Analysis-US rare earth pricing system is poised to challenge China's dominance
LONDON (Reuters) -U.S. efforts to break China's dominance of the rare earths market and to drive investment in its own industry have moved up a gear with a Washington-backed plan to create a separate, higher pricing system.
The West has struggled to weaken China's grip on 90% of the supply of rare earths, in part because low prices set in China have removed the incentive for investment elsewhere.
Miners in the West have long called for a separate pricing system to help them compete in supplying the rare earths group of 17 metals needed to make super-strong magnets of strategic importance. They are used in military applications such as drone and fighter jets, as well as to power motors in EVs and wind turbines.
Under a deal made public last week, the U.S. Department of Defense will guarantee a minimum price for its sole domestic rare earth miner MP Materials, at nearly twice the current market level.
Las Vegas-based MP already produces mined and processed rare earths and said it expects to start commercial magnet production at its Texas facility around the end of this year.
Analysts say the pricing deal, which takes effect immediately, should have global implications - positive for producers, but may increase costs for consumers, such as automakers and in turn their customers.
"This benchmark is now a new centre of gravity in the industry that will pull prices up," said Ryan Castilloux, managing director of consultancy Adamas Intelligence.
The DoD will pay MP the difference between $110 per kilogram for the two most-popular rare earths and the market price, currently set by China, but if the price rises above $110, the DoD will get 30% of additional profits.
Castilloux said other indirect beneficiaries of the pricing system may include companies, such as Belgian chemicals group Solvay, which launched an expansion in April.
"It will give Solvay and others the impetus to command a similar price level. It will give them a floor to stand on, you could say," Castilloux added.
While Solvay declined to comment, other rare earth miners, developers and their shareholders welcomed the news.
Aclara Resources is developing rare earths mines in Chile and Brazil, as well as planning a separation plant in the United States. Alvaro Castellon, the company's strategy and development manager, told Reuters the deal added "new strategic paths" for the company.
MP'S GRADUAL OUTPUT INCREASE
MP Materials, which suffered a net loss of $65.4 million last year largely because of China's low pricing, will build up magnet production at its Texas plant initially to 1,000 metric tons a year, later expanding to 3,000 tons a year.
Under last Thursday's deal, the DoD will become its largest shareholder with a 15% stake and MP will construct a second rare earth magnet manufacturing facility in the U.S., eventually adding 7,000 tons per year. In total, production would be 10,000 tons a year - equalling U.S. consumption of magnets in 2024.
That does not include, however, the 30,000 tons imported by the United States already installed in assembled products, Adamas consultancy said.
It predicts global demand for rare earth permanent magnets will more than double over the next decade to about 607,000 tons, with the U.S. seeing the strongest percentage annual growth rate in coming years at 17%.
The world's reliance upon China for much of this demand was brought into focus by China's curbs on its exports as trade negotiations continue between the United States and China.
So far Western governments have had little success in trying to help their own industries to compete.
Attempts to agree stronger pricing have been confined to piecemeal deals that set premiums for magnets.
Dominic Raab, a former deputy prime minister and former foreign secretary for the United Kingdom, said he was not surprised the Trump administration had concluded that tax breaks alone would not create the level of investment required.
"The next step is, can they scale it up?" asked Raab, now head of global affairs at Appian Capital Advisory, a private equity firm that invests in mining projects.
The $110 level for neodymium and praseodymium, or NdPr, guaranteed by the DoD is slightly above a $75-to-$105 per kg range that consultancy Project Blue reckons would be needed to support enough production to meet demand in coming years. It compares to a current level of about $63.
David Merriman of Project Blue said it was unclear how commercial industrial consumers would respond to higher prices and whether it would make them invest in rare earths as they have more diverse supply sources.
"Major non-government backed consumers are less likely to follow this same investment pattern, however, as they are not so clearly aligned to a particular regional supply route," he said.
A spokesperson for German auto giant Volkswagen declined to comment on pricing when asked about the DoD floor level but said: "We welcome all efforts to strengthen long-term stability and diversification in global supply chains for critical materials."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Unreleased Epstein files include logbooks for private island, records show
Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Federal Bureau of Investigation in February released what was then described as the "first phase of the declassified Epstein files." That initial release -- which was delivered to a group of prominent right-leaning influencers and journalists -- included 341 pages of documents related to the disgraced financier. But 118 pages of those files were duplicative of one another. The vast majority of those documents were previously made public through the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein's former associate Ghislaine Maxwell or civil lawsuits, including flight logs from Epstein's plane, a redacted version of Epstein's so-called "black book" of contacts and a heavily redacted seven-page list of masseuses. The only newly-released document in "phase one," which received little public attention, was a three-page catalog of evidence that appears to be an accounting of evidence seized during the searches of Epstein's properties in New York and the U.S. Virgin Islands after his arrest in 2019, and a search of his Palm Beach mansion a dozen years earlier. That little-noticed index offers a roadmap to the remaining trove of records that President Donald Trump's administration has declined to release, including logs of who potentially visited Epstein's private island and the records of a wiretap of Maxwell's phone. MORE: The times Trump's name appeared in the Epstein files the DOJ has already released The three-page index is a report generated by the FBI that lists the evidence inventoried by federal law enforcement during the multiple investigations into his conduct. According to that index, the remaining materials include 40 computers and electronic devices, 26 storage drives, more than 70 CDs and six recording devices. The devices hold more than 300 gigabytes of data, according to the DOJ. The evidence also includes approximately 60 pieces of physical evidence, including photographs, travel logs, employee lists, more than $17,000 in cash, five massage tables, blueprints of Epstein's island and Manhattan home, four busts of female body parts, a pair of women's cowboy boots and one stuffed dog, according to the list. The unreleased evidence notably includes multiple documents related to two islands Epstein owned in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Little Saint James -- where his compound was located -- and Greater Saint James. According to the index, the files include a folder containing Island blueprints, photographs and other documents. Some of the documents could shed light on who visited the island. According to the index, the files also include a Little Saint James logbook as well as multiple logs of boat trips to and from the island. The evidence also includes multiple lists, one vaguely described as a "document with names" and an employee contact list. Investigators also recovered pages of handwritten notes, multiple photo albums, an Austrian passport with Epstein's photograph and more than a dozen financial documents. The records also include three discs containing the outcome of "court authorized intercept[s]" of a phone number previously belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell. In a joint memo released last week, the FBI and DOJ argued that a "large portion" of the records included photographs of victims and child pornography. According to the DOJ, the evidence includes "images and videos" of victims who appear to be minors, "over ten thousand downloaded videos and images of illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography," and a "large volume" of images of Epstein. Authorities also concluded that Epstein did not maintain a "client list" or blackmail prominent individuals. MORE: Trump, facing MAGA uproar over Epstein files, tries to shift blame elsewhere "While we have labored to provide the public with maximum information regarding Epstein and ensured examination of any evidence in the government's possession, it is the determination of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation that no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted," the memo said. The memo argued that "a fraction of this material would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial" and that a court order prohibits further disclosure of the materials. "One of our highest priorities is combatting child exploitation and bringing justice to victims. Perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein serves neither of those ends," the memo said.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Coca-Cola changing its US recipe? What we know so far
While Coca-Cola has yet to announce a recipe change, President Donald Trump said the drink-maker agreed to switch a primary ingredient for its U.S. beverages. In a Truth Social post on Wednesday, July 16, the president said he has spoke with the company about using "REAL cane sugar" in its flagship soda, adding that company has agreed to do so. "I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!" he wrote. For its U.S. products, the soft drink manufacturer currently uses high-fructose corn syrup as opposed to cane sugar, which is used in other countries like Mexico. The announcement aligns with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s efforts to shift American food consumption away from certain ingredients, like artificial dyes. While Kennedy has deemed both sugar and high fructose corn syrup as unhealthy, his Make America Healthy Again initiative combatting chronic health problems has claimed the proposed substitutes are ultimately healthier. Here's what to know about the supposed recipe change. What has Coca-Cola said about the move? Coca-Cola has not yet confirmed a recipe switch, as of Thursday evening, July 17, but the company teased an announcement could be coming. "We appreciate President Trump's enthusiasm for our iconic Coca‑Cola brand. More details on new innovative offerings within our Coca‑Cola product range will be shared soon," the company said in a statement July 16. A company quarterly earnings call is scheduled for Tuesday, July 22, 2025 starting at 8:30 a.m. ET. What has Trump, the White House said? The White House has not responded to USA TODAY's requests for comment after Trump initially announced the recipe switch on Truth Social July 16. "I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so," Trump wrote. "I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better! Wall Street reacts: Stock prices of high fructose syrup producer ADM drop Archer-Daniels-Midland, a major producer of high fructose syrup, saw its shares fall close to 1% on July 17, following Trump's announcement. Meanwhile, ingredients provider Ingredion saw its shares decline by 0.6% after falling as much as 7% ahead of the market's open, CNBC reported. Coca-Cola shares rose nearly 2% on Thursday. Is cane sugar healthier than corn syrup? If consumed in excess, both cane and high-fructose corn syrup, like all sugars, can carry negative health effects including weight gain, diabetes and heart disease. While some studies have suggested that high-fructose corn syrup may be linked to increased fat production and inflammation, the FDA says it is "not aware of any evidence" of a difference in safety between foods containing high-fructose corn syrup and "foods containing similar amounts of other nutritive sweeteners with approximately equal glucose and fructose content, such as sucrose, honey, or other traditional sweeteners." How would the recipe change impact Coca-Cola? Coca-Cola switching from cane sugar to high-fructose corn syrup would pose changes to cost and product labeling, Reuters reported, citing industry analysts. The company would have to significantly adjust its supply chains as the two sweeteners primarily come from different producers. Is corn syrup cheaper than sugar? Ron Sterk, a senior editor at food industry insider SOSland Publishing, said it is cheaper for U.S. food and beverage companies to use corn syrup than cane sugar, Reuters reported. Contributing: Reuters and Mary Walrath-Holdridge, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Is Coca-Cola changing ingredients? What we know after Trump's post
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Won't Recommend A Special Prosecutor In Epstein Case, White House Says
President Donald Trump will not recommend a special prosecutor in the investigation of late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at a press briefing Thursday. 'The president would not recommend a special prosecutor in the Epstein case. That's how he feels,' Leavitt told reporters, as she confirmed that the idea had been floated to him by someone in the media. (A special prosecutor is usually relied on in instances where the main prosecutor has a conflict of interest or other issue that would prevent them from being unbiased in a particular case.) Epstein's death and his criminal trial, numerous investigations and lawsuits (collectively known as 'the Epstein files') have been the subject of debate for many right-wingers for years. Many have called for the files to be released — and some have — and for an additional investigation into Epstein and who was involved in his alleged sex trafficking. Trump previously had a relationship with the late disgraced financier, who died in a jail cell in 2019 as he awaited a trial on sex trafficking charges. Last year, while on the campaign trail, Trump claimed at least twice that he would release the Epstein files, but he has since reversed course. Billionaire Tesla CEO Elon Musk, whom Trump has had a rocky relationship with over the years, blasted Trump on his social media platform X over the Epstein files last month. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk said. '[Trump] is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' Last week, the Justice Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation said in a memo that they did not find any evidence that Epstein had a so-called 'client list' he had been rumored to have used as blackmail. It also said they would not release any additional information in the future. When prompted by a reporter at Thursday's press briefing, Leavitt rejected the idea that the White House could release the Epstein files with redactions protecting sensitive information. 'In terms of redactions or grand jury seals, those are questions for the Department of Justice. Those are also questions for the judges who have that information under a seal. And that would have to be requested and a judge would have to approve it. That's out of the president's control,' Leavitt said. Trump has largely tried to move away from the publicity surrounding the Epstein case, calling it a 'hoax.' Still, he's drawn the ire of some of his supporters and many of his Republican colleagues who continue to call for more transparency about the Epstein files. Fox News' Jacqui Heinrich asked Leavitt Thursday to 'clarify which part of the Epstein 'hoax' is the 'hoax'' that Trump has referred to. 'The president is referring to the fact that Democrats have now seized on this as if they ever wanted transparency when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein, which is an asinine suggestion for any Democrat to make,' Leavitt said. 'The Democrats had control of this building, the White House, for four years, and they didn't do a dang thing when it came to transparency in regards to Jeffrey Epstein and his heinous crimes.' While authorities said in the memo that they 'did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties,' they also confirmed that Epstein harmed more than 1,000 victims and that DOJ officials reviewed included more than 10,000 'downloaded videos and images of illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography.' It also included 10 hours worth of video footage — with one minute missing — of Epstein's prison cell before his death to prove that he died by suicide. Right-wing conspiracy theorists — including Trump, FBI Director Kash Patel and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino — have argued that Epstein did not commit suicide, but was instead killed by powerful figures attempting to keep secrets hidden. 'One of our highest priorities is combatting child exploitation and bringing justice to victims,' the memo read. 'Perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein serves neither of those ends.' The memo directly clashed with Attorney General Pam Bondi's claim to Fox News in February that she obtained the list and planned to review it following 'a directive by President Trump.' Related... Fired Jeffrey Epstein Prosecutor Warns Fear Is The 'Tool Of A Tyrant' Gavin Newsom Mocks Trump's Epstein Diversion With His Sweetest Jab Yet Rep. Jasmine Crockett Has 1 'Very Interesting' Question About Trump's Link To Epstein Trump Melts Down Over 'Jeffrey Epstein Hoax' — And The Internet Explodes