Tobacco Bill bans sale of loose cigarettes – informal traders fear bankruptcy
The Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Control Bill in South Africa prohibits the sale of single cigarettes (or loose cigarettes), which informal traders say could bankrupt their businesses.
It also regulates other aspects of tobacco control, including public smoking, advertising, and packaging requirements.
The Portfolio Committee on Health discussed the impact of the Bill on businesses earlier this week. Members have completed public hearings in all provinces and are now taking oral submissions in parliament.
ALSO READ: Why is parliament dragging its feet with the Tobacco Bill?
Tobacco Bill
Mampapatla Madikoto, Limpopo Small, Medium Enterprises and Hawkers Association general secretary, told members of the portfolio committee that the ban on single cigarettes would cripple their operations, as many of their customers not only buy cigarettes but also other items.
A clause in the Bill bans the sale of single cigarettes. If a person is found selling a 'loose' cigarette, they can be fined and/or imprisoned.
He added that there are many reasons why people decide to buy single cigarettes, including a box being too expensive, or they are trying to control their smoking habit.
Display of tobacco products
Madikoto added that the clause will affect approximately two million informal traders, hawkers, spaza shop owners and home-based operators across the country.
The proposed Control of Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Bill aims to strengthen these measures further by introducing even stricter regulations.
This includes banning the display of tobacco products at the point of sale, regulating electronic nicotine delivery systems, and potentially moving towards plain packaging.
He told the members that the Bill's ban on displaying cigarettes on countertops or tables is impractical.
ALSO READ: Tobacco bill won't curb smoking in the least
Smoking outdoors
The proposed Bill also seeks to hold traders liable if their customers are found smoking near their stalls in outdoor public places that are designated nonsmoking areas.
Currently, tobacco legislation prohibits smoking in indoor public places, except for designated smoking areas that can be up to 25% of the indoor area. However, the government is considering a complete ban on smoking in indoor public places and certain outdoor public areas.
The owner of the restaurant/pub, or employer, will be responsible for ensuring that the public space designated as a nonsmoking area is smoke-free.
Selling online
Madoda Khuzwayo, CEO and founder of SIP, told the committee that the Bill discriminates against online shopping.
The Bill seeks to ban the sale and offer for sale of tobacco products online. Khuzwayo, who sells alcohol and tobacco products online, said this clause is unfair, as selling such products contributes significantly to his business.
He highlighted that online retailers will not be able to list any tobacco products, while larger physical retailers are permitted to do so.
ALSO READ: Pressure mounts for government to pass Tobacco Bill
Underage smoking
One of the reasons for the strict measures is to control underage smoking, which Khuzwayo has addressed in his business.
'When someone buys alcohol or cigarettes through our business, they will need to produce a physical identification document upon delivery, which will be captured into the system.
'But it is close to impossible for underage smoking to be prevented if children need to go into the store to make a purchase, because some look older and there will be no need to ask for proof of identity,' he added.
He said the government can check online retailers' data to prove that alcohol and tobacco are not being sold to minors. Additionally, most of the websites that sell these items block minors.
Khuzwayo has requested that the government consider removing the clause banning online tobacco sales.
He highlighted that without the necessary amendments, the Bill risks discriminating against small and medium enterprises (SMEs), as e-commerce is many SMEs' main source of revenue.
'Without amendments, the Bill entrenches inequality, especially in townships, and excludes emerging small business players,' he said.
NOW READ: Budget 3.0: Alcohol and cigarette prices will increase — here's by how much
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Urgent call from Deputy Minister Masondo: Pass the 2025/26 Budget to protect vulnerable South Africans
Deputy Minister of Finance David Masondo warns that it will ultimately be the most vulnerable members of society who will suffer the most when the Budget is not passed by Parliament. Image: GCIS Deputy Minister of Finance David Masondo on Thursday called on parties not to prolong the passing of the 2025/26 Budget or vote against the Appropriation Bill. Speaking during debate on the first reading of the Bill, Masondo said the passing of the Bill by Parliament will allow the national government to spend R1.23 trillion to deliver services to protect the vulnerable and invest in the country's shared future. 'This R1.23 trillion is not just a number. It represents school meals, hospital beds, social grants, and infrastructure projects that will directly impact the lives of many South Africans,' he said. Masondo made the statement as MPs debated the Appropriation Bill as part of the process to pass the overall Budget with each of the departments' votes and schedules. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The debate centres on whether parties agree with the overall principles of the Bill, and should the National House vote 'no', the entire Bill will be deemed rejected and will be referred back to the standing committee for further consideration. Masondo said the absence of the Appropriation Bill will mean that the government may only spend 45% of the previous year's budget until the end of July, and thereafter only 10% of the previous budget. 'Our estimation overall by October is that the government will be without authority when we reach 100% last year's appropriation." He also said failure to pass the Budget would delay critical priorities of the government. 'We should not prolong or object to the passing of this Bill. It is ultimately the most vulnerable members of society who depend on grants, public schools, and clinics, who will suffer the most due to our inaction,' Masondo said. However, the two big parties outside the Government of National Unity (GNU), the EFF and MK Party, indicated earlier that they will vote against the Appropriation Bill. Some of the small parties have stated that they will vote in principle in favour of the Bill, but just against some of the individual votes of departments. MK Party's Sanele Mwali said there was no time for technicalities but a focus on bold and courageous measures. Mwali said Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana, the GNU, and the ANC missed the opportunity to redefine the economic trajectory and set South Africa on a new path of sustainable growth and development. 'When we debate budgets, there is an attempt to limit Parliament from exploring other available economic alternatives,' Mwali said. He said the government continued to pursue the same economic, fiscal, and monetary policy that failed to bring change and impoverished millions of people. EFF MP Omphile Maotwe said her party made proposals on all department votes. 'We did not come to play internal coalition games but to make sure the voices of communities are heard in this House,' Maotwe said. She said the Budget was not for transformation, redistribution, or to fight unemployment, poverty, and inequality. 'It is a compromised Budget negotiated in smoke-filled backrooms to keep a sinking coalition afloat,' Maotwe said. ActionSA's Alan Beesley said the Budget was supposed to focus on industrial development, but it allocated crime to the very departments. Beesley also said Appropriation Bill lacked vision, coherence, and urgency. He complained about money being lost to corruption, cadre deployment, and bloated bureaucracy. 'There is enough money to run this country well, but there is not enough to run a bloated Cabinet and feed the greed of ANC comrades,' Beesly added. When the Bill was put to a vote, it easily secured the majority votes. This after the ANC, DA, and other parties voted in favour of it with 262 votes, while the EFF, MK Party, ATM, National Coloured Congress, and United African Transformation garnered 90 votes. This means the Bill has passed the first hurdle for the day. The parties are busy making declarations on each of the department votes before the approval of the full schedule of votes and the second reading of the Bill later this afternoon.
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
APRAV raises alarm over RABS Bill's impact on road accident victims
Ngoako Mohlaloga, deputy chairperson of APRAV, and Chairman Pieter de Bruyn addressed the media on what they deem the dangers of reintroducing the RABS Bill as a replacement for the RAF. Image: Zelda Venter The Association for the Protection of Road Accident Victims (APRAV) has voiced concern and strong opposition to the reintroduction of the Road Accident Benefits Scheme (RABS) Bill to Parliament, saying a broken system cannot be fixed by stripping away the rights of road accident victims. 'RABS is not reform; it is regression,' Ngoako Mohlaloga, APRAV's deputy chairperson, said on Wednesday. He and the chairman of the association, Pieter de Bruyn, addressed the media during a briefing held in conjunction with the National Press Club on the 'flaws' of the proposed Bill. APRAV's response follows the reintroduction of RABS by Transport Minister Barbara Creecy, a Bill previously rejected three times by Parliament due to its limitations, unaffordable structure, and impractical design. Trade union Cosatu recently voiced its support for the Bill, which it called a progressive measure aimed at protecting the poor. But De Bruyn, however, warns that it will do the opposite, and explains that it will deny victims access to justice, limit financial support, and overwhelm an already dysfunctional Road Accident Fund (RAF). 'This Bill offers less money, fewer rights, and no path to challenge the system when it fails you. If implemented, it will turn the RAF from a safety net into a bureaucratic trap,' he said. In explaining how it will work, De Bruyn said under RABS, road accident victims will no longer receive once-off compensation. Instead, they will receive monthly annuities, regardless of the severity of injury or loss of income. These payments will be capped, and they will terminate immediately if the victim dies. 'You can't pay for trauma surgeries, prosthetics, or settle urgent debt with a few thousand rand a month. RABS shifts the financial burden to victims when they are at their most vulnerable,' De Bruyn said. RABS also removes the right of victims to take their case to court or to access legal assistance. The system places full administrative control in the hands of the RAF, leaving victims with no way to challenge underpayments, delays, or rejections. As it is based on a no-fault model, RABS ensures that even negligent or intoxicated drivers can qualify for compensation. It erases accountability and creates a system vulnerable to fraud, while victims receive reduced and delayed payouts, De Bruyn explained. He added that RABS will also exclude children over 18 who lose a parent, elderly victims over the age of 60, and foreign nationals, as well as informal workers, caregivers, and those not formally employed. APRAV calls this a system of exclusion — not protection. 'If your 19-year-old son depends on you and you're killed in a crash, he will get nothing,' Mohlaloga explained. APRAV has, meanwhile, presented Parliament with a 10-point evidence-based action plan which it said requires minor practical changes to existing legislation. It called for a transparent, public engagement process to determine what is in the best interests of road accident victims. According to the government, the proposed RABS Bill aims to create a more efficient and equitable system for compensating victims of road accidents by focusing on social security principles rather than individual liability. It also proposes that a new body be established to administer the scheme, replacing the current RAF. The proposed RABS Bill has faced considerable opposition in the past, which has delayed its progress. De Bruyn, however, said while APRAV wants the system to be fixed, the proposed Bill is not the answer. He proposed that the RAF should get back on track and settle claims rather than fighting for a law that has failed three times to pass muster. [email protected]
IOL News
12 hours ago
- IOL News
Fire more tainted ministers or else. . . DA tells Cyril
President Cyril Ramaphosa gives in to DA pressure to save the budget vote. Image: Supplied/GCIS President Cyril Ramaphosa's axing of Nobuhle Nkabane as higher education and training minister paves the way for the DA to throw its weight behind the Appropriation Bill set to be tabled before the National Assembly on Wednesday. The Bill allocates funding to each national department. Ahead of the crucial vote, the DA had threatened to withhold support for Nkabane's departmental budget following allegations of misconduct and misleading Parliament regarding appointments to Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) boards. DA's spokesperson, Willie Aucamp confirmed on Tuesday that his party would now vote with the ANC in every department, paving the way for the Appropriation Bill to pass without major challenges. 'Our caucus met this afternoon, and we have decided that we will support the other departmental budgets. So the DA will support the total budget. The axing of minister Nkabane came after relentless pressure from the DA on the president to get rid of the minister.' However, Aucamp said the party would keep applying pressure on the president to get rid of anybody in his government who is implicated in corruption, either by the Zondo Commission or through the VBS Bank looting scheme. The Appropriation Bill requires 201 of 400 votes in the National Assembly. With the DA's support, the Bill is likely to pass without significant hurdles. DA leader John Steenhuisen said Nkabane's removal must be the beginning, not the end. 'There are still individuals in the Executive facing serious allegations. If the President is serious about restoring public trust, he must act decisively and consistently, not only when under pressure. The ANC must also accept that it no longer governs alone. "In a coalition, meaningful consultation with partners is not optional. It is essential to rebuild public confidence and ensure accountable governance. We will continue to engage the GNU parties in good faith to stop corruption and drive delivery in government.' Cape Times
