House sellers 'keen to move on' driving increase in sales
Photo:
RNZ / Angus Dreaver
More houses changed hands in May, but for generally lower prices, and buyers are taking their time about their decisions, the Real Estate Institute (REINZ) says.
REINZ data shows that, at a national level, the median house price dropped 0.9 percent year-on-year in May, to $763,000.
Auckland's price dropped 3.5 percent. Excluding the biggest city, the median price was stable.
The number of properties sold rose 8.9 percent compared to a year earlier, to 7166.
Northland had the highest increase in sales count, up 33.3 percent year-on-year, from 171 to 228 sales. Tasman followed with a 29.7 percent year-on-year increase, from 64 to 83 sales.
Canterbury had the largest number of properties sold in any May month since 2006 and Tasman since 2013.
Listings were up almost 3 percent.
The median number of days to sell properties lifted by three to 47.
REINZ said this reflected buyer caution. "Purchasers are taking longer to commit, which local agents suggest could be due to a lack of buyer urgency and the fact that buyers have time to find a property that best suits them."
The institute's house price index, which is designed to smooth out variation caused by the make-up of sales, was up 0.1 percent year-on-year and down 0.6 percent compared to April.
Ed McKnight, property economist at Opes Partners, said there were signs of increasing demand and supply in the market.
"Lower interest rates are drawing more people into the market. But the number of property listings is high. That's in part because of Kiwis moving overseas and selling up in New Zealand.
"Because if both demand goes up you get more sales and higher prices. If supply goes up you get more sales and lower prices.
"So the pricing effects are cancelling each other out and sales are recovering well from the bottom of the market."
Kelvin Davidson, chief economist at Cotality, said sellers had already been willing to meet the market. the number of deals had returned to normal for this time of year after a long period of sluggishness.
"At face value, another rise in sales alongside a continued flat patch for prices would add to the case for thinking that more sellers who have sitting on the market for a while are now just keen to move on.
"That said, there's nothing to suggest sellers are capitulating; yes, there's a lot of listings and buyers still have the upper hand, but I'd say most vendors are still willing to be patient."
Prices remain 15.8 percent below their previous peak.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Wilson Parking locked in multi-million legal fight with ex-employee
Wilson Parking signage, Queen Street Photo: RNZ / Calvin Samuel Wilson Parking is locked in a $6 million legal fight with a former employee who now owns a company that is in competition with it. Wilson Parking told the Employment Relations Authority former employee Peter Turner breached his employment agreement, duty of good faith and various fiduciary duties, and ATE Property aided and abetted the breaches. It is seeking damages, an account of profits, and a declaration that receivables gained by Turner and ATE, during the operation of the ATE business, are held on trust for Wilson Parking and will be handed over. Turner and ATE denied liability. ATE was incorporated in 2024 with Turner as the sole shareholder and director. Wilson Parking also filed a claim in the High Court, with causes of action based on knowing receipt, knowing assistance and breach of the duty of confidence. ATE responded to the High Court claim by questioning the High Court's jurisdiction, raising an objection. It argued Wilson Parking's claims were within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Employment Relations Authority, based on an earlier Supreme Court decision. Wilson Parking said the authority could not grant equitable remedies, so the claim was appropriately filed. In a decision on 1 August, Associate Judge Paulsen found that the authority had exclusive jurisdiction over Wilson Parking's equitable claims against ATE and he dismissed the High Court claim. Wilson Parking then applied to remove the employment relationship problem to the Employment Court. It said there was uncertainty about the authority's power to award some of the remedies it was seeking. It said that removal to the employment court would also mean all the claims would be heard in one place at the same time. Complex expert evidence would need to be analysed, Wilson Parking said, and there was a significant amount at stake, of more than $6 million. Authority member Peter van Keulen was unconvinced by some of Wilson Parking's arguments to move the case to the Employment Court - he said the authority had the necessary experience and skill to deal with complex disputes involving significant sums. But he said the employment relationship problem had serious questions of law regarding the authority's jurisdiction, and a move was appropriate. Alison Maelzer, a partner at Hesketh Henry, said it was not unheard of for an employer to bring claims against an employee or former employee, and also to add in the former employee's new employer, where it was alleged that the new employer had helped to breach the former employee's obligations. "This is usually in matters involving a breach of confidentiality or breaches of restraints of trade or non-solicitation obligations - where the former employee is alleged to have taken confidential information, given it to the new employer, and the new employer has known about this or encouraged it. " She said Wilson Parking's case was unusual because of the claims filed in both the High Court and the Employment Relations Authority. "The High Court essentially struck out the general civil claims on the basis that the Employment Relations Authority had exclusive jurisdiction over those claims. "This was relying on a decision of the Supreme Court in FMV v TZB which found that if a dispute arose out of an employment relationship, it belonged in the Employment Relations Authority. "This was the case even if the dispute had been framed or could have been framed as a tort and put before the general courts. In other words, if it could be framed as an employment claim, the Employment Relations Authority would have exclusive jurisdiction. This was a matter to be determined on the facts - i.e. figuring out whether the dispute arose out of the employment relationship, or whether the employment relationship was incidental to the dispute." She said the former employer was seeking equitable remedies and was likely to add in the claims/remedies in relation to the matters that had been kicked out of the High Court. "While the Supreme Court in FMZ v TZB found that the Employment Relations Authority had jurisdiction to award the necessary remedies to address employment relationship problems, it was not clear whether this included equitable remedies. The Employment Relations Authority therefore decided to remove the matter to the Employment Court to determine the whether the Authority had this jurisdiction, and if so, what remedies could be awarded. " She said because Wilson Parking was seeking about $6m in remedies, the claims would require extensive and complex expert evidence. "This is unusual for an employment matter." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
More people making losses when selling their homes
The number of people losing money on home sales is at the level since 2014. Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER The number of people making losses when they sell their homes is at the highest level since 2014, property data firm Cotality says, and Auckland sellers are being hit particularly hard. In three months, there was $128,362,612 lost by sellers. Cotality has released its latest Pain and Gain report, which shows the proportion of sellers making a loss or a gain on sales across the country. In the second quarter of this year, 89.4 percent of sellers made a gross profit - 10.6 percent made a loss. This does not include the cost of the sale, such as real estate commission. But in Auckland, the number losing money increased to 15.9 percent. In Tauranga, it was 13.2 percent and Wellington 11.9 percent. Christchurch had the smallest proportion of loss-making sales, at 4.9 percent. Cotality chief property economist Kelvin Davidson said it reflected how much prices had fallen in Auckland, and the higher number of apartments, which were more likely to lose money. The median profit among those who sold for a gain was $279,000. That is well down on the $440,000 median gain recorded during the 2021 peak, but higher than anything recorded before the end of 2020. The median loss was $52,500. Combined, the total gain made by sellers in the quarter was $4.9 billion. Cotality chief property economist Kelvin Davidson. Photo: SUPPLIED Davidson said the length of time that someone had owned a property played a big part in whether they made a gain or a loss. "Almost 50 percent of the loss-making resales in the three months to June had been held for less than three-and-a-half years." Those who made a gain had held their properties for 9.4 years. Davidson said that was the longest hold period for a gain since the mid-1990s. He said the weakness in property values could be encouraging some owners to hold for longer to allow gains to accumulate. "In other cases it may just reflect the fact that in a quiet market a lot of sellers simply have to wait longer for a deal to be achieved. "Indeed, some property owners may also just be choosing to hold for a bit longer if they're uncertain about their job prospects or don't want to pay transactions costs such as an estate agent's commission or conveyancing fees as regularly. In addition, lending restraints such as the loan to value ratio rules may have kept more people where they are for longer." He said investors could sometimes choose when to make a move but owner-occupiers were often driven by life events. It was not always a bad thing to move in a soft market, he said. "You might get less than what you might like for your own house but you may well get a bargain on the next one. "You might come out better off." He said there were hints that some sellers were choosing to take their properties off the market rather than accept a disappointing price. Wellington real estate salesperson Mike Robbers said he was seeing that. He said separating couples would sometimes put a house on the market, and then when offers came in lower than they wanted, one person would buy the other out instead . Standalone houses were less likely to sell for a loss. Almost 34 percent of apartments sold for less than they were bought for. Investors' experience was very similar to that of owner-occupiers, at 10.7 percent of sales making a loss compared to 10.1 percent for owner-occupiers. Investors had slightly larger gains when they made a profit and slightly bigger losses. In Auckland, 17 percent of investors were making a loss. Gareth Kiernan, chief forecaster at Infometrics, said the current downturn was so far shorter than one recorded from 1998 to 2001 and from 2008 to 2012. But he said there were signs that people who bought in the peak might have to hold on longer than in previous downturns to get back to neutral. "It's worth noting that house prices are currently still sitting about 13 percent below their 2021 peak. At the same stage of the cycle, 13 quarters after the December 1997 and December 2007 peaks, house prices were only 2.0 percent and 5.5 percent below those respective peaks. In other words, although the 1998-2001 and 2008-2012 loss-making periods were getting close to ending by this stage of the cycle, this time around we're still a long time away from everyone not facing a loss when selling property. Our current house price forecasts could see people in 2030 who bought at the peak of the market in 2021 still be making a loss if trying to sell. In the context of the NZ housing market experience of the last 75 years, that would be an incredibly long time to still be making a loss." Davidson agreed the downturn was "fairly prolonged". "The current cycle is deeper - in the GFC prices only fell about 10 percent peak to trough. This time they were down closer to 17 or 18 percent, we're three-and-a-half years into the cycle and nowhere near the peak. This has been a deeper and more drawn out episode. In some ways we're only halfway through or even less. "It's taking longer to accumulate gains and I guess it's also taking longer to avoid losses." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Kiwisaver provider Simplicity to build 600 long-term rental houses in Queenstown
Simplicity Living directors (from left) Shane Brealey, Anna Brealey, Sam Stubbs, and Andrew Lance on site at an earlier development in Auckland. Photo: Supplied Kiwisaver provider Simplicity is to spend hundreds of million dollars on building up to 600 long-term rental houses in Queenstown. It has bought a six-hectare site on Ladies Mile for the build-to-rent development aimed at answering the need for affordable housing in the central Otago town. The head of Simplicity, Sam Stubbs, said the development stacked up financially and socially, and was the sort of investment that Kiwisaver funds should be looking at . "This is another example of the sort of thing our Kiwisaver scheme can help make possible. We think it's a good long-term investment for our members and helps provide warm, dry homes for Kiwi families, in a region that urgently needs them." He said it was the first development outside of Auckland for its housing arm, Simplicity Living. "We've been looking around the country, and Queenstown is the obvious place, which needs good long-term rental options for people who work in the town -- nurses, teachers and cops some of whom are now commuting from Cromwell now." Stubbs said Simplicity had looked at expanding into Wellington and Christchurch, but was not convinced at the moment. He said the capital had infrastructure risks such as earthquakes and water, while the commercial return in Christchurch did not not stack up because an oversupply of properties has lowered returns. Location of the planned Simplicity housing development in Queenstown. Photo: Supplied / Simplicity Living Queenstown mayor Glyn Lewers said the development was "much-needed". "The addition of up to 600 new Build-to-Rent homes will be a game changer for our community, offering secure long-term rentals. "It's a tangible step forward in delivering [part] of the Joint Housing Action Plan - working with developers to facilitate and deliver diverse housing options." The development site is located near Remarkables Park, close to planned schools, shops, and transport links. The homes would be built primarily using concrete, brick, and local schist, with high thermal and acoustic ratings, solar panels, rainwater harvesting and common use facilities. The Shotover Bridge is a 10-minute walk away, and Queenstown Airport is just a five-minute drive away. Simplicity is currently building just under 900 homes in various parts of Auckland. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
