Alberta government again shifting expense disclosure policy after widespread backlash
In early August, the province quietly published new rules axing a requirement for Smith, her ministers, senior staff and deputy ministers to publicly post receipts for expenses over $100.
Marisa Breeze, press secretary to Finance Minister Nate Horner, said in a Tuesday email that cabinet has directed Horner to see that the previous expense posting policy is reinstated — but with a tweak.
'Cabinet recognized the importance of an expense posting policy that achieves both security and transparency,' she said.
Breeze said the exact location of accommodations like hotels will be redacted on receipts posted online to ensure the security of elected members and staff.
It comes after the premier, facing heated questions at an Edmonton town hall last week, said the change caught her off guard – but was made for safety reasons.
'There are a number of my ministers who go to the same hotels when they're frequenting different municipalities, and they just wanted the name of the hotel redacted, just in case people were tracking them down,' Smith said.
'That was what the policy was supposed to be. It turned out to be something quite different.'
The move to stop posting expensive receipts sparked wide criticism.
The Canadian Taxpayers Federation said it was baffling and a bad look for Smith's government.
'This makes it look like the Alberta government has some expenses to hide from taxpayers, the people who are paying the bills,' the federation's Alberta director, Kris Sims, said in a statement last week.
She wasn't alone in calling for a reversal.
The Opposition NDP called the change 'shameful' and accused it of being a clear attempt by the United Conservative government to hide spending.
'It's entitled, and it's the exact opposite of being open and transparent,' NDP house leader Christina Gray said in a statement last week.
'Our province deserves nothing less than an ethical, transparent and competent government. Right now, Albertans are getting the complete opposite.'
The province's information and privacy commissioner, Diane McLeod, also has been critical of the move, telling media that the change diminished transparency.
Smith's former infrastructure minister, Peter Guthrie, who was booted from the UCP caucus earlier this year, said on social media last week the government was 'shielding their irresponsible use of Albertans' tax dollars from scrutiny.'
Guthrie also said Smith was being evasive with her explanation.
'Smith dodged responsibility, blaming cabinet — claiming it was MLAs who wanted to conceal receipts 'for safety reasons,'' he wrote.
'As a former cabinet member, I know this: under the Smith-Anderson duo-cracy, nothing moves without their permission,' he said, referring to Smith's chief of staff, Rob Anderson.
'This premier grabs credit when things go right and skirts blame when they don't,' Guthrie added.
Gray said if Smith is going to reverse the policy change, she should also republish the eight years of past expense reports the government recently took off its website, as first reported by the CBC.
That demand was echoed by Sims on social media as reports of the government's move trickled out without a formal announcement late Tuesday afternoon.
'It has to be fully reversed,' Sims wrote.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 19, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
3 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Wednesday's letters: Bring back traffic enforcement
Article content The powers that be removed cameras that regulated traffic somewhat on city streets and on the Henday. Now, it is obvious that few obey rules that once were followed. As a pedestrian, crossing the street is a dangerous action depending on whether the driver coming toward you is following the rules; you may be struck down or you may be allowed to cross in safety. Article content Lights mean nothing as many race through red lights without a thought. The many accidents and injured pedestrians can be laid at the door of those who removed those cameras because drivers are ignoring all driving rules and lights mean little. Article content Article content Article content When will this stop? Will it take the deaths of children when they return to school next month? I understand slowing down in a school zone is also an option so how many children have to be injured, or worse, before we bring back those dreadful cameras that kept us honest. Article content Article content Regarding defunding of Red Deer harm-reduction sites: The latest move by the province sickens me — a beat-down to another vulnerable group of Albertans by an inept UCP government led by a truth-bending premier. On what basis was this decision made, supposed input from involved people? Just like the two revisions to speed limits when passing roadside service/police vehicles, COVID vaccinations, Alberta's own police force, the flip-flop on coal mining on the eastern slopes and all the other supposed inputs for changes or new legislation that fly directly in the face of science, public opinion and just plain common sense. Article content Article content It's time for all you UCP lemmings to wake up and realize that our premier's continued imposition of her personal beliefs through whatever means possible is going to cost us dearly. Article content I am just appalled by Danielle Smith's decision to claw back the feds' Canada Disability Benefits (CDB). I'm under the AISH program (payments of $511) and AISH is removing $200 in CDB from my wife and a $200 CDB from me plus a Canada disability pension of $1,252 that is taxable monthly that AISH made me apply for before I was approved for AISH. Article content Don't forget this income is for both my wife and I who are legally disabled. In our opinion, this is 100-per-cent theft in the grossest way. I can't believe the public hasn't fought back. Article content In 2019, we moved to a skinny on 127 Street. There's a bike lane in front of our house. That means no parking directly in front of us. Know what? We don't care. The parade that passes is a delight. In summer, the families are out in force. In winter, intrepid souls make their way to work no matter the weather.
Winnipeg Free Press
11 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Alberta government again shifting expense disclosure policy after widespread backlash
EDMONTON – Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's government is again shifting its expense disclosure policy after critics from across the political spectrum accused her of dodging responsibility. In early August, the province quietly published new rules axing a requirement for Smith, her ministers, senior staff and deputy ministers to publicly post receipts for expenses over $100. Marisa Breeze, press secretary to Finance Minister Nate Horner, said in a Tuesday email that cabinet has directed Horner to see that the previous expense posting policy is reinstated — but with a tweak. 'Cabinet recognized the importance of an expense posting policy that achieves both security and transparency,' she said. Breeze said the exact location of accommodations like hotels will be redacted on receipts posted online to ensure the security of elected members and staff. It comes after the premier, facing heated questions at an Edmonton town hall last week, said the change caught her off guard – but was made for safety reasons. 'There are a number of my ministers who go to the same hotels when they're frequenting different municipalities, and they just wanted the name of the hotel redacted, just in case people were tracking them down,' Smith said. 'That was what the policy was supposed to be. It turned out to be something quite different.' The move to stop posting expensive receipts sparked wide criticism. The Canadian Taxpayers Federation said it was baffling and a bad look for Smith's government. 'This makes it look like the Alberta government has some expenses to hide from taxpayers, the people who are paying the bills,' the federation's Alberta director, Kris Sims, said in a statement last week. She wasn't alone in calling for a reversal. The Opposition NDP called the change 'shameful' and accused it of being a clear attempt by the United Conservative government to hide spending. 'It's entitled, and it's the exact opposite of being open and transparent,' NDP house leader Christina Gray said in a statement last week. 'Our province deserves nothing less than an ethical, transparent and competent government. Right now, Albertans are getting the complete opposite.' The province's information and privacy commissioner, Diane McLeod, also has been critical of the move, telling media that the change diminished transparency. Smith's former infrastructure minister, Peter Guthrie, who was booted from the UCP caucus earlier this year, said on social media last week the government was 'shielding their irresponsible use of Albertans' tax dollars from scrutiny.' Guthrie also said Smith was being evasive with her explanation. 'Smith dodged responsibility, blaming cabinet — claiming it was MLAs who wanted to conceal receipts 'for safety reasons,'' he wrote. 'As a former cabinet member, I know this: under the Smith-Anderson duo-cracy, nothing moves without their permission,' he said, referring to Smith's chief of staff, Rob Anderson. 'This premier grabs credit when things go right and skirts blame when they don't,' Guthrie added. Gray said if Smith is going to reverse the policy change, she should also republish the eight years of past expense reports the government recently took off its website, as first reported by the CBC. That demand was echoed by Sims on social media as reports of the government's move trickled out without a formal announcement late Tuesday afternoon. 'It has to be fully reversed,' Sims wrote. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 19, 2025.
CTV News
13 hours ago
- CTV News
Government moves to reverse new expense disclosure policy following backlash
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says her government may backtrack on a new expense policy that ends the public disclosure of receipts for government officials. Alberta's government is backtracking on a new expense policy that ended the public disclosure of receipts for government officials, following widespread criticism that the move erodes transparency. The policy, quietly published on Aug. 1 before the long weekend, removed a long-standing requirement that ministers, senior staff and deputy ministers publicly disclose receipts for expenses over $100. It also erased eight years of previously available online records. Premier Danielle Smith said the intent was to protect cabinet members, who often stay at the same hotels while travelling around the province. 'The issue that cabinet discussed was that there are a number of my ministers who go to the same hotels when they're frequenting different municipalities, and they just wanted the name of the hotel redacted, just in case people were tracking them down,' Smith said. 'It turned out to be something quite different.' Finance Minister Nate Horner's press secretary, Marisa Breeze, said the directive was meant 'to improve government operations and reduce red tape, and to bring Alberta's policies into alignment with other provinces.' She said the purpose was to 'ensure the privacy and safety of elected officials and staff specifically as it relates to the physical location of their accommodations while travelling.' She said receipts were still required for reimbursement and can be accessed through Alberta's Freedom of Information process. Later on Tuesday, Breeze provided CTV News with an additional statement: 'Earlier today, cabinet discussed recent amendments to the expense policy. Cabinet recognized the importance of an expense posting policy that achieves both security and transparency. 'Cabinet has therefore directed the president of Treasury Board and Minister of Finance to request Treasury Board immediately revert to the previous expense posting policy expecting that address information for accommodations will be redacted on receipts posted online to ensure security of elected members and staff.' The Opposition NDP called the policy a deliberate attempt to conceal government spending. 'Albertans foot the bill for government expenses. They expect receipts, not excuses,' said NDP house leader Christina Gray. 'Smith's government changed their policy on a Friday before a long weekend and scrubbed eight years of receipts from the internet. This was wrong, and all of these changes should be reversed.' NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi accused Smith of leading 'the most opaque government I've ever seen.' He said the premier 'claims she knew nothing about it. So she knows nothing about what's going on in her government. In reality, of course, she knew what was going on; she just wasn't expecting the backlash.' Independent MLA Peter Guthrie, a former cabinet minister, said the premier was also trying to shift blame. 'The premier is quick to take credit when things go right but just as quick to pass blame when they don't,' Guthrie said. 'Albertans deserve a government that leads with integrity, not one that hides expenses, blames others and dodges accountability.' The Canadian Taxpayers Federation said the rollback is essential. 'For the longest time, Alberta has had really strong transparency laws where politicians, their bureaucrats and staff have to show their receipts for their expenses,' said Alberta director Kris Sims. 'It isn't through FOI. You don't need to pay a fee. They have to post their receipts online—until now.' She added that taxpayers 'want to know if your tax dollars are paying to rent a Corolla or a Corvette, a Subway sandwich supper or lobster and steak on your dime. This is why detailed receipts matter.' Sims also dismissed the government's explanation that system capacity issues required the removal of older records. ' 'We hereby permit the government to go spend some money on external hard drives if it means they're going to be transparent with taxpayers,' she said. Lori Williams, a political scientist at Mount Royal University, said the explanation did little to ease concerns. 'They just removed eight years' worth of public records from the website,' she said. 'If it is a concern, you can simply redact the name of the hotel.' James Turk, executive director of the Centre for Free Expression at Toronto Metropolitan University, called the expense changes 'the tip of a far more serious iceberg.' He said the policy fits into 'a much larger blocking of access to information on the part of Albertans' under new legislation brought in by Smith's government earlier this year. 'In June, they brought in a new Access to Information Act, replacing the former FOIP Act as well as the Protection of Privacy Act,' Turk said. 'The access to information decreases the transparency of government and decreases the public and journalists' right to information from the government.' He added that by limiting the time receipts remain public and removing older records, the government is 'making it harder for the public and for journalists to keep track of what politicians and senior government officials are doing.' Turk said Alberta should be leading on transparency, not retreating. 'We don't want provinces going to the lowest common denominator,' he said. Diane McLeod, Alberta's information and privacy commissioner, provided a statement on the matter to media earlier this month. 'These changes diminish transparency and our office has no knowledge of the rationale for them,' her statement said, in part. 'The OIPC takes the view that transparency is critically important. Citizens are rightfully concerned about government stewardship of public resources and there is high, ongoing demand for records of government travel and other expenses, as well as other types of government spending. 'When expense concerns or scandals arise, they can lead to a crisis of public confidence in government. Proactively disclosing the expense data of senior government officials can enhance government transparency and accountability, build public trust and reduce formal access requests. 'This is why, in general, I regard government transparency as so important.'
