"Diddy Choked Me, Hit Me With Hanger": Cassie Ventura's Friend Details Abuse
Music mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs allegedly choked Cassie Ventura's best friend, beat her with a hanger, and once tried to force his way into his former girlfriend's apartment using a hammer, all to control and track her, a court heard in shocking testimony on Monday.
Kerry Morgan, Ms Ventura's former best friend, detailed years of alleged abuse she either witnessed or experienced herself at the hands of the music mogul. Ms Morgan, 39, a model and personal assistant from Buffalo, New York, testified that Sean Combs attacked her from behind in Ventura's Hollywood Hills apartment in 2018, as per The NY Post.
"He choked me," she told the court, adding that he left "finger marks on my neck" before hitting her behind the ear with a wooden hanger.
"When I got up, he boomeranged a hanger at my head," she said. He was reportedly trying to find out "who Cassie was cheating on him with," Ms Morgan added, insisting, "I had no idea."
Ms Morgan said she went to an urgent care facility where she was diagnosed with a concussion. She recalled being dizzy and throwing up multiple times after the beating.
That incident, she said, ended her 17-year-long friendship with Cassie Ventura. Ms Morgan claimed that Ms Ventura accused her of "exaggerating" the incident when they met shortly after.
Though Ms Morgan initially planned to sue Sean Combs, she said she dropped the civil claim after he paid her $30,000 (over Rs 25 lakh). Ms Ventura allegedly asked her to sign a non-disclosure agreement during that meeting. "That was the last time we ever spoke," Ms Morgan told the jury. "I draw the line at physical abuse."
Ms Morgan also recounted a 2016 incident, following Sean Combs' now-infamous beating of Cassie Ventura at the InterContinental Hotel in Century City. She testified that she was at Ms Ventura's Los Angeles home the next day when he showed up with a hammer. "He was hitting the door with a hammer to try to open it," she said, describing the scene as "terrifying."
"I was freaking out. I don't think [Ms Ventura] cared if [Sean Combs] came in and killed her," Ms Morgan testified. She said Ms Ventura looked "numb" during the ordeal. Though police arrived about three hours later, no complaint was filed.
Ms Morgan also spoke about two earlier times she saw Sean Combs abuse Ms Ventura. The first happened in Los Angeles, where she saw him push her and maybe even hit her inside the main bedroom of his house. "We hid outside on a neighbour's front steps for 30 minutes," she said.
The second incident was in Jamaica in early 2013. Ms Morgan said Sean Combs got angry because Ms Ventura was taking too long in the bathroom. He allegedly dragged her about 10 feet across the floor. When Ms Morgan came back after picking up her purse, she saw Ms Ventura hit her head on a brick after he pushed her. "She didn't move," Ms Morgan said.
Ms Morgan also added that Sean Combs was extremely jealous, even when Ms Ventura was just talking to actor Michael B Jordan. "They weren't together anymore, and he was still jealous," she said. "I think she was trying to leave him."
Sean Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to all charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering, and transportation to engage in prostitution. If convicted, he could face life in prison.
The trial is set to continue on Tuesday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
On I-Day, around 1500 convicts granted special remission at Tihar Jail
On the occasion of the 79th Independence Day, special remission in a range of 15 to 25 days, was granted to 1497 convicts at the Tihar Jail. During the Independence Day celebration at Tihar prison, Director General (Prisons) Satish Golchha, said that a total of 1,497 inmates were eligible for special remission ranging from 15 to 25 days based on their conduct during their time in the prison. In an effort to tackle overcrowding in the Capital's prisons, DG Golchha announced that a new jail will be built in Narela with Rs 145.58 crore sanctioned by the Delhi government. Golchha said that around 600 inmates are being provided training in Unnati Cognitive Behavioural Programme of the Bureau of Police Research and Development (BPR&D) in collaboration with Osmania University, while several other organisations are contributing to vocational training across jails. DG Golchha further said that over 3,200 vacant posts in Tihar Jail have been filled after Jail Cadre staff were promoted. '1,697 warden and 93 assistant superintendent posts have been newly advertised to strengthen manpower,' the DG said. The DG also informed that the department had recently taken over the operation of the Lampur Detention Centre.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Business of films: Why Aamir Khan took Sitaare Zameen Par to YouTube
Actor-filmmaker Aamir Khan this month released his Sitaare Zameen Par on the Google-owned video-sharing platform YouTube, rather than an over-the-top (OTT) platform such as Netflix or Amazon Prime Video, after the film had completed its theatrical run. The film, in the genre of comedy-drama known as 'dramedy', earned Rs 216 crore at the box office worldwide. Since August 1, it has been available for rent on YouTube for Rs 100 (and for half that price from August 15-17). What is the business logic for Aamir Khan's decision? Theatre owners were upset: multiplex giant PVR INOX said Sircar had 'vitiated the atmosphere of mutual partnership' between theatres and filmmakers. But amid the Covid-19 lockdown, direct-to-OTT was a fait accompli of sorts. Prime announced plans for six more digital-only premieres of Malayalam, Tamil, and Kannada films. In 2021, more than 100 films had opted for direct-to-OTT releases. But this Covid-era momentum faded quickly. In 2024, only 60 films were released directly on digital platforms — a more-than-42% decline compared to 2022, according to a report by the trade association FICCI and multinational accounting firm EY published this year. Direct-to-OTT films have not done particularly well either. Between January and June this year, 30 films in multiple languages were released on OTT platforms, of which only five ranked among the 50 most-watched streaming originals, Ormax Media, a Mumbai-based research firm, reported. The number of films being released in theatres first and subsequently on OTT has steadily increased — doubling from 217 in 2022 to 440 in 2024, according to FICCI-EY reports of 2024 and 2025. Filmmakers are confronted with two broad realities: 🔴 Footfall in theatres has recovered from pandemic-driven lows, but has been declining generally — having fallen from 994 million in 2022 to 857 million in 2024, according to the 2025 FICCI-EY report. This has been attributed to the narrowing theatre-to-OTT window: the availability of films on OTT platforms soon after their theatrical release is believed to depress theatre footfall. But this allows the OTT platforms to benefit from the theatre-marketing buzz. 🔴 The FICCI-EY report noted that 'cost pressures' led to subdued digital releases in 2024. With OTT platforms now focused on profitability, 'tentpole' films — big-budget productions that are expected to perform well — and small-budget ones were in demand, but mid-sized films had few takers. In some cases, it was 'understood that theatrical performance was required to market the film for OTT platforms as well', the FICCI-EY report said. Aamir's decision to go to YouTube effectively adds another distribution channel for films. 'We need a 'pay-per-view' (PPV) window between theatrical and OTT, and that's what I am pushing to create,' he told Matthew Beloni on the podcast The Town. In the PPV model, viewers essentially pay only for what they want to watch, not for a subscription. 'Once the theatrical run is exhausted, that's when I want to come on pay-per-view, and that's a window [for the theatrical run] that can be flexible. It should certainly not be below six weeks. And then, you should give pay-per-view a good three months, and then the film can come on OTT. That's the ideal window,' Aamir said. According to Aamir, the 'bulk of India does not subscribe to OTT platforms', and YouTube potentially has greater reach, including globally. He also suggested that YouTube could offer a more favourable deal than the traditional 50-50 split between the production house and theatres, and that the PPV model could open a path for younger filmmakers and smaller-budget films that do not get distribution in theatres. In 2024, only 30% of all films were released on OTTs (including digital-first and theatre-first), according to the FICCI-EY report. As such, there are a large number of unsold films that could find audiences on AVOD (advertising-based video-on-demand) and TVOD (transactional video-on-demand) platforms such as YouTube. AVOD allows free access to videos, but with advertisements. TVOD, which is the same as PPV, allows viewers to pay a one-time rent for a specific piece of content. The FICCI-EY report points out that TVOD releases (parallel to or shortly after theatre runs) would get audiences in regions with limited theatre access. Also, a Rs 100 rent fee is less than the average ticket price of Rs 139 (in 2024). Several factors work in favour of YouTube as the platform of choice for filmmakers. 🔴 YouTube accounted for 92% of all online video consumption in 2024; 🔴 It has the highest penetration in India among social media platforms, according to a 2024 report by Comscore, a media analytics company; 🔴 It is popular across generations — 91% of Gen Z and more than 80% of millennials and Gen X were on YouTube; 🔴 While the majority of YouTube consumption is on mobile phones, it also has an expanding CTV (connected TV) base: between March 2023 and March 2024, it was the most-watched streaming service on Indian CTV. There is not much publicly available data on YouTube's TVOD offerings. In 2024, TVOD revenues were more than Rs 13 billion in India, lagging behind SVOD (subscription video on demand) revenue from services like Netflix or JioHotstar, which charge an annual or monthly subscription fee for access to a large volume of content. According to a report by accounting firm PwC, SVOD accounted for 75% of OTT revenue in India in 2023, while TVOD and AVOD accounted for 5% and 20% respectively. However, the FICCI-EY report said TVOD is expected to scale amid rising OTT subscription costs and CTV penetration. Smaller OTT platforms may opt for TVOD models, with films that were previously unsold, and more major players may start offering a mix of SVOD and TVOD, following in the footsteps of Prime and Apple TV.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC imposes 15k cost on encroacher for frivolous plea
Madurai: Taking into account that a man despite being aware of the fact that he had encroached upon a highways land in Virudhunagar district had moved court seeking to claim Rs1 lakh compensation and to restore the portion of his demolished building, imposed a cost of Rs15,000 on him to be paid to highways authorities. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Ironically, in an earlier plea moved by the man challenging eviction proceedings issued by the authorities in 2024, the court directed the highways authorities to pay a cost of Rs 10,000 to him for removing a portion of his building without issuing a show cause notice. Petitioner Kamaraj's land in Karisalkulam is situated adjacent to Madurai-Tuticorin NH where he built a house and a commercial building comprising two shops. On finding that the petitioner had put up unauthorised constructions by encroaching on their land, highways authorities removed them. Kamaraj had filed a petition in 2024 challenging the highways authority's order for removing encroachment. The court then imposed a cost of Rs10,000 on the department payable to the petitioner for not issuing a show cause notice. If the construction was found to be in accordance with the building plan permission and highways lands are not encroached, the construction should be restored along with a cost of Rs1 lakh payable to the petitioner, the court said. Subsequently, the tahsildar deputed a qualified surveyor to measure the property as well as the highways and submit a report. The surveyor's report said the petitioner had encroached upon highway land, which was conveyed to the petitioner's counsel by the highways department assistant divisional engineer in Aruppukottai in May. Challenging the communication, the petitioner filed the present petition seeking restoration of the demolished portion at the highways' cost and payment of Rs1 lakh as per the court's earlier order. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A division bench of Justice S M Subramaniam and Justice A D Maria Clete observed that the report of the surveyor clearly stated that the petitioner encroached upon highways land and put up unauthorised construction, which was already demolished. Despite this fact, the petitioner filed the present petition, which in the opinion of the court is frivolous and vexatious. The court said that when the petitioner was well informed about the encroachment, he chose to file this petition only with an idea to claim a sum of Rs1 lakh and for restoration of the unauthorised construction. Hence, the judges dismissed the petition and imposed a cost of Rs15,000 on the petitioner to be paid to the assistant divisional engineer.
