Few Canadians are familiar with possible NDP leadership contenders: poll
A majority of respondents to the Research Co. poll said they 'don't know who the person is' when asked about possible candidates like current NDP MPs Leah Gazan, Gord Johns, Jenny Kwan and Heather McPherson.
The same goes for other high-profile New Democrats like former House leader Ruth Ellen Brosseau, former Vancouver mayor Kennedy Stewart and filmmaker Avi Lewis.
Brosseau got the most positive response in the poll, with 18 per cent of respondents saying they have a favourable view of her, while Kwan had the largest number of poll respondents saying they 'definitely' or 'probably' want to see her run for the leadership — a combined 22 per cent.
The poll is an online survey of 1,001 people conducted between June 30 and July 2.
The polling industry's professional body, the Canadian Research Insights Council, says online surveys cannot be assigned a margin of error because they do not randomly sample the population.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 8, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Alberta government again shifting expense disclosure policy after widespread backlash
EDMONTON – Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's government is again shifting its expense disclosure policy after critics from across the political spectrum accused her of dodging responsibility. In early August, the province quietly published new rules axing a requirement for Smith, her ministers, senior staff and deputy ministers to publicly post receipts for expenses over $100. Marisa Breeze, press secretary to Finance Minister Nate Horner, said in a Tuesday email that cabinet has directed Horner to see that the previous expense posting policy is reinstated — but with a tweak. 'Cabinet recognized the importance of an expense posting policy that achieves both security and transparency,' she said. Breeze said the exact location of accommodations like hotels will be redacted on receipts posted online to ensure the security of elected members and staff. It comes after the premier, facing heated questions at an Edmonton town hall last week, said the change caught her off guard – but was made for safety reasons. 'There are a number of my ministers who go to the same hotels when they're frequenting different municipalities, and they just wanted the name of the hotel redacted, just in case people were tracking them down,' Smith said. 'That was what the policy was supposed to be. It turned out to be something quite different.' The move to stop posting expensive receipts sparked wide criticism. The Canadian Taxpayers Federation said it was baffling and a bad look for Smith's government. 'This makes it look like the Alberta government has some expenses to hide from taxpayers, the people who are paying the bills,' the federation's Alberta director, Kris Sims, said in a statement last week. She wasn't alone in calling for a reversal. The Opposition NDP called the change 'shameful' and accused it of being a clear attempt by the United Conservative government to hide spending. 'It's entitled, and it's the exact opposite of being open and transparent,' NDP house leader Christina Gray said in a statement last week. 'Our province deserves nothing less than an ethical, transparent and competent government. Right now, Albertans are getting the complete opposite.' The province's information and privacy commissioner, Diane McLeod, also has been critical of the move, telling media that the change diminished transparency. Smith's former infrastructure minister, Peter Guthrie, who was booted from the UCP caucus earlier this year, said on social media last week the government was 'shielding their irresponsible use of Albertans' tax dollars from scrutiny.' Guthrie also said Smith was being evasive with her explanation. 'Smith dodged responsibility, blaming cabinet — claiming it was MLAs who wanted to conceal receipts 'for safety reasons,'' he wrote. 'As a former cabinet member, I know this: under the Smith-Anderson duo-cracy, nothing moves without their permission,' he said, referring to Smith's chief of staff, Rob Anderson. 'This premier grabs credit when things go right and skirts blame when they don't,' Guthrie added. Gray said if Smith is going to reverse the policy change, she should also republish the eight years of past expense reports the government recently took off its website, as first reported by the CBC. That demand was echoed by Sims on social media as reports of the government's move trickled out without a formal announcement late Tuesday afternoon. 'It has to be fully reversed,' Sims wrote. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 19, 2025.
Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Trump vows to ramp up pressure on the Smithsonian, citing ‘progress' with U.S. universities
U.S. President Donald Trump suggested on Tuesday he will pressure the Smithsonian Institution, a premier museum, education and research complex for U.S. history and culture, to accept his demands, just like he did with colleges and universities by threatening to cut federal funding. 'I have instructed my attorneys to go through the Museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with Colleges and Universities where tremendous progress has been made,' Trump said on Truth Social. The Smithsonian, which was established in 1846 and includes 21 museums and galleries and the National Zoo, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The White House said last week it will lead an internal review of some Smithsonian museums after Trump earlier this year accused it of spreading 'anti-American ideology' and raised alarm among civil rights advocates. 'The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been – Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future,' Trump said. White House seeking fines from Harvard, other universities after Columbia deal, official says Analysis: Donald Trump has taken aim at what he calls the 'woke' view of American history The Smithsonian receives most of its budget from the U.S. Congress but is independent of the government in decision-making. Civil rights advocates say Trump's administration is undoing decades of social progress and undermining the acknowledgment of critical phases of American history. Trump has made threats to cut federal funding of top U.S. educational institutions, citing pro-Palestinian protests against U.S. ally Israel's war in Gaza, transgender policies, climate initiatives and diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Last month, the government settled its probes with Columbia University, which agreed to pay $221-million, and Brown University, which said it will pay $50-million. Both institutions accepted certain government demands. Talks to settle with Harvard University are ongoing.
CTV News
6 hours ago
- CTV News
Colombian court frees former president Uribe from house arrest until it rules on bribery case
Former President Alvaro Uribe leaves court after a hearing in his trial over witness tampering and bribery charges in Bogota, Colombia, Feb. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Fernando Vergara, File) BOGOTA, Colombia — A Colombian appeals court ruled Tuesday that former president Alvaro Uribe must be released from house arrest while he challenges his conviction for bribery and witness tampering. On Aug. 1, the conservative leader was sentenced to 12 years of house arrest for threatening and trying to flip witnesses who had spoken to investigators about his alleged role in the formation of a right wing paramilitary group in the 1990s. Uribe denies the charges and has appealed the conviction to the Superior Tribunal in Bogota. The court has until mid-October to issue a definitive ruling on the case, which has gripped Colombia and also provoked reactions from Uribe's allies in the United States. On Tuesday the Superior Tribunal said it approved an injunction filed by Uribe's defense team seeking his release from house arrest. Uribe's lawyers argued the former president's right to due process was violated by the arrest order against him, as well as his right to a presumption of innocence.
