Scientists make antimatter discovery that could unlock secrets of big bang
Much of what we see in everyday life is made up of matter. But antimatter exists in much smaller quantities.
Matter and antimatter are almost direct opposites. Matter particles have an antimatter counterpart that has the same mass, but the opposite electric charge. For example, the matter proton particle is partnered by the antimatter antiproton, while the matter electron is partnered by the antimatter positron.
However, the symmetry in behaviour between matter and antimatter is not perfect. In a paper published this week in Nature, the team working on an experiment at Cern, called LHCb, has reported that it has discovered differences in the rate at which matter particles called baryons decay relative to the rate of their antimatter counterparts.
In particle physics, decay refers to the process where unstable subatomic particles transform into two or more lighter, more stable particles.
According to cosmological models, equal amounts of matter and antimatter were made in the big bang. If matter and antimatter particles come in contact, they annihilate one another, leaving behind pure energy.
With this in mind, it's a wonder that the universe doesn't consist only of leftover energy from this annihilation process.
However, astronomical observations show that there is now a negligible amount of antimatter in the universe compared to the amount of matter. We therefore know that matter and antimatter must behave differently, such that the antimatter has disappeared while the matter has not.
Understanding what causes this difference in behaviour between matter and antimatter is a key unanswered question. While there are differences between matter and antimatter in our best theory of fundamental quantum physics, the standard model, these differences are far too small to explain where all the antimatter has gone.
So we know there must be additional fundamental particles that we haven't found yet, or effects beyond those described in the standard model. These would give rise to large enough differences in the behaviour of matter and antimatter for our universe to exist in its current form.
Revealing new particles
Highly precise measurements of the differences between matter and antimatter are a key topic of research because they have the potential to be influenced by and reveal these new fundamental particles, helping us discover the physics that led to the universe we live in today.
Differences between matter and antimatter have previously been observed in the behaviour of another type of particle, mesons, which are made of a quark and an antiquark. There are also hints of differences in how the matter and antimatter versions of a further type of particle, the neutrino, behave as they travel.
The new measurement from LHCb has found differences between baryons and antibaryons, which are made of three quarks and three antiquarks respectively. Significantly, baryons make up most of the known matter in our universe, and this is the first time that we have observed differences between matter and antimatter in this group of particles.
The LHCb experiment at the Large Hadron Collider is designed to make highly precise measurements of differences in the behaviour of matter and antimatter. The experiment is operated by an international collaboration of scientists, made up of over 1,800 people based in 24 countries.
In order to achieve the new result, the LHCb team studied over 80,000 baryons ('lambda-b' baryons, which are made up of a beauty quark, an up quark and a down quark) and their antimatter counterparts.
Crucially, we found that these baryons decay to specific subatomic particles (a proton, a kaon and two pions) slightly more frequently – 5 per cent more often – than the rate at which the same process happens with antiparticles.
While small, this difference is statistically significant enough to be the first observation of differences in behaviour between baryon and antibaryon decays.
To date, all measurements of matter-antimatter differences have been consistent with the small level present in the standard model. While the new measurement from LHCb is also in line with this theory, it is a major step forward.
We have now seen differences in the behaviour of matter and antimatter in the group of particles that dominate the known matter of the universe. It's a potential step in the direction of understanding why that situation came to be after the big bang.
With the current and forthcoming data runs of LHCb we will be able to study these differences forensically, and, we hope, tease out any sign of new fundamental particles that might be present.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
6 minutes ago
- BBC News
Chester Zoo welcomes new snow leopard cub
An adorable baby snow leopard has been born at Chester Zoo as part of a conservation effort to save the incredibly endangered Nubra and Yashin, both three years old, gave birth to the cub on 10 July and have been caught on camera getting cosy with the newest addition to their family. It's the first snow leopard to be born at the zoo in its history, and keepers there are over the Hall, Team Manager of carnivores at Chester Zoo, said: "It's a truly historic moment and a real cause for celebration - not just for our teams here but also for the future of this magnificent species globally." Endangered species With only 4000 snow leopards left in the wild, the species is categorised as vulnerable by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), which means they're at risk of is when a species does not exist anywhere and has disappeared from the planet altogether. Famous examples include the dodo, quagga and Tasmanian snow leopard cubs' parents were matched together in 2024 as part of a conservation programme to ensure the survival of the big cat species, something organisations around the world are trying to help with too. Dr Mayukh Chatterjee, Regional Field Programme Manager for Asia at Chester Zoo, added:"While this birth is a significant moment for snow leopard conservation, our work to help this species thrive extends far beyond our zoo. "We're working alongside The Snow Leopard Trust and communities in countries like Kyrgyzstan to protect snow leopards in the wild, while also improving livelihoods for people who live alongside them."The birth of a cub here in Chester, alongside our conservation work in the wild, is a powerful symbol of what we can achieve together to help these iconic big cats thrive long into the future." Snow leopard fact file Their scientific name is Panthera unciaThey live in the high mountain ranges of Central and South Asia, including the HimalayasTheir thick white and grey fur helps them survive in cold climates, as it traps heat inThey can't roar like other big cats they're related to, but they can yowlEven though they're called leopards, they're more closely related to tigers
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Why do we age in dramatic bursts, and what can we do about it?
Scientists find humans age dramatically in two bursts – at 44, then 60 Support the Guardian:
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Scientists reveal the surprising secret to nailing a job interview
When it comes to job interviews, there are endless tips and tricks that promise to help you land the role. But experts have revealed one of the simplest ways to boost your chances – and it's all to do with timing. Researchers investigating oral exams at university discovered that students had the highest level of passing if their exam was held around lunchtime. In contrast, the chances of passing were lowest at the beginning and end of the day, they found. Given the similarities between oral exams and job interviews, they believe their findings could be applicable to hiring situations. 'We show that academic assessment outcomes vary systematically across the day, with a clear peak in passing rates around midday,' Professor Carmelo Mario Vicario, lead author of the study, said. 'Students were more likely to pass in late morning compared to early morning or late afternoon. 'We believe this pattern could extend to job interviews or any evaluative process scheduled throughout the day.' The researchers, from the University of Messina in Italy, were inspired by work which showed that judges were most likely to rule in favour of a defendant after meal breaks or at the beginning of a session. They collected the date, time and outcome of more than 100,000 assessments delivered by 680 examiners for 1,200 courses. 'Oral exams in Italian universities are scheduled at set times, typically lasting 10 to 30 minutes per student,' Professor Vicario said. 'There's no standardized format – professors ask questions based on the course content, and grades are assigned on the spot. 'These exams can be highly stressful due to their unpredictable nature and the strong weight they carry in academic progression.' Overall, only 57 per cent of the exams were passed, they found, with the passing rate peaking at noon. There was no significant difference in the chance of passing if the exam was held at 11am or 1pm, but the chances of passing were lower if the exam was at 8am or 9am, or at 3pm or 4pm, they said. 'These findings have wide–ranging implications,' co–author Professor Alessio Avenanti of the University of Bologna, said. 'They highlight how biological rhythms — often overlooked in decision–making contexts — can subtly but significantly shape the outcome of high–stakes evaluations.' Although the study can't identify the mechanisms behind this pattern, the peak in passes at midday reinforces evidence that cognitive performance improves over the course of a morning before declining in the afternoon. Students' falling energy levels could also lead to diminishing focus, compromising their performance, the team said. 'We would be very interested in investigating whether hiring decisions, too, fluctuate in fairness or outcome depending on time of day,' Professor Vicario said. The findings were published in the journal Frontiers in Psychology. WILL YOUR JOB BE TAKEN BY A ROBOT? PHYSICAL JOBS ARE AT THE GREATEST RISK Physical jobs in predictable environments, including machine-operators and fast-food workers, are the most likely to be replaced by robots. Management consultancy firm McKinsey, based in New York, focused on the amount of jobs that would be lost to automation, and what professions were most at risk. The report said collecting and processing data are two other categories of activities that increasingly can be done better and faster with machines. This could displace large amounts of labour - for instance, in mortgages, paralegal work, accounting, and back-office transaction processing. Conversely, jobs in unpredictable environments are least are risk. The report added: 'Occupations such as gardeners, plumbers, or providers of child- and eldercare - will also generally see less automation by 2030, because they are technically difficult to automate and often command relatively lower wages, which makes automation a less attractive business proposition.'
