
New rows over old divisions in Labour before Westminster MPs take summer break
House of Commons
doesn't officially rise for summer recess until Tuesday, but a giddy, end-of-term vibe had already enveloped parliament by Thursday afternoon, the time of week when most MPs leave Westminster and head back to their constituencies.
After an exhausting, battle-laden few weeks for
Keir Starmer
's
Labour
government, the prime minister sent his charges off for the summer with a flurry of decisions aimed at reasserting his waning authority over the restive parliamentary party.
Late on Wednesday afternoon, it emerged he had suspended four MPs, including three of the new intake from last year's general election landslide win. They had been prominent among Labour rebels who recently forced the government into an embarrassing U-turn on £5 billion (€5.8 billion) of disability benefit cuts.
The decision to remove the whip from newbies Brian Leishman, Chris Hinchliff and Neil Duncan-Jordan, as well as rebel leader Rachael Maskell, who was first elected in 2019, was viewed in Labour as a warning that Starmer will not idly brook such dissent.
READ MORE
However, as the party's MPs gathered for the last of Westminster's relentless stream of booze-fuelled summer receptions later that evening, many on Labour's soft-left wing complained the suspensions had made Starmer look vindictive and weak.
Others, notably MPs supportive of the view that Labour should focus on countering the populist threat of Reform UK, argued it was about time he was robust.
With Labour's factional fault lines laid bare, the only thing that seemed to unite Labour MPs as the week ended was that they all badly needed a break to reset over summer.
The situation was complicated further on Thursday morning by the emergence of comments by Diane Abbott, the veteran Hackney MP. She told the BBC she had 'no regrets' over a furore sparked by a letter she wrote to the Observer newspaper in 2023.
Her critics argued the letter had downplayed bigotry experienced by Travellers, Irish and, crucially, Jewish people compared to racism suffered by the Black community. The original row led to Abbott's suspension from Labour for alleged anti-Semitism, which she had always denied.
She was only readmitted on the eve of the last general election campaign, as a groundswell of support for her opened Starmer up to accusations of vindictiveness against a woman who had experienced racism all her life – Abbott was also an ally of former leader
Jeremy Corbyn
, whose backers Starmer had sought to vanquish.
By effectively doubling down this week on her original comments, Abbott presented the prime minister with a dilemma were he to reopen his row with her and, with it, old divisions that had damaged his party in the past.
Meanwhile, Thursday's announcement that Labour will lower the voting age to 16 in advance of the next general election points to divisions that may affect the party's future.
It had always been assumed that any move to reduce the voting age would directly benefit Labour over the Tories, as younger voters tend to tack left. Recent polls from ITV and More in Common, however, suggest the impact might be more nuanced.
A July survey by More in Common, a Westminster think tank, found that among 18- to 24-year-olds, the youngest cohort allowed to vote, the Greens were by far the most popular party, on 32 per cent versus 24 per cent for Labour. If that trend continued into 16- to 17-year-olds, then whatever Labour gained from the Tories on its right flank might be eliminated on its left, where anger over Starmer's stance on Israel pervades.
Meanwhile, an ITV poll of 16- and 17-year-olds found that while Labour was the most-supported party, the most popular politician was Starmer's old foe Corbyn, which doesn't play well for the prime minister as he battles with his predecessor's acolytes.
Both surveys also point to surprising levels of support among young people for Nigel Farage's Reform, which will cheer the populist politician as he gears up for his summer break. The numbers were awful, however, for the party he seeks to supplant, the Tories, down to just 6 per cent among 18- to 24-year-olds in the More in Common survey.
The decision by Starmer to risk more infighting in his party by suspending rebels was also criticised by some in Labour for letting the Tories off the hook; it took the focus off the Conservative party's handling when it was in power of a 2022 leak of the identities of 18,700 Afghans who had risked their lives by helping British forces there.
The fiasco, which emerged this week only after a court superinjunction was lifted, sparked an airlift of up to 24,000 Afghans to Britain to keep them safe from Taliban retribution. It was the perfect opportunity for Starmer to remind voters of what one of his minister's this week described as Tory 'ineptitude'.
Yet as the week petered out and the summer break beckoned, the British press was full of headlines over Labour division and the possible galvanisation of the party's left.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
5 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Zelensky faces backlash as Ukrainians protest against new anti-corruption law
Ukrainian activists have called for more protests against a law they say weakens the country's anti-corruption bodies, following the first major demonstration against the country's government in more than three years of war. The legislation has also drawn rebukes from European Union officials and international rights groups. President Volodymyr Zelensky, under pressure as the change threatened to endanger his public support at a critical time in the war with Russia, convened the heads of Ukraine's key anti-corruption and security agencies on Wednesday morning in response to the outcry against his decision to approve the new law that was passed by Parliament. Criminal cases should not drag on for years without verdicts, and those working against Ukraine must not feel comfortable or immune from punishment 'We all hear what society says,' Mr Zelensky wrote on Telegram after the meeting. But he insisted the new legal framework was needed to crack down harder on corruption. 'Criminal cases should not drag on for years without verdicts, and those working against Ukraine must not feel comfortable or immune from punishment,' the Ukrainian leader said. He said all government agencies agreed to work constructively and respond to public expectations for fairness and effectiveness. A detailed joint action plan is expected within two weeks, aimed at addressing institutional weaknesses, removing legal hurdles, and ensuring justice across the board, he said. Thousands of people gathered in the capital and other cities across Ukraine on Tuesday evening to urge Mr Zelensky to veto the controversial bill. After Mr Zelensky approved it, activists called on social media for another demonstration in the centre of Kyiv on Wednesday evening. The legislation tightens government oversight of two key anti-corruption agencies. Critics say the step could significantly weaken the independence of those agencies and grant Mr Zelensky's circle greater influence over investigations. A woman holds a phone with a sign reading 'veto' during a protest against the law (Alex Babenko/AP) Fighting entrenched corruption is crucial for Ukraine's aspirations to join the EU and maintain access to billions of dollars in western aid in its fight against Russia's three-year invasion. In a post on X, the EU's enlargement commissioner, Marta Kos, expressed concern over the vote in the Ukrainian parliament, called the Rada, calling it 'a serious step back'. The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International criticised parliament's decision, saying it undermines one of the most significant reforms since what Ukraine calls its Revolution of Dignity in 2014, and damages trust with international partners. It accused authorities of 'dismantling' the country's anti-corruption architecture. Mr Zelensky has been the international face of Ukraine's determination to defeat Russia's all-out invasion, and his domestic troubles are an unwelcome diversion from the war effort. Mr Zelensky said the new law clears out 'Russian influence' from the fight against corruption and ensures punishment for those found guilty of it, after what he said were years-long delays in criminal proceedings involving huge amounts of money. Volodymyr Zelensky said the new law clears out 'Russian influence' from the fight against corruption (Gregorio Borgia/AP) 'The cases that have been lying dormant must be investigated,' Mr Zelensky said in a Telegram post after midnight on Wednesday. 'For years, officials who have fled Ukraine have been casually living abroad for some reason – in very nice countries and without legal consequences – and this is not normal.' He did not provide examples of what he said was Russian interference. Russian officials relished Mr Zelensky's difficulties. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova mocked Mr Zelensky's claim of Russian infiltration into the anti-corruption agency, noting sarcastically that 'they might just as well pull a couple of bears out of the corner'. Delegations from Russia and Ukraine were set to meet in Istanbul on Wednesday for their third round of direct talks in two months, the Kremlin and Ukrainian officials said. The meeting was not expected to make progress on ending the war and would likely focus on exchanges of prisoners of war. The legal changes in Ukraine would grant the prosecutor general new authority over investigations and cases handled by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office.

Irish Times
5 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Former TD Colm Keaveney banned from driving for four years for refusing to provide sample to Garda
Former Labour and Fianna Fáil TD Colm Keaveney has been banned from driving for four years after refusing to provide a blood or urine sample to gardaí following a late-night incident in Boyle, Co Roscommon. Keaveney (54), of Milltown Road, Tuam, Co Galway appeared before Judge Sandra Murphy at Carrick-on-Shannon District Court on Tuesday. He pleaded guilty to two offences: failing to provide a specimen under Section 12 of the Road Traffic Act and failing to stop after a collision. The incident occurred on October 11th, 2024, when gardaí observed a Ford Focus being driven without lights through Boyle. READ MORE The vehicle veered across the road and collided with a car waiting at a junction, but did not stop. It was later pulled over on St Patrick Street. When approached, Keaveney appeared intoxicated, was unsteady on his feet, had glassy eyes, and smelled of alcohol. He was arrested and brought to Carrick-on-Shannon Garda Station, where he refused to provide a blood or urine sample to a designated doctor despite a formal demand. His solicitor said Keaveney had been under significant personal strain, including the recent deaths of both parents and ongoing chronic pain from spinal surgery. She said he had no previous criminal convictions and had asked to see his own doctor at the station, which was not possible. He is a father of three, including an infant. 'Mr Keaveney is not the sort of person you expect to see before the court,' she said, citing his background and cooperation. Judge Murphy imposed a €250 fine and a four-year disqualification from driving. Other charges, including no insurance and no licence, were struck out after he produced valid documents. A long-time figure in politics, Keaveney began his political career on Tuam Town Council in 1999 and was elected to the Dáil in 2011 as a Labour TD for Galway East. He lost the party whip in 2012 over a vote of conscience on a Government plan to cut to an annual care grant as part of the 2013 budget and later joined Fianna Fáil, becoming the first sitting TD to cross directly between the two parties. He lost his Dáil seat in 2016 and later served one term on Galway County Council.


Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Whether the abuse happens in Rathfarnham or west Belfast, the story is the same
Last weekend Máiría Cahill left a Belfast hospital bed and drove four hours to speak in the Galway Arts Festival 's First Thought series. As her interviewer, I expected moderate audience interest. It's been 15 years since she first went public in the Sunday Tribune about her alleged rape and abuse as a 16-year-old child by an IRA member and the heinous IRA 'investigation' which forced her to confront her abuser. Eleven years since a pivotal Spotlight BBC documentary on her case. Ten years since the former DPP for England and Wales, Keir Starmer, was asked to review the case and said he was sorry the Public Prosecution Service had let her down, soon followed by the NI Chief Constable's public apology to her and the other two victims after a shambolic trial. Seven years since the Northern Ireland Police Ombudsman revealed how as far back as 2000 CID and Special Branch had intelligence that her alleged abuser, Martin Morris - who had denied all wrongdoing - was abusing children and the IRA were investigating it. READ MORE Two years almost, since her book, Rough Beast: My Story and the Reality of Sinn Féin – described as 'shocking, important and unputdownable' by Roddy Doyle – was published. Yet such was the power of her quiet, measured, devastating delivery to a packed theatre on Saturday that the audience, visibly stunned, rose at the end to give her a thunderous standing ovation. To any other speaker, that visceral response would have been energising, but backstage she was drained to the point of speechlessness. It was a telling insight into the price that abuse victims continue to pay. Part of what continues to make her story so compelling after all this time, of course, is the involvement in that so-called 'investigation' of people with high status in the national political mainstream since that smart, funny 16-year-old girl was groomed, violated, isolated and often terrified for her life. She continues because she believes Sinn Féin leaders have never properly addressed the brutality of those investigations nor the generational reach of that savage misogynistic culture into the communities they ruled. But a larger part of her story is common to almost every case of abuse. It's in the context and the detail. The physical pain, confusion and humiliation, the gaslighting, the sudden shocking hostility of the family or tribe or institution closing ranks to protect itself, the urge to save other potential victims, the sense of a young, innocent mind and body being tested almost to destruction. One of the most agonising elements for any listener is the isolation invariably forced on the victims. No one is coming to help. It wasn't Cahill herself, but women – older Republican women – who 'reported' her complaints to the paramilitaries, despite the fact that they must have known the repercussions for her. Cahill – whose great uncle Joe Cahill founded the Provisional IRA – herself knew what happened to people who gave evidence against the IRA. The resulting sense of isolation for such a child is unimaginable, the damage unfathomable. How such children endure is a mystery. The case of the three remarkable Brennan sisters , Catherine Wrightstone, Paula Fay and Yvonne Crist, finally reached an endpoint in the criminal courts last week when the second of their brothers, Richard Brennan, was jailed for sexual offences against them in the 1970s and 1980s . They describe a childhood of suffocating fear: fear of unstable and violent parents, of their two abusive brothers, of revealing their terrible secrets to outsiders and not only jeopardising the family's reputation but Richard's aspirations for the priesthood, and fear of a wrathful God. In Máiría Cahill's case, her isolation was not rooted in fear of her parents – who still can't bring themselves to read her book – but rational terror of the larger tribe's vengeance. For the Brennan sisters in leafy Rathfarnham, Dublin, their isolation was about protecting reputations. When they tried to advocate for themselves they were failed at every level – by their parents, by the school, by the failure of state bodies to follow up. In 1984, when 12-year-old Catherine disclosed her abuse at Richard's hands to a trusted school connection, her parents were informed and raged at the child in disbelief. Family therapy meetings, organised following a referral by a hospital unable to diagnose the source of Catherine's lower limb disorder, were cut short by the parents. Lash marks on her body were noted by a teacher, but nothing was done. A poignant detail of the sisters' story all these years later is the harrowing internal battle common to many abuse survivors; that they should have found a way to speak out to protect others, even in the face of conditioning from the cradle. How do they endure? In that context it's important to remember the hundreds, maybe thousands, of vulnerable abused girls who are now no more than pawns in the Maga civil war over the Jeffrey Epstein files. Virginia Giuffre , the most prominent Epstein survivor who turned vocal anti-sex trafficking activist, was first abused by a family friend at the age of seven. Then at 15 while working a summer job at Mar-a-Lago was spotted by Ghislaine Maxwell and 'passed around like a platter of fruit' among her and Epstein's friends. Giuffre's multimillion dollar payouts from Prince Andrew, Maxwell and the Epstein estate brought no closure. Amid accusations of mental instability from her estranged husband – whom she accused of violent possessiveness – Giuffre lost custody of their children. She was just 41 when she took her own life in April. And of the long list of names associated with Epstein, Maxwell happens to be the only one serving time.