Corridors of Opportunity: Europe and Africa Pave the Way Together
Transport corridors are among the most powerful engines for economic transformation. In Europe, every euro invested in the continent's Trans-European Transport Network has been estimated to return four euros in GDP. The same – or even greater - potential exists in Africa – if investments are focused and coordinated.
That's according to Paul Riembault of the Directorate-General for International Partnerships (DG INTPA) at the European Commission.
Speaking at the 43rd Southern African Transport Conference (SATC) on 10 July, Riembault explored how Africa could leverage the European Union's long and complex corridor development experience.
He encouraged African institutions, planners and financiers to continue their coordinated approach to corridor development – and to consider Europe's successes as well as challenges in transforming fragmented infrastructure into the backbone of a thriving single market.
'Transport corridors are not just about roads and rails,' Riembault told delegates. 'They're about unlocking integration, intra-African trade, and regional prosperity.'
What sets Europe's TEN-T model apart is its data-driven, criteria-based approach. Corridors are not selected arbitrarily or through purely political negotiation.
Instead, they are based on criteria or even hard data: e.g. ports handling more than 33 million tonnes of freight annually – corresponding to 1% of total EU freight -, cities with over one million inhabitants, capital cities and strategic industrial zones. These 'core nodes' anchor each multimodal corridor.
'In a Union of 27 Member States, it's natural that national interests may diverge,' Riembault said. 'Hence, a strong common framework serves as protection against shifting political priorities and pet projects '
Currently, TEN-T consists of nine multimodal corridors, supported by harmonised regulations in road safety, rail electrification, axle loads, rail signalling systems, and even ticketing interoperability. Infrastructure is just one layer – governance, standardisation and financing form the others.
'Without harmonisation, corridors become patchworks. We learned that the hard way in Europe. Interoperability should start from day one.'
Riembault outlined Europe's difficult past – a continent once divided by war, incompatible rail gauges, and isolated national railway systems. 'Europe's map was built to divide, not connect,' he noted. But from the wreckage of conflict came the political will to unite, and with that will came the need for infrastructure that reflected integration.
Corridors in Europe, he explained, were not the starting point but the outcome of political alignment. The EU's single market project created the demand for connectivity, and the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) emerged to meet that demand.
Riembault's presentation also highlighted how the EU is applying the approach of concentrating investment through the Global Gateway initiative – the EU's global investment strategy, which prioritises energy, digital and transport infrastructure.
Through Global Gateway, the EU has identified a shortlist of African corridors – aligned with African Union (AU) and Regional Economic Community (REC) priorities – where it is focusing its transport funding between 2021 and 2027.
'The goal is not to duplicate Africa's frameworks like the Programme for Infrastructure Development in Africa (PIDA) or the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA),' he said. 'The goal is to support them strategically and at scale.'
More than €1.5 billion (about R30 billion) in grants have already been earmarked to African corridor development under the Global Gateway initiative, with many projects supported through blended financing that combines EU grants with loans and private capital.
Among the flagship investments is the Maputo–Walvis Bay rail corridor, where upgrades in Mozambique are set to significantly boost freight capacity.
In Dakar, a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system has been rolled out, featuring over 120 electric buses and dedicated lanes to enhance urban mobility and reduce emissions.
Meanwhile, in Lagos, the OMI EKO water transport project should improve connectivity along the Abidjan–Lagos corridor by expanding ferry services and infrastructure to better serve the region's rapidly growing population.
In addition to physical infrastructure, the EU is funding soft measures such as trade facilitation, customs reform, axle load regulations, and corridor governance frameworks.
The session, which brought together representatives and experts from the African Union Commission, Regional Economic Communities, the United Nations, the World Bank, and German cooperation, concluded with a vibrant discussion around a central question: Is it time to develop a more robust, African continental framework for corridor development?
This would not replace existing initiatives, but rather add a layer of consistency – shared criteria, common standards, and cross-border monitoring.
'Africa doesn't need to copy Europe,' Riembault said. 'But it can draw on key lessons that fit its context'
The EU, he added, stands ready to support African partners in shaping corridors that are modern, multimodal and resilient.
'This is Africa's corridor moment, the continent can transform transport corridors into economic lifelines,' he concluded.
Paul Riembault from the European Commission's Directorate-General for International Partnerships
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
20 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
EU defends Trump trade deal in face of backlash
BRUSSELS - The European Union on Monday defended its trade deal with President Donald Trump, with EU capitals and businesses sharply divided on an outcome some branded a "capitulation". "I'm 100% sure that this deal is better than a trade war with the United States," top EU trade negotiator Maros Sefcovic told journalists. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen clinched the framework accord with Trump on Sunday after dashing to Scotland as the 1 August deadline loomed for steep levies that threatened to cripple Europe's economy. EU exports are now set to face across-the-board tariffs of 15% - higher than customs duties before Trump returned to the White House, but much lower than his threatened 30%. The 27-nation bloc also promised its companies would purchase energy worth $750 billion from the United States and make $600 billion in additional investments - although it was not clear how binding those pledges would be. "This is clearly the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances," Sefcovic said. Full details of the agreement - and crucially which sectors could escape the 15% levy - will be known in the coming days, although the EU says it has avoided steeper tariffs on key exports including cars and medicines. EUROPEAN CRITICISM The reaction from European capitals - which gave von der Leyen the mandate to negotiate - ranged from muted to outright hostile. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said it was a "dark day" for Europe and that the accord was tantamount to "submission". Speaking for Europe's biggest economy, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said his country would face "substantial damage" from the tariffs but that "we couldn't expect to achieve any more". He argued that the deal's negative effects "will not only be limited to Germany and Europe, but we will see the effects of this trade policy in America as well". Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said he gave his support for the deal "without any enthusiasm". Industry groups in both countries made plain their disappointment, with Germany's main auto sector body saying the 15% levy "burdens" carmakers while its VCI chemical trade association said the rates were "too high". Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban attacked the deal in blunt terms, saying: "Trump ate Ursula von der Leyen for breakfast." European stock markets dipped later on Monday, wiping out early gains and reflecting unease at terms viewed as lopsided. "It looks a bit like a capitulation," said Alberto Rizzi of the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). "The EU accepted a fairly unbalanced deal," he added, saying it delivered a "political victory for Trump". EUROPE SECURITY STAKES Von der Leyen had faced intense pressure from EU states to strike a deal quickly with the bloc's biggest partner and protect a $1.9-trillion trading relationship. Defending Brussels' approach, Sefcovic warned that a no-deal scenario - meaning a 30% tariff and the prospect of further escalation - would have risked up to five million jobs in Europe. Throughout the months-long talks, Brussels prioritised stability and maintaining good relations with Washington over escalation. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, a Trump ally, said the deal had avoided "potentially devastating" consequences. Hanging over the negotiations was the risk to other areas of cooperation - such as the war in Ukraine - if the EU descended into a trade war with its closest security partner. "It's not only about the trade - it's about security, it's about Ukraine," Sefcovic told reporters Monday. Jacob Funk Kirkegaard of the Peterson Institute for International Economics acknowledged it was "clearly an imbalanced deal" if judged purely on trade terms. "But if you're trying to avoid worse national security outcomes, well then maybe the deal is not so bad," he said. CAUTIOUS APPROACH The EU had sought to ramp up the pressure in the final stretch of talks, fearing a bad deal and higher levies, with countries approving a $109-billion package of counter-tariffs at the last minute. And states led by France were pushing for a more robust response including the option to deploy the trade "bazooka" known as the anti-coercion instrument. But the threat of retaliation was consistently framed by Brussels as a last resort should talks fail, and experts suggested the hardening stance may have come too late to make a real difference. "If the EU had played hardball at the very beginning, it probably could have got a better deal," ECFR's Rizzi told AFP.
Eyewitness News
20 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
Trump slashes Russia ultimatum to '10 or 12 days'
TURNBERRY - Donald Trump issued on Monday a dramatic new ultimatum to Russia to end the war in Ukraine or face tough new sanctions, as he met UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland. Saying he was not very interested in talking to Russian President Vladimir Putin anymore, the US leader also shifted his tone on Gaza, acknowledging there were signs of "real starvation" in the conflict-ravaged Palestinian territory. Trump, sitting alongside Starmer at the US leader's luxury golf resort in Turnberry, south of Glasgow, said he was "very disappointed" with Putin over continued strikes against Ukrainian civilian targets. He announced that he was reducing an earlier 50-day deadline for Putin to bring the Ukraine conflict to an end to "about 10 or 12 days", starting immediately. "There is no reason in waiting," Trump said, adding he thought Putin would want to end things quick. "I really felt it was going to end. But every time I think it's going to end he kills people. "I'm not so interested in talking (to him) anymore," he added. Ukraine swiftly praised the US president's stand and thanked Trump for "standing firm and delivering a clear message of peace through strength". "When America leads with strength, others think twice," Ukrainian presidential aide Andriy Yermak said on social media. The comments came after Trump and Starmer held a bilateral meeting that focused on ending the suffering in Gaza and reviving stalled ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas. Trump announced the US would set up walk-in "food centres" in Gaza. GOLF DIPLOMACY "We're going to be getting some good strong food, we can save a lot of people. I mean, some of those kids -- that's real starvation stuff," he said. Starmer, under domestic pressure to follow France's lead and recognise a Palestinian state, called the situation unfolding in Gaza an "absolute catastrophe". The pair also discussed the implementation of a UK-US trade deal that was signed on May 8 that lowered tariffs for certain UK exports but has yet to come into force. Trump hosted Starmer and his wife Victoria under tight security at Turnberry, where he had spent two days playing golf since landing in Scotland on Friday night for a five-day visit. Their talks came after the United States and the European Union reached a landmark deal to avert a full-blown trade war over tariffs, when EU chief Ursula von der Leyen visited Trump at the resort on Sunday. Trump hinted that he would not impose heavy tariffs on British pharmaceuticals. "We certainly feel a lot better with your country working on pharmaceuticals for America than some of the other countries," he told Starmer. "With the relationship we have, you would not use that as a cudgel. You wouldn't be using it as a block," he added. Trump set out early in his second term to fulfil a decades-long desire of reshaping US trade with the world, with his administration predicting his aggressive strategy of punitive tariffs could bring "90 deals in 90 days." After months with very little to show, he is now enjoying some success, landing accords with Japan, the Philippines, Indonesia and, most importantly, the European Union. The deals are expected to kick in August 1 to replace the current tariff regime these economies face, a White House spokesperson told AFP. After their meeting, Trump and Starmer were to travel to Aberdeen in Scotland's northeast, where the US president is to open a new golf course at his resort on Tuesday. Trump played golf at Turnberry on Saturday and Sunday on a five-day visit that has mixed leisure with diplomacy, and also further blurred the lines between the presidency and his business interests.
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
EU must take lead in filling development gap in Africa left by US, says France
And France says it's happy to turn its military bases in the Sahel into schools, after being forced to withdraw its military forces from the region by new, pro-Russia juntas. Other donor countries — especially the European Union and its members — need to step in to fill the gap in development financing left by the withdrawal of the United States, says Thani Mohamed Soilihi, France's minister of state for Francophone and international partnerships, who is responsible for international development assistance. Soilihi attended last week's meeting in Skukuza of the G20 ministers on development, which agreed on the G20 Skukuza Development Ministerial Declaration focusing on the need to increase efforts to meet the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030, mainly by combating illicit finance flows — a big issue for Africa especially — and by establishing floors (minimum levels) of social protection. The declaration said the financing gap for reaching the SDGs by 2030 had undergone a 'quantum jump' from billions to trillions of dollars. Yet, as Soilihi told journalists, the context for financing development was adverse, especially with the withdrawal of the US and the shutting down of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) by the Trump administration. This would have 'very serious and dramatic consequences', especially for health, leaving a development financing hole of some $4-billion a year to be filled. Soilihi said it had been calculated that about 14 million people would die by 2030 because of the end of USAID. The rising public debt of countries was also a problem (which was addressed by the G20 finance ministers earlier in July). And so EU leadership and action were now more important, he said, because the EU was the first contributor of official development aid, providing about 42%. 'So we have a major responsibility, especially when it comes to supporting the health system and finding new ways to build cooperation with the countries that need it the most and have an effective impact on the ground. 'France does a lot for development, but we do a lot more when we're together within the European Union. So we have a major responsibility, and it's important for us to come and to speak as one.' That was why he had convened a meeting in Skukuza of EU development ministers and other heads of delegation to discuss how they could together contribute more to meeting the G20 development targets. He added that to increase the collective effort, France was also holding a meeting of its Paris Pact for People and the Planet (4P) initiative for more innovative development assistance. It includes 73 countries. He noted that having the development ministers of assisting countries — as well as ministers responsible for development in their own countries — all present at Skukuza had been useful for holding a constructive dialogue on how to tackle development problems. France was attending the meeting to help the success of SA's G20 presidency because 'France is really dedicated to the success of multilateralism'. He said the G20 was also advancing the agenda of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development, which was held in Seville, Spain, last month. Development priorities Soilihi said France fully supported the three development priorities that SA had set for its G20 presidency. The first was how to join forces to have universal social protection as a driver for development and reducing inequalities. 'This topic is very important and it relates to the importance of the health sector and what we are trying to do to change the way we address health issues.' The second priority was how to fight illicit financial flows (IFFs) as a way to mobilise more domestic resources to finance development. He said IFFs 'hinder states' capacities to mobilise resources for their own development'. The third priority was how to protect global public goods. Soilihi was asked whether France would change the way it offered development assistance to Africa in response to the US withdrawal. He said France had not waited for the US withdrawal but had started 'deeply' changing the way it partnered with Africa in 2017, as announced by President Emmanuel Macron in a major speech in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. 'The core principle is that we want partnerships based on mutual interest, we want win-win partnerships, and we want partnerships that are based on the country's needs and what they are asking from their partners.' He said France was not now going to change the way it operated in Africa. 'But we need to bring more means to the table now,' working together with the EU and the 4P partners. He said that when G20 member countries were asked by their public why they were in the G20, they should point out to them that the G20 countries represented 75% of global trade and 90% of global GDP. 'And if we join forces, we have a real power to change things.' Soilihi was asked about France's military strategy in the Sahel and West Africa since it had been forced — under pressure from new, pro-Russia juntas — to withdraw all its forces that had been invited in by the previous elected governments to help them fight jihadist insurgents. He stressed that the governments had asked France for help. 'But if today a number of countries in West Africa no longer want military French bases to have those kinds of cooperations, we'll be happy to change those military bases for schools.' France no longer had a security focus in that region, he said. 'We'll just be there to answer the calls from our partner countries if there is another ground for military cooperation or others. But we'll mostly be focused on ensuring the security of French and European people in Africa. 'And we'll always be in that position of considering the needs of the countries we work with. 'But we've understood loud and clear that in some countries in West Africa, military cooperation is no longer the focus.' DM
