
Locksmith under fire for charging elderly woman $80 despite cancelled service
The incident occurred on the morning of July 10 after the woman realised her key had broken, and she was unable to unlock her door.
A helpful neighbour called a locksmith, but while waiting, the woman remembered she had a spare key in her bag that was inside the flat. Using a long stick, another neighbour, Cheryl See, helped retrieve it, and they managed to open the door.
Ms See, who shared the encounter in a public Facebook group, Complaint Singapore, said she called the locksmith to cancel the job. However, the elderly woman - whom she affectionately referred to as "auntie" - said she would still pay for his petrol.
When the locksmith arrived, however, he demanded the full $80. According to Ms See, he "looked really angry".
When asked to be more understanding of the elderly woman's plight and feelings, he reportedly retorted: "Wouldn't you be angry if someone called you at 7am?"
Ms See responded that he was offering a 24-hour service.
The "auntie" asked if he could at least check her door's lock, but Ms See said he ignored her request.
"After he left, I saw auntie quietly wiping her tears and saying, 'It's okay, he wants it, just give it to him,'" Ms See wrote in her post. "My heart ached so much at this moment."
Her post drew over 700 reactions and more than 300 comments at press time. It was shared over 600 times.
Netizens criticise locksmith's behaviour
Many commenters criticised the locksmith's behaviour, saying he should have been more empathetic and that a smaller fee - such as $20 or $30 - would have been more reasonable.
Locksmiths in Singapore typically charge between $50 and $120 for a standard lockout service, depending on the type of lock, with digital locks potentially costing more.
"80 bucks for doing nothing? Could have written it off or given a huge discount. Angry for waking up at 7am when offering a 24-hour service? Might as well close shop!" said a user named X-lynge Lynge.
Another commenter, Bobby G Singh, said: "Thank you for sharing this, it truly broke my heart reading it. No one deserves to be treated that way, especially elders who have already given so much of their lives. Auntie showed so much grace and dignity despite being mistreated."
However, some users defended the locksmith, saying he was not completely wrong to have asked for compensation.
"I believe it's fair that someone gets paid something for their time, effort, and travel - especially if they've made the trip out," said Scott Maier.
"But charging the full $80 call-out fee without actually doing any meaningful checks or work feels unreasonable. It's not about age or income; it's about fairness and professionalism. If you're charging a fee, there should be a minimum standard of service. Sadly, some 24-hour trades can take advantage of urgency, so it's always worth asking upfront about costs and what's included."
Others, like commenter with the username Alvin Alvin, urged for empathy from both sides.
He felt that the auntie and her neighbours had to put themselves in the shoes of the locksmith, who would have been frustrated to have made the trip for nothing.
"Just let him vent his frustration (and) remove this post. It is unfair to the locksmith," he added.
Another, Ros Foo, said: "Already prepared to engage his services and he makes the effort to come - should pay…he is just making a living....both also poor thing."
Some netizens even offered to donate money to the woman, but Ms See said the auntie declined.
"She just hopes to use this platform to remind everyone to stay cautious and vigilant - let's help prevent this from happening to someone else," she said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Paper
11 hours ago
- New Paper
Work injury at Sumo Salad covered under valid insurance policy: MOM
The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) said salad shop Sumo Salad was covered by a valid insurance policy when an alleged work injury involving a staff member occurred on June 6. The salad shop's owner, the late Ms Jane Lee, had submitted an incident report to MOM soon after. As at June 27, the company had been reimbursed by its insurer for the medical expenses and medical leave wages it had claimed, MOM told reporters during a briefing on Aug 1. When asked whether there were outstanding claims after June 27, the ministry said the claims process has not concluded as investigations are still ongoing. Before finalising a claim, doctors must assess the extent of an injured worker's incapacity, which determines the amount of lump-sum compensation for the worker. MOM added that it has not received any indication from the insurer of potential fraud, but emphasised that the possibility cannot be ruled out. Ms Lee died on July 19, a day after she posted two Facebook posts alleging that a former staff member had staged a fall in an attempt to claim workplace injury compensation. She believed her company was targeted because of "an unfortunate gap" in insurance coverage. Ms Lee also urged MOM and the police to investigate the case thoroughly, as she believed it was a premeditated scheme involving the ex-employee's husband and possibly a law firm. The incident has sparked wider discussions about challenges faced by small business owners in Singapore, and the need for stronger safeguards against abuses of the Work Injury Compensation Act (Wica). MOM said the worker involved in this case is still in Singapore on a Special Pass, which is typically issued temporarily to those whose work permits have been cancelled and are awaiting departure, or for specific purposes such as assisting with investigation and attending court. MOM said insurers had referred about 12 claims a year for investigation into potential fraud. Over the last five years, the ministry had prosecuted about two workers a year for fraudulent claims. These workers were jailed between three and 13 weeks. The maximum penalty is a jail term of up to 12 months, or a $15,000 fine, or both. Employers who fail to buy insurance for their manual workers, and non-manual workers earning $2,600 a month or less, may be fined up to $10,000, jailed up to 12 months, or both. In the last five years, MOM had prosecuted about two employers a year for such offences. MOM said the ministry conducts audit checks on employers for their Wica coverage. "When we detect they do not have any insurance, we will nudge them," an MOM spokesman said, adding that a grace period is given to employers to buy or renew insurance. MOM added that over the past three years, 94 per cent of all work injury claims were paid by insurers. For the remaining 6 per cent, most were paid directly by employers exempted from buying the Workplace Injury Compensation (WIC) insurance. Generally, employers with insurance coverage can be reimbursed for medical expenses as well as wages paid to workers on medical leave. The insurer will make lump sum compensations to workers or their family in the event of death, permanent incapacity or incapacity that remains six months post-injury, based on doctors' assessments. If there are disputes on the degree of permanent incapacity awarded, the case will be referred to the WIC Medical Board for independent reassessment.

Straits Times
11 hours ago
- Straits Times
Thai-Cambodian cyberwarriors battle on despite truce
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The conflict kicked off a disinformation blitz as Thai and Cambodian partisans alike sought to boost the narrative that the other was to blame. BANGKOK - Thailand and Cambodia may have reached a ceasefire to halt their bloody border clashes , but cyber warriors are still battling online, daubing official websites with obscenities, deluging opponents with spam and taking pages down. The five-day conflict left more than 40 people dead and drove more than 300,000 from their homes. It also kicked off a disinformation blitz as Thai and Cambodian partisans alike sought to boost the narrative that the other was to blame. Thai officials recorded more than 500 million instances of online attacks in recent days, government spokesperson Jirayu Huangsab said on July 30. These included spamming reports to online platforms and distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks – halting access to a website by overloading its servers with traffic. 'It's a psychological war,' Cambodian government spokesperson Pen Bona told AFP. 'There's a lot of fake news and it would not be strange if it came from social media users, but even official Thai media outlets themselves publish a lot of fake news.' Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Tech Reporting suspected advanced cyber attacks will provide a defence framework: Shanmugam Business Singapore's US tariff rate stays at 10%, but the Republic is not out of the woods yet Business ST explains: How Trump tariffs could affect Singapore SMEs, jobs and markets Singapore Thundery showers expected on most days in first half of August Singapore SPH Media awards three journalism scholarships to budding newsroom talent Singapore Synapxe chief executive, MND deputy secretary to become new perm secs on Sept 1 Singapore 5 women face capital charges after they were allegedly found with nearly 27kg of cocaine in S'pore Business Sumo Salad had valid insurance coverage for work injury claims: MOM Disinformation Freshly created 'avatar' accounts have targeted popular users or media accounts in Thailand. On July 24, a Facebook post by suspended Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra condemning Cambodia's use of force was bombarded with 16,000 comments, many of them repeating the same message in English: 'Queen of drama in Thailand'. Another, similar post by Ms Paetongtarn on July 26 was hit with 31,800 comments, many reading: 'Best drama queen of 2025,' with snake and crocodile emojis. Government spokesperson Jirayu said the attacks were aimed at 'sowing division among Thais' as well as outright deception. Similarly, Cambodian government spokesperson Pen Bona said fake news from Thailand aimed to divide Cambodia. Apparent bot accounts have also published and shared disinformation, adding to the confusion. Videos and images from a deadly Cambodian rocket attack on a petrol station in Thailand were shared with captions saying they showed an attack on Cambodian soil. Other posts, including one shared by the verified page of Cambodian Secretary of State Vengsrun Kuoch, claimed Thai forces had used chemical weapons. The photo in the post in fact shows an aircraft dropping fire retardants during the Los Angeles wildfires in January 2025. AFP contacted Mr Vengsrun Kuoch for comment but did not receive a reply. Obscenities Hackers from both sides have broken into state-run websites to deface pages with mocking or offensive messages. One of the targets was NBT World, an English-language news site run by the Thai government's public relations department. Headlines and captions on articles about acting prime minister Phumtham Wechayachai were replaced with obscenities. Thai hackers meanwhile, changed the login page of Sachak Asia Development Institute, a Cambodian education facility, to show an image of influential ex-leader Hun Sen edited to have a ludicrously exaggerated hairstyle. The image was a reference to a video – much mocked in Thailand – of Cambodian youths sporting the same hairstyle visiting one of the ancient temples that were the focus of the fighting. Online attacks – whether disinformation messaging or full-blown cyber strikes to disrupt an adversary's infrastructure or services – are a standard feature of modern warfare. In the Ukraine conflict, Kyiv and its allies have long accused Russia of state-backed cyberwarfare, disrupting government and private IT systems around the world. And earlier this week, Ukrainian and Belarusian hacker groups claimed responsibility for a cyberattack on Russia's national airline that grounded dozens of flights. Dr Jessada Salathong, a mass communications professor at Thailand's Chulalongkorn University, said the border clashes had invoked the full spectrum of information disorder, carried out by both sides. 'In an era when anyone can call themselves media, information warfare simply pulls in everyone,' he told AFP. AFP


Online Citizen
13 hours ago
- Online Citizen
MOM: Sumo Salad employer fully reimbursed by insurer; no fraud found so far in work injury claim
SINGAPORE: The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) confirmed on 1 August 2025 that the employer involved in the Sumo Salad workplace injury case has been fully reimbursed by their insurer. The reimbursement, which covers medical bills and medical leave wages submitted up to that point, was completed on 26 and 27 June. Speaking at a media briefing on the Work Injury Compensation Act (WICA), MOM added that it had not received any indication from the insurer that fraud was involved. However, a ministry spokesperson clarified that this does not eliminate the possibility of fraud, as investigations are still ongoing. 'We have not received any indication from the insurer that there is fraud. But that is different from saying that there is no fraud, because we are investigating,' the spokesperson stated. The update comes amid heightened public scrutiny following the death of Jane Lee, the owner of Sumo Salad, who posted online allegations of a fraudulent work injury claim shortly before her passing. Lee alleged in Facebook posts on 18 July that a foreign worker had staged a fall to claim compensation from her business, operated under the name EatGreen. She said her company had become the target of what she believed to be a 'fraudulent scheme,' and lamented a gap in their insurance coverage at the time. Jane Lee died on 19 July. The Singapore Police Force is conducting an investigation into her unnatural death. According to MOM, the work injury incident was reported to have occurred on 6 June. The employer subsequently filed a work injury report. MOM said the employer held a valid insurance policy at the time of the incident. While confirming the employer's insurance status, MOM declined to name the insurer, citing ongoing investigations. The ministry also stated that the work injury claims process in this case has not yet concluded. Asked about the current status of the foreign worker involved in the claim, MOM said it does not usually disclose individual employment statuses. However, it noted that in certain cases under investigation, special passes may be issued to legalise a worker's stay in Singapore during the process. Jane Lee passed away after raising alarm over alleged foreign worker injury claim scam Jane Lee, a mother of two in her 40s, alleged before her death that the worker had staged the incident just two days before the end of her employment contract. In one of her final social media posts, she claimed that the worker's husband and possibly a law firm had collaborated in orchestrating the event. She warned that small businesses with incomplete insurance cover could be particularly vulnerable to such tactics, which she believed were meant to instil fear and extort money. Lee also voiced concerns that workers could exaggerate injuries or falsely claim permanent disabilities in order to obtain higher payouts. Her posts called on authorities to investigate the case thoroughly to protect small business owners facing similar risks. The incident has since triggered an outpouring of public sympathy and renewed calls for more robust safeguards against fraudulent claims under WICA. Many small business owners have echoed Lee's concerns and urged MOM to tighten checks on suspicious claims, while ensuring legitimate injuries continue to receive fair compensation. MOM: 28,500 work injury claims filed annually; about 12 cases a year flagged for suspected fraud During the same media briefing, MOM provided broader context about work injury compensation in Singapore. It revealed that approximately 28,500 work injury claims are filed annually. Out of these, insurers and employers pay compensation for around 26,800 cases each year. MOM said that insurers refer roughly 12 cases annually to the ministry for investigation into potential fraud. The ministry stressed that WICA is designed to balance the financial liabilities of employers with the social protections needed by injured workers. It explained that the Act imposes compensation caps to protect employers from sudden large financial burdens while providing workers with a quicker, low-cost path to compensation. Under WICA, employers are required to purchase work injury insurance for all manual workers, regardless of salary. Non-manual workers earning S$2,600 or less a month must also be insured, as must all platform workers through their operators. The Act covers medical expenses, medical leave wages, and lump sum compensation for permanent incapacity or death. Over the past three years, 94 per cent of WICA claims were paid out by insurers. The remaining 6 per cent were generally paid directly by employers who are exempt from mandatory insurance. MOM also highlighted several safeguards built into the system to prevent abuse. These include assessments by insurers, who act as gatekeepers, and mandatory medical evaluations, which are tightly regulated. Additionally, all parties involved in a claim, including employers, workers and insurers, are allowed to raise objections to any aspect of the process.