
New discounts could reduce energy costs from 1 July but there are other options
Adam Corrigan, an energy efficiency expert and founder of Your Energy Friend, says each household is different, and there are many other energy-saving options to consider before spending thousands on solar and batteries.
Bolger, who lives in the Victorian town of Great Western, says he installed 30 panels on his eight-bedroom home in March 2023. He rents out rooms in his house to boarders and says they use a lot of electricity as they often have the air-conditioning and heating on. His 12-kilowatt system cost him $12,680 after rebates and other discounts, which he estimated he could recoup in around six years. But the feed-in tariff at the time was around 12 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh), and now he only gets around 6 cents. More drops are expected, with comparison website Finder saying the minimum rate for tariffs in Victoria will drop to 0.04 cents from 1 July, although better rates are available depending on the provider. Fifteen years ago, they were as high as 60 cents.
Bolger estimates his original feed-in tariff of 12c per kWh would have saved him around $1,000 a year. When combined with the estimated $1,000 worth of electricity he saves relying on energy generated from his own system, he receives a total benefit of $2,000 per year from his solar panels. If the feed-in tariff drops to practically zero, the benefit from his panels will reduce to around $1000 a year, meaning the time Bolger would need to pay off his panels would almost double. He says the experience has made him "indifferent" about the economic benefits of solar and he won't be recommending it to others.
Bolger doesn't believe installing a battery will make a difference, because his solar panels won't generate enough excess energy to store — especially in winter when it's often raining and dark — to make the purchase worthwhile. "My summer bills were ridiculously low. In winter, you will not generally get enough charge into the battery to make a big difference," he says.
Corrigan says other households might be in a different position to Bolger, as the average NSW home only uses about 20kWh of electricity per day. The NSW-based energy expert, who has a 1.5 kilowatt solar system, says he uses less than 10 kilowatt-hours a day, although his cooktop is powered by gas. "[For] most homes, a 10 kilowatt or 14 kilowatt battery will get you through the night easily," he says. "However, if you are cranking your air conditioner and you've got ducted air conditioning, it's probably only going to last you two, three hours." Corrigan says batteries will work for some households and the new federal rebate does make the cost more affordable.
A battery makes so much sense, because you can store that excess electricity you're generating in the middle of the day and then use it in the early evening. Finder has estimated the cost of a 10kWh battery could come down to between $6,713 – $8,904 due to the federal discount. "In Australia, the average household uses about 15 to 20kWh of electricity per day," a Finder spokesperson says.
"If most of your energy consumption is in the evening and you're paying a single electricity rate — let's use 32.34c per kWh as an average based on single-rate plans in our database — then with a 10kWh battery and using 80 per cent of its capacity, you could save about $850 a year," a Finder spokesperson says. "However, the actual savings can vary depending on the type of electricity plan you have, the rates you pay, your solar panel setup, your energy consumption patterns, and how much electricity you export back to the grid." While the federal battery discount applies nationally, the states and territories also have programs that can be used to further reduce the cost.
Corrigan recommends considering other options before investing in expensive solar panels and battery systems. He suggests Bolger should review his insulation and energy efficiency measures to reduce his electricity consumption. The first thing he recommends for households is to analyse their power bills and shop around to get the best deal. Making your house more energy-efficient should be the next priority before considering solar panels and, finally, batteries.
If you want to make your home more comfortable, get your insulation sorted and do your draft proofing. That's your best return on investment. That's your best bang for buck. Corrigan says simple changes such as installing heavy-lined curtains and a box pelmet (which goes around the top of the curtain) can be very effective at keeping your home warm, and are much cheaper than double-glazed windows, for example.
Using a thermal camera around the home can also show gaps in roof insulation where batteries might have been moved. "You only need a 5 per cent gap in that insulation blanket, and the effectiveness of that insulation — the whole blanket — diminishes by almost a half," Corrigan says. "When you get into bed tonight and you pull the doona up, just cut some holes in it, see how well it works."
When considering whether to invest in a battery system, Corrigan says the first consideration is cost, as they are expensive and many people don't have the money sitting in the bank. Those who already have a solar system should check whether their inverter is battery-compatible, as this could also raise warranty issues if it needs to be replaced. Another consideration is what your next car will be.
Corrigan says in one to two years, electric vehicles will be capable of vehicle-to-home and vehicle-to-grid functionality, allowing EV batteries to be used to power your home. "Some people are already doing it," he says. They are an attractive option because EV batteries generally have a huge capacity of around 50-70kWh. "You could run your home for days on it."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
Jim Chalmers' three-day roundtable builds consensus on road user charge, clearing housing approvals backlog
Progressing road user charging and clearing a backlog on homes awaiting environmental approvals are among the 10 immediate reform directions to result from a three-day roundtable aimed to boost Australia's ailing productivity levels. Speaking after talks ended on Thursday, Jim Chalmers said there was 'a lot of conceptual support for road user charging', however no final model had been settled. The next steps will involve presenting an options paper to state treasurers at a meeting in two weeks on September 5, which would be drafted by NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey, Infrastructure Minister Catherine King and other relevant ministers. 'The model is not determined, but the key considerations are what's in and out and whether that's sequenced or not and over how long a time period,' he said. 'Treasurer Mookhey was very informed and very constructive on this question and really right around the table people had a view that this is an idea whose time has come and so we will do that work.' The charge, which would likely capture EV drivers currently exempt from the fuel excise, would reform how the government collects revenue to fund road maintenance and infrastructure upgrades. Other short-term reform initiatives involve fast-tracking deadlocked reforms on the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act to speed up approvals for projects while protecting the environment, and further work to remove nuisance tariffs and regulation reductions. Speeding up housing approvals was another 'quick win' which achieved consensus following 29 hours of discussions, with Environmental Minister Murray Watt set to work with Housing Minister Clare O'Neil to speed through the 'backlog of environmental approvals for new homes, most likely in the tens of thousands'. Longer-term reform areas included investigating prefabricated and modular housing, plus more modern methods of construction to increasing housing supply. Mr Chalmers also highlighted three priority areas of tax reform, which dominated the last day of talks, and appeared to achieve little consensus beyond agreement on the need for reform. This included improving intergenerational equality, 'affordable, responsible' offsets to 'incentivise business investment', and a simpler and more sustainable system to fund services such as aged care and the NDIS. 'There are hundreds of different changes you can make to the tax system. Some of them obviously unpalatable to our government or to governments broadly,' he said. 'But what they wanted to do was to give us the guidance that they will help us in those three areas to do the work that we need to do to inform future budgets.' Speaking more broadly about the roundtable, which had been criticised as a 'talkfest' and a 'stitch up' by the opposition, Mr Chalmers said he 'finished the three days more optimistic than I was at the start'. He also praised participants for working through the issues in a 'methodical, considered, consultative way'. 'I'm genuine when I say at the end of that three days I looked around the table and I saw people of, you know, big achievers in their own areas representing workers, business CEOs, academics, economists, public servants and others,' he said. 'I drew great strength and confidence from their contributions because not because they had some kind of faux camaraderie, but because they take the challenge so seriously.'

News.com.au
8 hours ago
- News.com.au
No winning Powerball entry, with prize jackpotting to $50m for next Thursday
Powerball has soared to $50m after there was no winning entry in Thursday night's draw. The winning numbers for Thursday night's Powerball draw 1527 were: 12, 18, 16, 1, 14, 4, and 8, with the Powerball number 14. No one took home the $30m Division 1 prize, which means the jackpot has increased another $20m for next Thursday's Powerball. However, despite no Division 1 winners, four Division 2 winners pocketed $147,381 each. Another 79 players each won $9,277.50 in Division 3, with $427.15 each won by 1492 players in Division 4. Next week's $50m jackpot won't be the biggest, with three $100m Powerball prizes going off over the financial year. But the winner of the last $100m jackpot is still a mystery, nearly three months after the draw. The entry was bought at Sydney's Bondi Junction Newsagency for draw 1217, which was drawn on June 12, making them the third-largest lottery winner in the country. However, the victorious ticketholder has yet to come forward to claim their winnings despite the best efforts of the Lott to locate them. The winner has six years to claim the prize. Meanwhile, the Lottery Corporation, which runs Powerball and other lottery games, announced on Wednesday that it would 'refresh' to the Powerball game and increase the cost of an entry. Managing director and chief executive Sue van der Merwe flagged changes to the Powerball game from November, where the entry price per game would rise from $1.20 to $1.40. But she said that would result in 'increases to prize offers and retailer commissions'.

ABC News
8 hours ago
- ABC News
Are ten storey apartment buildings coming to a street near you?
ADAM HARVEY, REPORTER: This elegant home in Sydney's inner west faded over time. Kerri Kennedy bought it 30 years ago. KERRI KENNEDY: It was definitely the ugly duckling in the street. We kind of lived with that for a good 20-odd years, raised our kids here and then we finally sort of managed to get enough together to give it some love and try to bring it back to the original look. ADAM HARVEY: Restoring it was a labour of love. KERRI KENNEDY: All the bricks that we took down we cleaned and recycled. We did all that ourselves so it was very hands on. The whole family was involved. ADAM HARVEY: Now this part of Marrickville is set to be transformed and the entire street, let alone Kerri's house, is unlikely to survive. KERRI KENNEDY: In the colour coding that the council are using, we're in the red zone, which is the highest residential zoning that they're proposing. So, I think right here would be eight to 12 stories, yeah. ADAM HARVEY: To tackle a shortage of affordable housing, the New South Wales Government is encouraging development by rezoning streets close to transport and shopping areas. In the inner west, the local council has come up with its own plan that's even bigger than the state government's proposal. Mayor Darcy Byrne says it's all about keeping the area affordable. DARCY BYRNE, MAYOR OF INNER WEST COUNCIL: We're seeing an exodus of young people from the inner west. People who've lived here all their lives, who love the place and want to live here into the future but simply can't find a home that they can afford. ADAM HARVEY: Here in Sydney's inner west Jersey Street, Marrickville is at the heart of the changes. Rezoning means that big apartment buildings are coming - around ten stories. And that'll suit some residents because when developers come knocking - and they will - they'll offer as much as double the market value. But for some cash is cold comfort as the reasons they moved here in the first place vanish. KERRI KENNEDY: We're not here to make money, we're here to live. DARCY BYRNE: I tell you what, if the exodus of young people from the inner west continues, we lose the heart and soul of the place. And so, character and heritage, that's not just about buildings, it's about people as well. ADAM HARVEY: That's tough for some of the young families who already live here. Alyce Umback bought her first home here last year. ALICE UMBACK: We've formed a little village of neighbours who care about our family and always make a point of saying hello when you see them on the street. It's just a really lovely close community vibe. ADAM HARVEY: She heard of the proposed rezoning via a pamphlet in her letterbox. ALICE UMBACK: It's like seeing everything you've worked so hard for just dissolve into meaninglessness. We didn't buy this place to get a short term, you know, super high windfall on an investment. We bought it because we wanted to live here for at least a couple of decades, for our kids to go to the local school, to know our neighbours, to form a sense of community. DARCY BYRNE: No one will have to leave, no one will be forced to sell their home. The only thing that will occur is that if people in a rezoned area choose to sell their home in the future, it will be for a higher value. So, a home that was worth $2.5 million before might be worth $3.5 million in the future. ALICE UMBACK: But if you've got a nine storey plus high rise going up right next to your backyard that blocks out all of the sunlight permeation into your home and eliminates any privacy you've got, would you want to live next to it is what I, I just don't think it's for us. ADAM HARVEY: Alyce says increasing housing supply doesn't mean the new homes will be any cheaper. ALICE UMBACK: I'm not against the greater investment in social and affordable housing. Unfortunately, that's not want council is proposing. I think it's 2 per cent dedicated to affordable housing. ADAM HARVEY: The council says it's still working on what proportion of the new homes will be 'not for profit' housing. Planning minister Paul Scully says the scale and speed of the changes is partly because of decades of overly tight restrictions on development. Is this not a way of saying that councils made it too hard for too long? PAUL SCULLY, NSW PLANNING MINISTER: Yes, put simply we didn't build enough homes in New South Wales for a long, long time. In New South Wales we've been building six homes per thousand people for the last few years, the last decade or so. In Queensland and Victoria, they've been building eight and nine. As a result, Sydney has become the second most expensive city on the planet. ADAM HARVEY: The changes are happening across Sydney. A 75-minute drive from Marrickville, in Sydney's Hills district, the commuter carpark for the new metro line fills early. MICHELLE BYRNE, MAYOR OF THE HILLS SHIRE COUNCIL: Usually by 7.30 every morning. Same with every commuter car park across the Hills. So, if you're not there early enough, you're not getting a spot. ADAM HARVEY: And more people are coming – a lot more. MICHELLE BYRNE: It is a TOD. So it's a transport orientated development. So, it's been rezoned for 11,300 units. So, in that one K between the two metros will be at least 23,300 people and that's denser than the middle of the CBD in Sydney. ADAM HARVEY: She says the area just isn't ready. MICHELLE BYRNE: And we've got schools that are crumbling. We've got a primary school that has toilets from the 1950s. We've got a high school that's got 51 demountables. We've got a wi-fi problem. Our schools sporting fields are also at capacity, clubs are turning kids away from playing sports. ADAM HARVEY: Paul Scully says the new homes were always coming and the roads, hospitals and schools will get there, soon. PAUL SCULLY: The Hills is part of the northwest growth area. It's long been identified as an area for future growth, and we've set housing targets on the basis of that continued growth. This is not something that was not ever going to be realised in the Hills. Perhaps it's quicker than the mayor and the council might've liked, but the reality is we're matching that housing growth with investment in the services that those communities need to make up for the infrastructure deficit that we inherited, and the Hills were left by the previous government. ADAM HARVEY: The new zoning rules restrict the ability of councils to block developments. MICHELLE BYRNE: I welcome new housing in the Hills. I want everyone to come and live in the Hills. It's the greatest place on earth, but we need the infrastructure to go with it.