‘My son was cut out of BBC's Harry and Meghan wedding highlights because he is black'
Sheku Kanneh-Mason was chosen to perform at the 2018 ceremony, held at St George's Chapel, Windsor.
His mother, Kadiatu, said she was dismayed to see that he was cut from the BBC highlights coverage, and was not featured in newspapers the next day.
She suggested that the media did not know how to deal with a black cellist, as classical music was normally the preserve of white musicians.
Speaking at the Hay Festival, in Wales, Mrs Kanneh-Mason said: 'When Sheku played at the royal wedding, that night he was not in any of the BBC highlights. So there was the choir, there was the preacher but he was left out as though he hadn't been there.
'The next morning, we looked through all the papers. He was not there. So they decided that he was going to be absent. And we thought, what's going on here?
'I think what it was: the gospel choir was doing what it was supposed to do. The preacher was doing what he was supposed to do. But a black cellist? A black cellist cancels itself out … he's not doing what he's supposed to be doing, he's not doing a black thing. That's really interesting, unpacking what the media thinks we're supposed to do.'
Sheku, the first black winner of the BBC Young Musician competition, was chosen to perform at the wedding after the Duke saw him play at a charity event. He played three pieces of music at the ceremony.
The wedding also featured gospel singers The Kingdom Choir, who performed Stand By Me, and American preacher Rt Rev Michael Curry, who was the first black presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church.
His sermon, which centred on the redemptive power of love, was well-received and drew significant attention.
The London-based choir, which features 30 singers and was formed in 1994, found fame after the wedding. They were regularly asked to perform and signed a record deal with Sony Music UK.
Mrs Kanneh-Mason has written a book, To Be Young, Gifted and Black, about Sheku and his six musically gifted siblings, exploring 'issues of cultural, racial and national identity'.
She said of Sheku entering the BBC Young Musician competition: 'I panicked because he had a massive afro at that point and I thought, 'If he goes on the stage with that… the judges are not going to believe he's a classical musician. Should we make him a bit more formal?'
'In the end, he went on as himself but we had to think about that: what the presentation was, what the image was. It's one of those things going on all the time.'
Mrs Kanneh-Mason said that her daughter, Konya, a pianist, was racially abused by an audience member while a student at the Royal Academy of Music.
She said a man came up to her daughter and said 'I think you played beautifully – I don't know, because I was looking at your body all the time.
'Then he said, 'You shouldn't be here, because you people are taking all the jobs from the white musicians who should be here'. And she looked around and thought, 'I am the only black musician, the only black person in this room, so whose job am I taking?''
Asked about her children suffering 'micro-aggressions', Mrs Kanneh-Mason said: 'They're called micro-aggressions but actually they're maxi-aggressions. They happen all the time. And having to navigate that on a daily basis is very difficult.'
A BBC spokesman said: 'BBC News reported widely on Sheku Kanneh-Mason's role in the 2018 royal wedding including news that he was selected to play, multiple stories of how the day unfolded and on the impact of his performance.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
Judge Judy recreates controversial American verdicts and challenges viewers in ‘Justice on Trial'
EXCLUSIVE – Judge Judith Sheindlin helps recreate some of the most controversial court cases in American history in her new show, 'Justice on Trial.' The show, which was over 10 years in the making and finally premiered on Prime Video last Monday, revisits eight of the most monumental court cases in American memory — allowing the viewer to decide if justice was truly served with each verdict. The main lawyers featured on the show are Larry Bakman and Daniel Mentzer. Advertisement Episode seven features a re-telling of 'Snyder v. Phelps,' in which a grieving father, Albert Snyder, sued Fred Phelps and his followers at the Westboro Baptist Church for emotional distress after church members protested his son Matthew's military funeral. The churchgoers, as depicted in the episode, carried signs reading, 'God Hates Your Son,' 'Thank God for Dead Soldiers,' and 'Thank God for 9/11,' to protest the military's tolerance of homosexuality. 7 The show, which was over 10 years in the making and finally premiered on Prime Video last Monday. Michael Becker/Prime 7 The main lawyers featured on the show are Larry Bakman and Daniel Mentzer. Michael Becker/Prime As Snyder noted during the trial, his son was not gay. The protesters were protesting the military at-large. The court showdown highlighted the legal boundaries of protected speech when it conflicts with potential harm to others. Advertisement A jury in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland agreed with Snyder and awarded him a total of $10.9 million, which the judge lowered to $5 million. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the judgment, holding that Phelps' speech was protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court upheld the Fourth Circuit's ruling. The fiery Sheindlin had an opinion on the matter. While she and others may find the protesters' signs 'abhorrent,' she intoned that the Constitution does protect free speech. 7 A jury in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland agreed with Snyder and awarded him a total of $10.9 million. Courtesy of Prime 'Totally uncaring for people who are religious people, totally uncaring about the emotional trauma that that kind of demonstration might have on the family,' Sheindlin said of the Westboro protests in an interview with Fox News Digital. 'And yet the Supreme Court said in its decision that they had a right to express their views, even though their views were maybe abhorrent to the vast majority of Americans. I suppose you have to be able to… I wouldn't want to tolerate seeing the American flag burned in protest in America. Just wouldn't. It would offend me. But you have the right to do it. Is there a law that proscribes it? And I'd say probably not.' Advertisement So how do Americans reconcile their anger at a verdict with the Court's constitutional responsibilities? Sheindlin began her answer by referencing the movie 'American President.' 'I mean, we all would like our presidents to be like Michael Douglas, correct?' she said. 'And he said something at the end, but he's making the big speech at the end. He said, 'As an American, America is not easy, and you have to be able to defend somebody burning a flag, the American flag, as a protest, if you're going to insist that freedom of speech and expression exists.' And while we are all offended, it just didn't seem right that for no apparent reason, with no knowledge of who this young man was who was killed, just because they had a cause, they didn't care what the collateral damage was emotionally to the family of this young man.' 7 Judge Judy Sheindlin presiding over a courtroom trial. Courtesy of Prime 7 Judge Judy said there was one case, in particular, that spurred her to want to create 'Justice on Trial' and that may also leave some Americans feeling like justice may have taken a walk. Courtesy of Prime Advertisement Judge Judy said there was one case, in particular, that spurred her to want to create 'Justice on Trial' and that may also leave some Americans feeling like justice may have taken a walk. 'It was a case that happened in New York many, many years ago,' she shared. 'Two young thugs decided to rob an old man on the subway. Believe it or not, I remember the man's name. His name was Jerome Sandusky, and he was a man well in his 70s. And one of them was acting as a lookout. The other one went down the stairs with the pretty deserted platform and was beating up this old man in an attempt to take his watch and cash. And a transit police officer heard the screams of the old man coming from the subway, and he ran down into the subway. Pulled out his revolver and said, 'Stop, police!' And the young thug ran off and was running up the stairs. Police said, 'Stop, police!' He didn't stop, and the police officer shot him. And he shot him in the back as he was fleeing.' Then things got tricky in court and the situation seemed to turn on the victim. 7 Then things got tricky in court and the situation seemed to turn on the victim. Courtesy of Prime 7 'The young man pled guilty to the robbery, was sentenced, but hired a lawyer who sued the transit authority in the city of New York and received a judgment, a jury verdict for $4.3 million,' Sheindlin continued. Michael Becker/Prime 'The young man pled guilty to the robbery, was sentenced, but hired a lawyer who sued the transit authority in the city of New York and received a judgment, a jury verdict for $4.3 million,' Sheindlin continued. 'And then Mr. Sandusky, who took a very long time to recover from his physical wounds, but who would, you know — if you're a crime victim emotionally, you really never get over being a victim of violent crime. And Mr. Sandusky, he said, 'Well, that's sort of outrageous. I was the victim.' And so he hired a lawyer because now this thug had $4.3 million and his lawsuit was barred by the statute of limitations. So there are many facets to that case. Whether or not, ultimately, justice was served is an issue. And if you ask 10 people, given those set of facts, you will get at least eight different opinions.' Advertisement All eight episodes of 'Justice on Trial' are streaming now on Prime Video. Other cases covered by the series include the famous Scopes Monkey trial, Gideon v. Wainwright and People v. Turriago. In the latter case, troopers stopped Leonardo Turriago for a speeding violation on the New York State Thruway, which led police to discover a decomposing body locked in a steamer trunk. The episode explores the question of whether or not the search of the truck was legal. The series is created and executive produced by Sheindlin. Casey Barber, David Carr and Randy Douthit are also executive producers. Amy Freisleben is a co-executive producer.
Boston Globe
26 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Tom Lehrer's influence on political satire is still playing out today
Advertisement Lehrer proved not just that the absurdity of American life could be an endlessly replenishing source of comedy, but that there was a decent-sized audience for that comedy. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up As Lehrer's subject matter encompassed the nuclear arms race ('Who's Next,' 'A Song for World War III,' 'We Will All Go Together When We Go'), organized religion ('Vatican Rag'), the sanctimony of self-satisfied liberals ('The Folk Song Army'), bigotry ('I Wanna Go Back to Dixie,' 'National Brotherhood Week'), military might as a tool of diplomacy ('Send the Marines'), saccharine nostalgia ('My Home Town,' 'Bright College Days'), the falsity of Hemingway-style glamorization of bullfighting ('In Old Mexico'), and unusual forms of recreation ('Poisoning Pigeons in the Park'). Advertisement Few satirists have zeroed in on contradiction, hypocrisy, or inanity with more scalpel-like precision than Lehrer. In the prescient 'Pollution,' he sang: 'Pollution, pollution/ You can use the latest toothpaste/And then rinse your mouth with industrial waste.' With 'Whatever Became of Hubert?', Lehrer lampooned onetime liberal lion Hubert Humphrey, whose voice grew muted after he agreed to be Lyndon B. Johnson's vice president: 'Whatever became of Hubert?/Has anyone heard a thing?/Once he shone, on his own/Now he sits home alone/And waits for the phone to ring.' In 'Wernher von Braun,' Lehrer lampooned the morally flexible scientist who designed weapons for the Nazis and later worked for NASA, with the lyric, sung by Lehrer in a German accent: ''Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down?/That's not my department,' says Wernher von Braun.' Dressed in a suit and tie and accompanying himself on the piano, Lehrer loved to upend expectations. His 'I Hold Your Hand in Mine' starts off as a delicate ballad but quickly turns disconcertingly … literal. There was a genius to some of his rhymes. In 'Smut,' he sang: 'Who needs a hobby like tennis or philately?/I've got a hobby: rereading Lady Chatterley; But now they're trying to take it all away from us unless/We take a stand, and hand-in-hand we fight for freedom of the press/In other words: Smut!' Advertisement Growing up in Manhattan, Lehrer saw a lot of Broadway musicals. And it showed. His affection for Gilbert and Sullivan was also palpable, especially in 'The Elements,' a listing of the chemical elements set to the tune of their classic patter song 'I Am the Very Model of a Modern Major-General.' Lehrer contributed songs to NBC's satirical 'That Was the Week That Was' (1963-1965), a US version of a British show, and later released the songs in an album titled 'That Was the Year That Was.' In the early '80s, his songs formed the spine of 'Tomfoolery,' a musical revue presented in London and New York. His debut album, 'Songs by Tom Lehrer,' released in 1953, sold half-a-million copies, But part of Lehrer's mystique stemmed from how relatively soon he left the public stage. Academia was where he felt most at home, and that's where he spent most of his life. He taught math at Harvard (which he had entered as a student when he was only 15) and MIT. However much they mine similar territory, today's late-night TV hosts are different from Lehrer in one important respect: They are idealists. Disappointed idealists, to be sure, but idealists all the same. Not Lehrer, at least not on the evidence of his songs. What undergirds his comedy is a certain wised-up quality. Not disillusionment, because he had no illusions to shatter. Whereas today's political satirists seek not just to garner laughs but to change minds, you always got the sense that Lehrer was primarily interested in amusing himself. His brilliance was such that he ended up amusing the rest of us as well. Advertisement He famously said that 'Political satire became obsolete when Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.' Lehrer was wrong about that. And he himself was a big part of the reason why. Don Aucoin can be reached at
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
'Bend it Like Beckham' sequel coming more than 20 years after original's release
The film's director. Gurinder Chadha, is hopeful Keira Knightley and Parminder Nagra will return for the second installment. It's a rematch two decades in the making. "Bend it Like Beckham," the beloved women's soccer drama that has picked up a cult-like fandom since its 2002 release, is reportedly getting a sequel. Director Gurinder Chadha confirmed plans for the film to the BBC and Deadline, which was the first to report the news. "I'm excited to revisit the original characters and revive the enduring story and build on the legacy we helped to create for the women's game," Chadha told Deadline. The original movie, a rare sports dramedy, followed two young British women (Keira Knightley and Parminder Nagra) as they faced institutional and cultural stigma in the field of women's sports, with both falling for their coach (Jonathan Rhys Meyers) in the process. Chadha, who is also behind popular films like "Blinded by the Light" and "Angus, Thongs and Perfect Snogging," said that Nagra and Knightley – as well as costars Archie Panjabi, Juliet Stevenson and other members of the original cast – are aware that a sequel is in the works, but "obviously" want to read the script before they commit. "I'm pretty certain that everyone's going to want to come back," she told Deadline, adding: "Everything hinges on the script and if the original cast likes it. I am working really hard to make sure every character I bring back has a decent arc and scenes." With dribbling sequences and interspersed tributes to a young David Beckham, the movie is as much about soccer as it is about cultural assimilation and female friendship. That's in part why Chadha told both Deadline and BBC that she hopes to time the movie to the FIFA Women's World Cup in Brazil in 2027, also marking the original film's 25th anniversary. "We've been part of changing the game for women, so it felt like this was a good time for me to go back and investigate the characters," Chadha told the BBC. Referencing the Lionesses, the U.K.'s national women's soccer team, she argued that cultural attitudes had evolved since "Bend It" first hit theaters, but could still use an extra push. "A lot has changed since the original movie, but I think that people still don't think that women should play football," Chadha told the BBC. "There are people who still don't take it seriously, although the Lionesses are riding high." Along with the original cast, she hopes some of the Lionesses' prominent players will make cameos. News of the sequel falls into a growing trend in Hollywood of second installments coming many years after the original. With films like "Freakier Friday" and "The Devil Wears Prada 2," out now or on the horizon, studios seem keen to revisit beloved classics, years after the original bow was tied on the franchise.
