McDonald's TMNT x Hello Kitty Happy Meal drops. See inside, toys, where to get in DE, PA
Cuteness and crime-fighting comes together for the TMNT x Hello Kitty Happy Meal, which is available on menus for a limited time. The newest Happy Meal has 12 new toys, drawing 1990s nostalgia with pizza-eating turtle heroes Leonardo, Donatello, Michelangelo, and Raphael as they join forces with Sanrio's Hello Kitty and friends, including My Melody, Kuromi and Cinnamoroll.
Cowabunga! Keep reading to see all the collectible toys, plus where to get the newest Happy Meal in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
When can I get McDonald's Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle x Hello Kitty meal?
McDonald's Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle x Hello Kitty Happy Meal came out on Tuesday, Aug. 12 and is available nationwide at participating restaurants for a limited time.
What is inside McDonald's TMNT x Hello Kitty Happy Meal?
Inside McDonald's Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and Hello Kitty Happy Meal includes either a Hamburger, 4-piece or 6-piece Chicken McNuggets plus a Kids Fry, Apple Slices and a TMNT x Hello Kitty toy.
What is the TMNT x Hello Kitty Happy Meal price?
The cost of the McDonald's TMNT x Hello Kitty Happy Meal varies by Pennsylvania and Delaware location and the food choice, according to the McDonald's app, as well as the food selection. In Wilmington, Delaware, for example, the Happy Meal costs between $5.99 and $7.49. Closer to the Philadelphia area, the meal costs between $5.19 and $6.09.
McDonald's TMNT X Hello Kitty toys
The TMNT x Hello Kitty Happy Meal comes with 12 different collectible toys, one in each Happy Meal. The collection is a fusion of characters from both worlds, with the four main turtles, plus Hello Kitty and several Sanrio characters. Guillaume Huin, McDonald's senior marketing director, posted the lineup on X:
Badtz-Maru x Leonardo
Cinnamoroll x Donatello
Cinnamoroll x Michelangelo
Hello Kitty x Donatello
Hello Kitty x Leonardo
Hello Kitty x Michelangelo
Hello Kitty x Raphael
Kuromi x Michelangelo
Kuromi x Raphael
My Melody x Donatello
My Melody x Leonardo
Other McDonald's Happy Meals
McDonald's has taken fans back to the whimsical world of McDonaldland with the new adult Happy Meal, which also came out on Aug. 12. The limited-time meal includes a mysterious Mt. McDonaldland shake and a souvenir among characters including Grimace, Hamburglar, and Birdie.
Where to get McDonald's adult Happy Meal near me
There are 475 McDonald's locations in Pennsylvania and 37 in Delaware, according to data company ScrapeHero. To find a McDonald's near you, visit McDonald's online locator.
Lori Comstock is a New Jersey-based journalist with the Mid-Atlantic Connect Team.
This article originally appeared on Delaware News Journal: McDonald's Happy Meal TMNT x Hello Kitty drops in PA, DE. See inside
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Yahoo Sports Network viewer's guide
Yahoo Sports Network debuts Wednesday, Aug. 20, and will feature more than 60 hours of original programming a week from shows covering a range of sports, including the NFL, NBA, MLB, combat and more. This includes live programming such as The Ariel Helwani Show, Yahoo Sports Daily, Inside Coverage and Yahoo Fantasy Forecast, as well as recorded episodes of The Kevin O'Connor Show, Football 301, Network with Rich Kleiman, and other fan favorites. The channel is an all-access pass to some of the biggest stories and most trusted voices in sports, delivering 24/7 expert commentary and analysis from Yahoo Sports and its partners. Operated by category leading FAST network, C15 Studio, Yahoo Sports Network is now available on LG Channels and Sling Freestream, and launching on Samsung TV Plus, Amazon Fire TV, Fubo, Plex, Prime Video, and The Roku Channel over the coming weeks. The channel is also available on a new comprehensive home for Yahoo Sports video. In addition to distributing Yahoo Sports Network, houses highlights from most every major sports league, as well as content from partners such as OneFootball and Motorsport Network. This gives fans a one-stop shop for Yahoo Sports video programming on desktop computers and mobile devices. Here's a guide to the first week of programming for Yahoo Sports Network… Wednesday, Aug. 20 9-11 a.m. ET — Yahoo Sports Daily: Wake up to everything you may have missed last night with Yahoo Sports' newest daily show as Jason Fitz and Caroline Fenton start your day with the biggest stories from around the world of sports. 12-1 p.m. ET — College Football Enquirer: Andy Staples, Ross Dellenger and Steven Godfrey discuss what the penalties for Michigan after the sign-stealing case mean for the future of NCAA punishments, as well as the Big Ten pondering a supposed 28-team College Football Playoff bracket. 1-3 p.m. ET — The Boys In The Back: Conner Burks and Eric Jackman analyze the latest in the world of combat sports. 5-6:30 p.m. ET — Yahoo Fantasy Forecast: Matt Harmon and Ray Garvin break down the 12 rookies you need to draft this year. 6:30-7:30 p.m. ET — Inside Coverage: Andrew Siciliano and Yahoo Sports NFL insiders Charles Robinson, Jori Epstein and Frank Schwab take a look at the latest news inside the NFL, covering the "hows" and the "whys" of the league's biggest stories. Thursday, Aug. 21 9-11 a.m. ET — Yahoo Sports Daily: Wake up to everything you may have missed last night with Yahoo Sports' newest daily show as Jason Fitz and Caroline Fenton start your day with the biggest stories from around the world of sports. 12-1 p.m. ET — Good Word with Goodwill: Senior NBA reporter Vincent Goodwill welcomes guests from around the league to chat about the latest offseason happenings in the NBA. 1-2 p.m. ET — The Craic: Ireland's own Petsey Carroll talks the latest in the world of MMA. 3-4 p.m. — Football 301: Nate Tice and Charles McDonald break down the AFC East and what to expect this season out of the Buffalo Bills, New England Patriots, New York Jets and Miami Dolphins. 5-6:30 p.m. — Yahoo Fantasy Forecast: Matt Harmon and Scott Pianowski take a look at 12 backup players who are just one injury away from fantasy superstardom that you may want to stash on your roster this season 6:30-7:30 p.m. — Inside Coverage: Live from The Venetian Resort Las Vegas, Frank Schwab, Charles Robinson and Ben Fawkes break down the biggest news from the NFL that day, look ahead to the third week of the preseason and talk some betting angles you might want to take a look at before the season kicks off in two weeks. 8-9 p.m. ET — The Cooligans: Alexis Guerreros and Christian Polanco sit with Canadian winger Jayden Nelson to talk about his first season with the Vancouver Whitecaps. Friday, Aug. 22 9-11a.m. ET — Yahoo Sports Daily: Wake up to everything you may have missed last night with Yahoo Sports' newest daily show as Jason Fitz and Caroline Fenton start your day with the biggest stories from around the world of sports. 11 a.m.-12 p.m. ET — College Football Enquirer: Andy Staples, Ross Dellenger and Steven Godfrey look ahead to Week 0 as the college football season officially kicks off in Ireland with Iowa State and Kansas State in Dublin 7:30-8:30 p.m. ET — Baseball Bar-B-Cast: Jake Mintz and Jordan Shusterman preview the weekend ahead in the MLB. 8:30-9:30 p.m. ET — The Kevin O'Connor Show: Kevin O'Connor chats NBA offseason with The Ringer's Wosny Lambre and dives into fantasy football with Yahoo Sports' Matt Harmon. Saturday, Aug. 23 All day: the best shows from the week at Yahoo Sports, On3 and Uncrowned Sunday, Aug. 24 5-6:30 p.m. ET — Yahoo Fantasy Forecast: Recorded at The Venetian Resort Las Vegas, Matt Harmon, Charles McDonald, Justin Boone and Scott Pianowski break down 12 high-risk/high-reward fantasy players who could make (or break) your season.
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Gavin Newsom is expertly trolling Fox News stars by mimicking Trump online — right down to the nicknames
Over the past week, Gavin Newsom's press office has been deliberately aping Donald Trump's over-the-top social media posting style in an obvious attempt to not only troll the president's most ardent defenders but also force them to come to grips with Trump's bullying and bombastic tone. The pitch-perfect parody, which comes as the California governor goes on the attack against Trump while clearly eying a run for president, has also resulted in a number of Fox News stars taking the bait – and seemingly making Newsom's point for him. 'DANA 'DING DONG' PERINO (NEVER HEARD OF HER UNTIL TODAY!) IS MELTING DOWN BECAUSE OF ME, GAVIN C. NEWSOM!' the governor's press office account tweeted on Tuesday. 'FOX HATES THAT I AM AMERICA'S MOST FAVORITE GOVERNOR ("RATINGS KING") SAVING AMERICA — WHILE TRUMP CAN'T EVEN CONQUER THE 'BIG' STAIRS ON AIR FORCE ONE ANYMORE!!! TRUMP HAS 'LOST HIS STEP' AND FOX IS LOSING IT BECAUSE WHEN I TYPE, AMERICA NOW WINS!!! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.' The all-caps screed, complete with a juvenile nickname and satirically signed 'GCN' to mimic Trump adding 'DJT' to his Truth Social posts, came after Fox News host Dana Perino groused Monday afternoon about Newsom's tweets while urging him to cut it out if he wanted to be taken seriously. 'You have to stop it with the Twitter thing,' Perino complained on The Five. 'I don't know where his wife is? If I were his wife I would say, 'You are making a fool of yourself, stop it!'' Noting that Newsom has presidential ambitions, she added: 'Do not let your staff tweet—and if you are doing it yourself, put the phone away and start over. He's got a big job as governor of California, but if he wants an even bigger job he has to be a little more serious.' Perino, however, wasn't the only one to fall into the trap set by Newsom and his social media team. Earlier this week, Tomi Lahren – a Fox News contributor who first shot to fame for her take-no-prisoners liberal-bashing monologues – objected to Newsom's press office mockingly referring to MAGA activist Scott Presler – who is openly gay – as GOP Rep. Nancy Mace. 'New lows unlocked by @GavinNewsom and his team of losers,' Lahren fumed on X, only for the governor's social team to throw back MAGA's favorite attack line back in her face. 'You sound woke,' the press office fired back. The governor's office used a similar tactic last week when Fox News host Raymond Arroyo expressed indignation that Newsom said Texas Gov. Greg Abbott — who is confined to a wheelchair — had 'rolled over' after Trump called for Texas to redraw its congressional maps. 'We asked for a statement, and Newsom's office gave us something flippant like, 'You're so woke, he'll get over it,'' Arroyo grumbled before airing the press office's comment, which read: 'No. But how woke of you to ask! I'm sorry Greg's feelings were hurt. Poor guy — we hope he recovers.' Meanwhile, Fox News anchor Trace Gallagher was also apoplectic about Newsom's new approach, which has ramped up as he's taken the fight to Trump and Republicans over their mid-decade redistricting efforts ahead of next year's midterm elections. 'I don't know what he's trying to do, but it comes across as childish and – you are the governor of the biggest state in the union – what are you doing?!' Gallagher complained on Friday night. 'BIRD-BRAIN TREY GALLAGHER (A SO-CALLED FOX 'NEWS' HOST THAT NOBODY HAS EVER HEARD OF) SAYS MY POSTS ARE 'CHILDISH' AND 'UNBECOMING' OF A LEADER — CAN YOU BELIEVE IT? MANY ARE SAYING FOX ("EDIT THE TAPES") NEWS SHOULD CANCEL HIS PATHETIC LITTLE 'BEDTIME SHOW' IMMEDIATELY,' Newsom's team tweeted in response the following day. 'THEY ARE CALLING IT THE MOST BORING PROGRAM IN CABLE HISTORY. TOTAL SNOOZE FEST! SAD!!! — GCN.' Gallgher followed suit on Monday night by criticizing Newsom's 'new Trumpian style' of posting, claiming his tweet mocking the Fox News host was an attempt to be 'clever' before calling for the governor to stop obsessing about Trump. He then went on to name-check The Mamas and the Papas and The Beverly Hillbillies while urging Newsom to pay more attention to his state than his social media activity. Perino also couldn't help herself, jumping online to double and triple down on her on-air commentary about the governor's Trump mimicry – all while seeming blissfully unaware of the point of Newsom's parody of the president. Responding to Pod Save America co-host Jon Favreau sarcastically stating that Newsom 'should take a lesson from Donald Trump on this' before asking her what she thought about the president's social media habits, Perino tweeted that 'copying isn't a good look and it isn't working' while suggesting the governor come up with original content. 'I mean, it's pretty clearly a parody of Trump's absolutely insane all caps, often non-sensical posts. Probably why all the people in my life who aren't political junkies keep reaching out to say they don't know much about Newsom but think the tweets are hilarious,' Favreau replied. 'Humor and mockery can be quite effective!' 'Cool if it works and he's your 2028 nom, I will buy you dinner,' Perino reacted. As if to hammer home the point to Perino, Newsom's office responded to Perino's comments by gleefully posting: 'ALMOST A WEEK IN AND THEY STILL DON'T GET IT.' Indeed, the governor himself hasn't exactly been coy about what his intentions are in adopting the online persona of a full-time Trumpian troll. While the social media operation – which is operated by a multi-aide staff – has generated over a billion impressions across a variety of platforms, Newsom has said outright that anyone upset with his account's online insults and trollish behavior should turn their attention towards the White House. 'I'm just following his example,' Newsom said last week. 'If you have issues with what I'm putting out, you sure as hell should have concerns with what he's putting out as president.' He continued: 'To the extent it's gotten some attention, I'm pleased, but I think the deeper question is how have we allowed the normalization of his tweets, Truth Social posts over the course of the last many years, to go without similar scrutiny and notice?' As CNN's Andrew Kirell noted in Tuesday's edition of the Reliable Sources newsletter, Newsom is essentially punking the right-wing media ecosystem right now with this tactic. 'The effort, clearly designed to hold a mirror up to MAGA and 'bully the bullies,' so to speak, has evidently gone over the heads of many conservative media personalities, baiting them into making Newsom's point about Trump's behavior on their own,' he wrote. Meanwhile, after Perino once again revisited the subject during Tuesday's broadcast of The Five by insisting that 'we get the joke' but that 'it's just not funny,' Kirell asserted that this was precisely what the governor's social media operation was meant to expose. 'I'm fascinated by how they don't seem to understand that saying 'it's just not funny' is exactly the reaction his team is aiming for,' he posted on X. 'It's the whole point.' Pointing out that Gallagher and Perino seemed 'oblivious they were criticizing a parody of Trump himself,' Mediaite's Colby Hall explained that Newsom was 'shooting fish in a barrel' at this point. 'Newsom's feed isn't Trumpian—it's an X-ray of Trumpian excess, but as if it were delivered by the king of ironically detached comedy himself, Steve Martin,' Hall stated. 'Newsom didn't just enter the arena of schoolyard retorts; he grabbed the microphone, turned it upside down, and made the absurd impossible to ignore.' While others, such as The Bulwark's Sarah Longwell, have spelled out that Newsom is making MAGA 'uncomfortable because he's holding up a mirror to what you tolerate on behalf of partisanship,' Democrats are increasingly embracing the governor's approach because it shows his willingness to fight. 'That allows Newsom to step out in front and say he is the first one to stand against Texas's actions,' The Independent's Eric Garcia wrote last week, referencing the Texas redistricting battle. 'Specifically, the Texas Democrats who decamped to blue states said they would return to Texas because California would respond in kind if Texas passed their new maps.' He concluded: '2028 is a long way off and plenty could change. Other candidates might be able to prove Newsom is a paper tiger. But then again, plenty of Republicans waited for Trump to implode and he laid waste to them.'
Fast Company
2 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Beauty publishing was always a lie. But AI just broke it
Beauty magazines have been lying to readers for decades—but at least they used to start with actual humans. NewBeauty magazine's Summer/Fall 2025 issue quietly crossed that line, publishing a multipage article dedicated to the beautification of female skin that featured perfect female models who weren't real. Spotted by professional photographer Cassandra Klepac, she pointed out that each photo was labeled as AI and included the prompt used to generate them. With the advent of technology capable of synthesizing ultra-high-definition photos of realistic humans, this was bound to happen sooner rather than later. Knowing the hell that Vogue recently faced for featuring Guess advertisements with AI-generated models—sparking the rage of 2.7 million TikTok viewers and subscription cancellations—it is surprising that NewBeauty's editors decided to do the same with actual editorial content, the supposedly 'real' part of magazines. So why did the magazine—which calls itself 'the beauty authority' in its tagline—do this? 'NewBeauty features both real people and patients, alongside AI-generated images,' executive editor Liz Ritter told me via email. 'We maintain a strict policy of transparency by clearly labeling all AI content in detail in our captions, including the prompts used to create these images, so readers always know the difference.' Subscribe to the Design newsletter. The latest innovations in design brought to you every weekday Privacy Policy | Fast Company Newsletters Her nonanswer leaves us to only speculate on the reasons why. Talking about the Guess campaign, Sara Ziff—founder of the Model Alliance—said that it was 'less about innovation and more about desperation and the need to cut costs.' Given the depressed status of the print media industry, I suspect that may have played a role in the case of NewBeauty. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Cass Klepac (@ Perfectly legal . . . However you may feel about the campaign, we know that NewBeauty didn't do anything illegal. There are virtually no laws governing editorial use of AI-generated humans at this point, except to stop deceptive use in politics and in regards to the honor of individuals (something already covered by libel laws). Surprisingly, advertising is a little bit more regulated. The Federal Trade Commission can penalize deceptive advertising practices. New York's groundbreaking AI disclosure law targets advertisements, requiring 'conspicuous disclosure' when synthetic performers are used. But editorial? It exists in a regulatory wasteland, leaving it to the judgment of editors. Europe's comprehensive AI Act mandates clear labeling of AI-generated content and carries maximum fines of €35 million ($40.7 million), but it focuses on transparency, not prohibition. You can fabricate entire humans for editorial use—you just have to mention it in the caption. NewBeauty did exactly that. . . . but dangerous anyway? We also know that, despite the fact there's nothing illegal about it, this doesn't mean it is right. Using artificial intelligence feels dangerous because it is so easy and so powerful. When it spreads—and it will—many professions will be affected. This includes not only the models, photographers, makeup artists, and all the people who make real photoshoots possible, but also the Photoshop artists who retouch what comes out of the digital camera into an image that quite often has very little to do with what the sensors capture. For the past few decades, Photoshop artists have erased wrinkles, refined arms, rebuilt waistlines, adjusted eyes, and turned anything that editors deemed imperfect into whatever fantasy beauty standard the industry set. Reality has been malleable, to be generous. advertisement Remember that time Rolling Stone heavily retouched Katy Perry because they didn't think she was pretty enough? Or that Lena Dunham Vogue cover and photo feature, the one in which she was missing an arm? Duham said at the time those photos were intended as 'fantasy.' Like everything else featured in glossy pages. Those were just two high-profile examples of a practice that happens regularly for any cover of any fashion, beauty, or celebrity print magazine. In this sense, acting surprised or offended by NewBeauty's AI models feels hollow, albeit understandable—due to a fear of the damage that AI tools will bring to the industry. It's been a ruse forever The hard reality is that photographers have used lighting and filtering tricks to make things look more beautiful than they are in real life since the advent of the medium. Then, the editorial and advertising industries have been breaking every taboo in digital manipulation since Photoshop was invented. Today, AI is democratizing the deception once again—to the point where a single art director for some random magazine can actually create a high-resolution print spread full of beautiful people who don't exist, simply by using a short prompt and spending a couple of dollars. I get it. It's tempting to tweak reality, sometimes rearranging it completely, to tell a compelling narrative. This summer I went to the Robert Capa museum in Budapest—highly recommended—and stared for a while at that famous Spanish Civil War photo of a Republican 'miliciano' being shot. I considered its terrible beauty and the effect it had on the public in an era in which the specter of Nazism and fascism was rising in Europe. I also considered the fact that some experts believe that the photo may have been staged (while others vehemently disagree) and pondered on what is real and what's not, on the effects of perceived reality versus 'real reality' versus manipulated reality. These are questions we constantly face as journalists. If Capa really staged that photo, perhaps it was the right thing to do at the time. Perhaps not. But I digress. I don't pretend to hold NewBeauty to the same fact-checking standards that governed news media back in the time of Capa. Beauty, fashion, cars, and luxury magazines are all part of that aspirational world in which reality easily gets bent to tell a fantasy. I would say that, by clearly labeling the AI images, NewBeauty is being way more honest than the editors of fashion and beauty magazines have been in years and decades past. Those magazines never labeled their photos, 'THIS CELEB IS PHOTOSHOPPED! THIS AIN'T REAL, STEPHANIE! STOP DIETING! LOL!' Yet all covers and many interior shots were digitally altered and many times reconstructed beyond recognition, sometimes pathetically so. Indeed, the beauty industry was already constructed on visual lies, but in the age of AI, the powers that be won't stop here. Will it be problematic? Yes. Will it cause real economic and personal damage? Most definitely. But we will get more and more used to it until we stop questioning the practice at all. I hate to tell you I told you so, but I told you so. It's the destruction of reality as we know it.
