Reserve Bank warns US tariffs pose risk to NZ financial stability
'However, lower borrowing costs and high agricultural export prices are supporting debt serviceability,' it said.
The Reserve Bank said the banks have strong capital and liquidity buffers in place to maintain credit flows even if conditions deteriorate further.
'They also remain profitable, with non-performing loans expected to decline as mortgage rates reprice lower.'
Global equity prices have declined and corporate funding spreads, both domestically and offshore, have widened from low levels, the Reserve Bank noted.
Long-term yields on US government bonds were volatile.
'Trade restrictions are a key risk to New Zealand's financial stability,' the Reserve Bank said.
'The impact of tariffs on our trading partners is expected to lower demand for our exports.
'Some agricultural industries that have limited scope to divert products from the US to alternative markets are more vulnerable to US tariffs.
'Banks are well placed to handle temporary dislocations in overseas funding markets.
'The direct impact of US tariffs on New Zealand exports could be severe for industries heavily exposed to US demand, although they are only a small part of the overall economy.'
New Zealand's largest exports to the US are meat, dairy products, and wine.
'US tariffs are also expected to have indirect impacts on New Zealand, by targeting our key trading partners and reducing their growth.
'These indirect impacts of tariffs on our trading partners may carry greater risk to financial stability than direct impacts,' it said.
High export prices have supported cashflow in the dairy sector.
Rising global commodity prices have improved conditions in many parts of the agriculture sector.
Dairy sector
Dairy sector conditions have improved over the past six months as international prices rose to elevated levels.
Fonterra's farmer suppliers may also benefit from a one-off payment from the cooperative's sale of its global consumer business, although the timing and size of the payment are uncertain, the bank said.
Lower farm-cost inflation has also eased cashflow pressures.
Improved cashflow will allow dairy farmers to continue to reduce debt and increase their resilience to future downturns.
Household and business demand for credit remains weak despite lower interest rates.
Many borrowers rolling off fixed rates are moving on to floating rates or shorter-term fixed rates, it noted.
These borrowers are waiting for further Official Cash Rate cuts before re-fixing for longer terms. The effective (weighted average) mortgage rate across all borrowers remained close to its peak.
'We expect around 60% of mortgage lending to reprice to lower rates within the next six months, and around 80% within a year,' the bank said.
Progress is continuing on the implementation of the Deposit Takers Act 2023.
The Depositor Compensation Scheme will come into effect on July 1 this year.
The scheme will protect depositors' funds in the event of a deposit taker failure and is a significant milestone for enhancing trust and competition in the financial system, the bank said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
New Hokonui Line To Support Growth And Power Decarbonisation In Southland
A major electricity infrastructure project is set to boost energy security, enable decarbonisation, and support future growth across eastern Southland with The Power Company Limited (TPCL) announcing plans for a new 110kV overhead line known as the Hokonui Line. The project is a partnership between TPCL, Transpower and Fonterra, and will see a 12.5km PowerNet line constructed between a new Transpower substation on Cuttance Road and a new Fonterra substation at Fonterra's Edendale site. TPCL Group Chair Peter Moynihan said the Hokonui Line was a critical investment in Southland's future. 'This project ensures our network has the strength and resilience needed to meet increasing demand, support industry, and enable the transition to a low-emissions economy. It's also a great example of what can be achieved when infrastructure partners work together toward a common goal - and we're proud that PowerNet, as part of the TPCL group, will be delivering the build' The new line will deliver the increased capacity needed to support industrial growth in the region. It will help power Fonterra's new UHT plant, which is currently under construction, along with key site upgrades such as two new electrode boilers. The line also plays an important role in supporting Fonterra's transition away from coal. Construction of the project will begin in November 2025, with the line build scheduled to commence in September 2026. The full project is expected to be completed by August 2027. Transpower Acting Executive General Manager External Affairs Diana Price said investment in electricity infrastructure today will ensure the power system is serving New Zealanders now and into the future. 'This project will increase electricity capacity in Southland for Fonterra and bring wider power security benefits for the region. We're pleased to be working alongside PowerNet, and this investment shows our shared commitment to supporting local people and businesses to thrive by enabling a lower emission future.' Fonterra General Manager Energy and Climate, Linda Mulvihill highlighted the importance of infrastructure investments like the Hokonui Line in enabling industrial decarbonisation and supporting long-term sustainability goals for both the Co-operative and the country. "At Fonterra, we are committed to transitioning to more sustainable energy sources. When evaluating the best energy options for our decarbonisation projects, we consider a range of factors, including security of supply, cost, and overall sustainability outcomes. 'The Hokonui Line is an important step in enabling the Edendale site's transition, providing the reliability and electrical capacity needed to support site upgrades like our new electrode boilers and UHT plant." Designed to minimise disruption, the project team is engaging early with stakeholders and landowners to ensure clear and consistent communication throughout the build.
Otago Daily Times
10 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Real-time info likely the best info
Real-time data can lead to better decisions, Dennis Wesselbaum writes. In late July, New Zealand was — slowly — receiving economic data from the June quarter. Inflation had hit a 12-month high, for example, confirming what many already suspected. But the country was still nearly two months away from getting figures on economic activity – namely, gross domestic product (GDP). Official statistics such as GDP and inflation have long been delayed, offering a picture of how the economy was, rather than how it is. Stats NZ, for instance, released GDP data for the December 2024 quarter in March 2025, a lag of around three months. As a result, economic decisions and public debate are often based on out-of-date information. One example from last year illustrates how such delays can distort policy. In August 2024, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand cut interest rates a year earlier than markets had expected, despite considering further hikes just months before. With no monthly inflation or GDP data, the Reserve Bank had to rely on private-sector indicators while waiting for official figures, which later confirmed that inflation was indeed easing. This is where "nowcasts" prove useful. Launched in April, the Reserve Bank's "nowcasting" tool — Kiwi-GDP — publishes weekly estimates of economic activity. Using advanced statistical models to estimate current GDP growth, it aims to bridge the gap between real-time developments and the lagging arrival of official statistics. As of mid-July 2025, Kiwi-GDP suggests there may be a decline in economic activity. The model estimated negative GDP growth, figures from July 18 indicating a decline of 0.29%. This marks a sharp reversal from earlier estimates of around 0.8%, and even from late June, when the model still pointed to modest positive growth. The downward revision appears to be driven primarily by weakness in retail and consumption data, as well as survey-based indicators. These early signals suggest that economic momentum may be fading, even before the release of official GDP data for the June quarter. While the tool offers insight, it is not without pitfalls. Politicians and economists must be cautious in interpreting its weekly updates. Tools such as Kiwi-GDP allow policymakers and analysts to synthesise multiple data sources and form an informed view of current conditions. But not all indicators are equal. Some are timely; others are noisy or unreliable. A good "nowcast" weighs data based on its quality and predictive value. The shift in outlook for the New Zealand economy illustrates both the strength and the limitation of these tools: it reacts quickly to new information, but is also prone to significant revision. This volatility poses challenges for policymakers. When monetary policy decisions were made in May, the prevailing "nowcast" pointed to 0.5% growth for the June quarter. If that projection influenced decision-making, the resulting policy would be misaligned with economic reality. Although "nowcasting" improves real-time analysis, its very responsiveness exposes central banks to risk. There are other New Zealand specific concerns. Kiwi-GDP relies on a single model, which comes with inherent limitations. Even in stable conditions, the actual economic process is likely more complex than any model — however flexible — can capture. As the economy evolves, the best models shift with it. These shifts are difficult to detect from past performance alone. Relying on one model increases the risk of blind spots and instability. A better approach would combine forecasts from multiple models. This reduces the impact of individual assumptions and helps smooth out measurement errors. Another drawback is that Kiwi-GDP produces point estimates — a single number for GDP growth — rather than a range of possible outcomes. This assumes the cost of forecast errors are equally likely to be positive or negative, when in fact they are not. Overestimating growth could lead to premature rate hikes and an unnecessary slowdown; underestimating it might result in overly loose policy and rising inflation. For policymakers, the consequences of being wrong vary depending on the direction of the error. To improve decision-making, Kiwi-GDP should make uncertainty more explicit. Presenting a range of outcomes or scenarios would help ensure that risks are properly accounted for. Without such transparency, there is a danger that decisions are made with a false sense of confidence. "Nowcasting" helps bridge the gap between decision-making deadlines and the delayed publication of official data. By leveraging real-time indicators, it offers a clearer picture of where the economy stands. Forecasting the future remains important – but understanding the present is just as crucial. Without an accurate sense of the current state of the economy, informed policy making becomes much harder. — ■ Dennis Wesselbaum is an associate professor, department of economics, University of Otago.
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Government overcooked spending during pandemic, against official advice, harming economy
This year's is on how fiscal policy – taxing and spending – should be used to respond to economic shocks. Treasury's calculation of the size of the Covid response. Graph / Treasury Its main finding, learning from the Covid-19 pandemic, was that fiscal policy should be used sparingly, with the Reserve Bank taking the lead on managing the economic cycle using its monetary policy tools like the Official Cash Rate. 'Polite, but its conclusions are damning' – Willis The report lands in the midst of a protracted economic downturn, with both the Government and the Opposition pointing the finger at each other over who is responsible. The Government blames Labour for excessive, inflationary and unsustainable spending that prompted the Reserve Bank to plunge the economy into recession with high interest rates. Labour blames the Government for cutting spending and axing infrastructure projects. Finance Minister Nicola Willis said the report validated the Government's concerns about Labour's spending. 'Treasury's language is spare and polite, but its conclusions are damning,' Willis said. 'The report makes clear significant errors were made in the fiscal response to Covid.' Finance Minister Nicola Willis said the report validated her concerns. Photo / Mark Mitchell Willis pointed in particular to Treasury's criticism of the last Government for spending the Covid-19 fund on things that were only tangentially related to the Covid response, such as the school lunch programme. The report said the fund was established in May 2020 to 'support a timely economic response and public confidence'. However, it added that 'as the economy recovered, the then Government was advised against further stimulating, in favour of more targeted support'. Willis said the Government 'ignored' that advice, favouring 'undisciplined spending that pushed up inflation, eroded New Zealand's previously low public debt position, and fuelled a cost-of-living crisis that many families are still suffering from'. Labour has been approached for comment. Just ahead of Budget 2022, the then Finance Minister Grant Robertson said the Government struck the right 'balance'. 'There were and are no costless decisions. Doing less would have seen unemployment grow, or put people's health at risk,' Robertson said. Treasury told Govt to ease up on spending Treasury outlined a history of its advice during the pandemic. It said that initially, it had encouraged the Government to spend money to support the economy through things like the wage subsidy. However in late '2020 and into 2021 ... Treasury started to move away from recommending broad-based fiscal stimulus to support the economy towards more targeted and moderate fiscal support'. After the 2020 election, Treasury said it informed Robertson that there was 'adequate' fiscal space to support the economic recovery and space for 'further temporary support if the economic or public health situation deteriorated'. However, officials also 'highlighted the importance of controlling ongoing spending and ensuring it was high value to meet the medium-term fiscal challenge'. By August 2021, the beginning of Auckland's long lockdown, Treasury warned that any support to businesses should 'take account of macroeconomic trade-offs'. By Budget 2022, Treasury said it was recommending 'against any further stimulus'. The briefing noted that five years on from the beginning of the pandemic, spending is still close to its pandemic-era peak and has only been partly offset by higher revenue. Higher debt-servicing costs are weighing on the Government's balance sheet and lower GDP has 'contributed to the deficit both directly, by leading to a smaller tax base and lower revenue than anticipated, and indirectly, as spending plans were based on revenue expectations that did not eventuate'. The Covid fund was closed in 2022, ending that era of stimulus and Budget 2023 ended up being more stimulatory than planned thanks to the Auckland Floods and Cyclone Gabrielle. Unlikely comparison between Labour Govt and Ruth Richardson The briefing made an unlikely comparison between the Labour Government of Dame Jacinda Ardern and Chris Hipkins and the fiscal policy of National Finance Minister Ruth Richardson. Treasury noted that fiscal policy can be counter-cyclical, which means it tries to counter and blunt the business cycle by, for example, spending money during a downturn to stimulate an economy, or saving during an upswing to cool an overheating one; or fiscal policy can be pro-cyclical – this means exacerbating a business cycle by spending money when an economy is hot or cutting back when an economy is shrinking. Treasury noted that the responses to the Asian Financial Crisis and the GFC had been accidentally counter-cyclical thanks to pre-promised tax cuts, however, fiscal policy was 'pro-cyclical in the early 1990s and during 2021-2023″. It said in the 1990s, 'pressures on fiscal sustainability motivated fiscal consolidation even as the economy was in recession'. In the case of the Covid response, the Government thought it was engaged in a counter-cyclical response to a 'severe economic downturn', however 'from late 2020, the economy turned out to be much stronger than expected (perhaps, in part, caused by the strength of fiscal stimulus itself)'. 'Combined with expenditure that was enduring rather than temporary, this resulted in large fiscal deficits while the economy was overheating.' The current Government is facing similar criticism for being pro-cyclical. Much like the Governments of the 1990s, it is trying to pull back spending to rebuild the balance sheet at a time of economic weakness. The Government was criticised for spending Covid money on school lunches. Photo / Liam Clayton How much was spent? Of the 20% of GDP spent on the pandemic, about half was spent on direct pandemic economic and health initiatives. Thirty-five per cent was spent on wage subsidies 'and similar schemes during lockdowns' and a further 18% 'arose from health-system costs such as vaccination and contact tracing, along with managed isolation and quarantine (MIQ) costs'. The parties that now form the Government broadly agreed with this spending at the time – National, at some points, called for spending on wage subsidies to be even greater. The remainder of the response was 'made up of a wide range of initiatives with varied objectives', Treasury said. Some initiatives were 'aimed at more directly responding to the impacts of Covid-19 and others aimed at providing fiscal stimulus or achieving social or environmental objectives'. These included tax changes, training schemes, housing construction, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, increases to welfare benefits, the Small Business Cashflow Scheme, Jobs for Nature, additional public housing places and school lunches. The then Opposition disagreed with much of this spending. Lessons for next time In a foreword to the report, Treasury Secretary Iain Rennie noted that increased use of fiscal support during shocks had 'contributed to public debt ratcheting up over time'. Rennie warned that if nothing changes, 'this leaves future generations with less financial capacity to respond to shocks'. The recommendations from the report note the Government needs to get better at saving money when the economy is booming to ensure there is fiscal space to support the economy when times are grim. When times are grim, the Government should allow the 'automatic stabilisers' to kick in, spending money on increased benefit payments. Managing the ups and downs of the economy should mostly be left to the Reserve Bank – a conclusion reached in Treasury's draft report, published earlier. 'Monetary policy changes can be reversed more readily and can often be implemented faster. The Government's spending and taxation decisions should generally seek to optimise long-run value for money rather than moderating economic cycles,' Treasury said. This does not mean there is no role for the Government. If monetary policy is constrained or at extremes – as it was at points during the pandemic – Government spending can kick in. Or, if interest rates can fall further, the Government could restrain spending to 'help moderate booms that would otherwise result in interest rates or the exchange rate becoming extremely high'. Treasury also said fiscal policy could be used to ease some of the distributional impacts of monetary policy, which can be blunt. Monetary policy during the pandemic was largely responsible for the housing boom and bust.
