logo
I do not think Conor McGregor is fit to be president of Ireland, minister says

I do not think Conor McGregor is fit to be president of Ireland, minister says

The Journal4 days ago
CONOR MCGREGOR WOULD not be fit to be president of Ireland, a minister has said.
Transport Minister Darragh O'Brien compared MMA fighter McGregor, 37, to Ireland's outgoing president Michael D Higgins, who is a former arts minister and sociology lecturer.
O'Brien said McGregor was free to challenge the process to get on the presidential ballot paper but that the Irish constitution was 'clear'.
He was responding to comments from McGregor to The Sunday Times where he said he is considering a legal challenge to the eligibility rules for the presidential elections.
To become a candidate, a person must be nominated by either 20 members of the Irish parliament or four local authorities.
They also must be an Irish citizen who is 35 or older.
An election for the largely ceremonial role is expected towards the end of October, as it must take place in the 60 days before outgoing President Michael D Higgins' term ends on November 11.
So far, two candidates have secured sufficient nominations to get on the ballot: former farming journalist and EU commissioner Mairead McGuinness, who is the Fine Gael nominee; and Catherine Connolly, a left-wing independent and former Galway mayor who has received the backing of opposition parties and independents.
Advertisement
Several figures have said they intend to seek the nominations needed to get on the ballot, including Riverdance star Michael Flatley, millionaire entrepreneur Gareth Sheridan, and previous presidential candidate Peter Casey, as well as McGregor.
Asked about McGregor's intention to legally challenge process to be nominated as a presidential candidate, O'Brien said he was within his right to take a case but did not believe he would be nominated.
'Like any citizen, he's entitled to take a case should he wish, but the constitution is clear on that, the nomination process is clear,' the Fianna Fáil TD said.
'I don't envisage he'll be nominated to run for president. But look, I think it's open to any citizen to take a challenge, should they wish.
'The office of Uachtaran na hEireann is the highest office in the land.
'It's a critically important office. If you look at the work that Michael D Higgins has done over the last 14 years and representing our country abroad with such distinction, I would just ask people to draw the comparison to what our president has done, and what someone like Conor McGregor might do.
'So I don't think he would be fit to hold that office.'
Last month, McGregor has lost his appeal against a civil jury's finding in favour of Dublin woman Nikita Hand, who accused him of rape.
Ms Hand, 35, successfully sued McGregor in a civil court over an incident in which he was alleged to have 'brutally raped and battered' her in a penthouse at a south Dublin hotel in December 2018.
Ms Hand was awarded almost 250,000 euro in damages and McGregor was also ordered to pay about 1.3 million euro in legal costs following the November trial.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From pharma to food, the known unknowns of Trump's EU tariffs deal
From pharma to food, the known unknowns of Trump's EU tariffs deal

Irish Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

From pharma to food, the known unknowns of Trump's EU tariffs deal

The US/ EU tariff deal was meant to bring certainty for exporters. But almost three weeks later there is a lot that we don't know – and more that remains uncertain. A joint statement signed off by both sides had been expected shortly after the big summit in Scotland at the end of July , clarifying key parts of the deal and how it would be implemented. But this week, a European Commission spokesperson said, in best bureacrateese, that while further contacts with the US were expected on this, 'I don't believe at this stage we can put a timeline on these engagements.' 1. What is covered by the new tariffs? The deal had been hailed as bringing 'certainty' to Irish exporters. And it has done so, but only up to a point. A blanket 15 per cent tariff now applies on most categories or exports from Ireland to the US. READ MORE As ever with trade, there are tweaks. Some goods which had been subject to previous higher tariff charges (under the most favoured nation or MFN system) will still pay these. For Ireland, the main product affected here is butter – with Kerrygold now the second biggest seller on the US market. Before Trump came to office it had been levied at a rate based on weight – rather than the more usual percentage calculation. However, this worked out at somewhere over 16 per cent in practice. So this slightly higher rate will remain. Other sectors face tariffs for the first time, or higher charges. For example, the large medical products sector had previously been largely exempted, but is now being levied at 15 per cent. So are parts of the food sector and spirits. 2. What is not covered? US customs has published a list of goods that are excluded from the 15 per cent tariff and Carol Lynch, customs partner at BDO, says this is a good place for SMEs unsure if they are covered to check. A key point for Ireland is that pharma products, by far the State's biggest in value terms, are not currently subject to the 15 per cent tariff. This may change, as the Trump administration is undertaking a study of pharma supply into the US market and the national security issues that apply – the so-called section 232 investigation which refers back to a 1960s act of congress. This is the backdrop to Trump's talk of 150 per cent or 250 per cent tariffs on pharma in 18 months or two years' time, applying to companies that do not play ball and return production to the US market. The EU believes the US has signed up to a 15 per cent cap on pharma – and semiconductor – tariffs under the deal, but Trump's subsequent statements suggest otherwise. This is why the absence of a joint agreed statement between the EU and US is important. 3. What might change? Another frustration for the EU is that the outline agreement suggested that more areas would be excluded from the 15 per cent tariff net but, beyond aircraft and aircraft parts, none of these has yet been spelt out. These 'carveouts' were due to cover some areas of food of potential interest to Ireland, some generic drugs and chemicals and perhaps medical devices, a sector which typically has lower margins and fixed price contracts with US buyers. The EU had also been pushing for a 'zero for zero' tariff deal on wines and spirits, though the indications were the US was unlikely to concede this. So bar the list published by US Customs, we are no wiser on what other sectors may, in time, get a pass. 4. What can companies do? The practical steps, according to Lynch of BDO, are, first, to check whether goods were in transit before August 7th, in which case the old 10 per cent rate would apply rather than the new 15 per cent. Companies need to know the tariff codes being used by those importing their products and whether any of the exclusions they know about so far apply. And, she says, they need to examine whether they have any flexibility under the rules in terms of the value of goods declared for customs purposes. This is a complex area with detailed pricing rules applying but, particularly in high value sectors like pharma, companies may have options to readjust supply changes or pricing policies to cut their tariff bills. 5. Where next on pharma? The Trump administration has been promising the results of its section 232 investigation shortly, expected by way of a big report. Alongside this, Trump's team have been negotiating on prices with the big US pharma companies, demanding that they charge the same prices in the US as other countries. A 2022 study showed that US prices were, on average, three times higher than the OECD average. This – in Trump's view- means prices should fall in the US and rise in other countries, thus giving the US consumer a better deal while giving companies ongoing revenue to fund research. It is unclear what the outcome of this will be but the two areas are linked. Imposing tariffs on imports risks increasing prices on the US market, the opposite of the goal of the price negotiations. The US president is threatening tariffs which would gradually increase over time as a way of getting big pharma to relocate more production to the US of key drugs and ingredients. So will we see 15 per cent pharma tariffs when the result of the Section 232 probes are out? Or will the US president hold off for now while holding out the threat of tariffs if big pharma does not fall into line on prices and investment? 6. Ireland's pharma exposure: In a post on the pharma issue on LinkedIn, Ben McConkey, an Irish MSc student at the London School of Economics, underlines the extent of Ireland's 'pharma' exposure by pointing out that the US imported over $50 billion worth of Irish pharmaceutical products in 2004, making it the single largest category of goods imported from any EU country by a margin of $15 billion and representing 8.3 per cent of all US imports from the EU. While the noise around the trade talks was about German cars, Irish pharma exports have a higher value, though this is of course hugely inflated by the pricing practices of the firms involved, which have a financial incentive to declare as much profit as possible in low tax Ireland. McConkey also makes the interesting point that the bulk of Irish pharma and organic chemicals go to republican states such as Indiana – home of Eli Lilly – as well as Puerto Rico, North Carolina and Illinois. Many are not finished drugs but are high value ingredients in drugs then sold across the US. As tariffs will have an economic impact on these companies – and on US consumers – it remains to be seen what the president decides. But the stakes for Ireland in the Section 232 process are huge as it could influence both future manufacturing investment and the transfer pricing structures the companies employ which led to huge profits being declared in Ireland and a lot of corporate tax being paid here. 7. The uncertainty may just roll on: The EU's belief was that a joint statement would be agreed with the US on the basis of the political agreement between Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland. This would then be followed by further detailed negotiations. It is unclear if the absence of even a basic, joint written understanding is just a result of August holidays or whether it is a sign of the way the US president tends to operate – in headlines and in a way which leaves him with maximum flexibility to change tack. The president and his team have been continuing to push the boat out in terms of tariffs and pressure on US businesses to bend to their will. There is a fair chance that the uncertainty will roll on – and on. And this in itself will have a cost on businesses, even if the 15 per cent deal will have left many feeling they have some more solid ground on which to plan. And, it must be remembered that the US president's right to impose the 15 per cent tariffs at all is being challenged in the courts – a process likely to go right to the US supreme court for an ultimate decision.

Budget 2026 day set for October amid rising US tariff pressure and deficit uncertainty
Budget 2026 day set for October amid rising US tariff pressure and deficit uncertainty

Irish Post

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Post

Budget 2026 day set for October amid rising US tariff pressure and deficit uncertainty

BUDGET 2026 is set to be unveiled on Tuesday, 7 October, in Dublin against a backdrop of rising international uncertainty for the Irish economy. The Government has outlined a €9.4 billion package as part of the Summer Economic Statement, including €7.9 billion in additional public spending and €1.5 billion in tax cuts. However, this package was agreed upon before the recent introduction of 15% tariffs on exports to the United States. This new rate poses a serious threat to Irish trade, particularly in the pharmaceutical sector. US President Donald Trump has also hinted at even higher tariffs in the future, mainly due to the trade surplus between the two nations. Despite the ongoing uncertainty, the Government is maintaining its commitment to long-term investment and fiscal stability. Ministers Paschal Donohoe and Jack Chambers have ruled out one-off cost-of-living payments, insisting that Budget 2026 will prioritise sustainability over short-term relief. Their approach reflects caution in a fragile global environment, with the business lobby Ibec and other economic observers urging a measured and prudent strategy. The Summer Economic Statement stated that €5.9 billion of the increased expenditure will go to current spending, with €2 billion directed towards capital investment under the National Development Plan. However, the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (IFAC) has raised concerns about the realism of these projections. It warns that spending overruns are likely in 2026, pointing to evidence that current spending this year has already exceeded budget targets by as much as €2 billion. IFAC also projects a budget deficit of nearly €11 billion next year which is about 3.2% of GNI, excluding corporate tax windfalls. It has criticised the government's signalling that the budget package could be reduced if the global trade environment worsens, arguing that this runs counter to standard economic practice, which recommends increased support during periods of downturn. Nevertheless, Ireland's tax revenues remain strong. Corporate tax receipts have already reached €16 billion this year, with further growth expected in 2026 due to changes in international tax rules. Income tax and VAT revenues are also holding steady, giving the government some room to manoeuvre despite looming deficits. All eyes will be on budget day on October 7th and the preceding weeks for any changes in the US President's tariff rates, which have an outsized impact on the very US-reliant Irish economy. See More: Economy, Irish Budget, Paschal Donohoe, US Tariffs

Taoiseach pledges Ireland's support for ceasefire in Ukraine ahead of Trump's Putin summit
Taoiseach pledges Ireland's support for ceasefire in Ukraine ahead of Trump's Putin summit

Irish Post

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Post

Taoiseach pledges Ireland's support for ceasefire in Ukraine ahead of Trump's Putin summit

TAOISEACH Micheál Martin has pledged Ireland's support for peace talks aimed at bringing an end to the war in Ukraine. Mr Martin attended an online leaders' meeting of the Coalition of the Willing held yesterday (August 13) in support of war-torn Ukraine. Convened by President of France Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the meeting was held ahead of a US-Russia Summit taking place in Alaska tomorrow (August 15). 'At a critical time for Ukraine and Europe, I joined my fellow leaders of the Coalition of the Willing to discuss recent developments and the ongoing engagement with our US partners ahead of President Trump's meeting with President Putin,' the Taoiseach said after the meeting. 'We also heard from President Zelenskyy who briefed us on the situation on the ground in Ukraine and the needs of Ukraine as it continues to defend itself against ongoing Russian aggression. 'The initiative of President Trump towards ending Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and achieving a just and lasting peace was warmly welcomed,' he added. 'We agreed that unity is vital and that close transatlantic coordination will continue as part of our efforts to secure a ceasefire and a durable peace. During the meeting, the leaders agreed that any peace deal must have Ukraine's involvement. 'Recalling the EU leaders' statement of 12 August, there was agreement that the people of Ukraine must have the freedom to decide their future and that the path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine,' Mr Martin said. 'Any diplomatic solution must protect Ukraine and Europe's security,' he added. The leaders further agreed that any 'meaningful negotiations on a just and lasting peace should be preceded by a ceasefire', the Taoiseach confirmed. 'We committed to continue to provide political, financial, economic, humanitarian, military and diplomatic support to Ukraine,' he added. 'There was also agreement to maintain pressure on Russia to agree to an unconditional ceasefire, including through the use of sanctions and other economic measures.' Mr Martin claimed a 'human dimension' must be at the heart of any peace deal. 'I believe that the human dimension must be a key component of a just and lasting peace for Ukraine,' he said. 'The Ukrainian children abducted by Russia must be returned to their families and communities,' he explained. 'Ireland will continue to support Ukraine, both bilaterally and through the EU, on its path towards EU membership and in its efforts to achieve a just and durable peace,' he added. See More: Coalition Of The Willing, Ireland, Russia, Taoiseach, Ukraine

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store