Anti-Trump Rally in Austin: After Minnesota shooting, Texas lawmakers warned about threats targeting legislators
AP People form a human banner at Ocean Beach during the "No Kings" protests in San Francisco on Saturday, June 14, 2025. (Santiago Mejia/San Francisco Chronicle via AP)
The Texas Department of Public Safety has issued a security warning to state lawmakers and staff. The alert came ahead of a planned protest against President Donald Trump at the Capitol in Austin. The warning follows a shooting involving Minnesota lawmakers earlier the same day.On Saturday, Texas lawmakers received a warning from the Department of Public Safety. The alert mentioned credible threats linked to a scheduled anti-Trump protest in Austin. The warning was issued around 1 p.m., a Texas Tribune report said. A DPS spokesperson confirmed that the Capitol was evacuated shortly afterward.
The Texas DPS stated it is working with local, state and federal law enforcement. Their aim is to ensure safety for both the public and state property. They also want to protect people exercising their rights to free speech and assembly. The protest is scheduled for 5 p.m. in downtown Austin.
Also Read: Nintendo Switch 2 Restock: Is new console available at My Nintendo Store, Walmart, Target, GameStop, Best Buy, Amazon, Costco and Staples? Here's how to buy Switch 2 and price
Several Democratic officials plan to speak at the event. These include US Representatives Greg Casar and Lloyd Doggett. State Representatives Lulu Flores and John Bucy III will also attend, along with State Senator Sarah Eckhardt. The event is part of larger protests taking place across the country on the same day.
Protests against Trump's administration are being held in many cities. Participants are speaking out against his immigration policies and governance style. The protests coincide with a planned military parade in Washington, D.C. The parade marks Trump's birthday and the US Army's 250th anniversary.Also Read: Echo Valley: New thriller's release date, where to watch, storyline, creative team and cast
Earlier on Saturday, a man dressed as a police officer shot two Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses. Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were killed. Senator John Hoffman and his wife were also injured. The incidents occurred at their homes, according to the Associated Press.Texas House Administration Chair Charlie Geren informed staff that officials are taking all necessary steps. He noted the event seems isolated for now. However, authorities remain alert to prevent copycat incidents or related threats.
Why did Texas lawmakers receive a security alert?
They received a warning due to threats tied to an anti-Trump rally, especially after a shooting involving Minnesota legislators earlier that day.
Who are the victims in the Minnesota shooting incident?
Minnesota Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband died. Senator John Hoffman and his wife were also shot at their homes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump praises military force at US Army's 250th anniversary parade
President Donald Trump praised the United States Army as the 'greatest, fiercest and bravest fighting force' at the conclusion of a grand display of military might in the nation's capital Saturday as the Army celebrated its 250th birthday with a parade. 'Time and again, America's enemies have learned that if you threaten the American people, our soldiers are coming for you. Your defeat will be certain, your demise will be final, and your downfall will be total and complete,' Trump said Saturday, offering a stark message amid a time of conflict across the globe. 'The Army keeps us free, you make us strong, and tonight, you have made all Americans very proud,' Trump told US Army soldiers gathered at the National Mall. Show more Show less
Hindustan Times
43 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Israel strikes Iran's gas fields: Why is South Pars indispensable for Tehran?
Tel Aviv and Tehran's military conflict escalated on Saturday as the Israeli army struck the world's biggest gas field in Iran, threatening the latter's energy security, which is highly dependent on the domestic oil and gas production sector. Iran's South Pars gas field, which it shares with Qatar, was on fire after Israel's precision strikes. The fire was extinguished. However, the attack shows that Israel will go for Iran's economic backbone if the conflict escalates further. The South Pars field is located offshore in Iran's southern Bushehr province. Iran is the world's third-largest gas producer after the US and Russia. It produces around 275 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas per year, or some 6.5% of global gas output. However, because of the US sanctions on exports, it is forced to consume the fuel domestically. It shares the field with Qatar, which produces 77 million tonnes of liquefied gas; it supplies the gas to several nations in Europe and Asia. The attack can potentially disturb the global oil pricing. The attack heightens the risk to oil infrastructure in Iran, OPEC's third-biggest producer, and to shipments from elsewhere in the region. South Pars provides roughly two-thirds of the country's supplies. 'It's going to be pretty significant,' Richard Bronze, head of geopolitics at consultant Energy Aspects Ltd., said of Saturday's attacks. 'We appear to be in an escalatory cycle,' and there will be 'questions about whether Israel is going to target more Iranian energy infrastructure,' he added. Iran has been facing an energy crisis for a long time, with some areas facing the worst power outages in decades. The Iran Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture estimated that these blackouts cost the cippled economy about $250 million a day. 'This is a significant escalation,' said Jorge Leon, an analyst at Rystad Energy A/S who previously worked at the OPEC secretariat, said of the onslaught on Saturday.'This is probably the most important attack on oil and gas infrastructure since Abqaiq,' Leon said, referring to the 2019 strike that briefly crippled one of Saudi Arabia's key oil-processing plants. Also read: Iran Israel war news live updates: 'We can easily get a deal done, end this bloody conflict' says Trump amid strikes In the 1970s, Iran's oil production was at its peak, with the nation accounting for 10 per cent of the world's output at the time. However, after the 1979 revolution, the US crippled the Iranian economy by announcing sweeping sanctions on Tehran. The United States tightened sanctions in 2018 after Trump exited a nuclear accord during his first presidential term. Iran's oil exports fell to nearly zero for some months. China is the biggest importer of Iranian oil. It says it does not recognise sanctions against its trade partners. The main buyers of Iranian oil are Chinese private refiners, some of whom have recently been placed in the US Treasury sanctions list. If Israel attacks Iran's oil and gas production, it may also impact China, the United States' biggest strategic and economic rival. Analysts, however, say Saudi Arabia and other OPEC members could compensate for the drop of Iranian supply by using their spare capacity to pump more. With inputs from Bloomberg, Reuters
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Trump Accuses China Of Breaking Trade Agreement After Brief Tariff Truce
President Donald Trump has publicly accused China of breaching their recent trade agreement, expressing frustration after attempting to ease tensions between the world's two largest economies. The President's criticism comes as trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing have reached a standstill, requiring direct intervention from both leaders to move forward. Trump's allegations follow his decision last month to impose a massive 145 percent tariff on Chinese imports, which he claims brought China to the brink of economic crisis. The unprecedented tariffs severely restricted China's ability to trade with the United States, leading to factory closures and what Trump described as civil unrest within China. In a detailed post on his Truth Social platform, Trump explained his reasoning for initially offering China relief from the punitive tariffs. He stated that witnessing China's economic distress prompted him to negotiate a quick agreement to prevent what he anticipated would be a catastrophic situation for the Asian nation. The President emphasized that his intervention helped stabilize China's economy and allowed normal business operations to resume. However, Trump now claims that China has completely violated the terms of their agreement, leading to his public declaration of disappointment with being cooperative. The President's frustration reflects his belief that his goodwill gesture was not reciprocated by Chinese compliance with the negotiated terms. The trade dispute had appeared to find temporary resolution earlier this month when both nations agreed to reduce their respective tariffs. The United States lowered its tariff rate from 145 percent to 30 percent on Chinese goods, while China reciprocated by reducing its tariffs on American products from 125 percent to 10 percent. This mutual reduction was established as part of a 90-day trial period designed to defuse escalating trade tensions. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed that trade discussions have stalled and require direct engagement between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to achieve progress. Bessent noted that while the temporary agreement helped stabilize financial markets, it failed to address fundamental American concerns regarding China's state-controlled economic structure. The initial agreement emerged from intensive negotiations held in Geneva, Switzerland, marking the first high-level diplomatic talks between the two nations since Trump implemented the steep tariffs on Chinese imports. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer had announced the tariff reductions as part of efforts to prevent a full-scale trade war. Legal challenges have also complicated the trade relationship, with a US trade court recently ruling that Trump exceeded his presidential authority when imposing most tariffs under emergency powers legislation. However, a federal appeals court quickly reinstated the tariffs while reviewing the government's appeal, with response deadlines set for early June. The Trump administration has simultaneously expanded its trade focus to include negotiations with other major economic partners, including Japan, India, and the European Union. This broader approach suggests the administration is seeking to diversify America's trade relationships while addressing ongoing disputes with China. The current impasse highlights the complexity of resolving trade disputes between the world's two largest economies, where economic policies intersect with broader geopolitical considerations and domestic political pressures in both nations.
