback was instructive: the industry reported a need for stable regulatory frameworks and a programmatic roll-out for pipeline predictability, while also flagging permitting, right-of-way acquisition and supply chain constraints as key risks requiring proactive mitigation.
The government listened.
First came the ministerial determination, gazetted on 28 March 2025, designating the Department of Electricity and Energy as the procurer and the National Transmission Company South Africa (NTCSA) as the buyer under Transmission Services Agreements. The determination defines Phase 1 scope as 1,164km of 400kV transmission lines across the Northern Cape, North-West and Gauteng.
Expropriation trump card
Next came the Draft Electricity Transmission Regulations, on 3 April, with public consultation closing on 22 May. The IPP Office will run the Phase 1 procurement, with pre-qualification tenders expected by end-July and requests for proposals by November.
A persistent obstacle that the NTCSA inherited from Eskom is the complexities of securing land for its transmission lines. Ramokgopa confirmed that expropriation with compensation would be used 'as a final instrument' after exhausting other engagement options.
For ITP projects, the government aims for 'late-stage tender' – resolving land acquisition, environmental impact assessments and statutory authorisations before developers take over execution, de-risking projects for private investors.
Some discussions have stretched over four years without resolution, but the NTCSA says it is committed to meticulously adhering to proper procedures to mitigate the risk of litigation as it navigates these challenging negotiations.
The R440bn funding puzzle
The Transmission Development Plan requires R440-billion over the next decade. Ramokgopa was blunt about the funding reality: 'The sovereign balance sheet cannot provide a blanket sovereign guarantee for this investment, nor are Eskom's or NTCSA's balance sheets strong enough alone.'
The government's solution is a 'bespoke financing instrument' backed by a Credit Guarantee Vehicle (CGV) developed with the World Bank. The CGV will be incorporated as a private non-life insurance company in South Africa and is expected to become operational in 2026.
For the first five years, R155-billion will be spent on transmission infrastructure, with R30-billion expected from third-party debt by 2028. NTCSA's board has increased its five-year budget by about R40-billion to R130-billion, with 76% allocated for network expansion.
A R219-billion provision from Budget 3.0 (part of the R1.03-trillion medium-term expenditure framework) was noted for strengthening the electricity supply network, from generation to transmission and distribution.
Supply chain nationalism
Ramokgopa pointed to the government's intention to build local industries on the back of energy investments rather than 'exporting opportunities'. The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition is coordinating interventions to ensure local production of Class 4 transformers and steel.
The progress is evident: 22 factories have been accredited for various transformer classes, while five of six identified steel tower suppliers have been certified. Eskom announced a panel of transformer suppliers in June 2024 to address demand for 101 large transformers over the next decade.
Racing against time
With the competitive electricity market targeted for April 2026 and the Credit Guarantee Vehicle becoming operational the same year, timelines are tight. The NTCSA is simultaneously developing market codes, managing infrastructure roll-outs and preparing for its role as market operator once the Electricity Regulation Amendment Act is passed.
The South African Wholesale Electricity Market School will launch at Wits Business School to build market participant capabilities, while synchronous condensers are planned to strengthen grid stability as renewable penetration increases.
That said, for the first time in years, South Africa has a comprehensive plan, committed funding mechanisms and private sector interest to transform its electricity system. Whether it can execute fast enough to meet the 2026 competitive market deadline – and finally end load shedding – remains the R440-billion question. DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The R440bn private transmission gamble that could finally end load shedding
Government fast-tracks private sector participation in grid infrastructure while the national transmission company prepares for a competitive electricity market by April 2026. South Africa's electricity salvation is called the Independent Transmission Projects (ITP) Programme – a joint venture between Kgosientsho Ramokgopa's Department of Electricity and Energy and Enoch Godongwana's National Treasury – and it's racing the clock to unlock billions in private investment and build the 14,000km of new transmission lines needed to connect renewable energy projects and end the country's electricity crisis. Speaking to the parliamentary committee on electricity and energy last week, Minister of Electricity and Energy Ramokgopa painted a picture of a country on the cusp of an energy revolution, but one that required unprecedented national rewiring coordination between government, the private sector and state-owned entities to succeed. Ramokgopa knows the stakes. It was his Integrated Resource Plan that estimated a desperate need of more than 14,000km of new transmission lines and 170 transformers over the next decade – requiring a minimum of the N1 road length from Joburg to Cape Town's worth of new lines annually – South Africa's current grid expansion pace is 'wholly inadequate', according to government briefings. Private sector rush The appetite for private sector involvement is clear. Between December 2024 and February 2025, the government conducted a request for information that received more than 130 formal responses from local and international developers, financiers, operators and equipment manufacturers. More than 44% of local participants indicated they intended to partner with international entities, suggesting the scale of investment required exceeds domestic capacity alone. The feedback was instructive: the industry reported a need for stable regulatory frameworks and a programmatic roll-out for pipeline predictability, while also flagging permitting, right-of-way acquisition and supply chain constraints as key risks requiring proactive mitigation. The government listened. First came the ministerial determination, gazetted on 28 March 2025, designating the Department of Electricity and Energy as the procurer and the National Transmission Company South Africa (NTCSA) as the buyer under Transmission Services Agreements. The determination defines Phase 1 scope as 1,164km of 400kV transmission lines across the Northern Cape, North-West and Gauteng. Expropriation trump card Next came the Draft Electricity Transmission Regulations, on 3 April, with public consultation closing on 22 May. The IPP Office will run the Phase 1 procurement, with pre-qualification tenders expected by end-July and requests for proposals by November. A persistent obstacle that the NTCSA inherited from Eskom is the complexities of securing land for its transmission lines. Ramokgopa confirmed that expropriation with compensation would be used 'as a final instrument' after exhausting other engagement options. For ITP projects, the government aims for 'late-stage tender' – resolving land acquisition, environmental impact assessments and statutory authorisations before developers take over execution, de-risking projects for private investors. Some discussions have stretched over four years without resolution, but the NTCSA says it is committed to meticulously adhering to proper procedures to mitigate the risk of litigation as it navigates these challenging negotiations. The R440bn funding puzzle The Transmission Development Plan requires R440-billion over the next decade. Ramokgopa was blunt about the funding reality: 'The sovereign balance sheet cannot provide a blanket sovereign guarantee for this investment, nor are Eskom's or NTCSA's balance sheets strong enough alone.' The government's solution is a 'bespoke financing instrument' backed by a Credit Guarantee Vehicle (CGV) developed with the World Bank. The CGV will be incorporated as a private non-life insurance company in South Africa and is expected to become operational in 2026. For the first five years, R155-billion will be spent on transmission infrastructure, with R30-billion expected from third-party debt by 2028. NTCSA's board has increased its five-year budget by about R40-billion to R130-billion, with 76% allocated for network expansion. A R219-billion provision from Budget 3.0 (part of the R1.03-trillion medium-term expenditure framework) was noted for strengthening the electricity supply network, from generation to transmission and distribution. Supply chain nationalism Ramokgopa pointed to the government's intention to build local industries on the back of energy investments rather than 'exporting opportunities'. The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition is coordinating interventions to ensure local production of Class 4 transformers and steel. The progress is evident: 22 factories have been accredited for various transformer classes, while five of six identified steel tower suppliers have been certified. Eskom announced a panel of transformer suppliers in June 2024 to address demand for 101 large transformers over the next decade. Racing against time With the competitive electricity market targeted for April 2026 and the Credit Guarantee Vehicle becoming operational the same year, timelines are tight. The NTCSA is simultaneously developing market codes, managing infrastructure roll-outs and preparing for its role as market operator once the Electricity Regulation Amendment Act is passed. The South African Wholesale Electricity Market School will launch at Wits Business School to build market participant capabilities, while synchronous condensers are planned to strengthen grid stability as renewable penetration increases. That said, for the first time in years, South Africa has a comprehensive plan, committed funding mechanisms and private sector interest to transform its electricity system. Whether it can execute fast enough to meet the 2026 competitive market deadline – and finally end load shedding – remains the R440-billion question. DM
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
South Africa moves closer to exiting FATF greylist after significant progress
South African is moving towards being lifted from the greylisting. Image: Independent Media archives KwaZulu-Natal Finance MEC Francois Rodgers and head of his department Carol Coetzee have expressed excitement at the news that South Africa was moving towards being lifted from the greylisting. The national Treasury released a statement on June 13 saying that the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) had announced that the country had substantially completed all 22 action items that were contained in the Action Plan adopted when South Africa was greylisted in February 2023. The country was placed on the greylist due to its failure to adhere to the FATF's requirements in dealing with anti-money laundering (AML) and combating of financing of terrorism (CFT). The FATF said it would now conduct an onsite inspection on South Africa's compliance with the requirements of being completely removed from greylisting. The FATF noted during its plenary meeting held in France that South Africa had shown political commitment in dealing with what landed it in greylisting. 'If we are removed from the greylisting, it means that the R5.7 trillion that we had borrowed as the National Treasury and incur interest, you can start negotiating better interest rates on the R5.7 trillion,' said Rodgers. He said the national treasury was currently paying R1.2 billion a day on interest to repay its loans. 'Should that be reduced, it will ultimately mean that there is more money at a national level, which can be cascaded down to provinces,' said Rodgers. Coetzee said being removed from greylisting would mean South Africa would now be in a better position to be an investment destination, as it would be considered less risky. 'It means that investors would be very interested to come and invest, and it would mean that the government is settling down, and their (investors) funds are secured,' said Coetzee. The National Treasury commended the country's law enforcement agencies, the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI), the State Security Agency, and the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), for their sustained increase in investigations and prosecutions of serious and complex money laundering and terror financing activities. 'This made it possible for South Africa to secure the upgrades of the last two remaining action items, often considered to be the most difficult, in the current reporting cycle,' read a statement from the National Treasury. The Treasury said FATF had noted that South Africa demonstrated 'a sustained increase in investigations and prosecutions of serious and complex money laundering and the full range of [terror financing] TF activities in line with its risk profile, updating its TF Risk Assessment to inform the implementation of a comprehensive national counter financing of terrorism strategy.' 'The improvements to South Africa's AML/CFT regime are particularly important for South Africa, given the legacy of state capture, one element of which was that law enforcement and prosecuting institutions were deliberately weakened. Improvements in these domains are critical not just for getting off the greylist, but for strengthening the fight against crime and corruption, and for contributing to the integrity of the South African financial system. 'Exiting the FATF greylist is a significant step forward as South Africa continues to improve and strengthen its supervisory and criminal justice systems,' read the treasury. However, the Umkhonto Wesizwe Party (MKP) called on the country not to jump into celebrating the FATF's move as the ANC continued with its chaotic policies and its failure to deal with the Phala Phala matter. 'This (Phala Phala) controversy raised alarming questions about financial controls, money laundering and the credibility of the President's own financial conduct, fueling international suspicion about South Africa's ability to manage financial crimes,' read MKP's statement. The party said the very fact that the FATF will still have to conduct an on-site assessment to verify South Africa's compliance 'speaks volumes about the fragility and questionable integrity of our financial oversight system.' 'This is not a routine check; it is a clear sign that international bodies have serious doubts about the reliability of South Africa's own reports and reforms. 'It underscores the deep trust deficit the ANC government has created, both at home and abroad. 'Until these doubts are fully dispelled, South Africa's voice on the global financial stage remains weak and contested,' read MKP's statement. ANC national spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu described FATF's move as a major milestone for South Africa, both domestically and internationally. 'It strengthens the credibility of our financial system and contributes to the global and national fight against illicit financial flows, terrorism financing, and the legacy of state capture. 'We will continue to support government efforts to fully comply with global standards, ensuring that the country is permanently removed from the greylist and that our financial systems are protected from abuse,' said Bhengu. [email protected]
TimesLIVE
10 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Eskom shells out R12m in board fees, R3bn in overtime in 2023/24
Eskom board members were paid a total of R12.1m in annual board fees between April 1 2023 and 31 March 31 2024, minister of electricity and energy Kgosientsho Ramokgopa said. This is contained in a written reply to MPs released to the media on Tuesday. EFF MP Mandla Shikwambana asked the minister about the annual expenditure on overtime for Eskom employees and the circumstances under which overtime is paid. He also asked whether, according to the 2024 Eskom annual report, the board held 22 meetings, averaging two meetings per month, if the meetings were pre-planned and why those that were unplanned occurred. 'Based on the principle of a board of directors functioning as one unit, a collective assessment approach is in place. The last collective performance assessment of the board was undertaken in the financial year 2024, and the outcomes of this assessment were shared with the shareholder representative,' Ramokgopa said in the written reply. Eskom board chair Mteto Nyati and non-executive directors Fathima Gany, Tryphosa Ramano, Claudelle von Eck and Clive le Roux were all paid more than R1m in board fees during the period. Non-executive director Rod Crompton earned the lowest quantum in board fees among listed board members at R676,000. 'During the reporting period, a total of 22 board meetings were held. Of these, 10 meetings had been pre-scheduled in the annual board calendar. 'In accordance with the approved fee structure, non-executive directors had not been paid per meeting but had received a fixed annual fee based on their committee allocations.' The minister said this fixed fee had implicitly covered participation in up to eight scheduled board meetings. The remaining 14 meetings, which had exceeded the planned schedule, had not attracted any additional fees. 'The additional meetings had been convened on an ad hoc basis to address urgent and time-sensitive matters that had required the immediate attention of the board. Several of these engagements had been necessitated by unforeseen and evolving developments.' Ramokgopa said the additional meetings primarily dealt with the group CEO recruitment process, recruitment for the National Transmission Company of SA and other unbundling matters. The minister said in addition to the fixed fee they received, non-executive directors were reimbursed for any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the execution of their duties. In the same written reply, Ramokgopa told Shikwambana that Eskom spent R3.03bn paying staff overtime between April 1 2023 and March 31 2024. Ramokgopa said this was in instances where work beyond the hours stipulated for staff typically included an emergency during a standby period, breakdown of plant, pre-arranged plant maintenance, or commissioning of plant. Other instances were authorised construction work on site, preventive and protective services, staff emergencies during continuous shift work, abnormal emergency services, special tasks on a one-time basis, exceptional cases when set target dates could not be met, and critical personnel shortages only for short periods not exceeding one month. 'About 92% of the workforce is eligible for overtime.'
