ChatGPT is eyeing its Reliance Jio moment in India
Live Events
You Might Also Like:
Chatgpt Go: OpenAI rolls out its cheapest ChatGPT plan for India at Rs 399
India's AI race is getting intense
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
A few months ago, OpenAI, the artificial intelligence (AI) research and deployment company which owns ChatGPT, was reportedly in discussions with Reliance Industries over potential partnerships to expand their artificial intelligence offerings in the country. A possibility being discussed involved a relationship between Reliance Jio and OpenAI to distribute ChatGPT. While there has been no confirmation about this partnership, OpenAI is now eying its own Jio moment -- the potential of one-billion internet consumer market which the American company is trying to tap with low-cost offerings.OpenAI has dived into the bottom of the AI market pyramid by launching a new, more affordable subscription tier in India called ChatGPT Go, priced at Rs 399 per month. The announcement was made by Nick Turley, OpenAI's vice president and head of ChatGPT, on X (formerly Twitter): 'We just launched ChatGPT Go in India, a new subscription tier that gives users in India more access to our most popular features: 10x higher message limits, 10x more image generations, 10x more file uploads, and 2x longer memory compared with our free tier. All for Rs. 399.' This new tier is far more affordable than OpenAI's other existing plans. The top-tier version of ChatGPT, ChatGPT Pro, is priced at Rs 19,900/month in India, while ChatGPT Plus, the mid-range plan, costs Rs 1,999/month.For its mass market strategy, OpenAI is leveraging a mass market tool. Its users in India will now see subscription prices in rupees and can make payments via UPI (Unified Payment Interface), a move likely aimed at improving accessibility for common users. India is ChatGPT's second-biggest market after the United States and may well become the biggest soon. By the number of installs, however, India is the top market, accounting for 13.7% of lifetime downloads, compared with second place, the US, which accounted for 10.3% of all downloads, TechCrunch has reported.OpenAI's strategy to customise its services for mass users comes at a time when several players, especially Gemini and Perplexity, are eying India's vast consumer market where common people are increasingly using AI chatbots instead of internet search engines. OpenAI aims to do what Reliance did with its low-cost strategy in India's telecom market, accumulating millions of users and retaining them with cheaper plans. However, OpenAI is likely to face intense competition from its rivals.Designed specifically for the Indian market, this localised, cost-effective ChatGPT subscription signals a strategic pivot for OpenAI toward one of the world's most dynamic technology ecosystems. While India has long been a high-engagement market for global tech players, this marks the first time OpenAI has introduced a geography-specific pricing model tailored to local user needs, payment habits and price sensitivities.India is not just another large market. It is a unique combination of scale, youth population and digital infrastructure. With over 1.4 billion people, a booming startup scene, and the world's highest mobile internet usage, the country presents a fertile ground for mass adoption of generative AI. OpenAI's move reflects both a recognition of this opportunity and a calculated bet on India becoming the proving ground for scalable AI deployment in other countries in the Global SouthChatGPT Go sits strategically between the free tier and the more expensive Plus and Pro offerings, providing a balanced mix of capability and accessibility. At Rs 399 per month, it offers significantly enhanced usage limits compared to the free version, including access to the latest GPT-5 model, faster performance, priority response times, and expanded message caps.What sets ChatGPT Go apart is not just its pricing, but its thoughtful localisation. For the first time, OpenAI has enabled Indian users to subscribe using UPI. Additionally, all billing is presented in rupees, eliminating friction related to currency conversion and international payments. These product decisions reflect a deeper understanding of local user behavior and a commitment to reduce the economic and procedural barriers to AI adoption.India has rapidly emerged as one of OpenAI's most engaged markets. The demand is not limited to urban knowledge workers. It extends across students, independent creators, developers and small businesses seeking productivity tools, creative assistants and educational companions. This growing user base exists within a uniquely price-sensitive market. The previous $20/month Plus plan, though successful in the West, limited penetration among Indian users who require value at lower price points. By offering a Rs 399/month alternative, OpenAI has significantly expanded its addressable market. Rather than relying on premium margins, the company appears to be following a high-volume, low-cost model, a strategy long proven effective in India across sectors from telecom to fintech.Furthermore, India provides the ideal testbed for product development. Its user diversity, mobile-first orientation, and rapid feedback cycles make it possible to fine-tune features before rolling them out globally. By selecting India as the first country for a localised plan launch, OpenAI is treating it not just as a revenue market, but as a strategic lab for future growth models.These choices indicate a nuanced strategy, combining ease of access for users with infrastructural alignment for future enterprise, educational, and governmental integrations.Despite its strengths, the ChatGPT Go plan does not come without challenges. At Rs 399/month, the subscription is still out of reach for many users in India's Tier 2 and Tier 3 towns and rural regions. While more accessible than the Plus plan, further price segmentation or student-focused pricing may be required to achieve true mass scale. Language support remains another critical hurdle. India's linguistic diversity is vast, and while GPT-5 has improved multilingual capabilities, conversational fluency, cultural sensitivity and dialectal understanding will require significant advancement. Data privacy is another potential friction point. With India's new data laws, any perceived opacity around data usage or model training could raise concerns among regulators and users alike. OpenAI is already facing a lawsuit in India from media firms for copyright infringement. Local hosting, transparency reports and ethical AI practices will be key to sustaining trust.OpenAI's decision to localise and downscale pricing in India also reflects a preemptive response to intensifying competition. The Indian AI space is heating up, with major global firms expanding their presence, and domestic startups like Krutrim, Sarvam AI and BharatGPT developing localised language models and enterprise solutions. The launch of ChatGPT Go comes when other AI companies are also looking to attract Indian mass users.The ChatGPT Go plan doesn't guarantee a monopoly. On the contrary, it signals the beginning of a more intense AI war in India. The two strongest contenders currently challenging ChatGPT's dominance are Google's Gemini and the rising star Perplexity AI. Both bring distinct advantages to the table, and OpenAI will need more than affordability to maintain its edge. Perplexity recently partnered with Airtel to offer free Pro subscriptions, while Google has introduced a year-long free AI Pro plan for Indian students.Google's Gemini is arguably ChatGPT's most formidable competitor, not just in India, but globally. In the Indian context, Gemini's strength lies in its seamless integration with the Google ecosystem, which already has deep penetration across search, Android, Gmail, Docs and YouTube. In India, where hundreds of millions rely on Android phones and Google services, Gemini is poised to become the default AI assistant. Integration gives Gemini an enormous advantage in terms of daily usage and user retention. Gemini also shows signs of strong multilingual capabilities, with growing support for Indian languages. While ChatGPT supports multiple languages, Google has the advantage of pre-existing translation infrastructure, vast regional datasets and deep localisation experience.While Gemini leverages its existing ecosystem power, Perplexity AI offers a different kind of value which combines the simplicity of search with the intelligence of AI. It's a hybrid between a chatbot and a real-time search engine, and its biggest asset is transparency. Perplexity provides answers with real-time web sources, enabling users to not only get concise summaries but also verify the information through direct citations. This makes it especially appealing to students, researchers, and professionals who want reliable, up-to-date information.The launch of ChatGPT Go is no doubt a bold move to unlock the Indian market. But OpenAI is not alone in this race as Gemini and Perplexity too gather speed. The future of AI in India will not be won on pricing alone. It will be shaped by how well each platform adapts to Indian realities, from language to platform access to cultural context.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Mohali MC plans mechanical cleaning of C-roads; Rs 25 crore development works on agenda
The Mohali Municipal Corporation is set to take a major step in city sanitation by introducing mechanical sweeping for C-roads (inner lanes). The proposal will be tabled in the MC meeting scheduled for August 22. Officials said the MC area, including villages, has a road length of 303.44 km, of which 101 km are C-roads. These will now be cleaned weekly by machines. The plan also includes lifting of dry leaves, with an estimated cost of Rs 4 crore over three years. The meeting will also consider development projects worth Rs 25 crore, including laying premix on main roads, installing iron grills, building new libraries, and upgrading community centres. Officials said these projects aim to strengthen Mohali's infrastructure and move the city towards a 'smart city' model. The agenda includes some table items regarding the boundary wall of the dumping collection centre near Sector 74, which has already faced protests from residents. Another proposal seeks to break the monopoly of private garbage collectors by hiring a professional company for door-to-door collection and segregation of waste. This, officials said, is the 'need of the hour'. However, the move has drawn sharp criticism from elected members. Deputy Mayor Kuljit Singh Bedi, former deputy mayor Manjit Singh Sethi, councillor Jasbir Singh Manku and Anuradha Anand, both Finance & Contract Committee members, announced their opposition. They said, 'The MC's experiment of mechanical sweeping on B-roads has already failed. When machines cannot clean B-roads, how can they work on narrow C-roads?' They added that in many villages falling under MC Mohali, C-roads are so congested that 'even a bicycle cannot pass'. The councillors also questioned the fate of existing MC employees who currently clean these 'C' roads. The August 22 meeting is expected to be crucial, with decisions impacting both sanitation and development across Mohali.
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Balganga dam project: HC upholds Tribunal order asking state authorities to pay Rs 303 cr to firm
In a setback to Maharashtra government and its authorities, the Bombay High Court earlier this month upheld the majority award passed by the arbitral tribunal in April 2019 that directed the authorities to pay Rs 303 crore to FA Enterprises, a private firm, towards unpaid bills for construction of Balganga dam. The HC through August 12 verdict restored the arbitral tribunal award related to the project of water supply to expanding areas of Navi Mumbai and for drinking and Industrial purposes. The copy of the order was made available on Wednesday. The HC observed 'findings of the Arbitral Tribunal are based on the materials on record and on a proper appreciation of evidence.' The two-judge bench noted that the majority award had held termination invalid as the firm had taken substantial steps to get forest land clearance. Therefore, there was 'no legal basis for the single-judge bench to have upset this finding.' Justice Karnik for the division bench recorded, 'We are satisfied that the view taken by the Arbitral Tribunal on the basis of the evidence on record is a plausible view. In such circumstances there was no scope for the Single Judge to have interfered with the award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 34 of the of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.' In a meeting held in January, 2009 under the chairmanship of the then state Water Resources Development (WRD) Minister, it was decided to construct a dam on Balganga river, near Niphad village in Pen taluka of Raigad district to meet the drinking water needs of Navi Mumbai's growing population and industries. The CIDCO was to bear the capital cost for Dam development and would get ownership right over the water and construction was to be executed by the WRD through KIDC. In May, 2009, the KIDC issued a work order to FA enterprises for nearly Rs. 495 crore and in June, 2011, project cost was revised to Rs. 1, 220 crore, which was disputed by CIDCO, compelling it to form expert committees to ascertain the same. 'Due to continuous pressure from banking institutions,' the FA Enterprises in 2013 approached the HC, after which an arbitral panel comprising representatives of the authorities and the firm was formed. The HC appointed its presiding member. Meanwhile, the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) in August, 2015 filed a chargesheet against the firm and others for corruption and other irregularities. The next month, the private firm claimed an amount of Rs 536.56 crore, which the authorities opposed. In 2016, the KIDC terminated the contract of the private firm. Three out of five members of the tribunal in April, 2019 passed a majority award directing KIDC to pay to the private firm a sum of Rs 303 crore, prompting the authorities to challenge it before the High Court. The single-judge bench of the HC in May, 2020 set aside the majority award. Thereafter the aggrieved private firm moved the two-judge bench of HC with appeals against the May, 2020 judgement. Accepting submissions by senior advocate Aspi Chinoy for the firm, the HC on August 12 held that there was no 'patent illegality' in the award and the Tribunal's decision was a 'plausible view,' therefore the same required to be restored.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
24 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US examines equity stake in chip makers for CHIPS Act cash grants: Report
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is looking into the government taking equity stakes in Intel and other chipmakers in exchange for grants under the CHIPS Act, which aims to spur factory-building in the US, two sources said. As part of a plan to revive US manufacturing - a key Trump agenda - Lutnick said earlier on Tuesday the US government wants an equity stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants approved by the administration of former President Joe Biden. Now Lutnick wants to expand that plan to other companies, according to a White House official and a person familiar with the situation. The Trump administration has recently made unusual deals with US companies, including allowing AI chip giant Nvidia to sell its H20 chips to China in exchange for the US government receiving 15 per cent of those sales. The Pentagon is slated to become the largest shareholder in a small mining company to boost output of rare earth magnets. The government's intervention in corporate matters has worried critics who say President Donald Trump's actions create new categories of corporate risk and that a bad bet could mean a hit to taxpayer funds. Much of the funding under the CHIPS Act has not yet been dispersed for companies such as Micron, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, Samsung and Intel. TSMC and Intel declined to comment. Micron, Samsung and the White House did not respond to requests for comment on whether Lutnick is considering more stakes. The two sources told Reuters on Tuesday that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is also involved in the CHIPS Act discussions, but that Lutnick is driving the process. The Commerce Department oversees the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act money. Lutnick has been pushing the equity idea, the sources said, adding that Trump likes the idea. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed earlier that Lutnick was working on a deal with Intel to take a 10 per cent government stake. "The president wants to put America's needs first, both from a national security and economic perspective, and it's a creative idea that has never been done before," she told reporters. Speaking on CNBC, Lutnick said the US wants a return on its "investment". "We'll get equity in return for that ... instead of just giving grants away," he said. Trump has previously said he wanted to kill the CHIPS Act program. Lutnick's comments suggested any stake would be non-voting, meaning it would not enable the US government to tell the company how to run its business. His comments came a day after SoftBank Group agreed to invest $2 billion in Intel, which has struggled to compete after years of management blunders. "The Biden administration literally was giving Intel money for free and giving TSMC money for free, and all these companies just giving the money for free, and Donald Trump turned it into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money. If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action for the American taxpayer'," Lutnick said. South Korean presidential advisor Kim Yong-beom said neither the government nor the potentially affected companies have heard about such a plan. He added that foreign companies like Samsung needed "predictability" for their US investments. A Korean chip industry official, meanwhile, said it would be hard for chipmakers to accept US government equity stakes, and some may either decide not to invest or delay investments unless Washington provides incentives like increasing funding. Taking lawmaker questions in Taipei on Wednesday and asked whether the US government could take a stake in TSMC, Taiwan Economy Minister Kuo Jyh-huei said his ministry would consult with the company, which he pointed out was private and not a state-owned enterprise. "We will also discuss with the National Development Council, as it is a shareholder of TSMC. We will thoroughly understand the underlying meaning of the US Commerce Secretary's remarks, but this will require some time for discussion and assessment," Kuo said.
