Tesla approves US$29bil in shares to Musk as court case rumbles on
WASHINGTON : Electric vehicle maker Tesla handed its chief executive Elon Musk a US$29 billion pay package today, as a lengthy legal battle over his compensation winds on.
The company said in a statement it will award an 'interim' distribution of 96 million Tesla shares to Musk as it 'intends to compensate its CEO for his future services commensurate with his contributions to our company and shareholders'.
'We have recommended this award as a first step, 'good faith' payment,' it added when announcing the board's approval of granting new shares to Musk.
'Retaining Elon is more important than ever before.'
The massive pay package comes eight months after the judge in a Delaware court rejected Musk's even larger US$55.8 billion compensation package at Tesla, denying an attempt to restore the pay deal through a shareholder vote.
In an initial decision in early 2024, the court struck down the package as excessive and unfair to shareholders.
Musk has appealed the ruling.
The new package would boost Musk's roughly 13% stake in the company, at a time when he seeks to prevent a possible ouster by activist shareholders.
Musk would be required to forfeit the new compensation package should the appeals court rule in his favour and grant him the full 2018 compensation, which at the time was valued at US$55.8 billion.
The new payout is sure to fuel concerns about the compensation for Musk, already the world's richest man, and whether the Tesla board is placing a sufficient check on the company's chief executive.
The statement posted on Tesla's X account came in the form of a letter to shareholders written by Robyn Denholm and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson, the two members of the board's special committee addressing the Musk compensation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
What happens next in the US court battle over Trump's tariffs?
WASHINGTON, Aug 5 — A federal appeals panel on Thursday appeared sceptical of US President Donald Trump's argument that a 1977 law historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets gave him the power to impose tariffs. Regardless of how the court rules, the litigation is almost certainly headed to the US Supreme Court. Here is what you need to know about the dispute, which Trump has called 'America's big case,' and how it is likely to play out in the months ahead. What is the case about? The litigation challenges the tariffs Trump imposed on a broad range of US trading partners in April, as well as tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico. It centres around Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives the president the power to address 'unusual and extraordinary' threats during national emergencies. Trump has said that trade imbalances, declining manufacturing power and the cross-border flow of drugs justified the tariffs under IEEPA. A dozen Democratic-led states and five small US businesses challenging the tariffs argue that IEEPA does not cover tariffs and that the US Constitution grants Congress, not the president, authority over tariffs and other taxes. A loss for Trump would also undermine the latest round of sweeping tariffs on dozens of countries that he unveiled late Thursday. Trump has made tariffs a cornerstone of his economic plan, arguing they will promote domestic manufacturing and substitute for income taxes. What's the status of the litigation? The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments on Thursday in the case. The panel of 11 judges sharply questioned the government about Trump's use of IEEPA, but did not rule from the bench. The Federal Circuit has not said when it will issue a decision, but its briefing schedule suggests it intends to move quickly. Meanwhile, the tariffs remain in effect after the Federal Circuit paused a lower court's ruling declaring them illegal. Will Trump's tariffs be blocked if he loses in court? A Federal Circuit ruling would almost certainly not end the litigation, as the losing party is expected to appeal to the Supreme Court. If the Federal Circuit rules against Trump, the court could put its own ruling on hold while the government appeals to the Supreme Court. This approach would maintain the status quo and allow the nine justices to consider the matter more thoroughly. The justices themselves could also issue an 'administrative stay' that would temporarily pause the Federal Circuit's decision while it considers a request from the Justice Department for more permanent relief. Is the Supreme Court likely to step in? The Supreme Court is not obligated to review every case appealed to it, but it is widely expected to weigh in on Trump's tariffs because of the weighty constitutional questions at the heart of the case. If the Federal Circuit rules in the coming weeks, there is still time for the Supreme Court to add the case to its regular docket for the 2025-2026 term, which begins on October 6. The Supreme Court could rule before the end of the year, but that would require it to move quickly. How might the Supreme Court rule? There is no consensus among court-watchers about what the Supreme Court will do. Critics of Trump's tariffs are optimistic their side will win. They point to the Supreme Court's decision from 2023 that blocked President Joe Biden from forgiving student loan debt. In that ruling, the justices limited the authority of the executive branch to take action on issues of 'vast economic and political significance' except where Congress has explicitly authorized the action. The justices in other cases, however, have endorsed a broad view of presidential power, especially when it comes to foreign affairs. Can importers seek refunds for tariffs paid? If Trump loses at the Supreme Court, importers are likely to seek refunds of tariffs already paid. This would be a lengthy process given the large number of anticipated claims. Federal regulations dictate that such requests would be first heard by US Customs and Border Protection. If that agency denies a refund request, the importer can appeal to the Court of International Trade. There is precedent for tariff refund requests being granted. Since May, CBP has been processing refunds to importers who inadvertently overpaid duties because of tariff 'stacking' — where multiple overlapping tariffs are applied to the same imports. And in the 1990s, after the Court of International Trade struck down a tax on exporters that was being used to finance improvements to US harbours, the court set up a process for issuing refunds. That decision was upheld by both the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court. Would a courtroom defeat unravel Trump's trade deals? Trump has used the threat of emergency tariffs as leverage to secure concessions from trading partners. A loss at the Supreme Court would hamstring Trump in future negotiations. The White House, however, has other ways of imposing tariffs, like a 1962 law that allows the president to investigate imports that threaten national security. Trump has already used that law to put tariffs on steel and aluminium imports, and those levies are not at issue in the case before the Federal Circuit. Some legal experts say a loss for Trump at the Supreme Court would not impact bilateral trade agreements the US has already inked with other countries. Others say that the trade deals alone might not provide sufficient legal authority for taxes on imports and may need to be approved by Congress. — Reuters
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Abu Dhabi's MGX could raise up to $25 billion for AI fund, Bloomberg News says
(Reuters) -Abu Dhabi-based MGX is considering plans to raise as much as $25 billion in third-party capital as the investment group looks to ramp up its artificial intelligence holdings, Bloomberg News reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter. MGX declined to comment on the report and Reuters could not immediately verify it. Company executives are weighing raising money from financial and strategic investors in Abu Dhabi and beyond, but Mubadala Investment Co and AI firm G42 will remain MGX's main backers, the report said. No final decisions have been made, according to the report. MGX, which has invested in OpenAI and Elon Musk's xAI, is chaired by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the UAE's national security adviser and a brother of UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed. The Financial Times reported last week that French AI startup Mistral is in talks with MGX and other investors to raise $1 billion at a valuation of $10 billion. (Reporting by Dheeraj Kumar in Bengaluru; Editing by Mrigank Dhaniwala and Devika Syamnath)
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
US futures edge up on growing Fed rate-cut bets, earnings in focus
Yesterday, Wall Street recorded its best session since May 27 and recouped losses from Friday's selloff. (AP pic) NEW YORK : Wall Street futures edged higher today, building on momentum from the previous session as expectations for the Federal Reserve's (Fed) interest rate cuts grew, while investors assessed a new round of major corporate earnings. At 5.23am, Dow E-minis were up 46 points, or 0.1%, S&P 500 E-minis were up 7.75 points, or 0.12% and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were up 34.25 points, or 0.15%. Yesterday, Wall Street recorded its best session since May 27 and recouped losses from Friday's selloff as weaker-than-expected July jobs data and significant downward revisions to previous months' data intensified bets for a September interest rate cut. According to CME Group's Fedwatch tool, the odds for a September rate cut now stand at 88.2%, compared with 63.3% a week earlier. Market participants expect at least two quarter-point cuts by the end of the year. In another twist, President Donald Trump's decision to fire the head of the bureau of labor statistics, responsible for past jobs data, stoked investors' fears about the integrity of economic data. Federal Reserve governor Adriana Kugler's surprise resignation on Friday also opened avenues for Trump to shake up the Fed's leadership earlier than expected. The US president has repeatedly criticised Fed chair Jerome Powell for not cutting interest rates. 'US growth resilience has been relatively remarkable so far, even if the US job market is raising doubts about what's coming next,' said Amelie Derambure, senior multi-asset portfolio manager at Amundi. The final July reading of S&P Global's Purchasing Managers' Index is scheduled for release at 9.45am, followed by the Institute for Supply Management's non-manufacturing PMI at 10am. Investors also weighed the impact of US tariffs on global economies and corporate earnings. Yesterday, Trump threatened to raise import tariffs on goods from India over its Russian oil purchases, while New Delhi called the attack 'unjustified' and vowed to protect its economic interests. Markets were also still watching if Trump will decide to extend a trade truce with China that expires on Aug 12, or potentially let tariffs shoot back up to triple-digits. Earnings from major names due today include Advanced Micro Devices, Pfizer, Snap, Rivian and Yum Brands. Among other movers, Palantir Technologies rose 5.4% in premarket trading after raising its annual revenue forecast for the second time, driven by strong demand for its AI-linked services. Online telehealth company Hims and Hers Health crashed 12.4% after missing Street estimates for second quarter (Q2) revenue, as subscribers for its compounded versions of weight-loss drugs declined. Inspire Medical Systems sank 25.3% after its Q2 earnings failed to impress investors.
