logo
Where is Barron Trump? Tabloid commenter claims, ‘He's lying low, with…'

Where is Barron Trump? Tabloid commenter claims, ‘He's lying low, with…'

Hindustan Times5 days ago
Barron Trump, the youngest son of President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump, has been absent from events since POTUS' second-term inauguration in January 2025. Barron Trump has taken a backseat since January 2025, focusing on his studies at NYU rather than public appearances. (AP/Rebecca Blackwell)
During the 2024 campaign, Trump frequently praised Barron for helping him connect with younger voters. 'He knew the youth vote. We won the youth vote by 36 points. He was saying - 'Dad, you have to go out and do this one or that one'. We did a lot of them. He respects them all, he understood them very well,' the President said at that time.
ALSO READ| Where is Barron Trump? Prolonged absence from public life sparks wild rumors about health
Barron Trump is simply doing what any 19-year-old would
The 6-foot-7-inch strong Trump was occasionally seen at press conferences, campaign stops, and family outings. But since the new term began, Barron has been missing from both official functions and family photo ops.
Notably, Donald Jr., Ivanka, and Eric Trump have all been busy attending events, like most recently, President Trump was joined by his sons Donald Jr. and Eric, daughter-in-law Lara, and grandchildren Chloe and Spencer at the opening of Trump International Golf Links in Scotland, but without Barron.
This raises the question among many: where is Barron Trump?
The Daily Mail report suggests Barron is reportedly settling into college life at New York University and is often spotted around campus or walking the streets of Manhattan. Rumors have swirled online about a new girlfriend, with some social media sleuths sharing speculative posts.
'He's 19yrs old. Things to do. People to meet. Life to lead. Stop trying to turn him into a middle-aged fogey before his time,' one reader wrote in the Daily Mail's comment section.
'He's lying low, with his new girlfriend I think. Must be hard to get the privacy he needs,' another piped in.
ALSO READ| What is Barron Trump's NYU Stern tuition cost? For the Trumps, just a drop in a $6 billion ocean
Interestingly, the POTUS in May, while discussing the 2026 FIFA World Cup, joked to reporters, 'These events will attract millions of passionate fans around the world, including my son. I have a son that loves soccer – Barron… Nobody's ever heard of Barron, right? Have you ever heard of Barron? He's a good soccer player, too. He's a little tall for soccer, but that's OK.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Emma Thompson reveals how Trump ‘stalked' her, asked for date after her divorce; 'I'd love you to come and stay at…'
Emma Thompson reveals how Trump ‘stalked' her, asked for date after her divorce; 'I'd love you to come and stay at…'

Hindustan Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Emma Thompson reveals how Trump ‘stalked' her, asked for date after her divorce; 'I'd love you to come and stay at…'

Hollywood actress Emma Thompson, who is widely known for her roles in Love Actually and the Harry Potter movie series, claimed that Donald made a phone call to her after 'stalking' her trailer to obtain her number. Emma Thompson further disclosed how Trump got her contact details and why he chose to get in touch. She went on to suggest that Trump wanted to take an advantage of a divorcee.(AP) The revelation comes as the celebrated actress attended the world premiere of her film, The Dead of Winter, and received the Leopard Club Award at the 78th annual Locarno Film Festival in Switzerland. On Saturday, she took part in a discussion called 'Conversation with Emma Thompson' as part of the festival's schedule. While reflecting on her career path during this Q&A session, Emma shared a humorous story about Trump when she was working on Mike Nichols' 1998 film Primary Colors. Also Read: Did Trump's White House delete sections on foreign gifts, due process from Congress' Constitution site? Trump called Emma Thompson; 'Maybe we could have dinner' 'I was in my trailer one day while we were making that movie, and the phone rang, and it was Donald Trump,' Emma told the Hollywood Reporter. 'I didn't know the number of the phone. No one had rung me on it before, and I said, 'Hello.' 'Hi, this is Donald Trump here,' and I thought it was a joke. And then I said, 'How can I help you? ,' thinking maybe he needed directions.' Trump's response, according to the Sense and Sensibility star, was, 'I'd love you to come and stay at one of my beautiful places. Maybe we could have dinner.' 'Well, that's very sweet. Thank you so much. I'll get back to you,' she told Trump as per the Mirror US. Emma further disclosed how Trump got her contact details and why he chose to get in touch. She went on to suggest that Trump wanted to take an advantage of a divorcee. 'I realised that on that day, my divorce decree had come through. And I bet he's got people looking for suitable people he could take out on his arm. You know, a nice divorcee, that's what he was looking for.' She went to mention that Trump found her number in a trailer, saying 'that's stalking.' Emma Thompson mocks Trump Poking fun at Trump, she guessed what would have happened if she had agreed to his offer, saying, 'I could have gone on a date with Donald Trump, and then I would have a story to tell. I could have changed the course of American history.' Emma Thompson and actor Kenneth Branagh finalized their divorce following their 1989–1995 marriage. In 2003, she wed Greg Wise. At that time, Trump divorced his second wife, Marla Maples, and wed Melania Trump in 2005.

Rolling back Roe: How Trump uses the federal courts to bypass political backlash on abortion
Rolling back Roe: How Trump uses the federal courts to bypass political backlash on abortion

First Post

time43 minutes ago

  • First Post

Rolling back Roe: How Trump uses the federal courts to bypass political backlash on abortion

One called abortion a 'barbaric practice.' Another referred to himself as a 'zealot' for the antiabortion movement. Several have played prominent roles in defending their state's abortion restrictions in court and in cases that have had national impact, including on access to medication abortion. read more As President Donald Trump advances his federal judicial nominees through the Senate, a clear pattern is emerging: many appointees hold strong anti-abortion views and have actively defended restrictive abortion laws. This strategy allows the Trump administration to reshape abortion access in the United States through the judiciary, sidestepping the political and public backlash that might accompany direct legislative or executive actions. Nearly half of Trump's 17 judicial nominees in his second term have taken public stances against abortion rights, participated in high-profile legal battles to uphold state restrictions, or are affiliated with conservative anti-abortion groups, a recent AP review found. These lifetime federal appointments promise to influence abortion access long after Trump leaves office, subtly embedding a federal rollback of abortion rights under the guise of state-level decision-making. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bernadette Meyler, a constitutional law expert at Stanford University, explains this judicial nomination strategy as a 'federal shaping' of abortion policy without the drama and visibility of legislation. 'It's a way to cover up a little bit what is happening in the abortion sphere compared to legislation or executive orders that may be more visible, dramatic and spark more backlash,' she said. Despite Trump's public statements favouring state control over abortion laws, the judicial nominees reveal a coordinated federal effort to restrict abortion access nationwide. None of the nominees have records supporting expanded abortion rights, and most hail from states that supported Trump in 2024 and where Republican legislatures have aggressively limited abortion access. Among the most notable nominees: Whitney Hermandorfer, confirmed to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, has challenged federal protections for abortion and transgender rights and defended Tennessee's strict abortion ban. She argued abortion deserves 'special scrutiny' as it 'terminates a life.' Maria Lanahan, nominated for a Missouri district court, helped draft lawsuits targeting FDA approval of the abortion pill mifepristone and defended state efforts to cut Planned Parenthood's Medicaid funding. Jordan Pratt, a Florida district court nominee, described abortion as a 'barbaric practice' and supported Florida's bans, including laws now prohibiting abortion as early as six weeks. Joshua Divine, Missouri's deputy solicitor general and a nominee for district judge, co-authored litigation falsely claiming medication abortion 'starves the baby to death,' and has defended abortion restrictions despite a 2024 Missouri ballot amendment protecting abortion rights. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Other nominees have similarly played key roles defending restrictive abortion laws in Kentucky, Montana, and Florida, among others. The White House, in defending these nominees, cites alignment with the 2022 Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade and emphasises states' rights and the 'sanctity of human life.' Anti-abortion organisations have praised the nominees as fulfilling campaign promises, while abortion rights advocates warn that the administration is systematically embedding anti-abortion ideologues into the federal judiciary, undermining decades of legal protections. Mini Timmaraju, president of Reproductive Freedom for All, said, 'This is a deliberate strategy to dismantle abortion access quietly through the courts, while publicly claiming to defer to states. It threatens to close off legal avenues that advocates have relied on to challenge harsh abortion bans.' As the Trump administration continues to nominate judges, the federal courts are becoming the primary battleground for the future of abortion rights in America—shaping access not through popular debate or elected representatives, but through lifetime judicial appointments. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies

Trump has said abortion is a state issue; his judicial picks could shape it nationally for decades
Trump has said abortion is a state issue; his judicial picks could shape it nationally for decades

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Trump has said abortion is a state issue; his judicial picks could shape it nationally for decades

AP President Donald Trump holds up a signed executive order relating to clemency for anti-abortion protesters as he signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House (File Photo) One called abortion a "barbaric practice." Another referred to himself as a "zealot" for the anti-abortion movement. Several have played prominent roles in defending their state's abortion restrictions in court and in cases that have had national impact, including on access to medication abortion. As President Donald Trump pushes the Senate to confirm his federal judicial nominees, a review by The Associated Press shows that roughly half of them have revealed anti-abortion views, been associated with anti-abortion groups or defended abortion restrictions. Trump has offered shifting positions on the issue while indicating he wants to leave questions of abortion access to the states. But his court nominees will have lifetime appointments and be in position to roll back abortion access long after the Republican president leaves the White House. Bernadette Meyler, a professor of constitutional law at Stanford University, said judicial nominations "are a way of federally shaping the abortion question without going through Congress or making a big, explicit statement." "It's a way to cover up a little bit what is happening in the abortion sphere compared to legislation or executive orders that may be more visible, dramatic and spark more backlash," she said. Trump is having an enduring impact on the federal courts Of the 17 judicial nominees so far in Trump's second term, at least eight have argued in favor of abortion restrictions or against expanded abortion access. No such records could be found for the other nine, nor did the AP review find evidence that any of Trump's judicial nominees support increased access to abortion. "Every nominee of the President represents his promises to the American people and aligns with the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark ruling," a White House spokesman, Harrison Fields, said in a statement that referenced the 2022 decision overturning the constitutional right to abortion established in Roe v. Wade. "The Democrats' extreme position on abortion was rejected in November in favor of President Trump's commonsense approach, which allows states to decide, supports the sanctity of human life, and prevents taxpayer funding of abortion." Trump's first term also had an enduring impact on the courts, appointing 234 judges. By the end of that term, more than one-quarter of active federal judges were nominated by Trump, including three Supreme Court justices who helped overturn Roe v. Wade. Challenging abortion care, medication, Planned Parenthood In his second term, all but five of his 17 nominees are from states that went for Trump in 2024 and where Republicans have pushed severe abortion restrictions. Among them, four nominees are from Missouri and five are from Florida. Here is a look at the nominees who have tried to reduce abortion access or have advocated for restrictions. They did not respond to requests for comment: - Whitney Hermandorfer, who has been confirmed to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, has built much of her relatively short career as a lawyer around challenging former President Joe Biden's policies related to abortion and transgender rights. She challenged a federal law requiring employers to provide workers with reasonable accommodations to get abortion care, as well as Title X regulations that required providers who receive funding through the program to give information about abortions to patients if asked. Hermandorfer defended Tennessee's abortion ban, one of the strictest in the country, in court and tried to dismiss a lawsuit from doctors seeking clarification on exemptions to the ban. She said abortion deserves special scrutiny because "this is the only medical procedure that terminates a life." - Maria Lanahan, a district court nominee in Missouri, helped write the state's complaint in a lawsuit that had sweeping national implications for access to medication abortion. The case challenged the FDA approval of the abortion pill mifepristone despite decades of evidence showing the drug is safe and effective. The lawyer supported Missouri's effort to strip Planned Parenthood of state Medicaid funding and defended the state's abortion ban after a group of clergy sued, arguing it violated the state constitution's protections for religious freedom.- Jordan Pratt, a nominee for the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, called abortion a "barbaric practice" and "one of the most severe invasions of personal rights imaginable" in an amicus brief supporting Florida's 15-week abortion ban. The state now bans the procedure at six weeks. In 2025, Pratt struck down a Florida law that created a judicial waiver program for minors seeking to have abortions without parental consent. The lawyer also worked for the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal organization that opposes abortion and has sued to reverse the FDA approval of mifepristone. - John Guard, also nominated to fill for the same district, defended Florida's then-15-week abortion ban in court as the state's chief deputy attorney general. - Joshua Divine, a deputy solicitor general of Missouri who is nominated to be a district judge in the state, is currently representing Missouri in a case challenging the FDA approval of mifepristone. Divine co-authored the lawsuit, which includes misinformation about medication abortion, including that it "starves the baby to death in the womb." In his college newspaper, Divine described himself as a "zealot" for the anti-abortion movement, referred to abortion as "the killing of an innocent, genetically unique human being" and argued that life begins at fertilization. He also stepped into a prominent role in the fight over abortion rights in the state after Missouri voters approved an abortion rights amendment in 2024. That amendment did not immediately override state laws. It left it up to abortion rights groups to ask courts to knock down abortion restrictions they believed were now unconstitutional. During the ensuing legal battles, Divine represented the state in defending a host of abortion restrictions. - Chad Meredith, Trump's nominee to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, defended the state's abortion ban and other restrictions while he was the state's chief deputy general counsel. That included a law requiring doctors to perform ultrasounds and describe images to abortion patients. - Bill Mercer, a Republican state lawmaker in Montana who is nominated for a U.S. District Court judgeship in the state, has repeatedly supported anti-abortion bills. Those include ones that sought to ban abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy; require a 24-hour waiting period and mandatory ultrasounds for abortion patients; require parental notification for minors to get an abortion; prohibit the use of state funding for abortions; prohibit certain insurance policies from covering abortions; and restrict what types of medical professionals can dispense medication abortion. - Jennifer Mascott, a lawyer in the White House Counsel's Office and a Trump nominee to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, has spoken repeatedly about abortion law in panels and interviews. After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Mascott in an interview on "Fox News Live" disagreed with the argument that the decision undermined the court's legitimacy. She said abortion issues are "more appropriately decided" by the states, elected officials in Congress and people in their local communities. Anti-abortion groups are optimistic based on Trump's early nominees Anti-abortion groups said it is premature to make broad conclusions about whether the nominees would help carry out their policy goals but that they were optimistic based on the names they have seen so far. "We look forward to four more years of nominees cut from that mold," said Katie Glenn Daniel, director of legal affairs for the national anti-abortion organization SBA Pro-Life America. Kristi Hamrick, spokesperson for Students for Life, said she was hopeful the administration will continue nominating those "who will respect the rule of law." Abortion rights advocates said Trump is embedding abortion opponents into the judiciary one judge at a time. Mini Timmaraju, president of the national abortion rights organization Reproductive Freedom for All, said the courts, until now, have largely been an effective option for advocates to challenge state abortion bans and restrictions. "This just feeds into this larger strategy where Trump has gotten away with distancing himself from abortion - saying he's going to leave it to the states while simultaneously appointing anti-abortion extremists at all levels of government," she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store