Latest news with #ComplaintSingapore
AsiaOne
3 days ago
- AsiaOne
Woman injured after PMD collision in Pasir Ris, lodges police report, Singapore News
A woman was left with cuts and bruises after she was allegedly knocked over by a Personal Mobility Device (PMD) rider on an overhead bridge in Pasir Ris. In a post to the Complaint Singapore Facebook page on July 13, user Mel Yap stated that the incident occurred that morning at around 7.15am near Block 124, Pasir Street 11. Calling it a "hit and run", she wrote that she had been walking downslope on the bridge when the PMD collided into her. She also called for the rider to apologise. "If [the] rider comes forward and apologises and compensates my bills (with receipt), I won't pursue further," she wrote on Facebook, with accompanying photos showing the injuries she sustained to her right palm, left elbow and right knee. She made a police report later. In an interview with Shin Min Daily News, the 49-year-old woman accountant described how she and her friends had been walking on the overhead bridge when she heard a sound from behind. She turned and saw a man who looked to be in his 20s on his PMD. Although Yap and her friends were walking in a single file, the path was narrow. The man did not pass immediately and appeared to be waiting for them to give way to him, said Yap. Yap said she told the rider to dismount from the PMD and push his device, as she believed PMDs should not be ridden on overhead bridges. Fell backwards, then forwards Yap claimed that not only did the rider ignore her advice to dismount, he also tried to squeeze past the group. In the process, a part of the PMD allegedly hit Yap, causing her to fall. "I fell backwards, but as he didn't stop, I tried to grab him and fell forwards," said Yap. "I shouted at him but he ignored me and left." Yap told Shin Min that as the path was strewn with small rocks, she ended up scraping her elbows, palms and knees, which bled. After cleaning her wounds with water, she went to a clinic before making a police report. Yap said that her medical bill cost $150 and the wound on her right knee continued to bleed after 12 hours. Although her injuries were not serious, she was issued two days of medical leave and she said her body was still aching. She reiterated that she is willing to drop the case if the rider comes forward to apologise, stating that he "should have a sense of responsibility". "There are often cases of errant riding in the area. The rider should have gotten down to push his device. I'm lucky, but the situation would be more serious if it were an elderly person who fell." In a statement to AsiaOne, police confirmed that a report has been lodged and investigations are ongoing. A photo taken by Shin Min Daily News at the site showed a "no riding" sign at the bridge. In spite of this, the reporter observed at least one cyclist or personal mobility device user crossing the overpass every two to three minutes. According to the Land Transport Authority guidelines, PMDs such as e-scooters are only allowed on cycling paths while e-bikes can only be used on cycling paths and on the road. [[nid:714126]] candicecai@
Independent Singapore
6 days ago
- Business
- Independent Singapore
Diner upset his lontong meal cost S$5 after adding begedil, but netizens say it's still ‘cheap'
Photo: Complaint Singapore/Facebook user Latt Latt SINGAPORE: A diner took to social media to vent his frustration after being charged $5 for a simple bowl of lontong at Bishan Interchange Food Centre. In a post on the 'Complaint Singapore' Facebook page on Tuesday (July 16), the man shared that his breakfast, which was listed at S$3, ended up costing S$5 after a piece of begedil was added to the dish. 'I was in shock,' he wrote. 'I ordered lontong for S$3; they added begedil, and the total cost became S$5? I couldn't say I didn't want it because it was already in the lontong bowl. He then asked other locals in the group, 'Are potato begedils really so expensive??' Photo: Screenshot from Complaint Singapore 'Begedil looks simple, but it's a lot of work.' The post quickly gained traction on the platform, though many netizens did not take the diner's side. Some felt he should have clarified his order or asked about the additional cost upfront. 'Just learn from your mistake,' one netizen told him. 'Next time ask for the price before ordering side dishes.' 'Can't afford! Move on and find something else cheaper to eat,' another said. 'You don't go into a Mercedes-Benz showroom with only enough money to buy a vehicle made in China.' Others pointed out that S$2 for begedil wasn't unreasonable, given the time and effort it takes to prepare the dish. 'Begedil looks simple, but it's a lot of work,' one commented. Another wrote, 'Try cooking every meal from scratch yourself, and you will understand the time and cost involved.' A few also noted that S$5 for lontong with an add-on is still considered affordable compared to rising prices at many other hawker stalls. One said, 'Ehhh dol, S$5 is already cheap sia… Other places can go up to S$7.' Another commented, 'Nowadays, S$5 for food is the norm everywhere. And since you added food, it's considered cheap already. I think you haven't eaten out in a long time.' In related news, a customer shared his disappointment on social media after receiving a surprisingly thin slice of salmon at a hawker stall in Suntec City's Food Republic. The set, which included spicy chicken galbi, came with a piece of grilled salmon that Mr Khoo noted was much thinner than he expected. '1st [time] saw such a thin salmon,' he mentioned in the caption. Read more: 'I thought it was egg' — Diner disappointed by $8 thin slice of salmon that looked like a piece of fried egg () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
Independent Singapore
14-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Independent Singapore
Netizens make fun of door that appears to go nowhere at Sengkang void deck
Screengrab/ Complaint Singapore SINGAPORE: A doorway that appears to have no discernible purpose baffled many netizens when a video of it was shared on Facebook last month. Although the person who posted it did so on the popular Complaint Singapore group page, they said it was not a complaint, but they wanted to know why such a door exists in the first place. The 12-second clip begins with a door on the void deck that bears the label 'Staircase B.' The person who took the video then walks around to show the door from the other side. Screengrab/ Complaint Singapore Screengrab/ Complaint Singapore The door is useless in keeping anyone out, but neither does it lead anyone into any specific place. It is located at Block 465A Fernvale Road. Incidentally, according to Shin Min Daily News, these doors may also be found at Blocks 465B, 466A, and 466B . Nevertheless, netizens who commented on the Complaint Singapore post had a lot of fun with the seemingly purposeless door. The post has since been viewed over 75,000 times, shared over 100 times, and received over 230 comments. A few jokingly called it a 'Doraemon door,' which is a reference to the iconic bright pink door from the anime and manga, where users can travel to any place they can imagine. 'They haven't finished it, they still have to paint it pink colour… then Doraemon will come,' one quipped, while another wrote, 'Doraemon left it there.' Some commented that a feng shui master might be responsible for the door. Others, having the Hungry Ghost Month festival in mind, left some creepy comments on purpose. 'You will see the Stair… during the Hungry Ghost Festival (7th month),' wrote one. ' This one for spirit… Just like tekong 3rd door,' which scared at least one other commenter. For those unfamiliar with it, this refers to the Pulau Tekong Charlie Company 3rd Door Bunk, which Asia Paranormal Investigators describe as 'a well-known army urban legend among the soldiers of Singapore.' (It's decidedly shiver-inducing, and you can read more about it here .) One commenter endeavoured to provide a logical explanation, writing, 'It has something to do with fire spreading… it doesn't make sense, but it is supposed to help in a time of fire. I am not a fireman, so maybe a fireman can explain better.' Others, however, explained that this cannot be the case. /TISG Read also: 'I thought toilet got ghost': TikTok user says she saw something scary at bathroom at CBD () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
New Paper
11-07-2025
- New Paper
Locksmith under fire for charging elderly woman $80 despite cancelled service
An elderly woman who was accidentally locked out of her home ended up in tears after a locksmith demanded $80 in payment - even though his services were ultimately not needed. The incident occurred on the morning of July 10 after the woman realised her key had broken, and she was unable to unlock her door. A helpful neighbour called a locksmith, but while waiting, the woman remembered she had a spare key in her bag that was inside the flat. Using a long stick, another neighbour, Cheryl See, helped retrieve it, and they managed to open the door. Ms See, who shared the encounter in a public Facebook group, Complaint Singapore, said she called the locksmith to cancel the job. However, the elderly woman - whom she affectionately referred to as "auntie" - said she would still pay for his petrol. When the locksmith arrived, however, he demanded the full $80. According to Ms See, he "looked really angry". When asked to be more understanding of the elderly woman's plight and feelings, he reportedly retorted: "Wouldn't you be angry if someone called you at 7am?" Ms See responded that he was offering a 24-hour service. The "auntie" asked if he could at least check her door's lock, but Ms See said he ignored her request. "After he left, I saw auntie quietly wiping her tears and saying, 'It's okay, he wants it, just give it to him,'" Ms See wrote in her post. "My heart ached so much at this moment." Her post drew over 700 reactions and more than 300 comments at press time. It was shared over 600 times. Netizens criticise locksmith's behaviour Many commenters criticised the locksmith's behaviour, saying he should have been more empathetic and that a smaller fee - such as $20 or $30 - would have been more reasonable. Locksmiths in Singapore typically charge between $50 and $120 for a standard lockout service, depending on the type of lock, with digital locks potentially costing more. "80 bucks for doing nothing? Could have written it off or given a huge discount. Angry for waking up at 7am when offering a 24-hour service? Might as well close shop!" said a user named X-lynge Lynge. Another commenter, Bobby G Singh, said: "Thank you for sharing this, it truly broke my heart reading it. No one deserves to be treated that way, especially elders who have already given so much of their lives. Auntie showed so much grace and dignity despite being mistreated." However, some users defended the locksmith, saying he was not completely wrong to have asked for compensation. "I believe it's fair that someone gets paid something for their time, effort, and travel - especially if they've made the trip out," said Scott Maier. "But charging the full $80 call-out fee without actually doing any meaningful checks or work feels unreasonable. It's not about age or income; it's about fairness and professionalism. If you're charging a fee, there should be a minimum standard of service. Sadly, some 24-hour trades can take advantage of urgency, so it's always worth asking upfront about costs and what's included." Others, like commenter with the username Alvin Alvin, urged for empathy from both sides. He felt that the auntie and her neighbours had to put themselves in the shoes of the locksmith, who would have been frustrated to have made the trip for nothing. "Just let him vent his frustration (and) remove this post. It is unfair to the locksmith," he added. Another, Ros Foo, said: "Already prepared to engage his services and he makes the effort to come - should pay…he is just making a also poor thing." Some netizens even offered to donate money to the woman, but Ms See said the auntie declined. "She just hopes to use this platform to remind everyone to stay cautious and vigilant - let's help prevent this from happening to someone else," she said.
New Paper
07-07-2025
- Automotive
- New Paper
Two-seater PMA sparks debate on road safety and regulations
A photo of a couple riding a personal mobility aid (PMA) has raised questions about the legality and safety of the two-seater vehicle. Akira Heng shared the photo on Thursday (July 3) in the Complaint Singapore Facebook group. It showed a man, wearing a long-sleeved shirt with the Grab logo, riding the PMA with a female passenger seated behind him. The post quickly gained traction, with many netizens raising concerns about the vehicle's legality on public roads. Some also questioned the safety of its battery, fearing the potential risk of a fire or an explosion. The photo appeared to have originated from Facebook user Patrick Ang, who had earlier shared it with the caption, "Why do I even buy a car?". Heng noted that he had found an identical-looking PMA on Taobao priced at $880, excluding delivery fees. He expressed curiosity about how much shipping would cost, and whether such an item would clear customs checks, given its size and questionable legality. PMAs restricted to single seat: LTA Land Transport Authority (LTA) regulations state that PMAs are limited to a single seat and are intended solely for individuals who are unable to walk or face difficulty walking. From 2026, PMAs will be subject to additional regulations, including a maximum speed of 6kmh. They will also be restricted in size: they must not exceed 70cm in width, 120cm in length, 150cm in height, and 300kg in weight. In May, Shin Min Daily News reported that similar PMAs, resembling Thailand's tuk-tuks, were seen parked near the Muslim cemetery in Lim Chu Kang. Some were being used to carry materials within the cemetery grounds. Cemetery worker Rosli (transliterated), 66, said these PMAs were typically used for transporting construction materials on-site. Another worker, Saleh (transliterated), 60, said he had purchased his PMA for $3,800 from a bicycle shop in Bukit Batok that helped him import it from China. In response to Shin Min's queries, LTA stated that enforcement action had been taken, and the vehicles were seized for investigation. "These vehicles are not approved for use and are currently impounded. All vehicles must be approved before being allowed on public roads."
