‘Strongly Advocating For Delhi's Interests': Rekha Gupta Hails SC's Order On End-Of-Life Vehicles
Delhi CM Rekha Gupta welcomed the Supreme Court's order preventing immediate action against owners of end-of-life vehicles in Delhi-NCR.
Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta on Tuesday welcomed the Supreme Court's order that no coercive action would be taken against owners of end-of-life vehicles, saying that the top court has accepted the government's request.
In a post on X, the Chief Minister congratulated the people of the national capital and asserted that no immediate punitive action will be taken against owners of diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years in the National Capital Region (NCR).
'Heartfelt congratulations to the people of Delhi! The Honorable Supreme Court has accepted our government's request. Now, no immediate punitive action will be taken against owners of diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years in the National Capital Region (NCR)," she said in a post on X.
Gupta further said that the Delhi government had petitioned the top court to review the ban on end-of-life vehicles, arguing it unfairly impacts the middle class without scientific backing.
'Through a review petition, we had urged that vehicles should not be evaluated solely based on their age but rather on their mileage and emission levels, so that only vehicles actually contributing to pollution are identified and acted upon. We will continue to actively participate in the judicial process, strongly advocating for the interests of Delhi's residents," she added.
Earlier today, the Supreme Court said that no coercive action will be taken against owners of 10-year-old diesel vehicles and 15-year-old petrol vehicles in Delhi and NCR.
A bench of Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria issued the order after Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Delhi government, requested relief for vehicle owners.
'Issue notice, returnable in four weeks. In the meantime, we direct that no coercive steps be taken against the owners on the ground that vehicles are 10 years old in respect of diesel vehicles and 15 years old in respect of petrol vehicles," the bench stated.
About the Author
First Published:
Latest News
Telangana CM calls for boost to ecotourism
Agency feeds
Agency feeds
Israeli PM in denial about Gaza crisis, claims Australian PM Anthony Albanese
Agency feeds
Mathura: Farmer set on fire over encroached hut dies of burns
Agency feeds
Punjab CM Mann offers prayers at Kali temple in Patiala
Agency feeds
UP: Woman kills self by consuming poison over husbands alcohol addiction
latest news
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The streets are no place for dogs. If Delhi gets it right, it can set a precedent for the nation
Written by Harish Tiwari The Supreme Court's recent directive to remove free-roaming dogs from Delhi-NCR streets and place them in shelters within eight weeks is a landmark moment in India's decades-long struggle with stray dog management. It finally recognises what has long been evident — the streets are not the right place for man's best friend. But the real test will lie not in the order itself but in its execution. If Delhi gets it right, it can set a precedent for the nation. If it fails through haste or poor planning, other states will hesitate for years, and the issue could slide back into neglect. The CJI has, however, constituted a three-judge bench to hear the matter further and has reserved the order. For years, debate on this issue has been reduced to 'dog lovers versus dog bite victims,' a false binary that tries to portray the issue as compassion against cruelty. This framing ignores the critical expertise of other stakeholders — ecologists, veterinarians, epidemiologists, urban planners, and public health experts — who understand dog population dynamics, rabies epidemiology, and human–animal interactions. Their insights must guide implementation. The Court's directive gives municipalities political cover to act, but how they do so will decide whether this becomes a turning point or a cautionary tale. Large-scale removal of street dogs is not as simple as netting and relocating them. Without proper planning, shelters risk becoming overcrowded warehouses breeding disease, neglect, and public outrage. Quick-fix, unscientific solutions will fail and harm India's credibility internationally. What is needed is a phased, humane approach supported by robust, long-term capacity. Shelters should not be holding pens but well-designed facilities with sustainable capacity, veterinary care, isolation wards, sterilisation units, vaccination clinics, and enrichment spaces. Microchipping, photo identification, or tagging every dog can ensure real enumeration, traceability and prevent them from returning to the streets. Adoption must be central to the plan. Puppies and sociable adults can find homes through public adoption drives, coupled with proper screening and follow-up to prevent repeat abandonment. Beyond rehoming, Indian local dogs should be valued for their resilience and adaptability. They can be trained as guard dogs, search-and-rescue animals, or security partners for police and disaster response teams, changing public perception about them from nuisance to asset. A lasting solution also requires stopping the pipeline of new street dogs. Pet owners must be required to register, sterilise, and vaccinate their dogs, with strict penalties for abandonment. Public campaigns should promote responsible ownership as part of civic duty. Feeding dogs in public without taking responsibility for their health and behaviour is misplaced compassion that sustains the cycle of conflict. Public fear of dogs is real and must be respected, but it should be addressed by tackling the root causes of aggression. Instead of public feeding, contributions can be channelised to the shelter homes to develop a sustainable business model with perennial social benefits and A-class animal welfare. The writer is DBT Wellcome Trust India Alliance Intermediate Fellow, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IITG), and research affiliate, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney
Scroll.in
29 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
SC criticises ‘completely vague' petitions against Gujarat's Vantara animal rescue centre
The Supreme Court on Thursday criticised two petitions alleging irregularities in animal rescue centre Vantara and the transfer of an ailing elephant from there, describing the pleas as 'completely vague', Live Law reported. However, the bench of Justices Pankaj Mithal and PB Varela allowed the petitioners to amend their submissions, and scheduled the next hearing for August 25. The first petition demanded that a monitoring committee be set up to look into alleged irregularities at the Reliance Foundation-run Vantara, all captive elephants be returned to their owners and all wild animals at the facility be released back to the wild. The petitioner also questioned the transfer of an ailing elephant named Madhuri or Madhavi from the Kolhapur district to Vantara in Gujarat's Jamnagar. A bench of Justices Pankaj Mithal and PB Varale, however, questioned how the petitioner could make allegations against the animal rescue centre without even making it a party to the plea. 'You implead them [as respondents] and then come back to us we will see,' the court said, according to PTI. In the second petition, the counsel for the petitioners said that Vantara had already been impleaded in the matter. Mithal, however, asked whether the petitioner had approached the Central Zoo Authority before approaching the Supreme Court. 'Don't file such vague petitions,' the court said, according to Live Law. 'We can't even understand the relief you are seeking.' For over 30 years, the elephant Madhuri had been at a Jain monastery, named the Swastishri Jinsen Bhattarak Pattacharya Mahaswami Sansthan Mutt, in Kolhapur's Nandani village. In July, the Bombay High Court ordered Madhuri's rehabilitation to Vantara, and the Supreme Court subsequently upheld the order. The elephant was moved to the Reliance Foundation-run centre in Gujarat on July 30, sparking protests in Kolhapur. On August 5, Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said that the state government will file a review petition in the Supreme Court seeking Madhuri's return to Kolhapur.
The Wire
29 minutes ago
- The Wire
Haryana: Supreme Court-Ordered Vote Recount Reverses 2022 Panchayat Poll Results
New Delhi: A Supreme Court-ordered recount of votes cast in a 2022 gram panchayat election in Haryana's Panipat has resulted in the reversal of results. This is the first exercise of its kind ordered by the Supreme Court. The case stems from panchayat elections held on November 2, 2022 in Panipat's Buana Lakhu village, in which Kuldeep Singh was declared elected over rival Mohit Kumar, the Tribune reported. The votes were recounted by Supreme Court OSD (Registrar) Kaveri in Kumar and Singh's presence and the entire process was recorded on camera. After the exercise was completed, it was found that Kumar had received 1,051 votes against Singh's 1,000 votes. "The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Election Officer, Panipat, is, accordingly, directed to issue a notification in this regard within two days declaring the appellant (Mohit Kumar) as the elected Sarpanch of the above-mentioned gram panchayat,' the court said in an order dated August 11. 'The appellant (Mohit Kumar) shall be entitled to assume the said office (of sarpanch) forthwith and perform his duties," the bench, comprising Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta and N. Kotiswar Singh said. After the November elections, Kumar had filed an election petition challenging the result before the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)-cum-Election Tribunal of Panipat in April. The tribunal on May 7 ordered a recount of votes cast at booth 69 in the village. However, the election tribunal's order was set aside by the Punjab and Haryana high court in July. Kumar then moved the Supreme Court, which ordered a recount of all votes cast at all booths during the panchayat elections. "Taking into consideration the peculiar facts and circumstances of this 1 case, the Deputy Commissioner and the District Election Officer, Panipat, Haryana is directed to produce all EVMs before the Registrar of this Court, to be nominated by the Secretary General, at 10 am on 06.08.2025. The nominated Registrar shall recount the votes, not only of the disputed booth but of all the booths. The recounting shall be duly video-graphed. The petitioner as well as the respondent no.1 or their authorized agents shall remain present at the time of recounting," the Supreme Court said in its July 31 order. A week later, OSD (Registrar) Kaveri recounted the 3,767 votes cast, after which Kumar emerged as the winner, the report said. 'There being prima facie no reason to doubt the report submitted by the OSD (Registrar) of this court, especially when the entire recounting has been duly video-graphed and its result is signed by the representatives of the parties, we are satisfied that the appellant (Mohit Kumar) deserves to be declared as the elected Sarpanch of the gram panchayat, Buana Lakhu village, District Panipat, Haryana in the election held on 22.11.2022,' the Supreme court said, setting aside the high court's verdict. The court said that the parties can still raise any remaining issues before the election tribunal.
