logo
'I'm British but I can't live in my own country with my partner'

'I'm British but I can't live in my own country with my partner'

BBC News30-06-2025
The UK government is facing calls to scrap an immigration policy which puts "untold stress" on British citizens who choose to marry or cohabit with someone from abroad.Citizens and settled residents wanting to sponsor their partner's visa application must earn a minimum income of £29,000 or have savings of £88,500.MPs in Bristol and Stroud are urging the government to scrap the requirement which was brought in by the Conservatives to curb migration."What the government does next will make or break many families who just want to be together," said Caroline Coombs of the campaign group Reunite Families UK.A Home Office spokesperson said the minimum income policy "needs to balance a respect for family life while also maintaining the UK's economic stability" and it is considering findings from a Migration Advisory Committee review.
For Rebecca Gray, 32, from Stroud in Gloucestershire, scrapping the policy would mean she could move back to the UK with her Turkish husband."I don't think people have any idea of how much harm the visa rules cause," she said.Self-employed with a UK business but unable to meet the minimum income requirement, she has been living in Turkey for the past four years.Together with her husband, Baran, 31, they have been saving to apply for a visa through the savings route.She said: "We're holding off having children because we've been so focused on saving money to get him a visa."Ms Gray said the couple has stronger family ties to the UK as her husband has lost both of his parents."We want to be close to family. Between us, we only have one parent left, that's my mum. "I'm forced to live thousands of miles away from my family if I want to be with my husband."Some countries, like the UK, set a minimum income requirement for a spouse visa.But while other countries, like France and the Netherlands, align it to their national minimum wage, the UK sets it at a higher level.The Migration Observatory estimates that roughly half of the UK working population earn under £29,000.
'My kids think I'm the man in the phone'
For a large number of applicants, the minimum income policy is not the only financial hurdle.Visa fees and NHS surcharges can cost more than £7,000 for a five-year route to settlement, excluding any legal fees."It's unfair that only the wealthy can bring their partner here," said Leighton Allen, from Worcester.
Mr Allen, 30, works in retail and said he cannot meet the salary threshold to bring his Tanzanian fiancée and his two young children to the UK.He said he tries to see them as much as possible, which can be three weeks in a year."All I want is to be a father to my children but I feel that choice is taken away from me. I'm financially supporting them but they don't see me."He added: "They think I'm in the man in the phone."The minimum income requirement was first introduced in 2012 to ensure the British partner or settled resident earned enough to financially support their foreign partner in the UK without resorting to public funds. Last year, the salary threshold increased for the first time, from £18,600 to £29,000.
'I can't come home to care for my parents'
Following Brexit and the end of free movement between the UK and EU countries, some British citizens who had been living abroad - like Sarah Douglas - are also finding it hard to return to the UK with their families.The 42-year-old lives in Italy with her husband Matteo and their three children.She wants to move back home to Scotland with her family to be close to her elderly parents, and help care for them.However, to follow the minimum income route, Ms Douglas would need to return without her Italian husband and accrue six months of UK payslips to apply for a spouse visa for him.
"I could work as a teacher in the UK and my husband is a software engineer who would find work easily. "We're financially stable, we don't rely on any support, but we're able to do that because we're together," she said.To avoid separation, they have been struggling to save £88,500 in order to apply via the savings route."Saving this much money is putting financial strain on us and it's taking years, but we feel it's our only option."She added: "If we were forced to separate, it would have a huge impact on us as a family. I've seen what that does to children and I don't want to put my children through that."A report by children's charity Coram found children in separated families showed signs of stress, anxiety and inability to focus in school. It also said that children living in families affected by the current minimum income requirement were likely to experience exacerbated challenges and poor mental wellbeing.The report was commissioned by Reunite Families UK, a not-for-profit representing families affected by the UK family visa scheme.Its co-founder and executive director, Caroline Coombs, said: "We have nearly 6,000 couples and families who are suffering on a daily basis."People feel completely unheard by their own government and they can't understand why they can't be here with their loved ones," she added.
Earlier this month, the Home Office said it would examine findings from a Migration Advisory Committee review and issue a response in due course.Migration experts suggested lowering the current threshold and gave a number of possible options.They said, for example, lowering it to £24,000 would help ease family reunification and increase net migration by roughly 1-3%.A Home Office spokesperson said: "We understand the Minimum Income Requirement for family visas needs to balance a respect for family life while also maintaining the UK's economic stability, which is why the Home Secretary commissioned the independent Migration Advisory Committee to undertake a review."We are now considering its findings and will respond in due course."
Migration is 'too high'
Conservative MP for Kent, Katie Lam, who is opposition assistant whip, defended an increase in the minimum income requirement."Migration has been far too high for the last two decades and remains so," she said."The public has consistently asked successive governments to lower migration. "The last (Conservative) government promised to do exactly this, but like the governments before it, it did not deliver it."At a parliamentary debate about the family visa income requirement in January, she said: "The question is not should British citizens be able to bring their foreign spouses to the UK. "The question is, does it benefit the country as a whole for British citizens on lower salaries to bring foreign spouses here who are unable to get a visa any other way?"But co-leader of the Green Party and Bristol Central MP, Carla Denyer, who has called the minimum income requirement a 'tax on love', - and wants it scrapped."The Home Office is failing not just people who are moving to the UK but British people who already live here and just want to enjoy family life in peace," she said. "The minimum income requirement puts untold stress on couples and families and it should be scrapped entirely."Family doctor and Labour MP for Stroud, Simon Opher, sponsored an exhibition in the Houses of Parliament last week which showcased the human impact of the family visa rules. "We're splitting up people who love each other, splitting families who are the bedrock of our society, and I think it's the wrong policy," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ICE ‘used popular chain hotel' to detain migrants despite company pledging not to participate
ICE ‘used popular chain hotel' to detain migrants despite company pledging not to participate

The Independent

time6 minutes ago

  • The Independent

ICE ‘used popular chain hotel' to detain migrants despite company pledging not to participate

A Louisiana hotel owned by a major chain has been used to hold immigrants awaiting deportation despite the company's pledge not to do so, according to new reports. The Intercept first reported that Immigration and Customs Enforcement allegedly used a Sheraton hotel on MacArthur Drive in Alexandria earlier this month, located near a central ICE holding facility. Edison Iza and his 15-year-old son were arrested on August 9 before reportedly being sent to the Louisiana Sheraton, along with other venues in the state and in Texas, before being deported to Ecuador five days later. Iza shared phone-tracking information with the publication as evidence, which The Guardian later reviewed. A person with knowledge of the Louisiana Sherton's operations told the British newspaper they believed the venue had been used to detain immigrant families and unaccompanied children since it was renovated in late 2023. ICE contractors known to assist with transferring unaccompanied minors had been observed operating at the Sheraton since June, the source said. They added that other hotels in the area have also been used to hold immigrant families. The reports appear to contradict a Marriott pledge, made during Donald Trump 's first term, that ICE would not use its hotels and properties to detain immigrants. It came after sources told ABC News in July 2019 that the Trump administration had internally discussed the possibility of using hotel rooms due to limited capacity in detention centers. 'Our hotels are not configured to be detention facilities, but to be open to guests and community members as well,' a company spokesperson told the news station at the time. 'While we have no particular insights into whether the U.S. government is considering the use of hotels to aid in the situation at the border, Marriott has made the decision to decline any requests to use our hotels as detention facilities.' The American Historical Association, a network of professional historians, released a statement of its appreciation for Marriott's 'principled stand' and noted the importance of immigrants to the hotel and related industries. The hospitality industry is especially susceptible to ICE raids and the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, with a high percentage of undocumented workers in the industry. About a third of housekeepers, a quarter of cooks, and one fifth of waitstaff employed by the U.S. hotel industry are undocumented, according to the 2023 census. The Department of Homeland Security issued guidance earlier this year that ICE agents were not to conduct raids at hotels, restaurants, and farms, which was swiftly reversed, The Washington Post reported in June. The Independent

Prince Andrew book edits out claims about Melania Trump's relationship to Epstein
Prince Andrew book edits out claims about Melania Trump's relationship to Epstein

The Independent

time6 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Prince Andrew book edits out claims about Melania Trump's relationship to Epstein

A new book about the Duke of York has been edited to remove claims about Melania Trump's relationship with Jeffery Epstein. The book, called Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, written by Andrew Lownie, has made headlines in recent weeks after making claims about the disgraced duke's life. An entire chapter is dedicated to Prince Andrew's infamous friendship with Epstein, the late convicted sex offender. The chapter also included a claim that Donald Trump and his wife had been introduced by the disgraced financier - which has now been edited out of future editions. The president and first lady have long said they were introduced by Paolo Zampolli, a modeling agent, at a New York Fashion Week party in 1998. A HarperCollins UK spokesperson said: 'We can confirm that several passages from Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York by Andrew Lownie have been removed in consultation with the author. Entitled is published in the UK by HarperCollins. In the US the book is self-published by Mr Lownie.' It is understood that the changes will appear in all future print editions of the book and that the ebook and audio book have already been updated to reflect these changes. However, it is estimated to have been printed in around 60,000 copies of the book already. The decision comes after Mrs Trump threatened to sue Hunter Biden, the son of former US President Joe Biden, for claiming Epstein introduced her and Mr Trump in the late 1990s. The statements are false, defamatory, and 'extremely salacious,' Melania Trump's lawyer, Alejandro Brito, wrote in the letter to Biden. The letter demanded that Biden walk back the claim and apologise or face legal action for 'over $1bn in damages'. It also accuses the former president's son of having a 'vast history of trading on the names of others' and repeating the claim 'to draw attention to yourself.' Hunter Biden has refused to apologise after the first lady threatened legal action. Democratic strategist James Carville was also forced to take down parts of a podcast episode that alleged a connection between her and Jeffrey Epstein, following involvement from the first lady's lawyer earlier this month. 'First Lady Melania Trump's attorneys are actively ensuring immediate retractions and apologies by those who spread malicious, defamatory falsehoods. The true account of how the First Lady met President Trump is in her best-selling book, Melania,' a spokesperson for the first lady's office previously told The Independent. The book has included a number of accusations about Prince Andrew, including claims of affairs, fights with Prince Harry and of being ' unbelievably cruel ' to royal staff. One passage says Andrew called a staff member in the Royal Household a 'f***ing imbecile' for not referring to the Queen Mother by her full title in 2005. According to the book, Prince Andrew's catchphrase when dealing with royal staff was 'I want this done and I want this done now. Do it!'

Educational inequalities have ‘grown wider' since the pandemic
Educational inequalities have ‘grown wider' since the pandemic

The Independent

time6 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Educational inequalities have ‘grown wider' since the pandemic

A report by the Institute for Government warns that educational inequalities in England have 'grown wider and more pronounced' since the COVID-19 pandemic. Pupils in London are outperforming those in other regions, with the attainment gap between the capital and the rest of the country growing since 2019. The disparity in GCSE attainment between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged students has increased, with poor white children particularly affected. The Institute for Government criticised the government for lacking a clear vision or plan to address these growing inequalities, despite commitments to close the disadvantage gap. Experts and politicians are calling for urgent action, including addressing funding disparities and tackling high pupil absence rates, to reverse the decline in educational outcomes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store