Brooklyn construction magnate gets probation for funneling illegal donations to NYC Mayor Eric Adams
Erden Arkan, 76, told Manhattan federal Judge Dale Ho that he regretted his 'poor judgments' in engaging in the straw donor scheme, which helped Adams fraudulently obtain public money for his 2021 mayoral bid under the city's matching funds program.
Ho cited Arkan's age and otherwise clean record in imposing the sentence, telling the Turkish-born businessman that his immigrant success story 'exemplifies the American dream.'
'I hope that you don't let this one mistake define you,' Ho told Arkan.
Arkan faced up to six months in prison under federal sentencing guidelines, but prosecutors and the federal probation officer agreed that no prison time was warranted. In addition to probation, he must also pay a $9,500 fine and $18,000 in restitution.
Arkan pleaded guilty in January to a conspiracy charge in Manhattan federal court. Weeks later, President Donald Trump's Justice Department pressured prosecutors to drop their underlying case against Adams, ultimately getting it dismissed.
In court Friday, Arkan's lawyer Jonathan Rosen blasted the government for continuing to pursue his case after getting Adams' charges dismissed.
'To put it mildly, this is a very unusual case. In fact, it is unprecedented,' Rosen argued.
In February, Justice Department leadership ordered Manhattan federal prosecutors to drop Adams' case, arguing that it was hindering the Democratic mayor's ability to assist the Republican administration's immigration crackdown.
Ho, who also oversaw the mayor's case, dismissed his charges in April. In a written opinion, he agreed it was the only practical outcome but also criticized what he said was the government's 'troubling' rationale for wanting the charges thrown out.
While Adams was spared, prosecutors continued to pursue related cases against Arkan and a former aide to the mayor, Mohamed Bahi.
Bahi, who served as City Hall's chief liaison to the Muslim community, pleaded guilty on Tuesday to soliciting straw donations for Adams' mayoral campaign from employees of a different Brooklyn construction company at a December 2020 fundraiser.
Arkan acknowledged in his January plea that he knowingly violated the law by reimbursing employees of his construction firm for their donations to Adams' campaign.
In brief remarks Friday, he apologized to city taxpayers who bankroll the matching funds program, telling Ho: 'I love this city. I dedicated my life to making it better. It pains me that I have harmed it.'
According to prosecutors, Adams personally solicited donations from Arkan and a Turkish consular official at an April 2021 dinner. The following month, Arkan held a fundraiser at the headquarters of his construction company, KSK, in which 10 employees donated between $1,200 and $1,500 to the campaign. They were later reimbursed by Arkan, making them illegal straw donations.
Adams then used those funds to fraudulently obtain public money under the city's matching funds program, which provides a generous match for small-dollar donations, prosecutors allege.
A well-known member of New York's Turkish community, Arkan's ties to Adams first emerged in November 2023 after federal investigators searched the businessman's home, along with the home of Adams' chief fundraiser and his liaison to the Turkish community.
Adams pleaded not guilty to bribery and other charges after a 2024 indictment accused him of accepting illegal campaign contributions and travel discounts from a Turkish official and others — and returning the favors by, among other things, helping Turkey open a diplomatic building without passing fire inspections.
At a Feb. 19 hearing that precipitated the dismissal of his case, Adams told Ho: 'I have not committed a crime.' The first-term mayor, a former police captain, skipped the June Democratic primary and is currently running for reelection as an independent.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
a minute ago
- Fox News
Shannon Bream Previews Trump's High-Stakes Summit With Putin
Anchor of 'Fox News Sunday' Shannon Bream joins Fox Across America With Jimmy Failla to shed light on the leverage President Trump has over Russian President Vladimir Putin as the two world leaders meet for a high-stakes summit in Alaska. 'That is one of the things that President Trump can hang over his head at this point. There's this massive sanctions package sitting there in the Senate. More than 80 senators have co-sponsored and they don't agree on anything at that level, but they want to drop this hammer on him about these sanctions that wouldn't only go after Russia, but they would hit trading partners like India and China too. And Trump is very much threatening a lot of sticks along with him, maybe a few carrots.' Brian Brenberg Stops By To Preview Trump's High-Stakes Summit With Putin Jimmy and Shannon also discuss what it would take to achieve a cease-fire between Russia and Ukraine. Listen to the podcast to hear the full segment!


CBS News
a minute ago
- CBS News
COPA investigating Chicago police-involved shooting in South Shore
The Civilian Office of Police Accountability said it is investigating a police-involved shooting in Chicago's South Shore neighborhood Friday afternoon. COPA said the shooting happened near 71st and Chappel some time after 2 p.m. They did not offer any further details. No further details were immediately available. It was not known how many officers or civilians were involved in the incident, and whether there was a shootout or just a shooting. CBS News Chicago has reached out to the Chicago Police Department for more information and are waiting to hear back. This is a breaking news story. Check back with CBS News Chicago for updates.


New York Times
a minute ago
- New York Times
Environmental Groups Sue Over D.O.E. Report Downplaying Climate Change
A new lawsuit in federal court alleges that the Trump administration violated the law by secretly recruiting a group of people who reject the scientific consensus on climate change to write a report downplaying global warming. The Environmental Defense Fund and the Union of Concerned Scientists, both environmental groups, accused the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency of 'flagrant violations' of a law that governs advisory committees. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on Tuesday. It alleges that in March Chris Wright, the energy secretary, 'quietly arranged for five handpicked skeptics of the effects of climate change' to form a committee called the Climate Working Group that then wrote a report downplaying the threat of rising greenhouse gas emissions. Lee Zeldin, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, cited the report to justify a plan to repeal the legal foundation for regulating climate pollution. But the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 does not allow federal agencies to recruit or rely on secret groups when engaging in policymaking, according to the lawsuit. The law requires that any groups developed to advise federal policy must be disclosed and that meetings, emails and other records be made public. 'This is one of the most brazen violations of federal law on one of the single most consequential issues to the lives of millions of Americans,' said Vickie Patton, general counsel for the Environmental Defense Fund. The lawsuit alleges that the agencies 'have sought to manufacture a basis to reject' widespread scientific agreement that the burning of fossil fuels is the primary contributor to global warming, and that swift action is needed to avoid the worst consequences. On Thursday the environmental groups filed a separate motion asking the court to block the E.P.A. from moving forward with a plan to repeal a scientific determination made by the government in 2009 that climate pollution harms public health and welfare. That assessment, known as the endangerment finding, is the basis for regulating greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. Officials with the Department of Energy did not respond to a request for comment. An E.P.A. official said the agency does not comment on current or pending litigation. The authors of the Department of Energy report were Steven E. Koonin, a physicist and author of a best-selling book that calls climate science 'unsettled'; Judith Curry, a climatologist who has cautioned of alarmism about warming; John Christy, an atmospheric scientist who doubts the extent to which human activity has caused global warming; Roy Spencer, a meteorologist at the University of Alabama, Huntsville; and Ross McKitrick, an economics professor at the University of Guelph in Canada. Dr. Koonin said in an email that he is not an attorney and not qualified to offer an opinion on the lawsuit. Dr. Curry said in an email that the Climate Working Group 'provided technical information to the DOE, not policy advice.' Dr. Christy declined to comment, and Dr. Spencer and Mr. McKitrick did not respond to requests for comment. Documents obtained by the Environmental Defense Fund under public records laws show that Dr. Koonin began contacting Trump administration officials within weeks of President Trump's inauguration. In one email exchange, Dr. Koonin reached out in February to Mr. Zeldin's chief of staff, Eric Amidon. 'I was told (through a mutual friend of mine and the Administrator's) that I should contact you to set up a meeting with Mr. Zeldin,' Dr. Koonin wrote. 'The subject is to offer technical assistance from me and colleagues in the review of the Endangerment Finding.' Mr. Amidon replied that the agency was 'moving right along on this topic' and said he would set up a call for Dr. Koonin with E.P.A. officials. On Friday Dr. Koonin said the call never occurred, writing in an email, 'A search of my records shows no further contact with the EPA (whether by phone, video, or in person)' after the Feb. 16 email exchange. Dr. Koonin did send Mr. Amidon a memo of what he called 'inconvenient truths' on climate change, including a claim widely rejected by mainstream scientists that 'there is no basis to conclude that human emissions enhance natural 'greenhouse' warming in any amount.'