logo
Top CIA Official's Son Killed Fighting for Russia: Father Speaks Out

Top CIA Official's Son Killed Fighting for Russia: Father Speaks Out

Newsweek26-04-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The father of an American who died while fighting for Russian forces in Ukraine has described his son as an anti-establishment champion who "would not hurt a flea."
Michael Gloss, 21, whose mother Juliane Gallina is CIA deputy director for digital innovation, was killed while in Ukraine's Donetsk region last April.
His father, Larry Gloss, an Iraq War veteran, told The Washington Post neither parent knew their son was fighting for Russia when they were informed by a State Department consular affairs official last June that he had been killed.
Larry Gloss told the Post that Michael struggled for most of his life with mental illness.
The CIA said in a statement that it was not a U.S. national security issue and Ralph Goff, a former senior CIA official in charge of operations in Europe and Eurasia described the death as a great tragedy for the parents.
Newsweek has contacted the CIA for comment.
This undated image from social media shows Michael Gloss in Red Square, Moscow.
This undated image from social media shows Michael Gloss in Red Square, Moscow.
Screen grab via social media
What To Know
The CIA confirmed the death of Michael Gloss, which had first been reported by Important Stories (iStories), an independent Russian investigative news outlet based outside Russia that has an English-language version.
Citing Russian government information and social media posts, the outlet documented Gloss' travels, which culminated in him joining the Russian army.
He left his home in Fairfax, Virginia, in January 2023 and traveled to Italy and then Turkey, where he helped to restore buildings damaged by an earthquake that year.
Larry Gloss told the Post his son went to the former Soviet republic of Georgia, where he attended a "Rainbow Family" counterculture movement gathering and the following month, told his parents he had crossed into Russia where he was going to meet friends from the group.
His parents were skeptical of the move but did not suspect he would join Russia's military. In social media posts, Gloss shared a photo of himself smiling in Moscow's Red Square and expressed sympathy for Russia's war effort.
In September 2023, Michael told his parents he wanted to stay in Russia and he then enlisted in the Russian military, according to iStories, which found a record of his recruitment in a Russian database.
Michael Gloss, an American citizen and the son of CIA Deputy Director for Digital Innovation Juliane Gallina Gloss, was killed in Ukraine while fighting on Russia's side. https://t.co/ECOivzGilW pic.twitter.com/OTxLvOP5a4 — Julia Davis (@JuliaDavisNews) April 25, 2025
IStories said Michael was sent to the Ukraine front in December 2023 and assigned to an assault unit, according to a Russian soldier in the 137th Airborne Regiment who said he knew him.
The regiment's units were stationed northwest of the city of Soledar in the Donetsk region and Russian forces moved to capture the besieged citadel of Bakhmut.
On the day Michael was killed, his division said on Telegram it had advanced backed by small assault groups and artillery.
Michael died on April 4, 2024, of massive blood loss during an artillery barrage, trying to aid a wounded comrade, Larry Gloss said, citing the Russian death certificate. The map below by the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) shows the state of the Bakhmut front line at the time.
He said his son wanted to become a Russian citizen, believing in Russia he could achieve his goal of building a water purifier to help those without access to clean water.
"I can only attribute it to his mental illness," Gloss told the Post, describing him as "the ultimate antiestablishment, anti-authority young man."
His funeral took place in December, and an obituary published the month before did not mention the war or Russia, saying that he "was forging his own hero's journey when he was tragically killed in Eastern Europe."
What People Are Saying
The CIA told NBC News that the death of Michael Gloss was "a private family matter for the Gloss family—not a national security issue. The entire CIA family is heartbroken for their loss."
Larry Gloss, per the Washington Post: "If you knew our son, he was the ultimate antiestablishment, anti-authority young man the minute he came into the world."
A former CIA official said per the Post: "For the parents, it's just a great tragedy."
What Happens Next
Without specifying which side he was fighting on, the CIA said in a statement that Michael Gloss' death was not a national security issue, suggesting there would be no further investigation.
Ralph Goff, a former senior CIA official who has traveled extensively in Ukraine, said that up to 3,000 Americans have gone to the battlefield to fight for Ukraine but only a small number have fought for Russia.
The outlet iStories has estimated that among Russian forces are troops from 48 countries and foreign soldiers are likely to continue to enlist.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Islamic State group claims first attack on Syrian government forces since Assad's fall

time29 minutes ago

Islamic State group claims first attack on Syrian government forces since Assad's fall

BEIRUT -- The Islamic State group has claimed responsibility for two attacks in southern Syria, including one on government forces that an opposition war monitor described as the first on the Syrian army to be adopted by the extremists since the fall of Bashar Assad. In two separate statements issued late Thursday, IS said that in the first attack, a bomb was detonated targeting a 'vehicle of the apostate regime,' leaving seven soldiers dead or wounded. It said the attack occurred 'last Thursday,' or May 22, in the al-Safa area in the desert of the southern province of Sweida. IS said that the second attack occurred this week in a nearby area during which a bomb targeted members of the U.S.-backed Free Syrian Army, claiming that it killed one fighter and wounded three. There was no comment from the government on the claim of the attack and a spokesperson for the Free Syrian Army didn't immediately respond to a request for comment by The Associated Press. The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said that the attack on government forces killed one civilian and wounded three soldiers, describing it as the first such attack to be claimed by IS against Syrian forces since the fall of the 54-year Assad family's rule in December. IS, which once controlled large parts of Syria and Iraq, is opposed to the new authority in Damascus led by President Ahmad al-Sharaa, who was once the head of al-Qaida's branch in Syria and fought battles against IS. Over the past several months, IS has claimed responsibility for attacks against the U.S.-backed and Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces in the northeast. IS was defeated in Syria in March 2019 when SDF fighters captured the last sliver of land that the extremists controlled. Since then, its sleeper cells have carried out deadly attacks, mainly in eastern and northeast Syria. In January, state media reported that intelligence officials in Syria's post-Assad government thwarted a plan by IS to set off a bomb at a Shiite Muslim shrine south of Damascus. Al-Sharaa met with U.S. President Donald Trump in Saudi Arabia earlier this month during which the American leader said that Washington would work on lifting crippling economic sanctions imposed on Damascus since the days of Assad. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement after the meeting that Trump urged al-Sharaa to diplomatically recognize Israel, 'tell all foreign terrorists to leave Syria' and help the U.S. stop any resurgence of the Islamic State group.

Tariff Ruling Threatens a $2 Trillion Fiscal Hole in Trump Plan
Tariff Ruling Threatens a $2 Trillion Fiscal Hole in Trump Plan

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tariff Ruling Threatens a $2 Trillion Fiscal Hole in Trump Plan

(Bloomberg) — The court ruling that blocked much of President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs threatens to blow what some economists estimate as a $2 trillion hole into the US fiscal outlook over the coming decade, should the judgment stay in place. NYC Congestion Toll Brings In $216 Million in First Four Months Now With Colorful Blocks, Tirana's Pyramid Represents a Changing Albania The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move NY Wins Order Against US Funding Freeze in Congestion Fight Why Arid Cities Should Stick Together The ruling could also present a new obstacle for Republicans who are relying on the revenue to help offset the cost of a roughly $4 trillion tax cut moving through Congress. 'At face value, this ruling will take away billions of dollars of prospective tariff revenue' annually, said Douglas Elmendorf a Harvard Kennedy School professor and former director of the Congressional Budget Office — a nonpartisan arm of the US legislature. A federal appeals court Thursday paused the Court of International Trade's Wednesday ruling striking down a swath of Trump's levies, and the White House is pushing to overturn the judgment entirely, aiming to appeal to the Supreme Court as soon as Friday. If the CIT ruling survives appeal, it would remove duties that would have raised nearly $200 billion on an annual basis, according to estimates by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Citigroup Inc. Trump and his aides had been relying on that increased revenue to get Republican lawmakers united behind the president's 'big beautiful bill' tax-cut package. The $2 trillion in added revenue over a decade would have gone some way towards offsetting the cost of the tax cuts, as measured by the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation, as the legislation's spending reductions aren't expected to cover even half the tab. Failing judicial success, Trump's trade team would have to stitch together duties using executive authority other than the one struck down. But the process would take months, and decisions could still end up facing legal challenges, economists say. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Fox News Thursday that 'anything that the courts do to get in the way both harms the American people in terms of trade and in terms of tariff revenue.' Even a short-term hit to revenue would pose problems: the government is currently barred from raising net new debt, and the Treasury has been using special accounting maneuvers to make good on payments. Monthly customs revenue just hit a record of over $16 billion, helping the department's cash flows. Barclays Plc warned that the court ruling will bring forward the date by when the Treasury will have exhausted its cash and extraordinary measures. That in turn builds pressure on Republicans to get the tax bill done, as it includes an increase in the debt limit. 'The fiscal outlook just got a lot worse as a result of this court ruling,' said Ernie Tedeschi, who is director of economics at Yale University's Budget Lab and a former Biden administration official. 'Very high tariffs just got less likely.' The Budget Lab also estimated revenues would be about $2 trillion lower over 10 years — roughly $700 billion compared with $2.7 trillion — if the court ruling stands, and current tariff levels remain in place. Wednesday's court ruling involved Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to threaten the highest tariff rates in more than a century. The April 2 'Liberation Day' tariffs involved a universal baseline levy of 10% plus much bigger rates for various trading partners — though Trump had put those on pause prior to the ruling. Bloomberg Economics estimated that the average US tariff rate got as high as nearly 27% at one point. The court ruling takes it below 6%. Other channels Trump has to impose tariffs include Section 232 authority to impose sectoral levies. The administration has already invoked it to set the stage for import taxes on items including smartphones and jet engines. Pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, lumber and other products are also being eyed for tariffs. Existing duties are in place on steel and autos, among others. 'There are other avenues to do the tariffs,' said Stephanie Roth, chief economist at Wolfe Research, who sees a $180 billion annual revenue hit from the court ruling. Economists at Citi, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley expect the administration will ultimately raise the tariff revenue it needs. White House Council of Economic Advisers Chair Stephen Miran on May 27 told Bloomberg Television the tariffs would take in hundreds of billions of dollars a year, helping alleviate concerns about the fiscal deficit. Those estimates have bolstered the Trump administration against charges that its tax bill blows a hole in the budget. 'The blatantly wrong claim that the one, big beautiful bill increases the deficit is based on the Congressional Budget Office and other scorekeepers who use shoddy assumptions,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday. They have 'historically been terrible at forecasting,' she said. After the House passed a version of the tax bill earlier this month, it's now in the Senate's hands. It's possible that Senate Republicans could propose adding tariffs in the multi-trillion dollar spending bill to help offset costs, though it's unclear it would garner enough support to pass. 'They might include trying to get some tariffs,' said Alex Durante, senior economist at the Tax Foundation. 'But I really don't see the appetite for something as broad as what the president has done.' Trump in a Truth Social post Thursday evening blasted the option, saying, 'In other words, hundreds of politicians would sit around DC for weeks, and even months, trying to come to a conclusion as to what to charge other countries that are treating us unfairly.' YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Inside the First Stargate AI Data Center How Coach Handbags Became a Gen Z Status Symbol ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Rangers under new ownership after completing deal with US consortium
Rangers under new ownership after completing deal with US consortium

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Rangers under new ownership after completing deal with US consortium

The Scottish Football Association has approved the takeover, with Rangers keen to stress they are not part of any multi-club model. The Scottish Football Association has approved the takeover, with Rangers keen to stress they are not part of any multi-club model. Photograph: Jane Barlow/PA Rangers are under new ownership after an American consortium, including 49ers Enterprises, completed a deal to buy 51% of the club late on Thursday night. Andrew Cavenagh becomes the new chairman at Ibrox, with Paraag Marathe, the president of 49ers Enterprises and chairman of Leeds, the vice-chairman. The Scottish Football Association has approved the takeover, with the club keen to stress they are not part of a multi-club model. 49ers Enterprises is the investment arm of the San Francisco 49ers NFL team. An extraordinary general meeting in late June will approve plans for a new share issue, through which the US-based group will invest £20m into Rangers. That is primarily earmarked for transfer dealings as they seek to wrestle back control of Scottish football from their city rivals Celtic. Funds so far have been spent securing shares, including from previous chairmen Dave King and John Bennett. Mark Taber, Andrew Clayton and Gene Schneur will join the Rangers board. Patrick Stewart, the chief executive, Fraser Thornton, John Halsted and George Taylor will remain as directors but Graeme Park, Julian Wolhardt and Alastair Johnston are stepping down. Advertisement 'The consortium will chart a new strategic vision for the club's future prioritising on-pitch performance and long-term financial sustainability,' read a Rangers statement. As part of this process, the club are expected to move from an unlisted public limited company to a private one. Marathe said: 'At 49ers Enterprises, we have built a track record of sporting and business success, but our driving motivation is our deep connection to the clubs and communities we serve. We are excited to join Andrew and our other consortium of investors in a new era for this iconic club, and we are determined to build something that supporters can be proud of for years to come.' Rangers remain in the market for a new manager after the sacking of Philippe Clement in February. Gretar Steinsson, who holds a key role within 49ers Enterprises, has been heavily involved in the recruitment process. Davide Ancelotti, son of Carlo, appears to be in pole position to succeed Clement but has been pushing for a swift decision from Rangers amid supposed interest from other clubs. Russell Martin, Francesco Farioli and Brian Priske are also known to have held talks with Steinsson. With Kevin Thelwell to formally start his job as sporting director of Rangers on Monday, a new manager is likely to be confirmed next week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store