
Investors head into Trump tariff deadline benumbed and blase
Just days before the end of a 90-day pause he announced on his April 2 'Liberation Day' tariffs, Trump said the first batch of letters outlining the tariff levels they would face on exports to the United States would be sent to 12 countries on Monday.
Investors who have been tracking this date for months expect more details to emerge in the coming days and protracted uncertainty too, anticipating Trump will not be able to complete deals with all of America's trading partners in the coming week.
And they are not overly concerned.
'The market has gotten much more comfortable, more sanguine, when it comes to tariff news,' said Jeff Blazek, co-chief investment officer of multi-asset at Neuberger Berman in New York.
'The markets think that there is enough 'squishiness' in the deadlines – absent any major surprise – to not be too unsettled by more tariff news and believe that the worst-case scenarios are off the table now.'
Both the tariff levels and effective dates have become moving targets. Trump said on Friday that tariffs ranging up to 70% could go into effect on August 1, levels far higher than the 10%-50% range he announced in April.
So far, the U.S. administration has a limited deal with Britain and an in-principle agreement with Vietnam.
Deals that had been anticipated with India and Japan have failed to materialize, and there have been setbacks in talks with the European Union.
World stocks are meanwhile at record highs, up 11% since April 2.
They fell 14% in three trading sessions after that announcement but have since rallied 24%.
'If Liberation Day was the earthquake, the tariff letters will be the aftershocks. They won't quite have the same impact on markets even if they are higher than the earlier 10%,' said Rong Ren Goh, a portfolio manager in the fixed income team at Eastspring Investments in Singapore.
'This financial system is so inundated with liquidity that it is hard to cash up or delever at the risk of lagging the markets, with April serving as a painful reminder for many who derisked and were then forced to chase the relentless recovery in the subsequent weeks.'
Taxes and the FED
Investors have also been distracted by weeks of wrangling in Congress over Trump's massive tax and spending package, which he signed into law on Friday.
Stock markets have celebrated the passage of the bill, which makes Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent, while bond investors are wary the measures could add more than $3 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion debt.
The S&P 500 and Nasdaq indexes closed at record highs on Friday, notching a third week of gains. Europe's STOXX 600 benchmark is up 9% in three months.
Musk announces forming of 'America Party' in further break from Trump
But the risks of tariff-related inflation have weighed on U.S. Treasuries and the dollar, and jostled expectations for Federal Reserve policy.
Rate futures show traders no longer expect a Fed rate cut this month and are pricing in a total of just two quarter-point reductions by year-end.
The dollar has suffered a knock to its haven reputation from the dithering on tariffs.
The dollar index , which reflects the U.S. currency's performance against a basket of six others, has had its worst first half of the year since 1973, declining some 11%. It has fallen by 6.6% since April 2 alone.
'The markets are discounting a return to tariff levels of 35%, 40% or higher, and anticipating an across-the-board level of 10% or so,' said John Pantekidis, chief investment officer at TwinFocus in Boston.
Pantekidis is cautiously optimistic about the outlook for U.S. stocks this year, but the one variable he is watching closely is interest rate levels.
For now he expects to see interest rates dip in the second half, 'but if the bond market worries about the impact of the bill and rates go up, that's a different scenario.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
X suspends Reuters account in India after ‘legal demand', government denies making request
NEW DELHI:The Reuters News account on X has been inaccessible to users in India since Saturday, when the social media platform suspended it in response to what it described as a 'legal demand'. A spokesperson for the Indian government's Press Information Bureau, however, told Reuters there was no requirement from any agency in the government of India to 'withhold the Reuters handle. We are continuously working with X to resolve the problem'. Reuters could not immediately determine what specific content the demand referred to, why its removal was sought or the entity that had lodged the complaint. Representatives for X did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A Reuters spokesperson said in a statement, 'We are working with X to resolve this matter and get Reuters account reinstated in India as soon as possible.' Musk announces forming of 'America Party' in further break from Trump Reuters World, another X account operated by the news agency, has also been blocked in India. The main Reuters account, followed by more than 25 million users globally, has been blocked in India since Saturday night. A note tells X users that '@Reuters has been withheld in IN (India) in response to a legal demand'. In an email to the Reuters social media team on May 16, X said: 'It is our policy to notify account holders if we receive a legal request from an authorized entity (such as law enforcement or a government agency) to remove content from their account.' 'In order to comply with X obligations under India's local laws, we have withheld your X account in India under the country's Information Technology Act, 2000; the content remains available elsewhere'. Reuters could not ascertain if the May 16 email was linked to Saturday's account suspension. While the email did not specify which entity had made the request or what content they sought to remove, it said X had been advised that in a case of this sort, a user could contact the secretary of India's Information and Broadcasting Ministry. The secretary, Sanjay Jaju, did not immediately respond to requests seeking comment. The 2000 law allows designated government officials to demand takedown of content from social media platforms they deem to violate local laws, including on the grounds of national security or if a post threatens public order. X has long been at odds with India's government over content-removal requests. The company sued the federal government in March over a new government website the company says expands takedown powers to 'countless' government officials. The case is continuing. India has said X wrongly labelled an official website a 'censorship portal', as the website only allows tech companies to be notified about harmful online content.


Express Tribune
7 hours ago
- Express Tribune
TikTok building new U.S. app ahead of forced sale deadline
TikTok is developing a new version of its app specifically for U.S. users as part of a planned sale to American investors, according to a report by The Information. The move aims to comply with the "divest‑or‑ban" law requiring ByteDance to sell its U.S. operations or face a shutdown. Sources indicate the updated U.S. version, internally referred to as 'M2,' is set to launch on September 5, while the current app will remain functional until March 2026—though these timelines could shift. The report comes as former President Donald Trump confirmed that negotiations with China will begin imminently over the proposed deal. Trump described the sale as 'pretty much' agreed upon, with a divestment deadline extended to September 17. Under this evolving plan, U.S. users will need to transition to the new app, while the original TikTok continues to operate until the rollout is complete. However, the company did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment. The push for a U.S.-based TikTok follows earlier attempts to establish an American-controlled entity, which were stalled due to China's concerns over tariffs and technology transfer. As political and legal pressure mounts, a new version of TikTok could satisfy both national security concerns and users' needs. Yet, both U.S. and Chinese government approvals will be required before the sale can proceed — and new timelines depend heavily on that cooperation.


Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Musk should stay out of politics, US Treasury Secretary Bessent says
WASHINGTON: A day after Elon Musk escalated his feud with Donald Trump and announced the formation of a new U.S. political party, the president's Treasury secretary said Musk should stick to running his companies. And investment firm Azoria Partners, which had planned to launch a fund tied to Musk's automaker Tesla, said it was delaying the venture because the party's creation posed 'a conflict with his full-time responsibilities as CEO'. Musk said on Saturday he was establishing the 'America Party' in response to Trump's tax-cut and spending bill, which Musk claimed would bankrupt the country. Speaking on CNN on Sunday, Treasury chief Scott Bessent said the boards of directors at Musk's companies – Tesla and rocket firm SpaceX – likely would prefer him to stay out of politics. 'I imagine that those boards of directors did not like this announcement yesterday and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities,' Bessent said. Musk, who served as a top adviser to the White House on trimming the size of government during the first few months of Trump's presidency, said his new party would in next year's midterm elections look to unseat Republicans in Congress who backed the 'big, beautiful bill'. Musk spent millions of dollars underwriting Trump's re-election effort and for a time, regularly showed up at the president's side in the Oval Office and elsewhere. Their disagreement over the spending bill led to a falling out that Musk briefly tried unsuccessfully to repair. Musk announces forming of 'America Party' in further break from Trump The bill, which cuts taxes and ramps up spending on defense and border security, passed last week on party-line votes in both chambers. Critics argue it will damage the economy by significantly adding to the federal budget deficit. Trump has said Musk is unhappy because the bill, which Trump signed into law on Friday, takes away green-energy credits for Tesla's electric vehicles. The president has threatened to pull billions of dollars Tesla and SpaceX receive in government contracts and subsidies in response to Musk's criticism. Bessent suggested Musk holds little sway with voters who, he said, liked his Department of Government Efficiency more than him. 'The principles of DOGE were very popular,' Bessent said. 'I think if you looked at the polling, Elon was not.' Investor rebuke Musk's announcement immediately brought a rebuke from Azoria Partners, which said on Saturday it will postpone the listing of its Azoria Tesla Convexity exchange-traded fund. Azoria was set to launch the Tesla ETF this week. Azoria CEO James Fishback posted on X several critical comments about the new party and reiterated his support for Trump. 'I encourage the Board to meet immediately and ask Elon to clarify his political ambitions and evaluate whether they are compatible with his full-time obligations to Tesla as CEO,' Fishback said. On Sunday, Fishback added on X, 'Elon left us with no other choice.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment on Musk's announcement, but Stephen Miran, the chairman of Trump's Council of Economic Advisers, defended the bill on ABC's 'This Week'. 'The one, big, beautiful bill is going to create growth on turbo charge,' Miran said.