Instant Scholar - Former fed reserve chief Janet Yellen's 1971 PhD thesis: Why her 'disequilibrium' view of open economies still matters

Time of India

2 days ago

Janet Yellen
's doctoral work at
Yale
, 'Employment, Output and Capital Accumulation in an Open Economy: A Disequilibrium Approach' (1971), offers an early framework for understanding jobs, prices, and cross-border capital flows when markets do not clear. More than five decades on, its core ideas help explain policy choices she later made as US Fed chair and now as
US Treasury
secretary.
Long before she steered America's central bank and then the US Treasury through turbulent years, Janet Yellen set out to answer a deceptively simple question that still vexes policymakers. What happens to employment, output, and investment when an economy that trades with the world is knocked off balance and stays there for a while, rather than snapping back to tidy textbook 'equilibrium'? Her 1971 PhD thesis at Yale confronted this head-on, building a framework in which wages can be sticky, prices adjust slowly, capital accumulation takes time, and cross-border flows transmit shocks instead of smoothing them away.
Although the original dissertation circulates mostly in academic repositories and library catalogues, its themes are clear from the title and from
Yellen
's early research agenda. The work sits in the Keynesian tradition that pays attention to short-run demand shortfalls and frictions, yet it pushes beyond closed-economy models by embedding those dynamics in an open setting with trade and finance. That move matters because open economies are exposed to imported inflation, volatile capital flows, and exchange-rate swings. A framework that assumes instant clearing misses the way these forces can keep unemployment elevated or investment subdued even when headline growth looks steady.
What 'disequilibrium' means in practice
At the heart of Yellen's approach is the idea that markets can be out of balance for meaningful periods. Wages may not fall quickly when demand weakens; firms may face capacity limits, financing constraints, or simply uncertainty that delays hiring and capital spending; banks and investors may ration credit rather than let interest rates jump to levels that would purportedly clear the market. In such a world, policy choices and external shocks have asymmetric effects. A fall in export demand or a rise in global interest rates can push employment down more quickly than it recovers once conditions improve.
By placing capital accumulation in the title, Yellen drew attention to the slow-moving stock of productive assets. Investment does not instantly respond to price signals; it depends on profits, access to credit, and expectations about future demand. The path of capital formation therefore shapes medium-term output and jobs. When the economy is open, the cost of capital is also influenced by foreign rates and risk sentiment. A disequilibrium lens makes room for these channels and asks how they interact with sticky wages, administered prices, and trade flows.
Open-economy transmission under frictions
In neat models, the exchange rate and interest rates adjust in a way that keeps employment near a natural level. In the disequilibrium world Yellen analysed, the transmission is messier. Depreciation can lift net exports, yet the pass-through to domestic prices can erode real incomes. If banks tighten credit in response to external stress, firms may cut investment even as exports rise, muting the overall boost. Capital inflows do not always finance productive expansion; in downturns they can reverse abruptly, forcing sharper domestic adjustments.
This helps explain why policy coordination and credible frameworks matter. When domestic monetary and fiscal choices interact with global finance under frictions, the sequence and mix of policies can change outcomes. Support for demand can safeguard employment and investment paths; credible disinflation plans can anchor expectations so that wage and price stickiness does not turn a relative-price shock into a broader spiral.
Why this early work foreshadowed Yellen's policy style
Observers often describe Yellen's policy instincts as pragmatic and data-driven. The intellectual roots trace back to this thesis period. A disequilibrium mindset encourages policymakers to look for real economy slack, labour-market scarring, and credit bottlenecks rather than assuming that prices will do all the work. At the Federal Reserve, Yellen's emphasis on labour-market indicators beyond the headline unemployment rate, and her attention to wage growth and participation, fit the thesis's spirit. At Treasury, her push for international cooperation on recovery and her focus on financial-stability channels echo the open-economy concern that shocks propagate through trade and capital flows under frictions.
It also illuminates her stance on inflation and jobs. A disequilibrium view does not dismiss inflation risks, but it treats them as contingent on expectations, bargaining structures, and supply constraints. That leads to calibrated responses that weigh the costs of overtightening on employment and investment against the need to restrain price pressures. The trade-offs are empirical; the mechanism is not automatic.
Reading the thesis through today's shocks
Three recent themes make Yellen's framework feel current. First, supply-driven inflation. When energy or food prices jump due to external events, an open economy imports a relative-price shock. In a sticky-wage, sticky-price environment, that shock can squeeze real incomes and suppress demand even as measured inflation rises. Policy then must navigate between supporting employment and preventing a drift in expectations.
Second, capital-flow volatility. Rapid shifts in global rates can tighten domestic financial conditions even without policy moves at home. If credit frictions bind, investment can fall faster than theory predicts. Macroprudential tools, targeted liquidity support, and international swap lines recognise that disequilibrium margins matter.
Third, the green and digital transitions. Large, lumpy investments with uncertain payoffs are precisely the kind of capital-accumulation problems where expectations and financing conditions drive outcomes. Policy clarity, public-private risk sharing, and stable external financing can tilt the path of capital formation, employment, and productivity.
What the structure likely looked like
Based on the norms of the period and the issues foregrounded in the title, the thesis likely combined:
A theoretical model of an open economy with wage and price rigidities, financial constraints, and an explicit capital-accumulation equation.
Comparative-statics or dynamic analysis showing how external price or interest-rate shocks move employment and output when markets do not clear quickly.
A discussion of policy levers, including fiscal expansion, monetary accommodation or tightening, exchange-rate regimes, and controls or prudential measures affecting capital flows.
Empirical context or calibration to illustrate the magnitudes, though early-1970s data and methods would have limited estimation scope compared to modern practice.
Even without the full text, this scaffolding fits Yellen's early published work and the Keynesian-open economy lineage. The contribution was not to claim that economies never return to balance, but to show that the path back matters for jobs and investment, and that policy can shorten costly detours.
Limits and debates
A disequilibrium approach, especially in early vintage models, draws criticism on two fronts. First, microfoundations. Later generations demanded explicit optimisation by firms and households, rather than behavioural rules that embed stickiness. Second, expectations. Credibility and forward-looking behaviour can alter the impact of policy, and early models often treated expectations in reduced form. Those critiques led to rich research programmes that formalised frictions while keeping the practical insight that adjustment is slow and uneven.
Yet the lived experience of crises keeps vindicating the core message. From the oil shocks of the 1970s to the global financial crisis, the pandemic, and energy price spikes, economies spend time away from neat equilibria. Labour markets can heal slowly after recessions; investment lags can weigh on productivity; capital-flow surges and stops can transmit foreign stress. A framework that takes these realities seriously remains useful to policymakers.
Why it belongs in today's policy conversation
Yellen's dissertation shows that the divides between monetary, fiscal, and international policy are artificial in real time. Under frictions, the mix and timing matter. Coordinated fiscal support during deep demand shocks can preserve human capital and firm balance sheets; monetary policy can lean against overheating or support credit markets; financial regulation can curb vulnerabilities that amplify external shocks. Exchange-rate policy and international cooperation add another layer in open economies where spillovers are large.
For students and reporters, the thesis is also a reminder that policy leaders often carry durable analytical priors from their early training. Yellen's later emphasis on labour-market dynamics, careful sequencing, and international coordination reflects the questions she studied as a doctoral researcher. The path from seminar room to cabinet table is not linear, yet the through-line is clear.
Access and research use
The dissertation was submitted to
Yale University
in 1971. Publicly accessible PDFs are hard to find, since many US doctoral theses from that period are housed in subscription repositories or library archives. Researchers typically access such work through university libraries, interlibrary loans, or dissertation databases. For journalists, the absence of a public PDF does not block coverage; the title, academic context, and the author's subsequent publications provide enough footing to explain the core ideas and their policy relevance.
Janet Yellen's PhD thesis framed an open economy that can get stuck away from tidy balance, where wages, prices, credit, and investment adjust slowly and external shocks bite hard. That lens helps decode both her academic trajectory and her later record as a policymaker who weighed employment outcomes, financial frictions, and international spillovers with care. It is a half-century-old work that still offers a clear guide to the messy world policymakers actually face.
Read full document:
'Instant Scholar' is a Times of India initiative to make academic research accessible to a wider audience. If you are a Ph.D. scholar and would like to publish a summary of your research in this section, please share a summary and authorisation to publish it. For submission, and any question on this initiative, write to us at [e-mail]
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!