Jeffries hammers Trump for seizing control of D.C. police: ‘No basis'
'Violent crime in Washington, D.C. is at a thirty-year low,' Jeffries posted on X. 'Donald Trump has no basis to take over the local police department. And zero credibility on the issue of law and order.
'Get lost.'
Jeffries, a frequent critic of the president, was alluding to Trump's own legal track record, which includes two impeachments, his conviction last year on 34 felony counts related to hush money payments to a porn star, and his decision to pardon more than 1,500 people who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in a failed effort to overturn the 2020 election.
Trump has been a long-time critic of the D.C. government, in general, and its law enforcement system, in particular, accusing local officials of negligence that he says led to a spike in crime during the COVID-19 pandemic. On Monday, he took that criticism a long step forward by announcing that his administration will assume control of the D.C. Police Department and send in 800 National Guard troops to patrol the city's streets.
'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people, and we're not going to let it happen anymore,' Trump said. 'We're not going to take it.'
Trump's assessment of crime in D.C. collides directly with the official numbers from the Justice Department, which have found that violent crime in the nation's capital is at its lowest rate in more than three decades.
Jeffries was not the only lawmaker to take note of that contrast on Monday. A number of Democrats on and off of Capitol Hill hammered Trump's move as more fitting of an authoritarian regime that seizes power unilaterally to hobble political rivals and silence critics.
'Trump's raw authoritarian power grab in DC is part of a growing national crisis. He's playing dictator in our nation's capital as a dress rehearsal as he pushes democracy to the brink,' Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) wrote on his X account.
'This assault on freedom is exactly why we've fought for DC statehood & to give DC control of its National Guard.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
California GOP lawmaker faces taunts and jeers over Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' at town halls
GOP Rep. Doug LaMalfa drew taunts and jeers at two raucous town hall meetings Monday over his support for President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' LaMalfa, whose district spans much of the state's northern interior, is the latest Republican to face harsh in-person criticism, as members of the party attempt to sell Trump's sweeping agenda back home during Congress' August break from Washington. Last week, Nebraska Rep. Mike Flood – who also heeded the guidance of the NRCC, the House GOP's campaign arm, to focus the district work period on the president's massive domestic policy bill – met a largely hostile crowd as he was pressed on a range of issues, including the agenda bill that Trump signed into law July 4. LaMalfa calmly address audience members throughout both town halls, even as some attendees cursed at him and railed against his support of the president, shouting 'Liar!' While the morning crowd in Chico had been much louder, the audience in Red Bluff later in the evening was at times just as vocal, especially when LaMalfa expressed skepticism about the role of carbon dioxide in climate change. At both town halls, LaMalfa was pressed over how Trump's agenda, which includes historic cuts to federal support for the social safety net, would affect rural hospitals, particularly those in his district. Other attendees asked questions about transparency around the so-called Jeffrey Epstein files. At the morning event, LaMalfa called it a 'bad look' to have Epstein-related information continue to be 'suppressed.' Still other attendees warned the president's tariffs would harm farmers in California and attacked the congressman's credibility. 'If you're not here to either announce your resignation, why aren't you here to apologize to the farmers of the north state because of your support for the Trump tariffs?' one audience members said at the Chico town hall. 'I'm not gonna do either. Thanks,' LaMalfa replied. 'Do you actually want to talk about something productive?' LaMalfa defended Trump's tariffs, insisting that the United States had been taken advantage of and that the tariffs were being used to negotiate better deals for American farmers. 'And you know, is it the ideal, perfect way to go? No, I hope these tariffs can end soon,' he said Monday evening. 'I want to believe at some point we'lll end up with very low or zero tariffs with all these countries.' LaMalfa also addressed Texas' redistricting effort, warning it is going to start 'a grass fire all across the country.' His comments come as California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has urged lawmakers to draw a new map to put before voters in a November special election. The map, as CNN previously reported, could flip five of Republicans' nine seats in the state if voters approve it in a ballot initiative and could potentially target LaMalfa's seat. For his part, LaMalfa said he didn't support either redistricting push. 'It's really ugly and no matter which side of the aisle you're on, it doesn't look good. It doesn't give you more faith in the political process if legislators draw the lines merely to have an outcome for a partisan win,' the congressman said.
a minute ago
ABC News Live Prime: Mon, Aug 11, 2025
Trump deploys National Guard to D.C.; Dozens hurt after steel plant explosion; Israeli strike kills 5 Al Jazeera journalists; ABC News' Linsey Davis shares medical struggle with fibroids. August 11, 2025
Politico
a minute ago
- Politico
Trial exposes internal tension over Trump's use of National Guard in LA
Asked by a lawyer for California if Bovino questioned Sherman's loyalty to the U.S. over the issue, Sherman answered simply 'yes' and did not elaborate. The Trump administration objected to the testimony about loyalty, but Breyer overruled the objection, saying it was a notable window into the mindset of key decisionmakers. A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, declined to comment, calling questions about the exchange a 'pathetic attempt to divide our law enforcement and our National Guard.' Ultimately, after Sherman raised concerns, the operation was retooled, rescheduled for July 7 and approved by Hegseth. In addition to the MacArthur Park deployment, dubbed 'Operation Excalibur,' lawyers for California homed in on two other immigration operations and suggested that Guard troops were being called in by ICE to aid law enforcement even when their presence was not necessary. The other two operations took place at marijuana farms far from Los Angeles' city center. In a sign of the trial's broader significance, the California lawyers also played a clip of Hegseth discussing the new D.C. deployment and comparing it to the mission in Los Angeles. Since the L.A. deployment earlier this summer, Hegseth has since scaled back the National Guard presence in that city, though about 300 troops remain. Sherman's testimony followed a turn on the stand from William Harrington, deputy chief of staff of the Army and another commander of Task Force 51, the contingent of California's Guard troops called by Trump and Hegseth into federal service. Harrington testified that over two months of the deployment, the National Guard was asked for assistance 64 times. On cross-examination by a Justice Department attorney, Harrington emphasized that he did not believe any National Guard troops had engaged directly in law enforcement activities that would violate the Posse Comitatus Act. But he also acknowledged that he was not present during any of the operations and was relying on reports from the field as well as watching portions of the operations on livestream. Sherman testified that troops deployed in L.A. were trained that they could take actions against civilians if they felt there was a direct threat to either ICE agents or soldiers, or if they felt that the agents were being blocked from performing their immigration operations. He also described an episode in which a veteran, seeking to access a VA facility, was detained by Marines after he walked through a checkpoint while wearing headphones. He said the Marines detained the man as a precaution and then waited for law enforcement to arrive to take over. Breyer, a Clinton appointee, previously blocked the Guard deployment but was reversed by a unanimous appeals court panel. However, he has yet to rule on whether the administration's deployment may have violated Posse Comitatus. A ruling against Trump could result in restrictions on the military's ability to operate in Los Angeles or even in other cities where Trump has deployed or is considering deploying troops. But Trump has greater control over the D.C. National Guard than the Guards of other states, and the Justice Department has long maintained that the D.C. Guard can be used for law enforcement purposes without violating the Posse Comitatus Act. The trial is slated to continue through Wednesday.
