logo
Canada's national portraiture prize is looking to gain mass appeal for its 2025 edition

Canada's national portraiture prize is looking to gain mass appeal for its 2025 edition

CBC3 days ago
Jason Donville was a fan of the Kingston Prize — Canada's national portraiture prize — long before he took over as the chair of its board.
The former Canadian naval officer-turned-hedge fund manager had always been interested in art. Figurative art in particular "just really got to me," he says. Initially, he was drawn to the prize as a way of scouting out new Canadian artists.
"As somebody who wanted to put figurative painting on the wall was how I originally got involved with it," he says. "I was using it as a way to say, 'How do I discover new painters that I've never heard of before?' And every two years, the list of 30 [nominees] was fabulous, and there are several paintings that have been on my walls for 20 years that came from me looking at the website of the Kingston Prize."
The Kingston Prize was founded in 2005 by Queen's University professor Julian Brown and his wife, Kaaren. The Kingston has been awarded every other year since then (except in 2021, when it was skipped due to COVID). It was inspired by the Archibald Prize, the national portraiture prize in Brown's native Australia, which has been running since 1921.
"They started up themselves from scratch and kind of begged, borrowed and whatever to get it going," Donville says of the Browns.
By 2023, though, the prize had begun to "run out of steam," says Donville, as the Browns and the rest of their cohort aged. He asked what he could do to help. "And before you know it, I became the chairman of the Kingston Prize." His goal as chairman, he says, is to make the prize a bigger deal in the Canadian consciousness. The Kingston Prize may be well-known in art circles, but in Australia, the Archibald has crossover appeal to people who aren't necessarily art aficionados. The Kingston Prize has just over 1,300 followers on Instagram, the Archibald has 11,700. Donville says there's no reason the Kingston Prize couldn't have the same mass appeal.
"The general public tends to really love [portrait prizes] because it's faces," he says. "It's the faces of a nation."
In March, the prize released its first-ever book, a 20-year retrospective, as part of that effort to get in front of more people. One of the artists featured was 2023's winner, Shaun Downey. Downey is familiar with the world of portrait awards. In 2010, he was accepted into the United Kingdom's national portrait award — then called the BP Portrait Award — where his work was hung in the National Portrait Gallery in London.
"They put my work on posters in the subway," he says. "It was on a huge banner on the front of the National Portrait Gallery.... And I really got my career sort of kicked into high gear. So I knew the possibility of that in Canada would be great."
He submitted work for the 2015, 2017 and 2019 Kingston Prizes — earning an honourable mention in 2017 — before his eventual win in 2023. He says his work isn't necessarily what people imagine when they think of portraits.
"I've often done portrait commissions where people say, 'I don't want it to be like a grandmother-over-the-fireplace-style portrait,'" he says. "So they've allowed me to add narrative elements, do something not quite so head and shoulders, sort of putting them more into a scene."
Jim Bravo was a 2023 honourable mention and is also featured in the book. In addition to being a portrait artist, he's also a muralist, and he says he likes to keep working at scale when doing portraits, too. Most of his works are life-sized or close to it. But he's also influenced by photojournalism, and views portraits as a way of not only capturing people's likenesses, but their lives. His 2023 submission showed his mother and grandmother working at home as seamstresses.
"She would go to work at, basically, a sweatshop in Chinatown during the day," he says. "Then, when she'd come home, she would be picking up orders … for her own little business. That really captures a moment in time back then for me in Toronto. That's my family, but [it] could have portrayed any number of my friends' parents that were doing the same thing.… We all came over as immigrants in the mid '70s and there's a lot of similar stories of that nature."
For Donville, beyond its artistic value, the Kingston Prize is yet another way of defining Canadian identity, showing us who we are as a people and talking about the things that affect our everyday lives.
"The country is continuously in evolution," he says. "And the mix of the population is in evolution. So the paintings are, in a sense, a reflection of us."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why SOCAN is suing a Quebec City music festival for copyright infringement
Why SOCAN is suing a Quebec City music festival for copyright infringement

CBC

timean hour ago

  • CBC

Why SOCAN is suing a Quebec City music festival for copyright infringement

Social Sharing The Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada (SOCAN) is suing Quebec City's Festival d'Été de Québec (FEQ) music festival for copyright. In the lawsuit, which was first reported by The National Post, SOCAN says the festival infringed copyright by performing or authorizing the performance of musical works under its repertoire, without a license and without paying the royalties, in 2022, 2023 and 2024. The FEQ is among the biggest outdoor festivals in Canada. Every year, the 11-day event gathers a star-studded lineup of artists with some shows drawing 90,000 people each night in Quebec City. But this year, on its first day on July 3, FEQ was hit with a lawsuit from SOCAN, which represents over 200,000 Canadian music writers, composers and publishers. The FEQ argued that its charitable status means it doesn't have to pay the fees. But experts in copyright law say it's not a strong defence. What does SOCAN want? Music composers, authors and publishers hold copyrights over their works and have the right to license the use of their music to those who want to play or perform them. SOCAN grants licenses and collects royalties on their behalf. Instead of paying these artists the fees directly, those playing the music can cut the check to SOCAN, who will redistribute the funds. Any public venue playing music has to pay royalty and licensing fees to SOCAN, whether it's a restaurant, bar or festival. But, SOCAN says the FEQ has been avoiding paying their fees by claiming that their charity status exempts them from doing so. It's an argument they've been using for a while, said Alexandre Alonso, SOCAN's director of Quebec affairs. He didn't specify if the festival had been avoiding payment for more than three years, stating SOCAN couldn't comment on the FEQ's actions beyond what is in the statement of claim. What SOCAN is asking from the festival is "simple," Alonso said, adding that SOCAN doesn't accept the FEQ's argument. "They are paying everybody, the vendors, the technicians, the artists on stage, but they don't pay the license fees," he said. He said SOCAN is open to negotiating with the festival outside the courts. "If they want to come and have that conversation and find a solution for the payment, we are still open," he said. No specific amount of money is claimed in the lawsuit. Alonso says it should equal three per cent of the festival's revenue for paid events or three per cent of the artist performance fee for free events. It's information that the FEQ hasn't disclosed to SOCAN, he says, making it impossible to estimate the amount they could be owed. CBC News reached out to the FEQ about prior exchanges with SOCAN on this issue. In an emailed statement, they declined to comment. How common is this? SOCAN enforcing copyright laws is nothing new. The organization often does so for smaller venues, including restaurants and theatres, says Madeleine Lamothe-Samson, a lawyer specializing in copyright law. "What's new is that SOCAN is now suing some very well known festival," she said. Compared to those who run local restaurants, and who might be unaware of the intricacies of licensing and royalty fees, she says music festivals ought to know their obligations. In 2022, SOCAN successfully sued a local restaurant in Alberta for copyright infringement and was entitled to nearly $150,000. In 2019, it sued another restaurant for just under $25,000. What is the FEQ's claim? In a statement sent to Radio-Canada on Friday, the festival has denied any wrongdoing. It maintains it was well within its right as a registered charity. The festival, also known as the Festival d'Été International de Québec (FEIQ), has been a registered charity since 1974. By virtue of its mission and legal status, the festival claims it is exempt under the Copyright Act from the payment of royalties to authors, composers and publishers. Copyright lawyer, Madeleine Lamothe-Samson, says this claim has no merit. "It's irrelevant. You still pay your electricity bill if you're a charity, you've got to pay," she said. "They know they don't have any argument," said Ysolde Gendreau, professor of law at the Université de Montréal (UdeM) specializing in copyright law. She added that the festival is likely using a common tactic: "They probably say 'I won't bother [to pay] and eventually if they really mean something, they'll sue me,'" she said. What's next? Lamothe-Samson sees a straightforward resolution to this case, suspecting it will not proceed to trial and will instead be settled before the next edition of the festival. Gendreau agrees with this outcome, but also sees the lawsuit as a potential "warning" to other venues who aren't paying SOCAN. "If the user does not want to pay, then it cannot play the music," she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store