Google just lost an appeal against opening up Google Play to Epic Games and others — what this means for you
The ruling comes from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and the most important part of it is that the Google Play Store needs to lift restrictions that make it harder for rival app stores to operate. Android may be a more open system than iOS, in terms of app installation, but the strict app store policies were never exclusive to Apple.
Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney has praised the ruling, claiming that it would allow Epic to distribute its own Epic Game Store via Google Play. Essentially, this means you won't need to sideload the alternative app store.
Bloomberg notes that the ruling also allows developers to set up their own billing systems, rather than filtering everything through Google Play, which involves paying Google commission on each transaction.
Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mandeep Singh said that increased third-party billing systems are the bigger problem for Google — estimating that it could be "a $1-$1.5 billion drag on the company's gross profits."
Google is not particularly happy about the ruling, naturally. "This decision will significantly harm user safety, limit choice, and undermine the innovation that has always been central to the Android ecosystem," said Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google's vice president for regulatory affairs.
"Our top priority remains protecting our users and developers, and ensuring a secure platform as we continue our appeal.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
From the sounds of things, this isn't the end of Google's fight, and it's likely that Google will be taking the appeals process further, and to the Supreme Court.
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
Quantum Machine Learning: Here's How Business Leaders Can Prepare Now
Klaudia Zaika is the CEO of Apriorit, a software development company that provides engineering services globally to tech companies. The computational demands of today's AI systems are starting to outpace what classical hardware can deliver. How can we fix this? One possible solution is quantum machine learning (QML). QML introduces a fundamentally different approach to learning and optimization by applying quantum principles to AI algorithm design. This isn't a replacement, but rather an enhancement to classical AI and problem-solving. You may think that it's too early to prepare for QML, as most of today's quantum-related projects remain experimental and scientific. But not so long ago, in 2022, almost no one had heard about ChatGPT, and Google's Bard (now Gemini) wasn't even released yet. Now, as we've all seen, they are among the top go-to services for anything from organizing personal schedules to operating large enterprises. That's how fast these technologies evolve. This is why I believe that now is the perfect time to get ready and start building new infrastructures, developing new skills and planning your QML adoption strategy. What Makes Quantum Machine Learning Different QML isn't just about running existing AI models on faster hardware. It's about reimagining how learning itself happens. Classical AI systems rely on binary data structures and deterministic logic. These models weren't built to take advantage of quantum behavior and may lose efficiency or accuracy when forced into that environment. In contrast, QML models are designed to implement quantum principles like superposition and entanglement. These capabilities allow QML models to explore complex problem spaces more efficiently than non-quantum systems. As this field is still forming, there's no unified vision for the term 'quantum machine learning,' and it often refers to: • Quantum-enhanced machine learning, where quantum algorithms boost specific AI tasks, such as optimization or clustering. • Machine learning-enhanced processing of quantum data and the outputs from quantum experiments or simulations. • Hybrid quantum-classical models that combine two previous approaches and are often the most practical path forward in today's noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era. With so much ambiguity, the path to industrial adoption of QML seems to be far from straightforward and is filled with lots of obstacles. Knowing and preparing for these obstacles will help your business avoid costly missteps when integrating this technology into your products, services and organizational processes. Barriers To Widespread QML Adoption From my company's experience with similar ground-breaking innovations, specifically cloud and AI, there are a few challenges that I believe leaders in this space should expect first. Take model size and complexity, for instance. The first and most important barrier to account for in this case is hardware. Most quantum systems today still fall into the NISQ category. They are a good fit for experimentation but won't be able to handle broad commercial deployment as they lack qubit stability, error correction and scalability. Next, if you look at today's software architectures, you'll see that they are also not ready for quantum adoption. In fact, there's still a lot of work for those who want to make legacy systems cloud- and AI-compatible, even in terms of building the right data architectures. And QML requires much more architectural modularity and flexibility than any other technology we can think of today. Hybrid systems are also a challenge of their own. You'll need to determine which functions to delegate to the quantum part and which are better left with the traditional, non-quantum side of your system. Designing and testing these hybrid environments, as well as integrating them with the existing software ecosystems, will require new thinking, especially in cybersecurity, data handling and orchestration. Last but not least, there's a deep talent gap. Quantum computing and machine learning are complex fields, and very few professionals are trained at the intersection of those two. When you listen to quantum enthusiasts, you may feel tempted to treat QML as an emerging silver bullet, which it isn't. Yet, it's a fundamental shift that will require prolonged, well-planned preparations from your business. How To Prepare For QML Today: A Strategic Roadmap QML adoption is a marathon, not a race. So if you want your business to use and benefit from QML, it's already time to prepare your teams, processes and software architecture for what's coming. Here's what you can start doing right now: 1. Educate your team. You don't need a quantum physicist on staff tomorrow, but your developers and architects should start building foundational literacy. Workshops, online courses and partnerships with academic programs can accelerate this process and help your business mitigate the risk of facing talent shortages in the future. 2. Explore low-risk pilot projects. Optimization, anomaly detection and pattern recognition are great starting points, especially when executed using quantum simulators or early-access platforms. These efforts can help your teams build hands-on familiarity without overcommitting. On the other hand, if you engage early as a business, whether through vendor exploration or academic partnerships, you can gain better visibility into what's coming and where your organization fits. 3. Build adaptable software architectures. Flexible, non-monolithic architectures are already gaining traction. But to prepare your software for QML or post-quantum cryptography (PQC), you need to bring it to a whole new level of agility. This means making your software architecture mostly API-driven, modular and as loosely coupled as possible. 4. Evolve your cybersecurity measures. Even if QML doesn't fit your business, you still need to think about ways to protect your data and systems from upcoming quantum threats. In particular, make sure to keep track of the US National Quantum Initiative and the latest PQC news from NIST. 5. Plan for the long run. QML isn't an investment that can offer a short-term ROI for most companies. Yet, just like cloud and AI before it, I believe this technology will fundamentally reshape how software is developed and deployed. The shift to quantum machine learning won't happen overnight. That means you still have time to prepare your business for the adoption of this promising technology—from considering fitting use cases and determining where and how QML will benefit you the most to deciding on the first implementation steps. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Chicago Tribune
31 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Mohammad Hosseini: White House plan bids a farewell to fair and responsible AI
'America's AI Action Plan,' unveiled by the White House on July 23, aims to accelerate the innovation of artificial intelligence by dismantling regulations and privatizing infrastructure. What the plan does is conflate innovation with deregulation and frame AI as a race to be won rather than a technology to be governed. President Donald Trump signed three executive orders to ensure that the federal government approves data centers as quickly as possible, promote the exporting of AI models for the sake of American dominance and guarantee that federally supported AI systems are 'ideologically neutral' and reject 'wokeism and critical race theory.' In its 24 pages, the plan does not mention 'ethics' at all and cites 'responsibility' once, in the context of securing AI systems against adversarial attacks. The 'Build World-Class Scientific Datasets' section is the only part of the action plan that explicitly mentions human rights: 'The United States must lead the creation of the world's largest and highest quality AI-ready scientific datasets, while maintaining respect for individual rights and ensuring civil liberties, privacy, and confidentiality protections.' However, without protection measures, there is no encouragement for responsible use and deployment. For example, the plan prioritizes a narrow interpretation of national security without addressing critical ethical needs such as the protection of vulnerable populations, children, neurodivergent individuals and minorities — issues that the European Union AI Act addresses. And the plan's only nod to misinformation is framed as a free speech issue. Instead of trying to address it, the plan suggests that references to it should be eliminated: 'Revise the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to eliminate references to misinformation, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and climate change.' Placing misinformation, DEI and climate change in one bucket suggests that these very different things can be treated the same way. The implications of this policy include that Google search, now enabled by AI, might censor references to these topics. The plan also contains significant accountability gaps. By rejecting 'onerous regulation,' the administration effectively green-lights opaque AI systems, prioritizing deregulation over transparency. It does not incentivize processes to help us understand the results produced by AI, enforceable standards or oversight mechanisms. For example, when AI systems discriminate in hiring or health care, there is no clear answer to questions such as: How did this happen? Who is responsible? And how can we prevent this in the future? The plan delegates oversight to private corporations, relying on self-policing as a substitute for governance. This hands-off approach mirrors a broader deregulatory playbook: During a May 8 Senate hearing led by U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, the Republican from Texas hailed 'a light-touch regulatory style' as a key strategy. This approach to data governance also raises serious concerns about fairness. While it calls 'open-weight' and 'open-source' AI the engines of innovation, it mandates that federally funded researchers must disclose 'non-proprietary, non-sensitive datasets' used in AI research. This creates a double standard: Academic researchers and institutions should share data in the name of transparency, while private corporations are free to hoard proprietary datasets in their ever-expanding data centers. The result is an ecosystem in which public research fuels private profit, reinforcing the dominance of tech giants. Indeed, rather than leveling the playing field, the plan risks entrenching imbalances in access, ownership, possession and control over the data that powers AI. Editorial: AI therapy? We won't be lying on that by ignoring copyright, the plan invites the unchecked scraping of creative and scientific work, which risks normalizing extracting data without attribution and creating a chilling effect on open scholarship. Researchers might ask themselves: Why publish clean and reusable data if it becomes free training material for for-profit companies such as Meta or OpenAI? During his introductory remarks at a White House AI summit, Trump provided the rationale: 'You can't be expected to have a successful AI program when every single article, book or anything else that you've read or studied you're supposed to pay for.' However, before the recent wave of deregulation, AI companies had begun forming licensing agreements with publishers. For instance, OpenAI's two-year agreement with The Associated Press signed in 2023 showed that publishers could license high-quality, fact-checked archives for training purposes and also allow their content to be displayed with proper attribution in AI-generated outputs. Without a doubt, the plan can turbocharge corporate American AI — but likely at the expense of the democratic values the U.S. has long worked to uphold. The document positions AI as a tool of national self-interest and a driver of global divides. While Americans have the right to want to win the AI race, the greater danger is that they might win it on terms that erode the very values the nation has for so long declared to defend.
Tom's Guide
31 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Apple is working on a ChatGPT alternative — but is it too late?
Apple has been lagging behind in the AI world. As the likes of OpenAI and Google barge on ahead, Apple is looking for new ways to keep up with the crowd, and with a new team brought in, they might have the answer. According to Bloomberg, Apple is now working on an 'AI answers' tool. The details of this remain unclear, but a team has been brought in specifically to develop a stripped-down rival to ChatGPT. Currently, Apple has stayed clear of delving into the world of chatbots. While they have their AI Apple Intelligence tool, they have never introduced a function similar to ChatGPT or Gemini. In the past, the company insisted that this wasn't necessary and instead focused on giving its users access to ChatGPT for that need. Mark Gurman, the author of the Bloomberg article, highlights that the new team from Apple is called Answers, Knowledge, and Information. They are rumoured to be working on an 'answers engine'. In other words, a tool that can respond to questions using information from across the web. It is still unclear if this would be a standalone tool or integrated into one of Apple's existing products. Gurman also noted that Apple is currently advertising for new members of the team. The job adverts focus on experience with search algorithms and engine development. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Apple has ended up surprisingly far behind in the AI mission. While it has launched Apple Intelligence, and brought out updates to the tool since its release, it is lagging far behind. They have no chatbot (which has quickly become the public's favourite AI tool), and, while it has experimented with generative AI, Apple has never quite got a grasp on this area either. The company's original plan seemed to be to piggyback off the OpenAI tools, offering these through Apple devices. However, now Apple seems to be trying to catch up in a fast moving world. Unless it can move quickly, Apple is stuck in a tricky position. Even if it does launch a ChatGPT-like tool on its devices, it will be coming out years after its competitors. By that point, the likes of OpenAI and Google will be working on AI browsers, video tools and other more advanced technologies. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
