BJP's Kerala, Chhattisgarh units divided over arrest of nuns; Chandrasekhar hopeful of ‘justice'
On Friday (August 1, 2025), Kerala BJP chief Rajeev Chandrasekhar said that the Chhattisgarh government will not oppose the bail applications of the two nuns who were arrested at Durg railway station on July 25. 'We hope that they get bail in the coming days because the State government has agreed not to oppose their bail,' he said, adding that both Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah had clearly said that justice would be given to the nuns.
Amid protests by the Christian community and political parties in Kerala demanding release of the nuns, the State unit continued its effort to mend bridges with Church leaders. Through its X handle, the unit on Friday posted a message from its former chief Kummanam Rajasekharan saying that it had been completely honest in its intervention in the issue. 'Shri George Kurien as Union Minister and Shri Rajeev Chandrasekhar as State President have intervened in this issue,' he said.
'There is nothing to hide in this matter, the party is intervening in this issue with sincerity and honesty. The Christian community should understand this. The Congress and the Communist Party have deceived the Christian community the most,' said Mr. Rajasekharan.
Earlier, as voices grew stronger demanding the release of the nuns, the matter drew wider attention. Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai on July 28 – via his X handle – had said that 'through inducement, an attempt was being made to engage in human trafficking and conversion' and that it was 'a serious matter related to women's safety', adding that the investigation in this case was still on.
Hours later, Mr. Chandrasekhar termed the arrests as a case of 'misunderstanding', stating that the unit had contacted the Home Minister of Chhattisgarh and the State government, and the Union Home Ministry. 'We received tremendous support from the authorities... the accompanying girls are adults, and they had parental consent...,' he said.
The same day, the party's Kerala State general secretary Anoop Antony reached Chhattisgarh and met the State's Deputy Chief Minister and Home Minister Vijay Sharma.
'Our State general secretary is currently in Chhattisgarh, and we are committed to ensuring that all necessary assistance is provided to secure justice for the nuns under arrest. While Chhattisgarh, being a tribal state, has an anti-conversion law in place, we are convinced that the allegations of conversion against the Malayali nuns are not true,' posted Mr. Chandrasekhar on X, adding: '...the BJP is determined to stand by the nuns until they are released and justice is delivered.'
However, the next day, BJP MP from Durg, Vijay Baghel, spoke during Zero Hour in Lok Sabha on the issue. Alleging a conspiracy by the Congress MPs to disturb communal harmony, he came out in support of the Chhattisgarh government for arresting the nuns.
'Around 8:30 a.m., one of the girls was seen crying, which drew the attention of some responsible citizens. When asked, she said she was brought there forcibly and wanted to return home,' Mr. Baghel said. 'This is a conspiracy to malign the image of the well-governed, sensitive government in Chhattisgarh and create tension between two religions. Are we not supposed to protect our daughters in Chhattisgarh?' he asked.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
There should not be targeted attempt to eliminate voice of some citizens, especially from deprived parts of India: Amartya Sen on SIR
1. Do you support the Election Commission's attempt to conduct a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls across the country? Getting the rolls right can indeed be a good exercise if it is done correctly. However, if in a hasty attempt to remove errors from the existing list, more errors are introduced, the result can be terrible. Volunteering to undertake this effort with little time and serious possibilities of significant bias can have the effect of making the election far less truthful than continuing to use the existing rolls. Many people have also questioned the neutrality of the Election Commission, and that is an issue that has to be appropriately assessed. But even with an unbiased Election Commission, there can be serious errors in a quickly produced electoral roll, particularly because of the absence of documentary evidence that many citizens, especially the poor and the deprived, are able to present. Class bias is a big danger here. 2. Is there a danger of disenfranchisement of large groups of people in the process of revising the rolls within a very short time, in a hurry? If there is a targeted attempt to eliminate the voice of some citizens, especially from the deprived parts of the nation, that would be a monstrous development. This must be totally avoided, and the Election Commission must take into account the reasons for suspicion that many fair-minded critics have found. It is extremely important that the Election Commission does not generate reason for suspicion by its choices, and that the Supreme Court plays its supervisory role actively and fairly. Indeed, the Supreme Court is ultimately the institution most responsible for making sure that the citizens' rights are not trifled with. As citizens of India, we all have to rely on the constitutional role of the Supreme Court and we are all dependent on its active protection of justice. This is a hugely important concern of citizens today, but there is, in addition, also the question of how the future would judge the Supreme Court today in the light of what they choose to do given the information they have. There is, in fact, a big tomorrow. 3. What do you think of the alleged atrocities against poor migrant Bengali workers in BJP-ruled states? There is a general point here that has to be addressed and also a special concern. The general point is that India is a country for all its citizens, and no part of the nation – whether Bengali or Tamil or Maharashtrian – should be discriminated against in any region of the country. Ill-treatment of Bengali workers elsewhere is very bad indeed, but so is the ill-treatment of any other group of migrant workers. That is the big general point, but a special concern, added to this, is the tendency of some political movements within India to portray many Bengali Indians as if they were Immigrants from Bangladesh. There have, unfortunately, been many attempts at treating Bengalis in general as Bangladeshis. Especially because of the anti-Muslim programmes of some political groups in India, Bengali Indians have often had to suffer from greater discrimination than other Indians. The level of ignorant confusion shown by many powerful officers in Delhi is truly catastrophic when they see the Bengali language (born between the tenth and the eleventh centuries – through the great poetry of Charyapad) as a 'Bangladeshi language'. 4. The BJP seems to be working hard in West Bengal to promote Hindutva in preparation of the state elections next year. Will they succeed? Bengal has had a long history of Hindu-Muslim cordiality as well as cooperative work shared by different communities. A political party that tries to generate communal narrow-mindedness might temporarily experience partial success through its divisive propaganda, but it will not be easy to turn Bengal into a communal bastion of hatred. Divisive efforts of this kind could sometimes have short-lived success, but Bengali culture and society are ultimately resistant to generating an invented internal enmity. The illusion of political gain, if any, from cultivated discord will turn out to be ephemeral.
Scroll.in
25 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
‘Abysmal failure of Modi': Opposition criticises Centre as Trump doubles tariffs on India
Opposition leaders on Wednesday said that United States President Donald Trump's decision to double tariffs on Indian goods from 25% to 50% reflected an ' abysmal failure ' of diplomacy by the Narendra Modi-led Union government. 'While his [Trump's] tariff and penalty actions are simply unacceptable, the fact remains that they also reflect the abysmal failure of Modi's personalised and headline-grabbing style of huglomacy,' Congress leader Jairam Ramesh said on X. Recalling former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's stance against US pressure in the 1970s, Ramesh said: 'Instead of defaming, distorting, and denigrating her, Modi should shed his ego – if indeed that were possible – and take inspiration from the manner in which she stood up to the USA'. Prime Minister Modi went to the US and attended a Howdy Modi event in Houston in Sept 2019. President Trump was also present and Mr. Modi broke with all tradition and declared Ab ki Baar Trump Sarkar. In Feb 2020, President Trump was hosted by Mr. Modi to a gala Namaste Trump… — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) August 6, 2025 Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi said that the tariff hike amounted to ' economic blackmail ' and a blatant attempt to pressure India into accepting an unfair trade deal. 'PM Modi better not let his weakness override the interests of the Indian people,' he said. Earlier on Wednesday, Gandhi had alleged that Modi's inability to confront Trump stems from the ongoing US investigation into the Adani Group – led by business tycoon Gautam Adani. Trump's 50% tariff is economic blackmail - an attempt to bully India into an unfair trade deal. PM Modi better not let his weakness override the interests of the Indian people. — Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) August 6, 2025 Trinamool Congress MP Derek O'Brien questioned, 'now what will 56 inch say about the 50% Trump tariff", in a pointed remark aimed at the prime minister. 'And now we know why Modi and his creaky coalition are disrupting Parliament,' he added. 25 + 25 =50 Now what will 56 inch say about the 50% Trump tariff And now we know why Modi and his creaky coalition are disrupting Parliament — Derek O'Brien | ডেরেক ও'ব্রায়েন (@derekobrienmp) August 6, 2025 Communist Party of India (Marxist) leader MA Baby called the 50% tariff hike ' unilateral and illegal ', urging the Indian government to 'stand firm, defend our interests, and resist US pressure'. We condemn Trump's unilateral and illegal imposition of 50% tariffs on India. India must stand firm, defend our interests, and resist US pressure. US unilateralism endangers global stability. Time to build a global front against US bullying, economic coercion, and wars.… — M A Baby (@MABABYCPIM) August 6, 2025 Trump on Wednesday issued an executive order imposing an additional 25% tariff on goods imported from India for purchasing Russian oil. This raised the US tariff rate on Indian goods to 50%. On July 30, Washington had announced a 25% levy on goods imported from India as part of the so-called reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries that have not finalised separate trade agreements with the US. The additional levy will take effect in 21 days. In response, New Delhi said on Wednesday that it was ' extremely unfortunate ' that the US had chosen to impose additional tariffs on India 'for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest'. 'We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,' said the Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson. 'India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests."
Hans India
25 minutes ago
- Hans India
Bandi Sanjay accuses Congress of betraying BCs with ‘Muslim Declaration' agenda
Hyderabad / New Delhi: Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Bandi Sanjay Kumar launched a blistering attack on the Congress party over its protest at Jantar Mantar, alleging that the dharna was not for Backward Classes (BCs) but a covert push for Muslim reservations. He claimed the Congress had abandoned its Kamareddy Declaration and was now pursuing what he termed the 'Mumtiki Muslim Declaration.' Addressing the media on Wednesday in the national capital, Bandi Sanjay accused Congress of conspiring to allocate only 5% reservations to BCs while diverting an additional 10% to Muslims under the guise of the BC Bill. 'This is not a BC Declaration—it's a Muslim Declaration. Congress is cheating BCs and trying to implement 100% Muslim reservations,' he said. He asserted that the Congress dharna lacked genuine support from BC communities and warned that the BJP would only support the bill if it ensured 42% reservations exclusively for BCs. 'Otherwise, we will block it. Ambedkar opposed religious reservations, and so do we,' he declared. Bandi Sanjay challenged Congress to a public debate on its historical treatment of BCs, questioning whether any BC had ever been made Prime Minister or Chief Minister during its decades-long rule. 'In 50 years of Congress rule, not a single BC was made PM. In 48 years of united Andhra Pradesh, not one BC was made CM,' he said, listing a series of upper-caste leaders who held the post. He contrasted this with the BJP's record, highlighting that the party had made a BC the Prime Minister three times, appointed 27 BCs as Union Ministers, and elevated BC leaders to Chief Ministerial positions across states. 'We've also given the highest constitutional posts to Dalits, tribals, and minorities,' he added. Bandi Sanjay accused Congress of trying to make Hindus a minority in Telangana through religious-based reservations and warned of national consequences. 'If this poisonous tree isn't uprooted in Telangana, it will spread across the country,' he said. He also criticized the Congress for failing to provide adequate representation to BCs in the Revanth Reddy cabinet, nominated posts, and Lok Sabha tickets. 'Congress is shedding crocodile tears for BCs. The weaker sections will soon rise and raze the party to the ground, as they did in UP, Bengal, Bihar, and Tamil Nadu,' he concluded.
