India Pakistan war: How many seconds does a nuclear bomb takes to explode? it can destroy area spread across…., India can shield atom bomb attack by…
Home
News
India Pakistan war: How many seconds does a nuclear bomb takes to explode? it can destroy area spread across…., India can shield atom bomb attack by…
India Pakistan war: How many seconds does a nuclear bomb takes to explode? it can destroy area spread across…., India can shield atom bomb attack by…
India possesses an advanced Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system. They are typically used in nuclear attacks, and this defense system acts as a protective shield against them.
New Delhi: India possesses one of the most advanced and capable defense systems in the world. In contrast, Pakistan's repeated assertions about countering India's defense capabilities are widely viewed as unsubstantiated and lack credibility. Alongside the S-400 air defense system, India possesses several other systems capable of neutralizing any Pakistani attack — whether it involves cruise missiles or ballistic missiles. Any ballistic missile launched by Pakistan to deliver a nuclear bomb can be targeted and destroyed.
Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system:
India possesses an advanced Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system. They are typically used in nuclear attacks, and this defense system acts as a protective shield against them. The Prithvi Defense Vehicle (PDV) is a formidable weapon against fighter aircraft, drones, as well as cruise and ballistic missiles. It can track and destroy targets at altitudes of up to 40,000 feet while still in the air. It becomes operational within just 10 minutes.
Here are some of the key details:
India possesses an advanced Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system.
They are typically used in nuclear attacks, and this defense system acts as a protective shield against them.
The Prithvi Defense Vehicle (PDV) is a formidable weapon against fighter aircraft, drones, as well as cruise and ballistic missiles.
It can track and destroy targets at altitudes of up to 40,000 feet while still in the air.
It becomes operational within just 10 minutes.
In addition to intercepting missile attacks, it is also capable of launching retaliatory strikes.
Using radar and missiles, it can shoot down Pakistani fighter jets, bombers, surveillance aircraft, and drones from a distance of up to 400 kilometers.
This ₹40,000 crore deal was finalized in 2018.
It was in the year 1996, India's missile defense program began. Israel developed a radar system capable of tracking enemy missiles, known as the Long Range Tracking Radar or Swordfish. It can detect missiles from Pakistan or China up to 300 km away. In February 2017, India tested the Prithvi Defence Vehicle (PDV). This is a new missile tracking system, launched immediately after detection, and is similar to the American THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) system. Its advanced air defense system is considered highly effective and accurate.
India also possesses a mobile missile defense system. It includes short-range surface-to-air missiles. The name of the system is the 9K33 OSA AK anti-aircraft system. In India, a team of five soldiers operates this system and launches the missiles. Its range is reported to be between 15 and 18 kilometers. These missiles can eliminate enemy targets at a speed of 3,704 km/h. The missiles are mounted on 17.5-ton BMP vehicles.
This MRSAM, or Barak 8 missile system, is lethal. This air defense system—Medium Range Surface-to-Air Missile (MR-SAM) Barak 8—has been jointly developed by DRDO (Defence Research and Development Organisation) and Israel. The system can intercept subsonic and supersonic missiles, fighter jets, patrol aircraft, helicopters, and missiles launched from the sea.
For breaking news and live news updates, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram. Read more on Latest India News on India.com.
More Stories
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
How China Has Been Blocking India's UNSC Actions Since The 2000s
In the India-Pakistan strategic dynamic, China has emerged as an inextricable third actor, turning a bilateral rivalry into a triangular matter. While military escalation in the subcontinent does not align with Beijing's strategic interests, its pro-Pakistan leanings often manifest on international platforms. Most recently, China blocked the designation of The Resistance Front (TRF), an alleged offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), following the 2025 Pahalgam attack. This move reflects a longstanding pattern: China has consistently complicated New Delhi's diplomatic efforts to isolate Pakistan-based groups in global forums. As India seeks broader consensus on counterterrorism designations, particularly at the UN Security Council (UNSC), China has frequently intervened by blocking or delaying the listing of individuals affiliated with anti-India groups such as LeT and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM). A 'technical hold' in the UNSC sanctions process allows a member state to indefinitely delay designation without a formal veto. For decades, China has exploited this to delay, if not deny, sanctions on Pakistan-linked terror architecture without triggering a diplomatic confrontation. The symbolic framing of China-Pakistan relations, famously described by former Pakistani Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani as 'higher than mountains, deeper than oceans, stronger than steel, and sweeter than honey", for now has translated into sustained strategic cover for Pakistan on the international stage. Chinese media's description of terrorism in India, such as the Pahalgam attack, as a case of 'shooting' by local gunmen against civilians, further supports the Pakistani narrative of the conflict. 'Technical Holds' China's pattern of using 'technical holds' in the UNSC 1267 Sanctions Committee can be traced to the early 2000s. After the 2001 Indian Parliament attack, India began pushing for international sanctions against Pakistan-based outfits. While China supported the designation of groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks, it remained reluctant to target individuals associated with these anti-India groups, most notably JeM chief Masood Azhar, who was finally listed in 2019. India's first formal request to enlist Azhar came in 2009, following the Mumbai attacks and was followed up in 2016, 2017, and 2019. While international pressure eventually influenced this reversal after two decades, the exclusion of any reference to the Pulwama attack in the final listing allowed China to maintain that Azhar's designation was based on his long-standing links to terrorism rather than a specific attack on India. Over time, the Pathankot attack of 2016 and the Pulwama suicide bombing in 2019 resulted in intensified Indian diplomatic efforts targeting Pakistan-based terrorist leaders and groups. All efforts were impeded by China's technical holds, despite co-sponsorship by France, the UK, and the US. At large, this trend continues. In 2023, Beijing blocked a joint India-US proposal to list Abdul Rauf Asghar and other anti-India terrorists. Double Standards This stands in contradiction to China's own counterterrorism posture against separatist and Islamist groups that threaten Chinese nationals and investments in Pakistan, including in major cities like Karachi. In 2021, a suicide bomber affiliated with the Baloch Liberation Army's (BLA) Majeed Brigade attacked a convoy carrying Chinese engineers and workers, killing three Chinese nationals near the Jinnah International Airport and the Chinese consulate area in Karachi. China has also raised similar concerns with the Taliban administration in Afghanistan regarding the alleged presence of Uyghur militant groups, such as the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM). This antithetical approach serves dual purposes - mitigating pressure on Pakistan's influential military establishment while keeping India preoccupied with cross-border security challenges. The SCO Factor China's selective counter-terror posture also plays out in other multilateral groupings like the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), which remains a key arena for its regional influence. With India and Pakistan inducted as full members in 2017, China portrayed the bloc as a pan-Asia alternative to Western-led groupings. But India's strong stance against cross-border terrorism and leanings towards the QUAD bloc have complicated that narrative. India's limited participation in the SCO, especially since 2019, is increasingly shaped by the grouping's silence on cross-border terrorism allegations against Pakistan. India's decision to downgrade its summit participation to a virtual format in 2023 further challenges China's efforts to position the SCO as a counterweight to US influence in the region. For China, India's continued engagement in the SCO remains crucial for maintaining the bloc's diplomatic credibility. India could continue framing Chinese obstructionism as a significant concern for global counterterrorism efforts with the aim of raising the reputational and diplomatic costs of China's inaction, without relying solely on the UNSC system. India's widening engagement with QUAD, involving Australia, Japan, India, and the US, through military exercises and joint dialogues, will also keep China on edge by signalling a strengthened Indo-Pacific alliance countering the Chinese regional influence.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 hours ago
- First Post
India likely to avoid trade ban on Turkey due to $2.73 bn surplus
India is restricting Turkish involvement in key infrastructure projects over security concerns but is avoiding a full trade ban. Despite industry calls, the government is unlikely to impose a trade ban, due to $2.73 billion trade surplus. read more While India is taking steps to limit Turkish involvement in key infrastructure projects on national security grounds, it is less inclined to impose similar restrictions on overall trade. This is despite industry groups calling for a ban on imports such as apples and marble. The main reason is that India runs a $2.73 billion trade surplus with Turkey, and blocking trade could harm India's own interests. 'We have received several representations requesting a ban on imports from Turkey. Apple growers from Himachal Pradesh have specifically sought a ban on Turkish apple imports. However, India maintains a trade surplus with Turkey, and we must also consider the interests of our exporters. A trade ban could send a strong geopolitical message, but it's a question of how far we are willing to take it,' a government official told The Indian Express. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The trade surplus is significant because India primarily exports industrial goods to Turkey—such as engineering products, electronics, and chemicals—which have steadily increased over the past five years. In contrast, Turkey's exports to India are mainly limited to fruits, nuts, gold, and marble. Following the Ukraine war, Turkey had ramped up its imports of petroleum products from India, but this category has seen a sharp decline in FY25. This development comes in the wake of Turkey backing Pakistan during heightened tensions with India, after New Delhi carried out Operation Sindoor targeting terror hubs in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). Last month, apple growers from Himachal Pradesh met officials from the Union Commerce Ministry, demanding a ban on apple imports. They claimed that cheap, subsidised Turkish apples are damaging the domestic horticulture sector and pushing local farmers into financial distress. They also emphasised that apples are not merely a crop, but the economic backbone of hill states. Marble processors from Udaipur also wrote to the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) last month, seeking restrictions on marble imports from Turkey. Earlier this month, Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan met Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif in Istanbul and stated that both countries would work to deepen cooperation, especially in defence, energy, and transport, according to a statement from Erdogan's office. Pak gets strong Turkey backing About two weeks ago, Turkey reaffirmed its close ties with Pakistan, which are rooted in shared religious identity and historical links. Erdogan also expressed solidarity with Pakistan after India conducted military strikes in response to a terror attack in Pahalgam carried out by Pakistan-backed militants.
News18
5 hours ago
- News18
India Reduced Poverty By Record Levels But 45% Of Pakistan's Population Is Poor, Reveals World Bank
Last Updated: In an assessment earlier this April, the World Bank said 1.9 million additional people fell into poverty in 2024-25 in Pakistan India has brought a record number of people out of poverty as per the World Bank, but the latter's latest projection on Pakistan says nearly 45 per cent of its population lives in poverty, while 16.5 per cent lives in extreme poverty. This is after a World Bank revision of the threshold poverty line last week. In an assessment earlier this April, the World Bank had said 1.9 million additional people fell into poverty in 2024-25 in Pakistan. India has been making a case before the IMF and the World Bank that Pakistan has been misusing global aid for the purposes of terrorism against India. The World Bank data could be further used by India to raise strong doubts on how Pakistan has been using global aid from agencies like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for the purported benefit of its common people. India's extreme poverty rate declined sharply to 5.3 per cent over a decade from 27.1 per cent in 2011-12, even as the World Bank has revised upwards its threshold poverty line to $3 per day. India has lifted 171 million people from extreme poverty in the decade between 2011-12 and 2022-23, as per the World Bank. The World Bank report on Pakistan in April said the country's 2.6 per cent economic growth 'remains insufficient to reduce poverty". The poverty rate is estimated to stand at 42.4 per cent (US$3.65/day 2017 PPP) in FY25 in Pakistan, 'virtually unchanged from last year", the report said. 'With population growing at nearly 2 per cent annually, this translates to 1.9 million additional people falling into poverty this year," the report said. The World Bank also said the agriculture sector faces significant challenges in Pakistan as in 2025, weather conditions deteriorated with a 40 per cent reduction in rainfall, alongside pest attacks and shifting production choices. 'Crop yields are projected to decline, ranging from 29.6 per cent for cotton to 1.2 per cent for rice, limiting sectoral growth to under 2 per cent," the report says. With India putting the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance, water flow to Pakistan's Punjab has also been severely affected, which could also put agriculture yield in Pakistan under severe stress. CNN-News18 had reported on Sunday that Pakistan's official data shows a 15 per cent drop in water flow in the Indus Water Basin in Punjab with the Dams Level at many Pakistani dams nearing the dead level. 'With agriculture employing approximately half of the working poor, rural poverty is expected to rise slightly (0.2 percentage points), while real incomes for agricultural workers are projected to fall 0.7 per cent in FY25. Food security concerns loom large, with an estimated 10 million people at risk of acute food insecurity in rural areas," the report says. The report said the consumption-based inequality in Pakistan has climbed nearly 2 points since FY21, holding steady just below 32 over the past year. 'However, actual inequality is likely higher since surveys typically underrepresent wealthy households. Additionally, external factors such as evolving global trade dynamics, could influence the pace of economic recovery and subsequent progress on poverty reduction." First Published: June 09, 2025, 08:12 IST
