logo
First Republican Indianapolis council member joins calls for Hogsett to resign

First Republican Indianapolis council member joins calls for Hogsett to resign

A Republican on the Indianapolis City-County Council has joined other calls for Mayor Joe Hogsett's resignation, following an investigation into the handling of sexual harassment complaints by his former top aide and the revelation of the mayor's late-night, personal text messages to two younger women.
Joshua Bain, who represents the south side of Marion County, is the first Republican on the 25-member Democrat-led council to call for Hogsett's resignation. Democrat Andy Nielsen and Democratic socialist Jesse Brown previously called on Hogsett to resign.
"Calling for resignation is not something I do lightly," Bain said in a statement June 10. "But the weight of these failures — ethical, personal, and professional —demands accountability. Immediate change in leadership would be right for Indianapolis."
The call from Bain follows an explosive City-County Council meeting on June 9 in which Lauren Roberts, who is one of three women who accused Hogsett's former right-hand man Thomas Cook of harassment and abuse, was forcibly dragged out of the council chambers by sheriff's deputies as she tried to make a statement to council members about her experience and the subsequent investigation.
Though the calls for Hogsett's resignation are growing, it's not up to the City-County Council whether Hogsett stays in office. An impeachment process exists, but is largely controlled by the Indiana General Assembly. Recall elections also don't exist here.
However, losing support from the council where there is a Democratic supermajority could make it more difficult for the mayor to govern.
It already appears to be impacting his schedule. Hogsett had been scheduled to attend a press conference June 10 to announce a city housing initiative called "Streets to Home" but that event was canceled.
More: 'We won't allow facts to be buried': Hogsett investigative report omissions raise concerns
The Council's Democratic caucus released a statement yesterday stating they were let down by the mayor's behavior but stopped short of calling for a resignation.
But the statement added "the mayor's past and recent conduct has compromised (public) trust and weakened the moral authority of the office." Democrats called for the city to implement several reforms, including establishing an independent human resources board to replace the city's current human resources division.
The council's Republicans are also demanding that the council take several additional action steps, including an oversight hearing, more documentation from the law firm that conducted the investigation and a public addendum to the report that includes any evidence omitted from the official version.
So far, just one member of the council, Democrat Ron Gibson, has released a statement in staunch support of Hogsett.
IndyStar's recent reporting revealed the mayor's late-night personal texts to younger women made them feel uncomfortable, they said, and they shared those texts with Fisher Phillips investigators who were probing the Cook allegations as evidence of a troubled workplace culture under Hogsett.
No mention of the texts appeared in the final report, IndyStar reported last week, even though they directly contradicted some of the report's conclusions.
After the June 9 meeting, where dozens of people came to protest Hogsett, another Democrat on the council, Crista Carlino, said she was "deeply considering" calling for Hogsett's resignation.
'As someone who serves part-time, runs campaigns, evening text messages with staff are things that unfortunately have to happen," Carlino said. "We pull late nights. But the content of those, particularly around the poetry especially for a married man, gives me great pause.'
Hogsett was married at the time the messages were sent but got divorced in 2023.
In his call for the mayor to resign, Bain said there was a "troubling and growing pattern" of issues with the mayor, including a "lack of response" during the 2020 protests in downtown Indianapolis.
"That lack of leadership left a lasting mark — on our downtown, on our public trust, and on our ability to move forward as a united city," Bain said.
More: Can Indiana mayors be removed from office? There's a law, but it's rare, experts say.
Fallout from the City-County Council meeting in which Roberts and her supporters were forcibly removed from the chambers continued the next day.
Before the meeting, Hogsett had been scheduled to attend a press conference June 10 to announce a city housing initiative called "Streets to Home."
On the day of the press conference, Hogsett's administration decided to "postpone" the meeting to an undetermined date "in light of recent events, in order to keep the focus on supporting our unhoused neighbors."
Faith leaders criticized that decision and said they had suggested that someone else from the mayor's office represent the administration "out of concern for the tone, perception and effectiveness" of the event.
"Last night's events at the City-County Council meeting deeply unsettled many in our community and cast a shadow over the important progress we are trying to make through the Streets to Home initiative," according to a statement from Rabbi Aaron Spiegel, Pastor David Greene and Rev. Gray Lesesne.
The Concerned Clergy of Indianapolis and the Baptist Ministers' Alliance also released a statement on June 10 criticizing the "disturbing revelations about sexual harassment, retaliation and silencing of victims at the highest levels of city government."
Removing Roberts from the council meeting was "further traumatizing a woman who had the courage to speak truth to power."
"We say with one voice: You cannot protect future victims by abandoning those already harmed. You cannot legislate equity while practicing erasure. You cannot call yourself a public servant and privately shield misconduct," the statement read.
Email IndyStar Reporter Jordan Smith at JTsmith@gannett.com. Follow him on X: @jordantsmith09.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case
Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case

Hamilton Spectator

time12 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court won't reconsider its ruling upholding a $5 million civil judgment against President Donald Trump in a civil lawsuit alleging he sexually abused a writer in a Manhattan department store in the mid-1990s. In an 8-2 vote Friday, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump's petition for the full appellate court to rehear arguments in his challenge to the jury's finding that he sexually abused advice columnist E. Jean Carroll and defamed her with comments he made in October 2022. Carroll testified at a 2023 trial that Trump turned a friendly encounter in spring 1996 into a violent attack after they playfully entered the store's dressing room. A three-judge panel of the appeals court upheld the verdict in December, rejecting Trump's claims that trial Judge Lewis A. Kaplan's decisions spoiled the trial, including allowing two other Trump sexual abuse accusers to testify. The women said Trump committed similar acts against them in the 1970s and in 2005. Trump denied all three women's allegations. In an opinion Friday, four judges voting to reject rehearing wrote: 'Simply re-litigating a case is not an appropriate use' of the process. 'In those rare instances in which a case warrants our collective consideration, it is almost always because it involves a question of exceptional importance,' or a conflict between precedent and the appellate panel's opinion, Judges Myrna Pérez, Eunice C. Lee, Beth Robinson and Sarah A.L. Merriam wrote. All four were appointed by President Joe Biden, Trump's one-time Democratic rival. The two dissenting judges, Trump appointees, Steven J. Menashi and Michael H. Park, wrote that the trial 'consisted of a series of indefensible evidentiary rulings.' 'The result was a jury verdict based on impermissible character evidence and few reliable facts,' they wrote. 'No one can have any confidence that the jury would have returned the same verdict if the normal rules of evidence had been applied.' Carroll's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, said in a statement: 'E. Jean Carroll is very pleased with today's decision.' 'Although President Trump continues to try every possible maneuver to challenge the findings of two separate juries, those efforts have failed. He remains liable for sexual assault and defamation,' said Kaplan, who is not related to the judge. Trump skipped the trial after repeatedly denying the attack ever happened. He briefly testified at a follow-up defamation trial last year that resulted in an $83.3 million award. The second trial resulted from comments then-President Trump made in 2019 after Carroll first made the accusations publicly in a memoir. Kaplan presided over both trials and instructed the second jury to accept the first jury's finding that Trump had sexually abused Carroll. Arguments in that appeal are set for June 24. The Associated Press does not identify people who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly, as Carroll has done. ___ Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Man convicted of killing 2 people outside bar to be executed in July

time15 minutes ago

Man convicted of killing 2 people outside bar to be executed in July

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. -- A man convicted of fatally shooting a man and woman outside a Jacksonville bar as part of an attempted revenge killing has been scheduled for execution in Florida under a death warrant signed Friday by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, the eighth this year. Michael Bernard Bell, 54, is set to die by lethal injection July 15 at Florida State Prison near the city of Starke. Bell was convicted in 1995 and sentenced to death for the murders of Jimmy West and Tamecka Smith. In December 1993, Bell spotted what he thought was the car of the man who fatally shot his brother earlier that year, according to court records. Bell was apparently unaware that the man had sold the car to West. Bell called on two friends and armed himself with an AK-47 rifle, authorities said. They found the car parked outside a liquor lounge and waited. When West, Smith and another woman eventually exited the club, Bell approached the car and opened fire, officials said. West died at the scene, and Smith died on the way to the hospital. The other woman escaped injury. Witnesses said Bell also fired at a crowd of onlookers before fleeing the area. He was eventually arrested the next year. Bell was later convicted of three additional murders. He fatally shot a woman and her toddler son in 1989, and he killed his mother's boyfriend about four months before the attack on West and Smith, officials said. Six other executions have taken place in Florida this year, with a seventh scheduled for June 24, all by lethal injection.

Reactions to Padilla incident fall mostly along party lines
Reactions to Padilla incident fall mostly along party lines

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Reactions to Padilla incident fall mostly along party lines

A day after federal agents forcibly restrained and handcuffed U.S. Sen Alex Padilla at a Los Angeles news conference, leaders of the country's two political parties responded in what has become a predictable fashion — with diametrically opposed takes on the incident. Padilla's fellow Democrats called for an investigation and perhaps even the resignation of the senator's nemesis, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, for what they described as the unprecedented manhandling of a U.S. senator who was merely attempting to ask a question of a fellow public official. Noem and fellow Republicans continued to depict Padilla as a grandstander, whose unexpected appearance at Noem's news conference seemed to her security detail to represent a threat, as she tried to speak to reporters at the Federal Building in Westwood. Republicans continued Friday to chastise Padilla, using words like 'launch,' 'lunge' and 'bum rush' to describe Padilla's behavior as he began to try to pose a question to Noem at Thursday's news conference. The Trump administration official was just a few minutes into her meeting with reporters when Padilla moved assertively from the side of the room, pushing past a Times photographer as he moved to more directly address Noem. He did not lunge at Noem and was still paces away from her when her security detail grabbed the senator. Read more: Arellano: Sen. Alex Padilla's crime? Being Mexican in MAGA America Padilla and his staff described how the veteran lawmaker went through security and was escorted by an FBI employee to the room where the press conference was held, saying it was absurd to suggest he presented a threat. Padilla spoke out after the secretary asserted that her homeland security agents had come to L.A. to "liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that the governor and the mayor have placed on this country.' The former South Dakota governor would have some reason to recognize Padilla, since he questioned her during her Senate confirmation hearing. A spokesperson at the Homeland Security Department did not respond to a question of whether Noem recognized Padilla when he arrived at her press conference. As has become the norm in the nation's political discourse, Republicans and Democrats spoke about the confrontation Friday as if they had observed two entirely separate incidents. Sen. Ben Ray Lujan (D-N.M.) said Noem 'should step down,' adding: 'This is ridiculous. And she continues to lie about this incident. This is wrong.' Lujan urged his Republican colleagues to support Democrats in asking for 'a full investigation.' 'This is bad. This is precedent-setting,' Lujan told MSNBC. 'And I certainly hope that the leadership of the Senate, my Republican leaders, my friends, that they just look within. Pray on it. That's what I told a couple of them last night. Pray on this and do the right thing.' Members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus went to Speaker Mike Johnson's office to protest Padilla's treatment. Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) spoke out on X and on the floor of the Senate. He said the episode fit into 'a pattern of behavior by the Trump administration. There is simply no justification for this abuse of authority …. There can be no justification of seeing a senator forced to their knees.' Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) went on X to repeat the call for an investigation and to say that 'Republican leadership is complicit in enabling the growing authoritarianism in this country.' Most Republicans remained silent, or accused Padilla of being a provocateur. 'I think the senator's actions, my view is, it was wildly inappropriate,' said Johnson, the House speaker. 'You don't charge a sitting Cabinet secretary.' Johnson added that it was Padilla, who should face some sanction. 'At a minimum … [it] rises to the level of a censure. … I think there needs to be a message sent by the body as a whole that that is not what we are going to do, that's not how we're going to act.' Rep. Tom McClintock, (R-Elk Grove) zinged Padilla on X, with some 'helpful tips.' '1. Don't disrupt other people's press conferences. Hold your own instead. 2. Don't bum-rush a podium with no visible identification. ... 3. Don't resist or assault the Secret Service. It won't end well.' Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-Big Bear Lake) also sought to reinforce the notion that agents protecting Noem sensed a real threat, having no way of knowing that Padilla was who he said he was. The congressman said on Fox Business that Padilla had obtained "the outcome that they wanted. Now they have a talking point.' Read more: L.A. braces for multiple 'No Kings' demonstrations across the city Saturday None of the officials in the room, several of whom know Padilla, intervened to prevent the action by the agents, who eventually pushed the senator, face down, onto the ground, before handcuffing him. Noem did not back off her earlier statement that Padilla had 'burst' into the room. "Senator Padilla chose disrespectful political theatre and interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on as he lunged toward Secretary Noem,' Tricia McLaughlin, an assistant Homeland Security secretary, said in a statement Friday. McLaughlin also said that Padilla 'was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers' repeated commands,' though video made public by Friday did not show such warnings, in advance of Padilla's first statement. The senator's staff members said he privately had received messages of concern from several Republican colleagues, including Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) Speaking publicly only one Republican lawmaker sounded a note of distress about the episode. 'I've seen that one clip. It's horrible,' said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). 'It is shocking at every level. It's not the America I know.' Padilla told Tommy Vietor of the "Pod Save America" podcast that Trump's aggressive immigration crackdown is an attempt to distract from many other failures — continued instability with the economy, a lack of peace in Ukraine and Gaza and a federal budget plan that is proving unpopular with many Americans. 'He always finds a distraction," Padilla said, "and, when all else fails, he goes back to demonizing and scapegoating immigrants. … He creates a crisis to get us all talking about something else." Padilla said repeatedly that Americans should be concerned about how everyday citizens will be treated, if forces working for the Trump administration are allowed to "tackle" a U.S. senator asking questions in a public building. On Friday afternoon, he sent a mass email urging his constituents to sign up for the protests planned for Saturday, to counter the military parade Trump is holding in Washington. "PLEASE show up and speak out against what is happening," Padilla wrote. "We cannot allow the Trump administration to intimidate us into silence." Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store